Frostillicus
Footballguy
Jefferson over 7.5 rebs
Smart over 4.5 assists
Smart over 4.5 assists
I haven't spent 1 second researching this Omaha thing, but doesn't he normally say it more than once when he uses it? ie, "red 27.....Omaha..Omaha..set".SI.com
Prop Bets
Manning says “Omaha” UNDER 27.5 times, excluding replays (-155). Manning, you might have heard, is ridiculously smart. And he thinks his offensive coordinator, Adam Gase, is even smarter. After all the attention that’s been given to “Omaha” over the last few weeks, in perhaps his last crack at a Super Bowl, do you think he’s going to make it easy on the Seahawks defense? Perhaps Manning and Gase will use it as a dummy call in attempt to use reverse psychology against Seattle, but if they do it’ll be sparingly. The Broncos have averaged 52 offensive plays a game in the playoffs, so if you take the over you’re counting on more than half of those plays getting the “Omaha” treatment, and you’re counting on the FOX mics to pick up every single one. I’m not buying it.
![]()
Was coming in here to post this, Cuse -3 for 2U.Got the a buddy who knows his college hoops who went 13-0 last Saturday on sides. He sends then to me Saturday mornings and I verified. I wouldn't say he's necessarily +ev but he's definitely on fire right now
Anyway, he likes Zona and Cuse.
Total is at 48 on SBSHARPS REPORT - SUPER BOWL EDITION .... omg omg omg omg omg!!!
Speaking of the total, sharps haven’t been interested in getting involved early at all because weather could be such a big factor. The number as we put this report together is hopping between 47 and 47.5. We understand that the quants made the game 46…but are waiting to see if they can get a 48 before hitting the Under. They know the public likes betting Overs in Super Bowls. If the weather forecast is confirmed for wind and/or precipitation, quants and other sharps would hit the Under at 46 or more…and possibly even at 45 if the conditions look to be extreme.
If conditions are calm and manageable, quants will hope for that 48 and will take the Under if they see it.
He almost always uses it singularly, "Omaha...set" then the ball is snapped.I haven't spent 1 second researching this Omaha thing, but doesn't he normally say it more than once when he uses it? ie, "red 27.....Omaha..Omaha..set".SI.com
Prop Bets
Manning says Omaha UNDER 27.5 times, excluding replays (-155). Manning, you might have heard, is ridiculously smart. And he thinks his offensive coordinator, Adam Gase, is even smarter. After all the attention thats been given to Omaha over the last few weeks, in perhaps his last crack at a Super Bowl, do you think hes going to make it easy on the Seahawks defense? Perhaps Manning and Gase will use it as a dummy call in attempt to use reverse psychology against Seattle, but if they do itll be sparingly. The Broncos have averaged 52 offensive plays a game in the playoffs, so if you take the over youre counting on more than half of those plays getting the Omaha treatment, and youre counting on the FOX mics to pick up every single one. Im not buying it.
![]()
"It's the only line that we make for the entire year that is geared towards the betting public."
It's funny (abnormal) that there has only been one defensive special teams score all postseason - Colts safety vs NE. Hopefully you are dueProp Bet I like is
Will there be a defensive or special teams TD
YES +150
Jets special teams coach Mike Westhoff was on Sirius saying with the cold temps, the kickoffs aren't automatic touchbacks. Both teams have good returners.
11 points is a #### ton. I was gonna pass at 6/7 but 11? DamnDespite the Nets' 1H performance they scored 60 in the 2H and only came one point shy of hitting their full game team total - and they had to fly to Indy last night. Realistically they only play the Thunder about twice a year. They are 3-8 SU (.273) and 4-7 ATS (.364) against the the Thunder since they established in 2008, and they already beat them in OKC four weeks ago. Versus the rest of the West, the Nets are 45-89 SU (.336) and 62-70-2 ATS (.470) since 2008.
The Nets and Pacers are both Eastern Conference teams, though. The Nets went 3-0 SU and ATS against them in 2012, but are 0-3 SU and ATS against them this season - tonight is their last regular season meeting. Since 2011 the Nets are 10-14 SU (.417) and 15-9 ATS (.625) away versus the Central Division (2-3 SU and 4-1 ATS at Indiana against an average line of 9.0).
Before the L2 games, the Nets had won 10 of their last 11 (8-2-1 ATS), and are 4-1 SU and ATS on the road L5. The Pacers are in the fade spot in their second game back from a road trip, and the Nets just got some added value ATS after last night.
