What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (6 Viewers)

Thinking Portland will score and won't be able to stop San Antonio from scoring. Thoughts gents?
Don't look at us. You're the expert. What's the play?!
I think 206.5 is a good number to bet the over. Portland will have to prove to me that they can stop San Antonio before I pass on an over in this series.

I wanted the under in that last game but passed. Instead of running out the clock with 16 seconds left, Norris Cole drove and dished for a slashing dunker to push the total to 193, 1 point over the pregame line.

I hate unders, woulda been fuming had I played that one.

 
Thinking Portland will score and won't be able to stop San Antonio from scoring. Thoughts gents?
Don't look at us. You're the expert. What's the play?!
I think 206.5 is a good number to bet the over. Portland will have to prove to me that they can stop San Antonio before I pass on an over in this series.

I wanted the under in that last game but passed. Instead of running out the clock with 16 seconds left, Norris Cole drove and dished for a slashing dunker to push the total to 193, 1 point over the pregame line.

I hate unders, woulda been fuming had I played that one.
oh, I hadn't considered that Portland needs to score, too.

 
CHI -1.5 (+470) at 5d seems worth a shot at that price. Need one and the empty netter as the WILD will be desperate already down 2-0 in the series.

I also played them at -125 to win. If Suter is out, that's a massive loss for Minnesota.

EDIT: also Chi to score next goal at -105

 
Last edited by a moderator:
CHI -1.5 (+470) at 5d seems worth a shot at that price. Need one and the empty netter as the WILD will be desperate already down 2-0 in the series.

I also played them at -125 to win. If Suter is out, that's a massive loss for Minnesota.

EDIT: also Chi to score next goal at -105
Because OF COURSE the Wild score next (I didn't make the plays in time). Sucks brotha. 3-1 will make it better.

 
that hurt, but I still think it was the right play.

odds were so weird. CHI to score next goal was -105, then +110, then +120 so I kept adding since CHI was still considered a decent favorite to win the game.

oh well.

 
ChainsawU said:
Also playing Rockies' team total over when the book offers a line. The wind will be from SSW (directly out to center field) at 12 mph. This ump is 6-3-0 O/U lifetime at Coors. When the temp has been between 70 and 80 degrees at Coors field this season, the O/U is 6-1-0 and the Rockies have totaled 10,12,9,2,10,10,11 runs by themselves in those games. The 2 was against Bumgarner. The only experience either of these two pitchers has with this umpire was a Rockies home game on May 28, 2011, where Nicasio and the Rockies beat the Cardinals 15-4.
:thumbup:

 
ChainsawU said:
Also playing Rockies' team total over when the book offers a line. The wind will be from SSW (directly out to center field) at 12 mph. This ump is 6-3-0 O/U lifetime at Coors. When the temp has been between 70 and 80 degrees at Coors field this season, the O/U is 6-1-0 and the Rockies have totaled 10,12,9,2,10,10,11 runs by themselves in those games. The 2 was against Bumgarner. The only experience either of these two pitchers has with this umpire was a Rockies home game on May 28, 2011, where Nicasio and the Rockies beat the Cardinals 15-4.
:thumbup:
Marty McFly: The almanac. Son of a ##### stole my idea! He must have been listening when I- It's my fault! The whole thing is my fault. If I hadn't bought that damn book, none of this would have ever happened.

 
Wood owns a career-high strikeout rate of 8.8 K/9 this year, and a career-low walk rate of 1.7 BB/9. He is 2-0 versus the White Sox with a 2.25 ERA, .286 opponent SLG%, and 11 K in 12.0 IP. Going back to last season, Danks is 1-5 SU lined as the favorite (0-5 L5) and 47-51 SU in his career lined as the favorite (avg line -135.5, ROI -17.4%). How do you pay money for that?

Cubs 113

 
lumpy19 said:
Good stuff. Where'd he get the Lexus already?
Not sure.....or the headphones, the diamond studs, etc

I don't know much about the kid but looks like he's had a tough life and even if he took creampuff classes a 3.5 GPA is fantastic.

I can't imagine the pressure when performing on that pro day, his 3 brothers relying on him.
So Mizzou is paying well these days.

 
ChainsawU said:
Also playing Rockies' team total over when the book offers a line. The wind will be from SSW (directly out to center field) at 12 mph. This ump is 6-3-0 O/U lifetime at Coors. When the temp has been between 70 and 80 degrees at Coors field this season, the O/U is 6-1-0 and the Rockies have totaled 10,12,9,2,10,10,11 runs by themselves in those games. The 2 was against Bumgarner. The only experience either of these two pitchers has with this umpire was a Rockies home game on May 28, 2011, where Nicasio and the Rockies beat the Cardinals 15-4.
:thumbup:
:hifive: :hifive:

double for me since played game over as well

 
Some TPC bets from Bovada, 5D, Sb.ag, and sportsbetting.ag

3 chance to win: Furyk, Westy, Zach Johnson 11-1

Top Englishmen: Poulter 5-1

Poulter over McDowell -110

Furyk over Westy -115

Kokrak over Knox -120

Furyk over Mickelson -130

Dufner over Na +110

 
Glazier coming out and saying neither the Browns or Raiders will de drafting manziel at 4 or 5. I think the over 5.5 is safe but there are always trades that could mess things up. Mainly the Rams trading that #2 pick.

Can still get it at over +165 on SB

 
Last edited by a moderator:
swirvenirvin said:
swirvenirvin, on 07 May 2014 - 08:45 AM, said:Glazier coming out and saying neither the Browns or Raiders will de drafting manziel at 4 or 5. I think the over 5.5 is safe but there are always trades that could mess things up. Mainly the Rams trading that #2 pick.

Can still get it at over +165 on SB
There's value in the over still. Was quite a bit more tasty at +240 yesterday :popcorn:

 
swirvenirvin said:
swirvenirvin, on 07 May 2014 - 08:45 AM, said:Glazier coming out and saying neither the Browns or Raiders will de drafting manziel at 4 or 5. I think the over 5.5 is safe but there are always trades that could mess things up. Mainly the Rams trading that #2 pick.

Can still get it at over +165 on SB
There's value in the over still. Was quite a bit more tasty at +240 yesterday :popcorn:
I looked at one I made a while back at -220 :(

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a local book that is running a half point spread on the kings at +118 and the ducks ML +119 the only way a loss happens is with an overtime win by the kings right? Unless I'm missing something it is a wise bet to take both sides right?

 
I have a local book that is running a half point spread on the kings at +118 and the ducks ML +119 the only way a loss happens is with an overtime win by the kings right? Unless I'm missing something it is a wise bet to take both sides right?
Assuming the kingsbet is for regulation and the ducks is for game then yes.Only thing is you are betting $200 to win $20 that the kings won't win in OT. I'm not sure it's a good bet.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a local book that is running a half point spread on the kings at +118 and the ducks ML +119 the only way a loss happens is with an overtime win by the kings right? Unless I'm missing something it is a wise bet to take both sides right?
Assuming the kingsbet is for regulation and the ducks is for game then yes.Only thing is you are betting $200 to win $20 that the kings won't win in OT. I'm not sure it's a good bet.
Right but If the ducks win in OT it would be 220 though, and any regulation win from either team would be the 20. Only loss is the kings in overtime. And you are right not a huge net positive but any positive gain has to be worth some attention.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top