I haven't been paying attention... do we have dueling CBB systems here or something?I have a really uneasy feeling I will be fading a lot of bmj's picks tonight :sad:
The Pats signed Billy Bob Thornton?I think something is wrong with brady, some type of injury. They talked about it on espn radio this morning. He did not play a good game yesterday. A lot of low throws, on that one seam route he missed a wide open Gronk, WIDE OPEN, he doesn't miss throws like that. That Giants front 4 is nasty.100u on NYG +3.5 -115 through +3 +105 for me so far. I wonder who is going to cover Nicks and Cruz. Gronk on Nicks? Maybe Edelman or Woodcock on Cruz?
I'm rolling with Giants ML and over 55.No, it's basically the same and usually repeats picks. I've been seeing a trend with some of them that I want to check if it has historical significance, but not sure how easily I can. If it does, it would most likely go against 3 or 4 of our picks for tonightI haven't been paying attention... do we have dueling CBB systems here or something?I have a really uneasy feeling I will be fading a lot of bmj's picks tonight :sad:
Only way it goes down from here is if someone gets Hurt.You guys think the SB total holds steady at 55 for the next week or so?We know it almost always gets bet up in the 24 hours before game time. But if we like the over, bet it now?FYI, the Giants played three games in domes or retractable roof stadiums this year. All three went over. Pats didn't play indoors.
Wrong team2u Ark-PB +5.5
2u Santa Clara -1
1u Ga Southern +9.5 1u The Citadel +9.5
1u Kansas -19
175-156 +1.75u
I do, what is your question?In England for work for a few weeks, going to the Queens Park Rangers-Chelsea game on Saturday. Can't wait to use a betting shop and not have to deal with online payouts for this. Anyone here follow the EPL? Need some help. Here's a link to William Hill's bet options, it's mindblowing.
My link
Did a little research on ESPN. Based on stats, looking at Heidar Helguson to score anytime @ 11/4. Thinking match result QPR @ 9/2 as a small swing for the fences at basically a parlay payout, and mid-to-large on over 2.5 goals at -105. Square play of Chelsea at the half/Chelsea to win at +135 seems like a nice hedge and QPR +1 goal @ +115. Possibly Ramires to score @ 11/4, but based on facts a number of guys who can score on Chelsea could make that a much longer shot that 11/4. Thoughts on those, and anything stick out at you as eas(ier) money?I do, what is your question?In England for work for a few weeks, going to the Queens Park Rangers-Chelsea game on Saturday. Can't wait to use a betting shop and not have to deal with online payouts for this. Anyone here follow the EPL? Need some help. Here's a link to William Hill's bet options, it's mindblowing.
My link
Frankie Lampard is out...so I like QPR and the under...QPR +1 is a good bet at + money imoDid a little research on ESPN. Based on stats, looking at Heidar Helguson to score anytime @ 11/4. Thinking match result QPR @ 9/2 as a small swing for the fences at basically a parlay payout, and mid-to-large on over 2.5 goals at -105. Square play of Chelsea at the half/Chelsea to win at +135 seems like a nice hedge and QPR +1 goal @ +115. Possibly Ramires to score @ 11/4, but based on facts a number of guys who can score on Chelsea could make that a much longer shot that 11/4. Thoughts on those, and anything stick out at you as eas(ier) money?I do, what is your question?In England for work for a few weeks, going to the Queens Park Rangers-Chelsea game on Saturday. Can't wait to use a betting shop and not have to deal with online payouts for this. Anyone here follow the EPL? Need some help. Here's a link to William Hill's bet options, it's mindblowing.
My link
Thanks man, will probably play those, appreciate the heads up.'derek245583 said:Frankie Lampard is out...so I like QPR and the under...QPR +1 is a good bet at + money imo'mquinnjr said:Did a little research on ESPN. Based on stats, looking at Heidar Helguson to score anytime @ 11/4. Thinking match result QPR @ 9/2 as a small swing for the fences at basically a parlay payout, and mid-to-large on over 2.5 goals at -105. Square play of Chelsea at the half/Chelsea to win at +135 seems like a nice hedge and QPR +1 goal @ +115. Possibly Ramires to score @ 11/4, but based on facts a number of guys who can score on Chelsea could make that a much longer shot that 11/4. Thoughts on those, and anything stick out at you as eas(ier) money?'derek245583 said:I do, what is your question?'mquinnjr said:In England for work for a few weeks, going to the Queens Park Rangers-Chelsea game on Saturday. Can't wait to use a betting shop and not have to deal with online payouts for this. Anyone here follow the EPL? Need some help. Here's a link to William Hill's bet options, it's mindblowing.
My link
I'll give it a look in a bit. We have one play we are reviewing now that interests us more then the rest and it is getting most of our attention right now. Not sure how good we like it yet, and I can't in good faith say it before we get our play in. As you saw with the Capitials play yesterday these prop lines/odds move fast so I can't tip my hand yet. It just wouldn't be fair to my partner in crime.Ref>what is your shot play for the Isles/Leafs tonight?This is a weird game because recent history between the teams says over, but they both are trending under as of late. I'm going over because I like the Leafs and the teams to break out some but I'm trying to see what your system has as a future indicator. Yesterday you pegged the Caps and that was great, but the game went over on some weird luck. The shots are a more controlled variable while where those shots end up, is not. Basically I think team shots are a good bet if the information available can provide details. However I think there will be overlap with the game total more than not especially if you are calling for both teams being under, or both being over. I think this passes the educated guess level and into handicapping foundation territory.
