What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (7 Viewers)

I am going with Man City/Liverpool O3 -130 today. In their 8 home matches this season Man City has scored 35 and given up 5 for an avg scored of 5 per. In Liverpool's 8 away matches they have scored 17 and given up 13 for a avg scored of 3.75 per. Plus it adds some extra rooting interest for those that bet the Luis Suarez Top Goal Scorer future.

ETA a Prop of 7 or more goals +1200 $5/$60

 
Last edited by a moderator:
swirvenirvin said:
Heres what I have so far

Boise St +3 (even) Loss

S. Diego St -1 Win

E. Carolina -13.5Win

Wisky (E) -115

Va Tech +7.5

Oklahoma +16

Ga Tech +3.5 -115

Duke +13

Cuse +5

Michigan +4

Texas +14

Texas Tech +14.5

Nebraska +9

Iowa +8

Clemson +3 -115
Bowling Green -4.5 tomorrow for big
Before the lines were released I had Bowling Green as a strong play at -6 or better, so I'm tempted by that line also. I played the under because I don't see Pitt being able to handle that great Falcon front seven. Pitt's D is pretty decent as well, but I'm not all that sure about Bowling Greens offense vs a team with better athletes. They scored 20 on Miss State and 10 on Indiana, I think Pittsburgh is somewhere in-between those two teams but probably closer to Indiana.

I'm surprised the Michigan line hasn't moved much with news that Devin Gardner is somewhere between questionable and doubtful. I don't see them staying in that game if Gardner doesn't play.

I am also tempted to take OU. I had that line at 10.5 and it's 15 so that falls into autoplay territory as far as my system goes. Problem is as a homer, it's hard to push that button because then I lose in more ways than one. Public has 80% on Bama and on paper Bama is not two TDs better than OU. I just worry about Bama getting a two touchdown lead then running down hill the rest of the game. OU's front seven is young and iffy vs the run.
Let's hit it tomorrow. Before family and kids we would go to motor city/little ceaser's bowl every year. Except we called it the black out bowl, and would just drink all day stay for about the first half and end up on at some "club" on 8 mile. Remember seeing Eminem's wife there once

also yes worried about Umich line now. Morris was supposed to be a stud. Kid went to my high school :hifive:
Benders of Boys, Molders of men

 
swirvenirvin said:
Heres what I have so far

Boise St +3 (even) Loss

S. Diego St -1 Win

E. Carolina -13.5Win

Wisky (E) -115

Va Tech +7.5

Oklahoma +16

Ga Tech +3.5 -115

Duke +13

Cuse +5

Michigan +4

Texas +14

Texas Tech +14.5

Nebraska +9

Iowa +8

Clemson +3 -115
Bowling Green -4.5 tomorrow for big
Before the lines were released I had Bowling Green as a strong play at -6 or better, so I'm tempted by that line also. I played the under because I don't see Pitt being able to handle that great Falcon front seven. Pitt's D is pretty decent as well, but I'm not all that sure about Bowling Greens offense vs a team with better athletes. They scored 20 on Miss State and 10 on Indiana, I think Pittsburgh is somewhere in-between those two teams but probably closer to Indiana.

I'm surprised the Michigan line hasn't moved much with news that Devin Gardner is somewhere between questionable and doubtful. I don't see them staying in that game if Gardner doesn't play.

