BeaverCleaver
Footballguy
Squissy has quite the long list of people he blocks.Yeah, bad enough to actually block someone. What kind of sally does that?!?
Squissy has quite the long list of people he blocks.Yeah, bad enough to actually block someone. What kind of sally does that?!?
Sorry, I meant anyone with some authority or investment or input into mod policy.
One recommendation I would make is a pinned thread where mods chime in and help discuss mod policy. But if no mod is reading this thread it seems like all this good thought (in this thread) goes to waste.
timschochet WAS suspended as of last night
Indeed, the race-baiting that is allowed in this forum is hardly likely to be earning FootballGuys, INC many new customers. Ditto the attacks on posters deemed to be non-patriotic enough (see the recent national anthem at athletic contests thread for evidence).During the run up to the Iraq War I was called many hateful things. None of them were true or even supported by what I posted. Mods were heavily involved in those threads. Including Joe. I don't remember a single person getting banned for any of that. People stalked me across numerous threads derailing them to attack me some more. Nothing. And that's fine. I am a big boy and I understand my opinions occasionally upset others. I believe management disagreed with my position and that's why little to no action was ever taken. But I lived through it. But when someone say calls out someone out for their obvious race baiting and general dooshery and they get banned? Yeah that then makes me wonder, where's the fairness in the system? And you know if you don't want to be called a racist don't post like one. So maybe mods need a more concrete guideline to go by. Because this I know it when I see it approach leads to a lot of uneven and even silly treatment.
I'll defend Tim since he's not here. I think he honestly believes it when he blames everything on white institutional racism rather than him trying to race-bait.Indeed, the race-baiting that is allowed in this forum is hardly likely to be earning FootballGuys, INC many new customers. Ditto the attacks on posters deemed to be non-patriotic enough (see the recent national anthem at athletic contests thread for evidence).
I wasn't criticizing Tim. Tim isn't one of the posters who think the country was better before the Civil Rights Act was passed.I'll defend Tim since he's not here. I think he honestly believes it when he blames everything on white institutional racism rather than him trying to race-bait.
On the + side porcupine it's good to see you came to your senses about your avatar.I wasn't criticizing Tim. Tim isn't one of the posters who think the country was better before the Civil Rights Act was passed.
postsactually, he was suspended for something in this particular thread that he posted last night.So Tim was suspended for something he said months or even years ago?![]()
Ah ok, carry on.actually, he was suspended for something in this particular thread that he posted last night.
Sometimes the guy driving this alias gets in a good one.Footballguys helped me win a championship.
Thanks, Tim.timschochet WAS suspended as of last night- either for the original comments about Eminence or for defending them rather glibly in this thread yesterday- not quite sure which.
0. Alias accounts
Are a pain for moderators. If you feel the need to create extra accounts just for trolling, this message board isn't for you. We see them; we close them. New accounts created in response to having your original account suspended/banned may also be axed.
- MTThis is from a prior thread about moderating:
This is a good example of what Aaron was talking about. It's the type of post that was getting reported -- along with scores of others just like it -- when no report was warranted.
"You, personally, are an idiot" should be reported.
"Millions of people I disagree with about something-or-other are idiots" should not be reported. It's not a personal insult. It may be a sloppy overgeneralization, but anyone who takes personal offense at it is just trying to feel offended for sport.
- Aaronthat thread has led to non-stop post reporting for the past week or more. most of the posts being reported were mild, but none of us mods have the time to babysit a thread filled with people who can't seem to have a rational, reasonable discussion that doesn't involve trading insults back and forth.
And:The forum for all non-NFL topics. Most things go, but keep it clean. Be excellent to each other. And please don't whine.
Presumably this means anything "offensive" is the definition of not being excellent to each other. That is extremely broad and inherently subject to uneven interpretation.18. If someone makes an offensive post, should I quote it in my response before reporting it?
at tim getting banned and then coming right back into the exact same thread and posting about it under his alias. We did it!!!This thread feels like a trap.
This.Yup. At the very least, a separate forum just for politics.Time is long past for a politics and religion board. That would solve everything.![]()
This is exactly the kind of asinine moderating that needs to change. People get hit for saying a naughty word while people are attacking each other left and right.Bucky86 said:I subscribed last year and got nailed with a 7 day ban a week later in the deflate-gate thread for jokingly saying, "Salty salt lickerers." (It was a running joke in the thread) Really? THAT gets a 7 day ban? Like you, I wanted to support their site, but after that I'll never subscribe again. I even wrote an email asking if all paying customers can expect ridiculous bannings and received no response.