Is Desjardins starting for Tampa? Montreal is a tough venue for your first NHL game as a goalie.NHL Matinee Parlay
TBL +130
Boston -235
If you like that you might take a look at Baldwin as SB MVP at 60/1.Prop Bet I like is
Will there be a defensive or special teams TD
YES +150
Jets special teams coach Mike Westhoff was on Sirius saying with the cold temps, the kickoffs aren't automatic touchbacks. Both teams have good returners.
That gets posted a day or two before I get around to posting it here, Bill.Total is at 48 on SBSHARPS REPORT - SUPER BOWL EDITION .... omg omg omg omg omg!!!
Speaking of the total, sharps haven’t been interested in getting involved early at all because weather could be such a big factor. The number as we put this report together is hopping between 47 and 47.5. We understand that the quants made the game 46…but are waiting to see if they can get a 48 before hitting the Under. They know the public likes betting Overs in Super Bowls. If the weather forecast is confirmed for wind and/or precipitation, quants and other sharps would hit the Under at 46 or more…and possibly even at 45 if the conditions look to be extreme.
If conditions are calm and manageable, quants will hope for that 48 and will take the Under if they see it.
Lmao.That gets posted a day or two before I get around to posting it here, Bill.Total is at 48 on SBSHARPS REPORT - SUPER BOWL EDITION .... omg omg omg omg omg!!!
Speaking of the total, sharps havent been interested in getting involved early at all because weather could be such a big factor. The number as we put this report together is hopping between 47 and 47.5. We understand that the quants made the game 46but are waiting to see if they can get a 48 before hitting the Under. They know the public likes betting Overs in Super Bowls. If the weather forecast is confirmed for wind and/or precipitation, quants and other sharps would hit the Under at 46 or moreand possibly even at 45 if the conditions look to be extreme.
If conditions are calm and manageable, quants will hope for that 48 and will take the Under if they see it.
I got a fresh hundo on it, 'sdoo this!Got a few Cuse backers in here, thread play, perhaps?
Wtf was that for??? I about hurled my quinoa. Gross.I'm gonna have Torry Holt give them the finger.
Imagine if Kurt Warner actually threw hard?Wtf was that for??? I about hurled my quinoa. Gross.I'm gonna have Torry Holt give them the finger.
Put the thread stamp on it boys.inGot a few Cuse backers in here, thread play, perhaps?
InPut the thread stamp on it boys.inGot a few Cuse backers in here, thread play, perhaps?

I think Ryan Miller is 8-3-3 (2.09, .938) in his last 14 games so I wouldn't take the Avs at that price.Rude/Doc/anyone.... if you could take one big NHL chalk today, which of these do you like the best?
Colorado -225 vs. Buffalo
L.A. -170 vs. Philly
St.L -220 vs. Nashville
Anaheim -200 vs. Dallas
All of the favorites are at home.
Got to be higher than that. Lot of options in that offense.What percentage would you give on Denver winning and Manning not winning MVP? Less than 5%?
You're probably right. I'm thinking if he struggles and they win, maybe Moreno or a defensive player that has a pick 6 or something.Got to be higher than that. Lot of options in that offense.What percentage would you give on Denver winning and Manning not winning MVP? Less than 5%?
I somewhat agree with Aaron in that it's more than 5% but also agree with you that Manning is certainly likely the most likely offensive player on Denver to win it.What percentage would you give on Denver winning and Manning not winning MVP? Less than 5%?
Blues/DucksRude/Doc/anyone.... if you could take one big NHL chalk today, which of these do you like the best?
Colorado -225 vs. Buffalo
L.A. -170 vs. Philly
St.L -220 vs. Nashville
Anaheim -200 vs. Dallas
All of the favorites are at home.
DDI think he'd have to play really poorly for him not to win it. I also have a tough time seeing Denver winning without him playing well.I somewhat agree with Aaron in that it's more than 5% but also agree with you that Manning is certainly likely the most likely offensive player on Denver to win it.Check out famous Jameis winning MVP in the Natl Championship game with Mario Edwards, Jr and Timmy Jernigan both played better.What percentage would you give on Denver winning and Manning not winning MVP? Less than 5%?
Bishop actually played, nice hit here.Is Desjardins starting for Tampa? Montreal is a tough venue for your first NHL game as a goalie.NHL Matinee Parlay
TBL +130
Boston -235