I am also tempted to take OU. I had that line at 10.5 and it's 15 so that falls into autoplay territory as far as my system goes. Problem is as a homer, it's hard to push that button because then I lose in more ways than one. Public has 80% on Bama and on paper Bama is not two TDs better than OU. I just worry about Bama getting a two touchdown lead then running down hill the rest of the game. OU's front seven is young and iffy vs the run.
Let's hit it tomorrow. Before family and kids we would go to motor city/little ceaser's bowl every year. Except we called it the black out bowl, and would just drink all day stay for about the first half and end up on at some "club" on 8 mile. Remember seeing Eminem's wife there once

also yes worried about Umich line now. Morris was supposed to be a stud. Kid went to my high school :hifive:
Benders of Boys, Molders of men
no no its builders of boys makers of men!

 
swirvenirvin said:
Heres what I have so far

Boise St +3 (even) Loss

S. Diego St -1 Win

E. Carolina -13.5Win

Wisky (E) -115

Va Tech +7.5

Oklahoma +16

Ga Tech +3.5 -115

Duke +13

Cuse +5

Michigan +4

Texas +14

Texas Tech +14.5

Nebraska +9

Iowa +8

Clemson +3 -115
Bowling Green -4.5 tomorrow for big
Before the lines were released I had Bowling Green as a strong play at -6 or better, so I'm tempted by that line also. I played the under because I don't see Pitt being able to handle that great Falcon front seven. Pitt's D is pretty decent as well, but I'm not all that sure about Bowling Greens offense vs a team with better athletes. They scored 20 on Miss State and 10 on Indiana, I think Pittsburgh is somewhere in-between those two teams but probably closer to Indiana.

I'm surprised the Michigan line hasn't moved much with news that Devin Gardner is somewhere between questionable and doubtful. I don't see them staying in that game if Gardner doesn't play.

I am also tempted to take OU. I had that line at 10.5 and it's 15 so that falls into autoplay territory as far as my system goes. Problem is as a homer, it's hard to push that button because then I lose in more ways than one. Public has 80% on Bama and on paper Bama is not two TDs better than OU. I just worry about Bama getting a two touchdown lead then running down hill the rest of the game. OU's front seven is young and iffy vs the run.
Let's hit it tomorrow. Before family and kids we would go to motor city/little ceaser's bowl every year. Except we called it the black out bowl, and would just drink all day stay for about the first half and end up on at some "club" on 8 mile. Remember seeing Eminem's wife there once

also yes worried about Umich line now. Morris was supposed to be a stud. Kid went to my high school :hifive:
Benders of Boys, Molders of men
no no its builders of boys makers of men!
As long as you didnt go the the university of michigan of the Catholic League (cc), we are ok Swirve..... :hifive:

 
swirvenirvin said:
Heres what I have so far

Boise St +3 (even) Loss

S. Diego St -1 Win

E. Carolina -13.5Win

Wisky (E) -115

Va Tech +7.5

Oklahoma +16

Ga Tech +3.5 -115

Duke +13

Cuse +5

Michigan +4

Texas +14

Texas Tech +14.5

Nebraska +9

Iowa +8

Clemson +3 -115
Bowling Green -4.5 tomorrow for big
Before the lines were released I had Bowling Green as a strong play at -6 or better, so I'm tempted by that line also. I played the under because I don't see Pitt being able to handle that great Falcon front seven. Pitt's D is pretty decent as well, but I'm not all that sure about Bowling Greens offense vs a team with better athletes. They scored 20 on Miss State and 10 on Indiana, I think Pittsburgh is somewhere in-between those two teams but probably closer to Indiana.

I'm surprised the Michigan line hasn't moved much with news that Devin Gardner is somewhere between questionable and doubtful. I don't see them staying in that game if Gardner doesn't play.

I am also tempted to take OU. I had that line at 10.5 and it's 15 so that falls into autoplay territory as far as my system goes. Problem is as a homer, it's hard to push that button because then I lose in more ways than one. Public has 80% on Bama and on paper Bama is not two TDs better than OU. I just worry about Bama getting a two touchdown lead then running down hill the rest of the game. OU's front seven is young and iffy vs the run.
Let's hit it tomorrow. Before family and kids we would go to motor city/little ceaser's bowl every year. Except we called it the black out bowl, and would just drink all day stay for about the first half and end up on at some "club" on 8 mile. Remember seeing Eminem's wife there once

