Feedback Time - Room for Improvement at FBGs (1 Viewer)

[Jeff Pasquino]

Time to hear back from the Shark Pool. Where are the areas that we need to improve?

There will also be a "What did you Like" thread.

Fire away.

 

[pizzatyme]

JP. just some feedback here...

Wheel's Needles in the Haystack articles were lost on me this season. When it was in the Shark Pool, it was a must read. Now that it gts posted elsewhere, it gets lost IMO. I know I can look it up, but with so much info on this site, sometimes it is nice for it to be in your face. With so many petty threads creeping into the SP, I recommend we let this article be posted there or someplace else prominent.

TIA

 

[PranksterJD]

One thing that would be helpful, though may require some work on the site architecture, is to get a better method for finding information on the site.

The basic idea is that if Terrell Owens is mentioned in an article or blog post, I should be able to find that.

A couple of thoughts:

1) A search engine that is not restricted to player pages.

2) More complex, but a bigger win IMHO, would be cross-references between site topics. E.g., if "Jacoby Jones" shows up in a Dynasty Watch article, I should be able to find that article from his player page and vice versa. Most of the major outlets use a form of linking to player pages already (CBS, etc), but taking it to the upper limits and getting back to the article from the player page is more complex. Yahoo! does it in some fashion, but I believe it would take a bit of work though it is possible.

 

[phthalatemagic]

I think you should remove some underperforming staffers.

 

[Judge Smails]

I would like to see a lot more info on Def/ST for the weekly rankings. A summary, especially for the top 10 or 15. Team A gives up X # of sacks per game on the road, key injuries/matchups, etc. Also discussion of intangibles, including motivation, trap games, etc.

 

[deadstick]

More updates to IDP dynasty rankings (QB, RB, WR and TE are usually updated weekly, but IDP were not). Mostly due to only 2-3 staffers concerned with IDP. May just be the nature of the beast (I know there's still more non-IDP customers for you guys than IDP customers).

I'd LOVE to see a quick download to lineup dominator that has future projections or last year's totals or something. I use LD to keep track of the rosters in my larger (mostly Zealots leagues - 53 man rosters). It's nice to quickly scan rosters and not have Terrell Owens buried as a guy's 14th WR since his projection for Week 16 was low as compared to someone like Josh Reed or something. Of course, I could always export (I think you can do that) into Excel or something.

Overall, I have much more positive to say about your product than negative. I feel I easily get my money's worth. Thanks for your continued dedication. I won 2 of my 3 leagues this year.

 

[Pictus Cat]

More of a good thing.

Dominator 3rd, 4th, 5th...opinions. Maybe a weekly article on differences of opinion in the dominator.

A variance factor for rankings/Dominator. This would communicate expected consistancy/close to weekly prediction versus could be one of his expected big games/swinging for the fences. This would be very helpfull when comparing the same position to eachother.

A transcript to refer back to for that Cecil Bloom show.

Continue the roundtables.

I have enjoyed reading the staff opinions and usually agree most of the time. The opinions give me an idea of why some staffers rank players the way they do. The real fun for me is when I don't agree and take a gamble in my leagues. ADP over Aaron Stecker nearly killed myself in the fantasy playoffs for going against yall though. You already helped me build a team to overcome such mistakes.

 

[Captain Hook]

JP. just some feedback here...Wheel's Needles in the Haystack articles were lost on me this season. When it was in the Shark Pool, it was a must read. Now that it gts posted elsewhere, it gets lost IMO. I know I can look it up, but with so much info on this site, sometimes it is nice for it to be in your face. With so many petty threads creeping into the SP, I recommend we let this article be posted there or someplace else prominent.TIA

Russ - it can't be posted here now that it is part of the subscriber package. You'll just have to remember to go read it each week - still a great read.

 

[JohnDoe]

I have one small complaint. The player names are not always consistent on the stats and target files. For example: In the target file you have DeShaun Foster and in the weekly stats file his name is shown as De'shaun Foster. Just a minor problem, but it makes it hard on me when I copy/paste into excel and do a VLOOKUP to merge the two files together into one sheet.

