What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (9 Viewers)

What are zitos odds for series MVP? Winning twice against verlander would get it done, and his odds are bound to be long.

 
'Abraham said:
What are zitos odds for series MVP? Winning twice against verlander would get it done, and his odds are bound to be long.
Click to expand...
i'm checking on realbettors, and he isn't listed as a possibility. so he is field +300. Shame, i would lay a little on zito at +1800 or something crazy
 
Couple of early plays for Thur/Sat

Clemson -12 1/2

Kansas St. -7 (2 units)

Washington St. +25

Auburn +15 1/2

Utah -1

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'modogg said:
'Abraham said:
What are zitos odds for series MVP? Winning twice against verlander would get it done, and his odds are bound to be long.
Click to expand...
i'm checking on realbettors, and he isn't listed as a possibility. so he is field +300. Shame, i would lay a little on zito at +1800 or something crazy
Click to expand...
SB's "field" is +800, and includes every pitcher except Verlander. Sanchez could win two games. Fister could win two games. Bumgarner could win two games. Vogelsong could win two games. Zito...well, Verlander could get hurt.1u!
 
I'm 6-0 on my last 3 games involving the Packers.

Sportsbook now doesn't list the Packers on the site.

Is it missing for everybody for some reason, or are they screwing with me?

 
'pricklypete said:
I'm 6-0 on my last 3 games involving the Packers.Sportsbook now doesn't list the Packers on the site.Is it missing for everybody for some reason, or are they screwing with me?
Click to expand...
Are you also respondsible for the the Jaguars not knowing who their starting QB will be for the game?It's either you crushing them $10 at a time or the QB thing
 
I have some +740 futures on the Giants and I bet some more on the Giants at +160 for the series. I think I'm also going to bet SF for game 1, just too much Verlander love in this line. I thought the betonline opener for G1 at -140 was right on and now it's moved to -165.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'lumpy19 said:
'TheWick said:
'pricklypete said:
I'm 6-0 on my last 3 games involving the Packers.Sportsbook now doesn't list the Packers on the site.Is it missing for everybody for some reason, or are they screwing with me?
Click to expand...
Are you also respondsible for the the Jaguars not knowing who their starting QB will be for the game?It's either you crushing them $10 at a time or the QB thing
Click to expand...
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Click to expand...
:lmao: Sorry, that's why I asked. I've read how Sportsbook would put limits on, omit things, etc. So I wanted to see if other Sportsbook users had this and they were doing something with my account specifically.
 
'John Bender said:
How much of a trap is Giants -1 @ Cowboys? I like to fade the public, but I can't get away from this thing.
Click to expand...
Here's how you solve that problembig bet on giants(treat it like the yankees series bets you love in the mlb playoffs)and then cowboys in your teasersgiants win by 3-7 :moneybag: :moneybag: :moneybag: :moneybag: :moneybag: :moneybag: :moneybag: :moneybag: :moneybag:
 
'pricklypete said:
'lumpy19 said:
'TheWick said:
'pricklypete said:
I'm 6-0 on my last 3 games involving the Packers.Sportsbook now doesn't list the Packers on the site.Is it missing for everybody for some reason, or are they screwing with me?
Click to expand...
Are you also respondsible for the the Jaguars not knowing who their starting QB will be for the game?It's either you crushing them $10 at a time or the QB thing
Click to expand...
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Click to expand...
:lmao: Sorry, that's why I asked. I've read how Sportsbook would put limits on, omit things, etc. So I wanted to see if other Sportsbook users had this and they were doing something with my account specifically.
Click to expand...
I just couldn't pass it up man, sorry...I don't know if there is a difference between Gabbert and Henne...but they think there is.
 
'TheWick said:
'pricklypete said:
'lumpy19 said:
'TheWick said:
'pricklypete said:
I'm 6-0 on my last 3 games involving the Packers.Sportsbook now doesn't list the Packers on the site.Is it missing for everybody for some reason, or are they screwing with me?
Click to expand...
Are you also respondsible for the the Jaguars not knowing who their starting QB will be for the game?It's either you crushing them $10 at a time or the QB thing
Click to expand...
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Click to expand...
:lmao: Sorry, that's why I asked. I've read how Sportsbook would put limits on, omit things, etc. So I wanted to see if other Sportsbook users had this and they were doing something with my account specifically.
Click to expand...
I just couldn't pass it up man, sorry...I don't know if there is a difference between Gabbert and Henne...but they think there is.
Click to expand...
No need. Gave me something to laugh about this morning.
 