Bucky86 said:I subscribed last year and got nailed with a 7 day ban a week later in the deflate-gate thread for jokingly saying, "Salty salt lickerers." (It was a running joke in the thread) Really? THAT gets a 7 day ban? Like you, I wanted to support their site, but after that I'll never subscribe again. I even wrote an email asking if all paying customers can expect ridiculous bannings and received no response.
Old Winston Churchill should get hit with the ugly stick for being dumb enough to do itIvanKaramazov said:at tim getting banned and then coming right back into the exact same thread and posting about it under his alias.
Joe got his normalized bell curve centered on "keep it how it is now" and checked out half way through page 2. Problem is the pole asked about the level of moderation and ignored consistency and/or bias that a lot of the comments, even on the first page and a half, tried to point out.Walking Boot said:Seriously, @Joe Bryant, what's the point of stuff like this if you're not going to engage the users?
To me, this is indicative of the problem. The "moderation", such that it is, is done by someone who is not part of the community being moderated. Joe seems to think of it as compartmentalized, maybe even something that can be outsourced or done remotely, with dispassionate analysis and cold rules. It isn't. It is necessarily fluid and deeply integrated into the community. The problem is the people who run this place seem so removed from it.
Seconded. I just read the police shooting thread and that was some atrocious moderating, no offense. I disagree with jon_mx most of the time too but 30 days for a non-inflammatory post like that? Ridiculous. That absolutely reeked of "believe what I believe in or get a timeout."Joe got his normalized bell curve centered on "keep it how it is now" and checked out half way through page 2. Problem is the pole asked about the level of moderation and ignored consistency and/or bias that a lot of the comments, even on the first page and a half, tried to point out.
I agree with your second paragraph. Aaron does a pretty good job at moderation because he's here all the time and has a pretty good feel for the temperature of things. The moderation discussion seems pop up when FBGs who don't hang out here decide to come in, post and take an interest in a thread, and instead of joining the conversation at an even level resort right to their mod powers. Clayton in the Bernie thread is a perfect example, he even admitted it.
I'd prefer timeouts and post deletion be reserved for inflammatory comments. Having differing opinions is what makes this place great. I do not like jon_mx, but, if you've listened to conservative talk radio at all in the past month it is really easy to see that there are a lot of people putting blame on BLM for the police shootings. It is not a novel idea, probably warrants some debate, and he didn't deserve a timeout. Just MHO.
Can't speak to any specifics today fwiw. Seems to have been a bit Mrs even of late though.proninja said:We can probably consider that a lifetime achievement award
ing at each other, insulting each other, bickering about the same ####### 5 topics over and over and over and over and over and over. What is the major complaint you get out of the FFA? #### from politics thread guys and those who argue with those politics threads guys. Cordon them off and let them go at it. I'd imagine the vast majority will still post in the FFA as well. WE have a baseball forum, is a News, Current Events and Politics Forum that ridiculous?This is really good stuff here. I can't say I feel the level of passion about this that you do, but I think these are all entirely reasonable and productive suggestions.I say this with all due respect @Joe Bryant , mostly because I don't want to get banned, but I have zero warning points here and hope you'll consider that when you hopefully don't ban me but...
It's amazing how out of touch you are with this place considering it makes up a good deal of your livelihood...it is your site, at the very least.
While Rude and Clayton really do a yeoman's job to cover this aspect of this business (and whomever I missed), you are asking for feedback and then, (at least temporarily), disappearing.
(most of) US/your subscribers who also use the boards: "We can handle posting pictures and youtube videos like adults (like every single other well moderated message board on the internet - including highly successful ones). We self moderate for the most part. If something it out of bounds, it will be reported, and taken down within minutes most times."
FBG Staff/Your reaction: "We're going to remove that privilege. Surely a group of 20K+ ? mid-life crisis aged men who've been here for over a decade can't handle that. Fun? There's no fun in the free for all!"
(most of) US/your subscribers who also use the boards: "Ease up on the registration process." 3 league mates I referred here last year weren't able to get their handle's approved. I have no idea why. 1 of them was, but it took 5 days. This is the internet. It's time to integrate user feedback/message board activity to be part in parcel of your business (not just posting here, but using the IDP board, the Assistant Coach or Shark Pool forums). This isn't Club 54, it's footballguys.com - check the registration, if it's not a counterfeit of another IP, or an offensive handle, approve it...immediately. It's the internet, people lose interest quickly. What a welcoming community you have here when it's about a 30% chance ? you'll be able to register the board.
FBG Staff/Your reaction: Who knows, but this has gotten worse.