 

[stbugs]

I know I will get skewered for this, but I play in a week 17 championship game in one league. I had a bunch of injuries (FWP, Bush/Stecker) and I made the wrong call on my RBs and lost by 2 points. It was my fault for overthinking and taking Pierre Thomas out of my lineup, but it was hard to figure out who was playing and starting. I looked through all of the content and it just seemed like there was very little Sunday info like there was in most weeks. Most weeks it seemed like you would figure out who was starting, etc. right before the game. This week there was mention of Stecker being active and probably starting, but he had 0 carries/receptions. I didn't start him, but I was worried about 1 of those 2 getting all the work (as happened) and not having a clue which one. The two I started were much higher in the cheatsheet, yet they both got replaced early.

It would be nice next year if you guys cared as much about week 17 as you do weeks 1-16. That was my impression even before the 1pm games started. I felt like I was trying to dig for tidbits and there were none, so it ended up being a guess and the cheatsheets were way, way off on the Saints and the 2 other teams.

 

[pizzatyme]

JP. just some feedback here...Wheel's Needles in the Haystack articles were lost on me this season. When it was in the Shark Pool, it was a must read. Now that it gts posted elsewhere, it gets lost IMO. I know I can look it up, but with so much info on this site, sometimes it is nice for it to be in your face. With so many petty threads creeping into the SP, I recommend we let this article be posted there or someplace else prominent.TIA

Russ - it can't be posted here now that it is part of the subscriber package. You'll just have to remember to go read it each week - still a great read.

PVH, thanks. I'm just being lazy I guess. I still think it'd be a good read for non-subscribers. Kind of like the Random Shots. Maybe it could be an opt-in weekly email? Okay, I'm really getting lazy now.

 

[PranksterJD]

JP. just some feedback here...Wheel's Needles in the Haystack articles were lost on me this season. When it was in the Shark Pool, it was a must read. Now that it gts posted elsewhere, it gets lost IMO. I know I can look it up, but with so much info on this site, sometimes it is nice for it to be in your face. With so many petty threads creeping into the SP, I recommend we let this article be posted there or someplace else prominent.TIA

Russ - it can't be posted here now that it is part of the subscriber package. You'll just have to remember to go read it each week - still a great read.

An interesting idea that could help this is to add an RSS feed for the articles. Would allow subscribers to just sign up and the feed would notify them when a new one is posted.

 

[TheGreatInTraining]

I know I will get skewered for this, but I play in a week 17 championship game in one league. I had a bunch of injuries (FWP, Bush/Stecker) and I made the wrong call on my RBs and lost by 2 points. It was my fault for overthinking and taking Pierre Thomas out of my lineup, but it was hard to figure out who was playing and starting. I looked through all of the content and it just seemed like there was very little Sunday info like there was in most weeks. Most weeks it seemed like you would figure out who was starting, etc. right before the game. This week there was mention of Stecker being active and probably starting, but he had 0 carries/receptions. I didn't start him, but I was worried about 1 of those 2 getting all the work (as happened) and not having a clue which one. The two I started were much higher in the cheatsheet, yet they both got replaced early.It would be nice next year if you guys cared as much about week 17 as you do weeks 1-16. That was my impression even before the 1pm games started. I felt like I was trying to dig for tidbits and there were none, so it ended up being a guess and the cheatsheets were way, way off on the Saints and the 2 other teams.

I have to second this. Other then that though, great product!

 

[Jayrod]

I would like to see a minor expansion to the returnerguys article......

While seeing what each guy has done and where he ranks is helpful, coming up with some kind of projection could be even more useful to us return yardage league guys.

Perhaps just a simple formula using KR/PR yards allowed per game for the next opponent and average that out with what the player (or team to make things simpler) has averaged per game so far. So if Chicago is playing Seattle in week 12, and the average KR yards for Chicago is 85/game and the avg. KR yards allowed by Seattle is 103/game, then the factored KR yards for Chicago's Kick Returners would be 94/game. I'm suggesting this because this is what I did for all of my kickreturners anytime I wanted to factor in some kind of projections to compare MJD and Ted Ginn to my other flex players. It took a while to do it manually and it would be something that I think all return yardage guys would love to see each week.