also yes worried about Umich line now. Morris was supposed to be a stud. Kid went to my high school :hifive:
Benders of Boys, Molders of men
no no its builders of boys makers of men!
As long as you didnt go the the university of michigan of the Catholic League (cc), we are ok Swirve..... :hifive:
de la salle and michigan st. Growing up in Detroit, public school would have been Finney or Denby. I think I would be a different man today if I went to either of those

 
swirvenirvin said:
Heres what I have so far

Boise St +3 (even) Loss

S. Diego St -1 Win

E. Carolina -13.5Win

Wisky (E) -115

Va Tech +7.5

Oklahoma +16

Ga Tech +3.5 -115

Duke +13

Cuse +5

Michigan +4

Texas +14

Texas Tech +14.5

Nebraska +9

Iowa +8

Clemson +3 -115
Bowling Green -4.5 tomorrow for big
Before the lines were released I had Bowling Green as a strong play at -6 or better, so I'm tempted by that line also. I played the under because I don't see Pitt being able to handle that great Falcon front seven. Pitt's D is pretty decent as well, but I'm not all that sure about Bowling Greens offense vs a team with better athletes. They scored 20 on Miss State and 10 on Indiana, I think Pittsburgh is somewhere in-between those two teams but probably closer to Indiana.

I'm surprised the Michigan line hasn't moved much with news that Devin Gardner is somewhere between questionable and doubtful. I don't see them staying in that game if Gardner doesn't play.

I am also tempted to take OU. I had that line at 10.5 and it's 15 so that falls into autoplay territory as far as my system goes. Problem is as a homer, it's hard to push that button because then I lose in more ways than one. Public has 80% on Bama and on paper Bama is not two TDs better than OU. I just worry about Bama getting a two touchdown lead then running down hill the rest of the game. OU's front seven is young and iffy vs the run.
Let's hit it tomorrow. Before family and kids we would go to motor city/little ceaser's bowl every year. Except we called it the black out bowl, and would just drink all day stay for about the first half and end up on at some "club" on 8 mile. Remember seeing Eminem's wife there once

also yes worried about Umich line now. Morris was supposed to be a stud. Kid went to my high school :hifive:
Benders of Boys, Molders of men
no no its builders of boys makers of men!
As long as you didnt go the the university of michigan of the Catholic League (cc), we are ok Swirve..... :hifive:
de la salle and michigan st. Growing up in Detroit, public school would have been Finney or Denby. I think I would be a different man today if I went to either of those
You were almost a Tar? I was two months away from being a Comet, then my parents decided they didn't want me to go to prison.

 
I took BG earlier this week in the pool and I think I regret it. Pitts played some good teams really well and catching 6-6.5 points just feels like a good spot all of a sudden. Pitt beat Duke, ND, and Virginia. BG kept it close vs Miss St and beat NIU and Buff. I think I like Pitts body of work much better.

Pitt +7 -120 seems like the right play here.

EDIT: Maybe not... this thing has steamed up from 4.5 fairly steadily.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like both MAC teams to win today. Liked BGSU -4 but waited too long (5.5 at RB last I looked) and not as enticing to me now. Will probably lay off since I already have some -4 in parlays (also have NIU -1.5 in them :kicksrock: )

 
Seems like some pitt money is starting to roll in. I just punched Pitt +7 -130 for 1.5 Units and I'll probably lay off on some BG closer to game time. Seems to me the sentiment is on Pitt and everyone was just waiting to get to 7 at -110 and that is' probably not going to happen. I'm betting we will see BG closer to 5 by kickoff.

EDIT: I got head faked. 30 min later it's back to 6.5 :sadbanana:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Starting at 6pm tonight, we have bowl games every day there isn't the NFL until January 7th when it's all over. Day games tomorrow, Saturday, Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.

I need to buy more alcohol and Fritos.