(most of) US/your subscribers who also use the boards: No one's asking for 20 different sub forums. It's confusing with message boards who have them. It's nice we all congregate in the FFA for the most part, but for years and years and years, the only common, ubiquitous request has been for a "News, Current Events, and Politics Forum". Sports centric ancillary topics in the FFA are fewer and fewer with each passing year. There are what, hundreds, thousands who come here for nothing more than political debate? And 30-40% of them are doing nothing but trolling?ing at each other, insulting each other, bickering about the same ####### 5 topics over and over and over and over and over and over. What is the major complaint you get out of the FFA? #### from politics thread guys and those who argue with those politics threads guys. Cordon them off and let them go at it. I'd imagine the vast majority will still post in the FFA as well. WE have a baseball forum, is a News, Current Events and Politics Forum that ridiculous?
FBG Staff/Your reaction: "Yes that's ridiculous, even though it's the most overwhelming response from FBGs every time we have one of these come-to-Jesus threads"
3 Very minor, very simply things to make the quality of life here easier. And almost definitely, I'd bet anything, making moderation here easier. This is a good group of adults, who are generally respectful to each other with lots of ribbing, fun, injected with the toxic political discussion pill in too many ####### threads.
It's been the same here for going on 2 decades now? Small changes can be good. Especially when we've been asking for them, consistently, for so long now. You need to get more in tune with your users. You seem completely disconnected and it gets worse every year.
What I'm assuming FBG Staff/Your reaction will be: "if you don't like it, don't use the board."
BTW - I commend you and the staff for building the community you built here and getting so many great people to coalesce around a simple message board add-on to your main business. But, in my opinion, we're on the downslope here on the bell curve of FBG's message board popularity and relevancy. You can make it great again (see what I did there?) but you actually have to listen to us and then act on it. Most of the time, when you start these threads, you disappear (or comment but don't act) and the quality and integrity of the boards just continue to erode away.
I don't know , ever since Mr ! Departed every interaction I've had with mods/staff have been pretty fairLike I said, I would bet sign ups and page views are trending downward here. After years of rudely telling users "there are plenty of other places to get FF info", maybe Joe shouldn't be surprised people are finding better communities elsewhere.
The way the staff treats the plebes needs some major work.
Thanks John Bender. That's a bummer you think I'm that out of touch. Or that criticizing the forums would be something to be banned for.I say this with all due respect @Joe Bryant , mostly because I don't want to get banned, but I have zero warning points here and hope you'll consider that when you hopefully don't ban me but...
It's amazing how out of touch you are with this place considering it makes up a good deal of your livelihood...it is your site, at the very least.
While Rude and Clayton really do a yeoman's job to cover this aspect of this business (and whomever I missed), you are asking for feedback and then, (at least temporarily), disappearing.
(most of) US/your subscribers who also use the boards: "We can handle posting pictures and youtube videos like adults (like every single other well moderated message board on the internet - including highly successful ones). We self moderate for the most part. If something it out of bounds, it will be reported, and taken down within minutes most times."
FBG Staff/Your reaction: "We're going to remove that privilege. Surely a group of 20K+ ? mid-life crisis aged men who've been here for over a decade can't handle that. Fun? There's no fun in the free for all!"
(most of) US/your subscribers who also use the boards: "Ease up on the registration process." 3 league mates I referred here last year weren't able to get their handle's approved. I have no idea why. 1 of them was, but it took 5 days. This is the internet. It's time to integrate user feedback/message board activity to be part in parcel of your business (not just posting here, but using the IDP board, the Assistant Coach or Shark Pool forums). This isn't Club 54, it's footballguys.com - check the registration, if it's not a counterfeit of another IP, or an offensive handle, approve it...immediately. It's the internet, people lose interest quickly. What a welcoming community you have here when it's about a 30% chance ? you'll be able to register the board.
FBG Staff/Your reaction: Who knows, but this has gotten worse.
(most of) US/your subscribers who also use the boards: No one's asking for 20 different sub forums. It's confusing with message boards who have them. It's nice we all congregate in the FFA for the most part, but for years and years and years, the only common, ubiquitous request has been for a "News, Current Events, and Politics Forum". Sports centric ancillary topics in the FFA are fewer and fewer with each passing year. There are what, hundreds, thousands who come here for nothing more than political debate? And 30-40% of them are doing nothing but trolling?ing at each other, insulting each other, bickering about the same ####### 5 topics over and over and over and over and over and over. What is the major complaint you get out of the FFA? #### from politics thread guys and those who argue with those politics threads guys. Cordon them off and let them go at it. I'd imagine the vast majority will still post in the FFA as well. WE have a baseball forum, is a News, Current Events and Politics Forum that ridiculous?