 

[trader jake]

#1) Cheatsheets: When a player is listed as questionable on the injury report his teammates are given a second listing that would reflect their status on the cheatsheet if he doesn't play.

For example: If a team's starting quarterback is questionable but plays: his top WR would be listed as #15. If the QB in question doesn't play that same WR would be listed #22.

WR Rankings

1-14

15. Player A (22. - QB)

#2) A list of possible waiver wire players needs to come out prior to Wednesday, even if it is very speculative and is later updated, Many leagues (Zeaolts, etc) have Tuesday night waiver priorities.

#3) Crack down on fishing trips in the Shark Pool. There are some regular fisherman who do nothing but inflame guppies, aggravate the masses, and "make a name for themselves" by continuously posting a bunch of nonsense. I would suggest the same thing in the FFA, but understand that it is more acceptable/tolerated/partially encouraged there.

Thanks for your consideration.

 

[Keys Myaths]

#2) A list of possible waiver wire players needs to come out prior to Wednesday, even if it is very speculative and is later updated, Many leagues (Zeaolts, etc) have Tuesday night waiver priorities.

This comes out Monday night.

 

[Keys Myaths]

1. David used to have a regular thing during the preseason where he gave short comments as to why players moved up or down in the Draft Dominator projections every week. I miss that. It was quite helpful.

2. When compiling cheatsheets for the week, it seems injured players who might potentially not play get bumped down. Why not just project the stats as if you were assuming they were going to go, then make a note (Q) (D), etc. next to them? It's a shame to see a good running back with a great matchup listed at #23 because he's a GTD.

3. We need a dynasty form of the DD. Another full-time dynasty guy on staff would be tremendous, and with the advent of more and more keeper/dynasty leagues around, building a model for dynasty drafting is the next step. Honestly, from a business standpoint, it's just one more way to differentiate yourselves from The Huddle, FFToday, etc., and it helps out the hardcore (who are the ones who pay money for fantasy football info subscriptions) tremendously.

4. Upside/downside of players included in preseason projections and the DD. It's nice to see the amount of work David puts into it, but not all players have as much upside as others (or downside) in certain tiers. Could be another huge game-changer in terms of reworking DD.

I have way too many ideas. There's four for now.

 

[Keys Myaths]

One more, and I was going to do it as a guest article, but hey, if it saves me the time of writing...

Fantasy Mythbusters. There are some amazingly cool things discussed and backed up statistically in the Shark Pool (from SSOG, F&L and others) that completely buck the trend of what has become "common" FF knowledge. Stuff like SSOG's statement that QBs who don't finish in the top 10 in their first two seasons aren't going to, another statement that says "inconsistency" for a WR can't be predicted, and whether or not you can predict injuries based solely off of how much a player was hurt (or not) in the past (I think this one was busted as well). Could be a weekly article, could be something done a few times in the preseason, but there's some very cool stuff that can be debunked.

 

[ipljeff]

I would love a more redraft oriented Buy Low / Sell High article. I Bloom's work, but his article of the same name seems to be more in line with you dynasty guys. Another request along the same lines is this article needs to come out early in the week. It usually takes me a couple of days to work out a trade. Thanks for all of your hard work. FBG is by far and away the best FF site on the web.

 

[Stingdiddy]

I could use more information for my annual playoff draft (it starts in an hour).

Dodds has the top 130 players, but, we draft around 180 players.

 

[Keys Myaths]

I could use more information for my annual playoff draft (it starts in an hour).Dodds has the top 130 players, but, we draft around 180 players.

Solid use of sarcasm with a hint of praise.

 

[flranger]

PERFECT AUCTION ARTICLE AT LEAST 1 WEEK BEFORE THE SEASON

 

[trader jake]

#2) A list of possible waiver wire players needs to come out prior to Wednesday, even if it is very speculative and is later updated, Many leagues (Zeaolts, etc) have Tuesday night waiver priorities.

