I draft and manage my team using FBG projections, and rarely do anything other than what their predictions suggest. However, that may change moving forward. Week 10's projections had Ryan slightly higher than Goff, so I started the Falcon's QB. I lost my matchup by 5pts, and would have won both my matchup AND the week's point total prize had I started Goff.
Goff has been on a tear, and yet FBG seems to still favor Ryan moving forward (using the "top 200 forward" rankings):
Ryan 124
Goff 116
Here is the projection accuracy for these two (projected minus actual points) over the last two weeks (9,10):
Goff: -27, -18 = -45pts (scored 45pts more than predicted, 22.5 per week)
Ryan: -6, 2.8 = -3.2pts (scored 3.2pts more than predicted)
I realize that Ryan may have an easier schedule moving forward, but Goff seems to be the most likely to score.
I just don't understand why Goff's predictions have been higher than Ryan...hopefully Dodds and Norton will get on board the Goff train so I don't have to keep second guessing!
Goff has been on a tear, and yet FBG seems to still favor Ryan moving forward (using the "top 200 forward" rankings):
Ryan 124
Goff 116
Here is the projection accuracy for these two (projected minus actual points) over the last two weeks (9,10):
Goff: -27, -18 = -45pts (scored 45pts more than predicted, 22.5 per week)
Ryan: -6, 2.8 = -3.2pts (scored 3.2pts more than predicted)
I realize that Ryan may have an easier schedule moving forward, but Goff seems to be the most likely to score.
I just don't understand why Goff's predictions have been higher than Ryan...hopefully Dodds and Norton will get on board the Goff train so I don't have to keep second guessing!