What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (9 Viewers)

Adding Stanford -.5 1st quarter and over 13.5. Stanford 1st half -2.5. I think they want to send Harbaugh off victorious, for all his efforts and contributions to the program.

 
Statistically speaking, Andrew Luck plays up to the level of his competition - over the course of the Season, the better (statistical) Pass Defense he played against, the better he performed. Va Tech has a better than average pass defense, but Luck's propensity to raise his level of play relative to this, combined with the return of Stanford's best WR Chris Owusu, who will have a positive impact on both the passing offense and special teams, should give Stanford the edge...Va Tech is pretty much an adopted 'home team' for my area of the country, and I know a good bit about 'Beamer Ball' (Va Tech's special teams prowess), but as good as Va Tech is on Teams, Stanford is even better, and adding Owusu back into that mix gives The Cardinal an edge over Va Tech's biggest strength. Lots of folks out there lasting impression of Stanford is a defensive collapse vs Washington State late in the Season, but they played that game without S Delano Howell, who's a standout ballhawking playmaker...Stanford at full strength can probably beat anyone outside of Oregon, Auburn and TCU...Va Tech is an outstanding Team, just not 'as' outstanding as Stanford. The Cardinal can probably cover a TD spread, so getting them at less is fortunate.

Stanford -2.5, buying to be safe...

Good Luck, fellas!

 
Could someone talk me out of New Orleans -10.5 over Seattle?I haven't made a bet all year, but I think the Saints will crush the Seahawks.
I was hoping someone could talk me out of betting Seattle +10.5, maybe we should call each otherGetting 10.5 points at home in the playoffs :confused: NO up by 17 and seattle scores a meaningless TD with less than a minute to play.
I'll probably be on some piece of Seattle +11. I'm surprised that number is on the other side of 10. Hassleback will prob start. He had some success earlier this year against the Saints but the Saints def has been better of late.
 
here goes:VT +175VT +4 evenvt +3 -110 1hUn 60 -105Stan un 31.5 +105VT 1q +.5 -120Un 1q 13.5 +125Luck un 35.5 rush yds -120
+4 even from SIA?I really miss that book. Pulling out of there during the Neteller collapse, only to have monies stuck in Neteller for months, was one of the stupider (in hindsight) outcomes.
 
Pinny holding the best line on Stanford (-3.5 +102). I think I know what the correct side is....
How can you be so sure of this anymore? They don't take US bettors and haven't in some time so they are much less likely to try to shade their holds to meet public perceptions when they exist. At least that's how I would think about that.
 
Pinny holding the best line on Stanford (-3.5 +102). I think I know what the correct side is....
How can you be so sure of this anymore? They don't take US bettors and haven't in some time so they are much less likely to try to shade their holds to meet public perceptions when they exist. At least that's how I would think about that.
Well, the 2nd best line for Stanford was at 5dimes. And the third was the greek. I didn't check cris, but I'm sure they held a good Stanford line as well. As for Pinny, I know of more message board guys who have figured out a way to get an acct there after all of these years (not sure how they do). And the line moved just before gametime at those books from 4 to 3.5. Not a big move but still with more people on Stanford the line moved the other way. I know I'm not telling you things you don't already know so please don't take it as an insult.
 
Not sure I'll bet much for the 2h. I feel dirty for cashing VT 1h tickets but I'll take it.

I did bet first score td -200. This was -300 pregame, why the huge change?

 
If anybody is degenerate enough (LOL) and has ESPN3, Fresno is -5.5 to Nevada and will be on at 11 eastern. I took Fresno based solely on the fact that I know Nevada is brutal.

 
Does this look strange to anyone??

Result: Wager Won Marist 67

LoyolaMaryland 83 01/03/11(19:00 ET)

LoyolaMaryland -13 Pennsylvania 62

Kentucky 86 01/03/11(19:05 ET)

Pennsylvania +24

Result: No Action Pennsylvania 62

Kentucky 86 01/03/11(19:05 ET)

Pennsylvania +24

 
You'll like these two. Bet un 14.5 4q+105 and ov 14.5 +115. Or so I thought. The under bet didn't have the hook. Of course it hits 14.