This comes out Monday night.

Not if you're making a pick-up for a one week start and you're relying on the cheatsheets.

 

[BassNBrew]

I know I will get skewered for this, but I play in a week 17 championship game in one league. I had a bunch of injuries (FWP, Bush/Stecker) and I made the wrong call on my RBs and lost by 2 points. It was my fault for overthinking and taking Pierre Thomas out of my lineup, but it was hard to figure out who was playing and starting. I looked through all of the content and it just seemed like there was very little Sunday info like there was in most weeks. Most weeks it seemed like you would figure out who was starting, etc. right before the game. This week there was mention of Stecker being active and probably starting, but he had 0 carries/receptions. I didn't start him, but I was worried about 1 of those 2 getting all the work (as happened) and not having a clue which one. The two I started were much higher in the cheatsheet, yet they both got replaced early.It would be nice next year if you guys cared as much about week 17 as you do weeks 1-16. That was my impression even before the 1pm games started. I felt like I was trying to dig for tidbits and there were none, so it ended up being a guess and the cheatsheets were way, way off on the Saints and the 2 other teams.

I have to second this. Other then that though, great product!

I'll third this. I was torn on several waiver and starting decisions in week 17. I defered to the staff here and their expertise and decided to enjoy my holiday. Ended up with an injured/inactive Gonzalez starting and Witten in over Boss. Thank goodness Portis and Hester saved my behind. My impression is that FBG mailed it in during the last week.

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

I know I will get skewered for this, but I play in a week 17 championship game in one league. I had a bunch of injuries (FWP, Bush/Stecker) and I made the wrong call on my RBs and lost by 2 points. It was my fault for overthinking and taking Pierre Thomas out of my lineup, but it was hard to figure out who was playing and starting. I looked through all of the content and it just seemed like there was very little Sunday info like there was in most weeks. Most weeks it seemed like you would figure out who was starting, etc. right before the game. This week there was mention of Stecker being active and probably starting, but he had 0 carries/receptions. I didn't start him, but I was worried about 1 of those 2 getting all the work (as happened) and not having a clue which one. The two I started were much higher in the cheatsheet, yet they both got replaced early.It would be nice next year if you guys cared as much about week 17 as you do weeks 1-16. That was my impression even before the 1pm games started. I felt like I was trying to dig for tidbits and there were none, so it ended up being a guess and the cheatsheets were way, way off on the Saints and the 2 other teams.

I have to second this. Other then that though, great product!

I'll third this. I was torn on several waiver and starting decisions in week 17. I defered to the staff here and their expertise and decided to enjoy my holiday. Ended up with an injured/inactive Gonzalez starting and Witten in over Boss. Thank goodness Portis and Hester saved my behind. My impression is that FBG mailed it in during the last week.

Sorry to hear that BnB - I did zero out Gonzalez before the start of the early games - about an hour before IIRC, and while Dodds still had him in, he only had him in the mid 30s.As far as Boss over Witten, it was just hard to project a rookie TE for top 10 numbers after he drew a zero in his first start (albeit in bad conditions). I had him 13th, but I couldnt justify anything higher than considering how inconsistent Shockey's target #s were. With TO out, and Romo playing over a half, Witten seemed like a good play - I didnt anticipate Romo playing as badly as he did. At least I had Jerramy Stevens and Scheffler in my top 5, and Crumpler 6th.

 

[NoFBinLA]

As far as Boss over Witten, it was just hard to project a rookie TE for top 10 numbers after he drew a zero in his first start (albeit in bad conditions). I had him 13th, but I couldnt justify anything higher than considering how inconsistent Shockey's target #s were. With TO out, and Romo playing over a half, Witten seemed like a good play - I didnt anticipate Romo playing as badly as he did. At least I had Jerramy Stevens and Scheffler in my top 5, and Crumpler 6th.