FBG Staff/Your reaction: "Yes that's ridiculous, even though it's the most overwhelming response from FBGs every time we have one of these come-to-Jesus threads"
3 Very minor, very simply things to make the quality of life here easier. And almost definitely, I'd bet anything, making moderation here easier. This is a good group of adults, who are generally respectful to each other with lots of ribbing, fun, injected with the toxic political discussion pill in too many ####### threads.
It's been the same here for going on 2 decades now? Small changes can be good. Especially when we've been asking for them, consistently, for so long now. You need to get more in tune with your users. You seem completely disconnected and it gets worse every year.
What I'm assuming FBG Staff/Your reaction will be: "if you don't like it, don't use the board."
BTW - I commend you and the staff for building the community you built here and getting so many great people to coalesce around a simple message board add-on to your main business. But, in my opinion, we're on the downslope here on the bell curve of FBG's message board popularity and relevancy. You can make it great again (see what I did there?) but you actually have to listen to us and then act on it. Most of the time, when you start these threads, you disappear (or comment but don't act) and the quality and integrity of the boards just continue to erode away. Personal anecdote: I come here for most everything, except for political/current event debate or discussion here I'm transitioned over to reddit for. They actually enforce the rules in select political threads there and take a zero tolerance approach to anything that's even slightly condescending. You could learn a lot by checking out one of their political subreddits without the same characters being richards to each other over and over.
Thanks Koya. I guess maybe I should have been more clear on what I meant this thread to be. I heard some people say they wanted more strict moderation. I then I asked the question of the board with a quick poll. Lots of people replied pretty quickly and I felt like I got the answer to the question. It was that they felt it was ok the way it was. I didn't see it as much bigger than that. Certainly not a "Come to Jesus" meeting or an "all hands on deck". I listened, asked a question and you guys answered.Pretty evenly distributed with a strong plurality stating keep as is.
I'd take that as a job well done and worth keeping the current course.
Sure, I appreciate you've engaged me, so I'll try to earnestly expound on my post. (My original post, was meant to be earnest as well FWIW. I know you don't like whining - I wasn't; I was responding to your OP).Thanks John Bender. That's a bummer you think I'm that out of touch. Or that criticizing the forums would be something to be banned for.
Can you describe in more detail what you'd personally like in a FFA subforum? Or exactly how you'd like the forums broken down?
For the moderating with the reddit style, can you describe how you'd think the enforcement should go when a poster is even slightly condescending? I think the most difficult part of moderating a board is making the judgement calls on the gray area stuff like that.
J
ing and admitting they were aliases for months and months and nothing being down. Isn't that one of your basic tenents? How about tim coming in here, after being suspended for being a #### and then posting under his alias that we all know exists? Then we all laugh at it like it's so brazen, it's funny. That's a daily occurence here. It's one big running joke. Joe, I think most FFA posters would like a subforum (or just another forum -- not sure how that works) for current events/politics. Particularly with the reduction of topics shown on the first page with the recent upgrade, the number of political/current events threads often dominate the first page and seems less inviting for users less interested in debating that stuff.Can you describe in more detail what you'd personally like in a FFA subforum? Or exactly how you'd like the forums broken down?
Really? The over run so many threads. If you want to get news here, forget it. By page 3, it will be a gun control debate, or a debate about Hillary Clinton.I never understood why it's hard for people to not open political threads if they're not interested in such, imo.
Right now, 5 of the 25 threads on page 1 are political. 2 are pinned. 18 are random.Really? The over run so many threads. If you want to get news here, forget it. By page 3, it will be a gun control debate, or a debate about Hillary Clinton.
Yes, I left this out of my answer to your post Joe.@Joe Bryant longtime member, first-time caller.
Seriously the moderation here is mainly fine. But why take the embedded pictures away? It's 2016, we can handle it. If anybody posted something out of line it would get reported immediately and that aspect really made the site 10x more enjoyable.
If we stopped ISIS we wouldn't have so many damn political threads gumming up the first page!
Damn terrorists win again...
Dude! There's work to be done here and we may have the owner's ear. Please stop playing.Hey Joe, next thing you know they'll be telling you how to sell boats!
If you're asking for a News, Current Events and Politics Sub-forum, though, you're still going to have to sift through the politics threads to find the news. I, for one, think if the political threads were in their own sub-forum, that would solve most of the issues.Really? The over run so many threads. If you want to get news here, forget it. By page 3, it will be a gun control debate, or a debate about Hillary Clinton.
I'm assuming Joe has him on ignore.Dude! There's work to be done here and we may have the owner's ear. Please stop playing.