fantasyplayer
Footballguy
Fantasy football is full of contradictions. Every season it seems fantasy football owners interpret the same data/information differently to suit their own preferences. It seems like we see arguments like the following over & over:
Owner A says, "Roy Williams is going to get fewer targets and decreased production due to the presence of Calvin Johnson." Owner B counters saying, "Defenses won't be able to key on Williams because they have to contend with Johnson too."
Owner A says, "Henry's due for a huge year because Cutler will keep defenses honest." Owner B responds saying, "Denver's credible passing game is going to reduce Henry's touches."
I tend to think the "decrease attention from defenses theory" is basically offset by the "reduced targets/touches theory."
Do any of you have a method to evaluate how these types of situations truly affect a player's situation/outlook?
Owner A says, "Roy Williams is going to get fewer targets and decreased production due to the presence of Calvin Johnson." Owner B counters saying, "Defenses won't be able to key on Williams because they have to contend with Johnson too."
Owner A says, "Henry's due for a huge year because Cutler will keep defenses honest." Owner B responds saying, "Denver's credible passing game is going to reduce Henry's touches."
I tend to think the "decrease attention from defenses theory" is basically offset by the "reduced targets/touches theory."
Do any of you have a method to evaluate how these types of situations truly affect a player's situation/outlook?