FWIW - Boss would have had to have a ridonkulous game the week prior for me to plug him in over Witten after the season Witten had. Probably more than one. Even if FBG ranked him as the top TE that week. my .02 - the rankings seemed right on, as far as Iwas concerned.Insofar as improvements - yes more dynasty. And I would like to see the player projections and rankings sortable by team again. I can live without, but I liked looking at say the Pats page and seeing how their WRs racked up overall. Especially for lower teir players, I was able to track #3 and 4 WRs more easily.

 

[Crusaderfan]

The one thing I would like to see improved would be the AC forum. In the past either Keys, Ravnzfan and a few others were there on a weekly basis to offer advice. They were missed this season. Most of us like to make our own decisions but still want to bounce some thoughts off others that we have come to respect on here. I'm not sure how we can get more participation there but it would be great if we could.

 

[Jeff Tefertiller]

The one thing I would like to see improved would be the AC forum. In the past either Keys, Ravnzfan and a few others were there on a weekly basis to offer advice. They were missed this season. Most of us like to make our own decisions but still want to bounce some thoughts off others that we have come to respect on here. I'm not sure how we can get more participation there but it would be great if we could.

You are welcome to post any question in Trader Joe's and Jeff Pasquino will respond fairly quickly. Same goes with the Wannabee thread. I try to answer questions promptly. Also, I think most of the staff members are good about replying to PMs and emails with questions.

 

[Jeff Tefertiller]

3. We need a dynasty form of the DD. Another full-time dynasty guy on staff would be tremendous, and with the advent of more and more keeper/dynasty leagues around, building a model for dynasty drafting is the next step. Honestly, from a business standpoint, it's just one more way to differentiate yourselves from The Huddle, FFToday, etc., and it helps out the hardcore (who are the ones who pay money for fantasy football info subscriptions) tremendously.

Hey Keys,I am working on something ... just trying to figure out a way to make it applicable. But, this thought is one that is being looked at.

Thanks for the responses.

Jeff

 

[GrandpaRox]

Where are Dynasty Rankings.

FF season is over and trading has been turned back on but there are no dynasty rankings to be found.

I have had a couple of offers already this off season and have tried looking for dynasty values and cannot find anything.

 

[BassNBrew]

I know I will get skewered for this, but I play in a week 17 championship game in one league. I had a bunch of injuries (FWP, Bush/Stecker) and I made the wrong call on my RBs and lost by 2 points. It was my fault for overthinking and taking Pierre Thomas out of my lineup, but it was hard to figure out who was playing and starting. I looked through all of the content and it just seemed like there was very little Sunday info like there was in most weeks. Most weeks it seemed like you would figure out who was starting, etc. right before the game. This week there was mention of Stecker being active and probably starting, but he had 0 carries/receptions. I didn't start him, but I was worried about 1 of those 2 getting all the work (as happened) and not having a clue which one. The two I started were much higher in the cheatsheet, yet they both got replaced early.It would be nice next year if you guys cared as much about week 17 as you do weeks 1-16. That was my impression even before the 1pm games started. I felt like I was trying to dig for tidbits and there were none, so it ended up being a guess and the cheatsheets were way, way off on the Saints and the 2 other teams.

I have to second this. Other then that though, great product!

I'll third this. I was torn on several waiver and starting decisions in week 17. I defered to the staff here and their expertise and decided to enjoy my holiday. Ended up with an injured/inactive Gonzalez starting and Witten in over Boss. Thank goodness Portis and Hester saved my behind. My impression is that FBG mailed it in during the last week.

Sorry to hear that BnB - I did zero out Gonzalez before the start of the early games - about an hour before IIRC, and while Dodds still had him in, he only had him in the mid 30s.As far as Boss over Witten, it was just hard to project a rookie TE for top 10 numbers after he drew a zero in his first start (albeit in bad conditions). I had him 13th, but I couldnt justify anything higher than considering how inconsistent Shockey's target #s were. With TO out, and Romo playing over a half, Witten seemed like a good play - I didnt anticipate Romo playing as badly as he did. At least I had Jerramy Stevens and Scheffler in my top 5, and Crumpler 6th.