'lumpy19 said:
I have some +740 futures on the Giants and I bet some more on the Giants at +160 for the series. I think I'm also going to bet SF for game 1, just too much Verlander love in this line. I thought the betonline opener for G1 at -140 was right on and now it's moved to -165.
Click to expand...
Not sure if you are betting against Verlander anyway. Tigers have struggled against LHP all year and the game could be a 1-1 quagmire with Verlander leaving after 8 and the bullpen melting down. I have SF and Detroit WS futures, so I win regardless. If I bet against my team I'd add some to the Giants +160 for the series.

 
'Doctor Detroit said:
'lumpy19 said:
I have some +740 futures on the Giants and I bet some more on the Giants at +160 for the series. I think I'm also going to bet SF for game 1, just too much Verlander love in this line. I thought the betonline opener for G1 at -140 was right on and now it's moved to -165.
Click to expand...
Not sure if you are betting against Verlander anyway. Tigers have struggled against LHP all year and the game could be a 1-1 quagmire with Verlander leaving after 8 and the bullpen melting down. I have SF and Detroit WS futures, so I win regardless. If I bet against my team I'd add some to the Giants +160 for the series.
Click to expand...
Yeah I don't like being this invested but I played SF G1 at +157
 
'John Bender said:
How much of a trap is Giants -1 @ Cowboys? I like to fade the public, but I can't get away from this thing.
Click to expand...
I don't believe in trap games, but ATL +1(+110) @ PHI certainly looks odd. ATL undefeated and coming off a bye week, PHI on a 2 game losing streak(including a home loss to DET) and have lost 3 of their last 4. The only thing preventing me from putting way too much $ on ATL is the inevitable proclamation by lhucks that this is a "lock" before kickoff.Am I missing something obvious in this matchup?
 
'BoltBacker said:
'John Bender said:
How much of a trap is Giants -1 @ Cowboys? I like to fade the public, but I can't get away from this thing.
Click to expand...
I don't believe in trap games, but ATL +1(+110) @ PHI certainly looks odd. ATL undefeated and coming off a bye week, PHI on a 2 game losing streak(including a home loss to DET) and have lost 3 of their last 4. The only thing preventing me from putting way too much $ on ATL is the inevitable proclamation by lhucks that this is a "lock" before kickoff.Am I missing something obvious in this matchup?
Click to expand...
I'm on philly, I'd look harder at what ATL has actually done this year, their wins aren't all that impressive. They're quite lucky to be 6-0
 
'TheWick said:
'pricklypete said:
I'm 6-0 on my last 3 games involving the Packers.Sportsbook now doesn't list the Packers on the site.Is it missing for everybody for some reason, or are they screwing with me?
Click to expand...
Are you also respondsible for the the Jaguars not knowing who their starting QB will be for the game?It's either you crushing them $10 at a time or the QB thing
Click to expand...
awesome
 
'lumpy19 said:
'BoltBacker said:
'John Bender said:
How much of a trap is Giants -1 @ Cowboys? I like to fade the public, but I can't get away from this thing.
Click to expand...
I don't believe in trap games, but ATL +1(+110) @ PHI certainly looks odd. ATL undefeated and coming off a bye week, PHI on a 2 game losing streak(including a home loss to DET) and have lost 3 of their last 4. The only thing preventing me from putting way too much $ on ATL is the inevitable proclamation by lhucks that this is a "lock" before kickoff.Am I missing something obvious in this matchup?
Click to expand...
I'm on philly, I'd look harder at what ATL has actually done this year, their wins aren't all that impressive. They're quite lucky to be 6-0
Click to expand...
Also on Philly.Philly is also coming off a bye, so wouldn't that be a wash in your analysis, Bolt?Hard game to bet on, Philly can beat them. If they keep fumbling the ball, they can't. It's going to be an unpredictable game but I wouldn't go throwing the mortgage down on either side.
 
'John Bender said:
Philly is also coming off a bye, so wouldn't that be a wash in your analysis, Bolt?
Click to expand...
Ah, I had missed that. Good point. Lumpy also makes a solid point with regard to the number of quality wins by each team. Even the ATL win in WAS was with RGIII on the bench at the end of the game.Maybe not the slam dunk I had thought. Thanks for the input from both of you.
 
'BoltBacker said:
'John Bender said:
Philly is also coming off a bye, so wouldn't that be a wash in your analysis, Bolt?
Click to expand...
Ah, I had missed that. Good point. Lumpy also makes a solid point with regard to the number of quality wins by each team. Even the ATL win in WAS was with RGIII on the bench at the end of the game.Maybe not the slam dunk I had thought. Thanks for the input from both of you.
Click to expand...
You got it. I don't hate the ATL bet. Just trying to talk you down off making it a huge play. I could see reasoning for either side and it really all depends on whether or not A. Vick gets destroyed again and B. Andy Reid decides to run the ball more than 10 times.
 