Then, this one isn't bad. My one book offers under 56.5 -115 on longest td of the 2h. Of course that's the game number but they always offer it on the half. It's offered on many of the primetime games.

 
Pinny holding the best line on Stanford (-3.5 +102). I think I know what the correct side is....
How can you be so sure of this anymore? They don't take US bettors and haven't in some time so they are much less likely to try to shade their holds to meet public perceptions when they exist. At least that's how I would think about that.
They still have the sharpest line. The serious bettors found ways to get around the US ban and are still playing at Pinnacle. I tried weaseling back in there to no avail. I haven't given up yet, I have a solution but only because I live 5 min from the Canadian border. When I get more desperate I'll make it happen.Either way, MP is placing his bets right before game time he really has no other option than VT +4.I got my stanford -2.5 when the lines released :goodposting:
 
Pinny holding the best line on Stanford (-3.5 +102). I think I know what the correct side is....
How can you be so sure of this anymore? They don't take US bettors and haven't in some time so they are much less likely to try to shade their holds to meet public perceptions when they exist. At least that's how I would think about that.
Well, the 2nd best line for Stanford was at 5dimes. And the third was the greek. I didn't check cris, but I'm sure they held a good Stanford line as well. As for Pinny, I know of more message board guys who have figured out a way to get an acct there after all of these years (not sure how they do). And the line moved just before gametime at those books from 4 to 3.5. Not a big move but still with more people on Stanford the line moved the other way. I know I'm not telling you things you don't already know so please don't take it as an insult.
Well, I honestly have no idea who has access to there from the US, or what their market is like now. If they are getting all layoffs then I can buy their lines are probably sharp. Is that what is happening? Either way RIP
 
Pinny holding the best line on Stanford (-3.5 +102). I think I know what the correct side is....
How can you be so sure of this anymore? They don't take US bettors and haven't in some time so they are much less likely to try to shade their holds to meet public perceptions when they exist. At least that's how I would think about that.
Well, the 2nd best line for Stanford was at 5dimes. And the third was the greek. I didn't check cris, but I'm sure they held a good Stanford line as well. As for Pinny, I know of more message board guys who have figured out a way to get an acct there after all of these years (not sure how they do).

And the line moved just before gametime at those books from 4 to 3.5. Not a big move but still with more people on Stanford the line moved the other way. I know I'm not telling you things you don't already know so please don't take it as an insult.
5dimes is a pinny clone, if you watch the screen when pinny moves they move.
 
Total Rushing Yards – Knile Davis (Arkansas)

Player must play in game for wagers to have action

Over 84½ (-130)

My only play of the day but pretty large.

 
I almost always play right before the game. Good and bad with it, but I feel as though I have all of the information the game has to offer and the correct side of the game is very easy to see. Lumpy would be correct, VT was really the only side for me.

Stanford -2.5 - good bet

Stanford -3 - above average bet

Stanford -3.5 or -4 - idiot bet

VT +4 ev - good bet

 
I almost always play right before the game. Good and bad with it, but I feel as though I have all of the information the game has to offer and the correct side of the game is very easy to see. Lumpy would be correct, VT was really the only side for me. Stanford -2.5 - good betStanford -3 - above average betStanford -3.5 or -4 - idiot betVT +4 ev - good bet
You're really forcing yourself to bet against the line move every time, especially on these bowl games when the lines are out for a month. tough way to win betting sides and totals, you're going against the smart money every time. MAYBE in these big bowl games the public moves a line but for the most part syndicates and smart money is controlling the lines.
 
1u Ark +3 -1101u Ark +3.5 -1101u Ark +145Go razorbacks!!
:bye: PIG SSSOOOOOEEEEEYYY!!!Possible Hogs two-fer working with Hoops: Arkansas +10 @ #12 Texas...I follow Hogs Hoops diligently, and theyr are gelling into a helluva squad down in Fayetteville this Season - they have a legitimate chance to cover that spread, and possibly upset the Longhorns tonight.
 