My bad for not looking at your rankings, I didn't go any deeper than Dodds and the Sunday breaking news. With TO out any WR in the 30s would have been nice. I realize the last week is difficult, just seem like the info I decided to used was weighted to heavily towards the status quo.Now that I think about it, where does one find your rankings? I've only noticed Dodds and Norton.

 

[Jeff Tefertiller]

I know I will get skewered for this, but I play in a week 17 championship game in one league. I had a bunch of injuries (FWP, Bush/Stecker) and I made the wrong call on my RBs and lost by 2 points. It was my fault for overthinking and taking Pierre Thomas out of my lineup, but it was hard to figure out who was playing and starting. I looked through all of the content and it just seemed like there was very little Sunday info like there was in most weeks. Most weeks it seemed like you would figure out who was starting, etc. right before the game. This week there was mention of Stecker being active and probably starting, but he had 0 carries/receptions. I didn't start him, but I was worried about 1 of those 2 getting all the work (as happened) and not having a clue which one. The two I started were much higher in the cheatsheet, yet they both got replaced early.

It would be nice next year if you guys cared as much about week 17 as you do weeks 1-16. That was my impression even before the 1pm games started. I felt like I was trying to dig for tidbits and there were none, so it ended up being a guess and the cheatsheets were way, way off on the Saints and the 2 other teams.

I have to second this. Other then that though, great product!

I'll third this. I was torn on several waiver and starting decisions in week 17. I defered to the staff here and their expertise and decided to enjoy my holiday. Ended up with an injured/inactive Gonzalez starting and Witten in over Boss. Thank goodness Portis and Hester saved my behind. My impression is that FBG mailed it in during the last week.

Sorry to hear that BnB - I did zero out Gonzalez before the start of the early games - about an hour before IIRC, and while Dodds still had him in, he only had him in the mid 30s.As far as Boss over Witten, it was just hard to project a rookie TE for top 10 numbers after he drew a zero in his first start (albeit in bad conditions). I had him 13th, but I couldnt justify anything higher than considering how inconsistent Shockey's target #s were. With TO out, and Romo playing over a half, Witten seemed like a good play - I didnt anticipate Romo playing as badly as he did. At least I had Jerramy Stevens and Scheffler in my top 5, and Crumpler 6th.

My bad for not looking at your rankings, I didn't go any deeper than Dodds and the Sunday breaking news. With TO out any WR in the 30s would have been nice. I realize the last week is difficult, just seem like the info I decided to used was weighted to heavily towards the status quo.Now that I think about it, where does one find your rankings? I've only noticed Dodds and Norton.

Here Bloom has his own drop down box

 

[Tick]

I'd like to be able to choose which articles are emailed to me. I never read Passing Matchups, Rushing Matchups, or Random Shots, but would love to get the IDP, dynasty, and Kickermania articles emailed to me.

 

[Tick]

Where are Dynasty Rankings.FF season is over and trading has been turned back on but there are no dynasty rankings to be found.I have had a couple of offers already this off season and have tried looking for dynasty values and cannot find anything.

If you look under the Forecast tab, it's pretty far down there.There aren't many rankings in the list right now, but there's something.

 

[Judge Smails]

The one thing I would like to see improved would be the AC forum. In the past either Keys, Ravnzfan and a few others were there on a weekly basis to offer advice. They were missed this season. Most of us like to make our own decisions but still want to bounce some thoughts off others that we have come to respect on here. I'm not sure how we can get more participation there but it would be great if we could.

I second this. The AC Forum in my opinion has become close to useless. You could answer three other people's question, then see that the question you asked the day before is now on page 6 with zero responses. Here's an idea. Have each staffer post their own fantasy lineup each week. Lowest scorer has to answer questions on Sat/Sun in the AC forum the following week!

 

[ShadowMaster]

Game breakdown and analysis on PRESEASON games so I know who went vs. the starters and who went for 150 yards vs. the scrubs. (Asked for this LAST YEAR!)