Where are these at?'The Ref said:If the rest of you are like me, you will end up with 40 units on the SUper bowl by kickoff.So far I got...Heads 2 unitsPats Toss 2 UnitsGiants Recevie 4 unitsGiants TT 2 UnitsPats TT 2 units
I have 28.5 for Isles and 29.5 for Toronto.The rest:Jets 28.5, Hurricanes 30, Blues 30.5, Red Wings 33, Jackets 29, Preds 29, Sharks 32.5, Oilers 26.5, Sens 27, Kings 32.5Ref>what is your shot play for the Isles/Leafs tonight?This is a weird game because recent history between the teams says over, but they both are trending under as of late. I'm going over because I like the Leafs and the teams to break out some but I'm trying to see what your system has as a future indicator. Yesterday you pegged the Caps and that was great, but the game went over on some weird luck. The shots are a more controlled variable while where those shots end up, is not. Basically I think team shots are a good bet if the information available can provide details. However I think there will be overlap with the game total more than not especially if you are calling for both teams being under, or both being over. I think this passes the educated guess level and into handicapping foundation territory.
That's top secret MP.Where are these at?'The Ref said:If the rest of you are like me, you will end up with 40 units on the SUper bowl by kickoff.So far I got...Heads 2 unitsPats Toss 2 UnitsGiants Recevie 4 unitsGiants TT 2 UnitsPats TT 2 units
Sweet. I think I'm gonna start tracking these things. I'm going to guess that 60 is a key number for combined shots, but that is a guess based on save percentage and the possibility of an empty net goal. If I can find a standard deviation based on 100 or so games, that would be a good start. I'm sure someone else has already tried this or even employs it, but I'm gonna see what I can find out. Thanks again.I have 28.5 for Isles and 29.5 for Toronto.The rest:Jets 28.5, Hurricanes 30, Blues 30.5, Red Wings 33, Jackets 29, Preds 29, Sharks 32.5, Oilers 26.5, Sens 27, Kings 32.5Ref>what is your shot play for the Isles/Leafs tonight?This is a weird game because recent history between the teams says over, but they both are trending under as of late. I'm going over because I like the Leafs and the teams to break out some but I'm trying to see what your system has as a future indicator. Yesterday you pegged the Caps and that was great, but the game went over on some weird luck. The shots are a more controlled variable while where those shots end up, is not. Basically I think team shots are a good bet if the information available can provide details. However I think there will be overlap with the game total more than not especially if you are calling for both teams being under, or both being over. I think this passes the educated guess level and into handicapping foundation territory.
STOP - you have probably already said too much!That's top secret MP.Where are these at?'The Ref said:If the rest of you are like me, you will end up with 40 units on the SUper bowl by kickoff.So far I got...Heads 2 unitsPats Toss 2 UnitsGiants Recevie 4 unitsGiants TT 2 UnitsPats TT 2 units
, damn thing has fallen to +3 -125 over the last several hours...Just grabbed 2 units on Giants ML +125Was worried it would go down before the end of the weekFrom a preliminary look at the match up stats, it appears to me that the Super Bowl line is off. Way off.At the very least, this ought to be a pick 'em, or the Giants giving points...I'd feel almost dirty getting +3.5 -120 right now, like I could have last night. Wish I could still get it, damn thing has fallen to +3 -125 over the last several hours...ML is still +125, though. Tasty. Big and tasty...
I was so pissed. A game THAT big!
These guys don't bet, btw, so they just don't understand.I grabbed Sixers -7 1st half for the hell of it. I can see them beating up on the Wizards tonight, hopefullyNeed a hockey play tonight.something...anything.NBA is fine too.Everytime I tail bmj's 2 uniters we lose, so I'm not going to mush ARK-PB
SportsbookWhere are these at?'The Ref said:If the rest of you are like me, you will end up with 40 units on the SUper bowl by kickoff.So far I got...Heads 2 unitsPats Toss 2 UnitsGiants Recevie 4 unitsGiants TT 2 UnitsPats TT 2 units
Pats -135 in places now. Was leaning towards going heavy on the hedge to favor the Pats, but with all the confidence on the Giants in here wondering if I should just let it be.See my last post. I think the Pats ML gets a little bit better maybe -145. This will settle on 3.ME too. I see Pats ML at -155 now. Not sure it would get better then that...?Very good day.Have a Giants SB future too +1800, need to hedge.
I have Giants 1U +2500Predators Moneyline. $1000 pays 3 bucks.Someone give me a winner tonight.The Egg McMuffin lock of the year please.
okIf you're wrong, I'm going to punch you right in the egg mcmuffinsPredators Moneyline. $1000 pays 3 bucks.Someone give me a winner tonight.The Egg McMuffin lock of the year please.

you mustn't have seen the lakers lose to the Pacers at home last nightThe Wizards are the worst team in professional sports.
Betting hoops is only for late night fun while drinking with randoms on the inter-web.And the Celtics have four guys on the court I've never heard of.![]()
If ORL -3.5 for the 1H loses, I'm done betting hoops forever.
Not anymore.Nobody playing in the game gives a s##t ... so why should I?Betting hoops is only for late night fun while drinking with randoms on the inter-web.And the Celtics have four guys on the court I've never heard of.![]()
If ORL -3.5 for the 1H loses, I'm done betting hoops forever.
My best buddy and I were talking about how bad the Pistons were, the worst team since we were kids and I said, "you should see the Wizards, they are worse." He said, "unpossible." But it is, it is possible.The Wizards are the worst team in professional sports.