comfortably numb
Footballguy
I love itNot sure I like this one. I have a feeling the game won't be tied after the first scoreadding
will the game be tied after the 1st score
YES -110
o112.5 -125
tempted to add more
I love itNot sure I like this one. I have a feeling the game won't be tied after the first scoreadding
will the game be tied after the 1st score
YES -110
o112.5 -125
It's the 5th bet down under all bets. Interestingly tails is even moneyNo coin flip prop at Sportbook?
nope, over. books have it at 2 minutes 2 seconds, and she usually goes around 2:18 or soWe on Under for National Anthem?
I thought Truck played under and had her at closer to 1:40 based on past performance.nope, over. books have it at 2 minutes 2 seconds, and she usually goes around 2:18 or soWe on Under for National Anthem?
that's just SEattle. I think the data above was referring to 2nd half total for both teams, no?no idea how this will come over in format, but it is in RB under Seattle props:where'd you see this? having trouble finding it.i bet it earlier in the week. niceBilly Bats said:The Man With No Name said:Last 10 Super Bowl scoring by half
2014: 22-29
2013: 27-38
2012: 19-19
2011: 31-25
2010: 16-32
2009: 24-26
2008: 10-21
2007: 30-16
2006: 10-21
2005: 14-31Was just coming in to post this. Total second half points has gone 12-2-1 in the last 15 Super Bowls.
Will the Seattle Seahawks score more points in the? - Super Bowl XLIX - New England Patriots vs. Seattle Seahawks - 02/01 06:30PM
2307
1st Half
Max: 100
Risk Win+½-125
2308
2nd Half + OT
-½-105
yeah it is. i took the Seattle one though because they have scored very little in the 1st half for quite a few gamesthat's just SEattle. I think the data above was referring to 2nd half total for both teams, no?no idea how this will come over in format, but it is in RB under Seattle props:where'd you see this? having trouble finding it.i bet it earlier in the week. niceBilly Bats said:The Man With No Name said:Last 10 Super Bowl scoring by half
2014: 22-29
2013: 27-38
2012: 19-19
2011: 31-25
2010: 16-32
2009: 24-26
2008: 10-21
2007: 30-16
2006: 10-21
2005: 14-31Was just coming in to post this. Total second half points has gone 12-2-1 in the last 15 Super Bowls.
Will the Seattle Seahawks score more points in the? - Super Bowl XLIX - New England Patriots vs. Seattle Seahawks - 02/01 06:30PM
2307
1st Half
Max: 100
Risk Win+½-125
2308
2nd Half + OT
-½-105
Somebody make a decision!!!!!!I thought Truck played under and had her at closer to 1:40 based on past performance.nope, over. books have it at 2 minutes 2 seconds, and she usually goes around 2:18 or soWe on Under for National Anthem?
Both teams make a 33 yd + FG +100... They've got the lines set at 7.5 points for each kicker, this feels like a good one.NE plays close Super Bowls, anyone on last score not a TD +160?
Since the 2001 season, when the spread is less than a TD the underdog is 5-2 SU and ATS, and Vegas' return was 8.97 ±4% in those seven games (from the article Swirve posted). In the games the dog lost SU but covered the spread, Vegas returned 13.5 ±5%. link
Rachel Nichols @Rachel__Nichols 32m32 minutes ago
Just texted w/#Seahawks Richard Sherman. He tells me his girlfriend Ashley is not experiencing any signs of labor & that he's playing today
yeah dawson shut him down most of the game, then when he did get past someone he dished it to the open guyMore like Zak Worthless.