Game breakdown and analysis of Thursday and Saturday games on the next day (vs. waiting until Monday)

 

[Cecil Lammey]

Game breakdown and analysis on PRESEASON games so I know who went vs. the starters and who went for 150 yards vs. the scrubs. (Asked for this LAST YEAR!)Game breakdown and analysis of Thursday and Saturday games on the next day (vs. waiting until Monday)

We do this on The Audible. I think the preseason DOES matter, and I know that's not a popular sentiment.I am also going to be doing my preseason Dark Phoenix which looks at breakout players in each week of the preseason.

 

[Routilla]

Is there any way to remove threads from our viewable list? This would also reduce the need for Mods to continually merge threads. TIA.

 

[Bluestaples]

Bring back Harris's TFL report

 

[chuckmorris]

There were only 2 things I could think of with the content that were mildly irritating this year which I'd like to see improved:

1. The 2nd opinion projections in most weeks were not available when the link to them on the week's content page "lit up", and generally appeared sometime the next day. I'd prefer that the link not become active until the projections are actually accessible.

2. The values of players as shown in the trade analyzer window of DD for most players "zeroed out" when we reached week 16. Though our trade deadline was already past by then, I've found those values to be useful in judging the relative worth of players available via waivers (we allow waiver pickups in all weeks), and if I had needed a replacement for week 16, the values would have been nice to have.

As I said, both were only mild irritants, and overall the available content is both very good, and (just as important) is available when I really need it.

Keep up the good work! It's well worth the subscription price!

 

[culdeus]

At some point you have to consider vertical integration and start hosting leagues here. That's the logical next step.

 

[Sigmund Bloom]

Where are Dynasty Rankings.FF season is over and trading has been turned back on but there are no dynasty rankings to be found.I have had a couple of offers already this off season and have tried looking for dynasty values and cannot find anything.

Ill be renewing mine today - just tying up end of season loose ends...

 

[Toads]

Put a link for the NFL season schedule in the FBG's links.

It was content on the message boards, printed up real nice, but it was a hit or misss effort to locate it.

In the "My Controls" for the messager board, install a "change display name" link.

There's a record of change name and change date but, if there's a link there for that purpose.....it's good luck finding it.

 

[whitem0nkey]

Lineup Dominator Application -

Trade Dominator Application

Draft Dominator Application -

Projections Dominator Application -

to have the above applications work on a mac with out having to simmulate windows.

 

[burd]

Is there any way to remove threads from our viewable list? This would also reduce the need for Mods to continually merge threads. TIA.

great idea and i hope it's possible. There are way too many garbage threads for busy folks like myself who have to try to research while doing other things. Anything that would make it easier for us busy folks would be greatly appreciated.

 

[Hugonel]

On news reports - with offensive lineman I've often wished that FBG would clarify if he's a starter (or a primary backup with lots of playing time). All of us know the impact of injuries on skill positions, but I don't even pretend to keep up with the OL details. I know we can cross reference the depth chart, but even that doesn't tell us if a back up gets much playing time.

Outstanding work overall, however.

 

[videoguy505]

Lose deadweight staff, and ban some of the "high-profile" posters who are really just tools.

Then, divide the shark pool into subforums as follows, it's far too large and full of crap to be of any use at all:

Teams, Players, & Game threads

News, Injuries, Trades, and Rumors

Fantasy Football Strategy, Theory, and Discussion

College & other non-NFL football

 

[Keys Myaths]

ban some of the "high-profile" posters who are really just tools.

 

[PR Sparty]

I think the "breaking news" updates we a little slow this year. Seems that in years past, you were first to break a lot of news. This year i noticed that CBS and fanball were beating you to the punch a bit.

Maybe this is because you wait till something is done, not speculated, but i subscribe to FBG's to get a edge on other owners and in terms of breaking news, it was not there this year.

 

[Maroney=Speed]

Bloom needs a raise and hirer EBF.

Rookie poster of the year: benson_will_lead_the_way.

Kids got game.