'John Bender said:
'BoltBacker said:
'John Bender said:
Philly is also coming off a bye, so wouldn't that be a wash in your analysis, Bolt?
Click to expand...
Ah, I had missed that. Good point. Lumpy also makes a solid point with regard to the number of quality wins by each team. Even the ATL win in WAS was with RGIII on the bench at the end of the game.Maybe not the slam dunk I had thought. Thanks for the input from both of you.
Click to expand...
You got it. I don't hate the ATL bet. Just trying to talk you down off making it a huge play. I could see reasoning for either side and it really all depends on whether or not A. Vick gets destroyed again and B. Andy Reid decides to run the ball more than 10 times.
Click to expand...
Also remember that the Eagles are 13-0 coming off a bye week under Andy Reid.
 
Regarding the World Series, I heard on the radio today that the last 3 times one team swept their LCS and the other team's series went 7, the team that went 7 went on to win the World Series. Dunno if that means anything, but there it is.

 
'commisholio said:
Regarding the World Series, I heard on the radio today that the last 3 times one team swept their LCS and the other team's series went 7, the team that went 7 went on to win the World Series. Dunno if that means anything, but there it is.
Click to expand...
Yep, one of those years was 2006 when Detroit swept Oakland and St. Louis beat NY Mets in 7 games. Verlander had nine days rest and lost game 1 7-2 after giving up 6 ERs. Fast forward six years and Detroit swept the Yankees and SF beat St. Louis in 7 games. Verlander will be pitching on seven days rest.:DOCTORDETROITMELTDOWN: emoticon
 
'lumpy19 said:
I have some +740 futures on the Giants and I bet some more on the Giants at +160 for the series. I think I'm also going to bet SF for game 1, just too much Verlander love in this line. I thought the betonline opener for G1 at -140 was right on and now it's moved to -165.
Click to expand...
I'm in the same boat as you, but I have multiple units on them winning the WS. Sometimes it pays to be a donkey homer. I'm trying to figure out if I should hedge with some Detroit WS win bets :yucky: . -175 (last I checked) is a steep price and I don't think they are that much better than SF especially if Bumgarner has fixed some flaws in his pitching motion.Everyone loves Verlander, but he isn't the same pitcher on the road as home (3.57 ERA vs. 1.65 ERA) and he hasn't pitched a meaningful game in a week. I also like the value in betting SF to win tonight.
 
'tjnc09 said:
'commisholio said:
Regarding the World Series, I heard on the radio today that the last 3 times one team swept their LCS and the other team's series went 7, the team that went 7 went on to win the World Series. Dunno if that means anything, but there it is.
Click to expand...
Yep, one of those years was 2006 when Detroit swept Oakland and St. Louis beat NY Mets in 7 games. Verlander had nine days rest and lost game 1 7-2 after giving up 6 ERs. Fast forward six years and Detroit swept the Yankees and SF beat St. Louis in 7 games. Verlander will be pitching on seven days rest.:DOCTORDETROITMELTDOWN: emoticon
Click to expand...
Six days rest and Verlander was a rookie in 2006, not the best pitcher in baseball as he is in 2012. He's also not facing American League hitting in this series and is in a park that is even more pitcher-friendly than Comerica.
 
Oregon hosts Colorado (that comes from USC last week) this week. 1 million LHUCKS units when on Oregon 1st half spread when it is posted.

 
'tjnc09 said:
Oregon hosts Colorado (that comes from USC last week) this week. 1 million LHUCKS units when on Oregon 1st half spread when it is posted.
Click to expand...
I think i have a couple of longshot parlays with the buffs and 45.5. Hopefully they continue with what they've been doing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'tjnc09 said:
Oregon hosts Colorado (that comes from USC last week) this week. 1 million LHUCKS units when on Oregon 1st half spread when it is posted.
Click to expand...
I think the whole world is onto the ducks first half domination. It wouldn't suprise me if the 1h line is greater then the game line.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ministry of Pain
Texas floods
2
Replies
59
Views
3K
fatness
fatness
scorchy
Any banking guys that can offer solutions to a vexing issue?
Replies
31
Views
555
Mrs. Rannous
Mrs. Rannous
Skipdog77
Walking Style, what say you?
Replies
31
Views
291
FarFromHome
FarFromHome

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)
Back
Top