I liked reading this. I got 2 hundred on Seattle and that's it.Great = exciting?Whomper said:On the greatest betting day of the year, I wish all of you the best of luck![]()
Because the Super Bowl should be no more important (betting-wise) than a MAC game in October.
bumpNational Anthem u122.5 -135(2007 performance ~94 seconds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js2miifnClM)
I liked reading this. I got 2 hundred on Seattle and that's it.Great = exciting?Whomper said:On the greatest betting day of the year, I wish all of you the best of luck![]()
Because the Super Bowl should be no more important (betting-wise) than a MAC game in October.
you guys are doing it all wrong. if you aren't betting on the pre-game, half-time, or any novelty props, you aren't livingbump/runs down the ramp, slides into the ring
Menzel sang the national anthem at the MLB 2014 All-Star Game. Video here: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x21jerv_hd-idina-menzel-national-anthem-2014-mlb-all-star-game_people
She does not exactly speed through it. I have her at right about 2:00, maybe a smidge under.
Alright...in for u122.5bump/runs down the ramp, slides into the ring
Menzel sang the national anthem at the MLB 2014 All-Star Game. Video here: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x21jerv_hd-idina-menzel-national-anthem-2014-mlb-all-star-game_people
She does not exactly speed through it. I have her at right about 2:00, maybe a smidge under.
Over $120MM is up to +125 now.NV sportsbooks made 40% more money on football in 2014 than 2013. So yeah, doubling up on that Las Vegas handle bet.
Who's money moved the line from Seahawks -2.5 to Patriots -1 within 48 hours after the lines were initially released? Squares aren't placing wagers that far out. You're absolutely right that the pros look at the sides and O/E of this game just like any other, and that it's on the props that they feast. Super Bowl has to be one of the most publicly bet games of the Season, with higher # of individual bets on side and total coming from squares, and the majority of that square money coming in on Saturday or today, as the square public typically doesn't lie in wait for line moves and such, they just take what's available when they bet, which is closer to kickoff than farther away. I'm probably wrong, but I think a lot of square public money is hitting the Seahawks hard. I'm liking the Pats more and more.The Linemakers @TheLinemakers 24h24 hours ago
Make that 4 Las Vegas books that have gone to #Seahawks -1 today; Golden Nugget the latest.
That line moved as the Pats were destroying a bad Colts team in the 2H. People are influenced by the most recent thing they saw. Seems like everyone has come to their senses now.Who's money moved the line from Seahawks -2.5 to Patriots -1 within 48 hours after the lines were initially released? Squares aren't placing wagers that far out. You're absolutely right that the pros look at the sides and O/E of this game just like any other, and that it's on the props that they feast. Super Bowl has to be one of the most publicly bet games of the Season, with higher # of individual bets on side and total coming from squares, and the majority of that square money coming in on Saturday or today, as the square public typically doesn't lie in wait for line moves and such, they just take what's available when they bet, which is closer to kickoff than farther away. I'm probably wrong, but I think a lot of square public money is hitting the Seahawks hard. I'm liking the Pats more and more.The Linemakers @TheLinemakers 24h24 hours ago
Make that 4 Las Vegas books that have gone to #Seahawks -1 today; Golden Nugget the latest.
Probably going to lose my ###...
5 dimes has it.Would National Anthem normally be under "novelty props?" I don't even see this at sportsbook or greek. Who has it?
Recency bias plays heavy in the public for sure. Greek/Heritage opened at a pick'em, it's really the same concept as stock market overnight futures. Seattle was at -2 or so before the Pats game finished, and the books adjusted accordingly.That line moved as the Pats were destroying a bad Colts team in the 2H. People are influenced by the most recent thing they saw. Seems like everyone has come to their senses now.Who's money moved the line from Seahawks -2.5 to Patriots -1 within 48 hours after the lines were initially released? Squares aren't placing wagers that far out. You're absolutely right that the pros look at the sides and O/E of this game just like any other, and that it's on the props that they feast. Super Bowl has to be one of the most publicly bet games of the Season, with higher # of individual bets on side and total coming from squares, and the majority of that square money coming in on Saturday or today, as the square public typically doesn't lie in wait for line moves and such, they just take what's available when they bet, which is closer to kickoff than farther away. I'm probably wrong, but I think a lot of square public money is hitting the Seahawks hard. I'm liking the Pats more and more.The Linemakers @TheLinemakers 24h24 hours ago
Make that 4 Las Vegas books that have gone to #Seahawks -1 today; Golden Nugget the latest.