1u Ark +3 -1101u Ark +3.5 -1101u Ark +145Go razorbacks!!
I locked this is in weeks ago when the rumor came out that Ohio State was going to have some players susupended for the game, including Pryor. I have thought about laying off my Ark +3 bet but seeing how badly the Big Ten fared on 1/1, I think I just have to let my Ark +3 ride. Glad to see you are doing the same.LET'S DO THIS!
 
I almost always play right before the game. Good and bad with it, but I feel as though I have all of the information the game has to offer and the correct side of the game is very easy to see. Lumpy would be correct, VT was really the only side for me. Stanford -2.5 - good betStanford -3 - above average betStanford -3.5 or -4 - idiot betVT +4 ev - good bet
You're really forcing yourself to bet against the line move every time, especially on these bowl games when the lines are out for a month. tough way to win betting sides and totals, you're going against the smart money every time. MAYBE in these big bowl games the public moves a line but for the most part syndicates and smart money is controlling the lines.
I understand that. I got off to a slow start with the bowls (dogs did), but dogs and unders have been running very well lately. It's the way that works for me.
 
If I have a college football team it's Ohio State. Love coach Tressel even though he's a bit more conservative then he should be at times. Anyway, this team is tired of hearing how much the big 10 sucks, did poorly etc.

Big 10 goes as follows:

Oh St

Wisky

Iowa/Mich St/Illinois/Penn St

Everyone else

Wisconsin played average and really should have beaten TCU in a good game. The other teams simply aren't very good. I bet Bama, Florida (lucky cover), Miss St, and bet Iowa (covered). I passed the Illinois and NW games.

Big 10 is 2-5 in their bowl games but 3-3-1 ats. And probably 4-3 if you took the hook with Northwestern. That really isn't that bad.

Yes, Michigan got embarrassed but I'm not shocked their defense is terrible. Mich St getting the doors blown off was kind of a shocker but playing Bama when they are on is as scary as it gets.

I will fade the line move and take the class of the Big 10 against an above-average Arkansas team.

 
I think all the distractions and turmoil are going to hurt ohio st. I really think this game should be a pick'em.

1u Arkansas +3

Also made a small play on the megamillions

 
CBB:

1u: Providence +5.5

1u: Iowa +12.5

NBA:

1u: Bucks +10

1u: Raptors +9

1u: Kings +5

YTD: 57-37 60.4% +22.65u (We'll count UPenn as a 2u loss yesterday since I did post it at +23.5)

 
CBB:1u: Providence +5.51u: Iowa +12.5NBA:1u: Bucks +101u: Raptors +91u: Kings +5YTD: 57-37 60.4% +22.65u (We'll count UPenn as a 2u loss yesterday since I did post it at +23.5)
So are you using a system of numbers/math with your picks or just what your thoughts are based on being a watcher of the sport?I only ask because I don't miss much Big East hoops and I think Prov gets shellacked tonight. Not sure what you've seen in them to take the Friars. Just a question, nice work so far in here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CBB:1u: Providence +5.51u: Iowa +12.5NBA:1u: Bucks +101u: Raptors +91u: Kings +5YTD: 57-37 60.4% +22.65u (We'll count UPenn as a 2u loss yesterday since I did post it at +23.5)
So are you using a system of numbers/math with your picks or just what your thoughts are based on being a watched for the sport?I only ask because I don't miss much Big East hoops and I think Prov gets shellacked tonight. Not sure what you've seen in them to take the Friars. Just a question, nice work so far in here.
It's mostly numbers/math. I do watch a lot of games just because I love basketball, but unfortunately (fortunately?) I haven't seen much of Providence.
 
Angry Beavers said:
lumpy19 said:
1u Ark +3 -1101u Ark +3.5 -1101u Ark +145Go razorbacks!!
I locked this is in weeks ago when the rumor came out that Ohio State was going to have some players susupended for the game, including Pryor. I have thought about laying off my Ark +3 bet but seeing how badly the Big Ten fared on 1/1, I think I just have to let my Ark +3 ride. Glad to see you are doing the same.LET'S DO THIS!
They weren't suspended for this game. I still love Arkansas tonight, dead fish and birds be damned.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top