Probably going to lose my ###...
Thanks man!5 dimes has it.Would National Anthem normally be under "novelty props?" I don't even see this at sportsbook or greek. Who has it?
under +110
30 bets and counting here on props, 0 on the side/total.I liked reading this. I got 2 hundred on Seattle and that's it.Great = exciting?Whomper said:On the greatest betting day of the year, I wish all of you the best of luck![]()
Because the Super Bowl should be no more important (betting-wise) than a MAC game in October.you guys are doing it all wrong. if you aren't betting on the pre-game, half-time, or any novelty props, you aren't living
i like that. You have to listen to the girl!Bruce Murray interviewed the National Anthem chick on Sirius NFL radio on Friday. She's aware of the prop bet, and she said she may "drag it out" a bit.
Not sure if she was kidding or not.
![]()
completely forgot to bet those cross sports onethats our 1st winner then!Ovie with 9 shots on goal so far.![]()
Add Russell Wilson MVP +280Shane Vereen OVER 3.5 Receptions +125
Shane Vereen OVER 27.5 yards receiving -115
Marshawn Lynch OVER 19 rushing attempts -115
Patriots first scoring play: Field Goal +125
Seahawks first scoring play: Touchdown Run +250
First penalty: offsides/encroachment/Neutral zone +250
Those are my props. I'm sure I'll tail some others posted here, but I liked all of those.
She told Lebatard the same thing Thursday.Bruce Murray interviewed the National Anthem chick on Sirius NFL radio on Friday. She's aware of the prop bet, and she said she may "drag it out" a bit.
Not sure if she was kidding or not.
![]()
Is it TheGooRoo.?Here's a list of plays from a guy pretty connected to the prop world.
http://awesomescreenshot.com/03a4bbzh7f
Sweet, added these three from that list:Here's a list of plays from a guy pretty connected to the prop world.
http://awesomescreenshot.com/03a4bbzh7f
It is not, but the guy is sharp. TGR. is on Seattle, National Anthem u, Gronk and Lafell u recepts, and Wilson -17.5 rush yds over Vereen, among others.Is it TheGooRoo.?Here's a list of plays from a guy pretty connected to the prop world.
http://awesomescreenshot.com/03a4bbzh7f
another guy who is pretty good is all over edelman under tooHere's a list of plays from a guy pretty connected to the prop world.
http://awesomescreenshot.com/03a4bbzh7f
I like that he has money on Lynch yes with the crotch grab. Think i will have to tail that oneIt is not, but the guy is sharp. TGR. is on Seattle, National Anthem u, Gronk and Lafell u recepts, and Wilson -17.5 rush yds over Vereen, among others.Is it TheGooRoo.?Here's a list of plays from a guy pretty connected to the prop world.
http://awesomescreenshot.com/03a4bbzh7f
My largest bets are:
Sea +1 and pk for 5.5k.
Willson o 2.5 rec for 3k
Willson o 30.5 yds for 3k
Blount u 62.5 for 3k
Vereen o 28.5 rec yd for 2k
Vereen o 12.5 longest rec for 4k
I went under because women are liarsI grabbed the anthem over![]()
Henry has 4 TDs now, ####### mother####er!!!!!I got Fritz for Puppy Bowl MVP +450![]()
You're probably talking about NFLPlayerProps. There is alot of sharing/stealing among these guys.another guy who is pretty good is all over edelman under tooHere's a list of plays from a guy pretty connected to the prop world.
http://awesomescreenshot.com/03a4bbzh7f
yeppppp.. Who is doing the stealing?You're probably talking about NFLPlayerProps. There is alot of sharing/stealing among these guys.another guy who is pretty good is all over edelman under tooHere's a list of plays from a guy pretty connected to the prop world.
http://awesomescreenshot.com/03a4bbzh7f