 
Pitt versus the MAC (since 1980, entire database):
SU: 22-3-0 (20.68, 88.0%) ATS: 13-11-0 (1.23, 54.2%) avg line: -19.4

This will be the first time they have been lined as the dog versus a MAC team according to the db, and they are 26-3 SU all-time versus the MAC, so I am pretty sure this will be the first thime they have ever been lined as a dog against them.

 
MAC conference teams' Bowl Games last 5 years:

SU: 9-19-0 (-5.82, 32.1%) ATS: 7-20-1 (-3.11, 25.9%) avg line: 2.7 O/U: 12-16-0 (-2.71, 42.9%) avg total: 58.1 link

 
Michigan announced today that Devin Gardner won't start but didn't rule him out completely. I don't think he plays at all. I won't fade my guys but I am hitting the under 55.5 now because I can't see Michigan getting more than 17.

Lamb>thoughts?

 
Seems like some pitt money is starting to roll in. I just punched Pitt +7 -130 for 1.5 Units and I'll probably lay off on some BG closer to game time. Seems to me the sentiment is on Pitt and everyone was just waiting to get to 7 at -110 and that is' probably not going to happen. I'm betting we will see BG closer to 5 by kickoff.

EDIT: I got head faked. 30 min later it's back to 6.5 :sadbanana:
Well this blew up on me......

I bought out of it. I'm basically guaranteed a $30 loss unless by some miracle BG wins by exactly 7.

 
swirvenirvin said:
Heres what I have so far

Boise St +3 (even) Loss

S. Diego St -1 Win

E. Carolina -13.5Win

Wisky (E) -115

Va Tech +7.5

Oklahoma +16

Ga Tech +3.5 -115

Duke +13

Cuse +5

Michigan +4

Texas +14

Texas Tech +14.5

Nebraska +9

Iowa +8

Clemson +3 -115
Bowling Green -4.5 tomorrow for big
Before the lines were released I had Bowling Green as a strong play at -6 or better, so I'm tempted by that line also. I played the under because I don't see Pitt being able to handle that great Falcon front seven. Pitt's D is pretty decent as well, but I'm not all that sure about Bowling Greens offense vs a team with better athletes. They scored 20 on Miss State and 10 on Indiana, I think Pittsburgh is somewhere in-between those two teams but probably closer to Indiana.

I'm surprised the Michigan line hasn't moved much with news that Devin Gardner is somewhere between questionable and doubtful. I don't see them staying in that game if Gardner doesn't play.

I am also tempted to take OU. I had that line at 10.5 and it's 15 so that falls into autoplay territory as far as my system goes. Problem is as a homer, it's hard to push that button because then I lose in more ways than one. Public has 80% on Bama and on paper Bama is not two TDs better than OU. I just worry about Bama getting a two touchdown lead then running down hill the rest of the game. OU's front seven is young and iffy vs the run.
Let's hit it tomorrow. Before family and kids we would go to motor city/little ceaser's bowl every year. Except we called it the black out bowl, and would just drink all day stay for about the first half and end up on at some "club" on 8 mile. Remember seeing Eminem's wife there once

also yes worried about Umich line now. Morris was supposed to be a stud. Kid went to my high school :hifive:
Benders of Boys, Molders of men
no no its builders of boys makers of men!
As long as you didnt go the the university of michigan of the Catholic League (cc), we are ok Swirve..... :hifive:
de la salle and michigan st. Growing up in Detroit, public school would have been Finney or Denby. I think I would be a different man today if I went to either of those
You were almost a Tar? I was two months away from being a Comet, then my parents decided they didn't want me to go to prison.
grew up in 48224 off Morros. Wouldnt say almost as I went to private the whole way. Our Lady Queen of Peace was grade school

 
swirvenirvin said:
Heres what I have so far

Boise St +3 (even) Loss

S. Diego St -1 Win

E. Carolina -13.5Win

Wisky (E) -115

Va Tech +7.5

Oklahoma +16

Ga Tech +3.5 -115

Duke +13

Cuse +5

Michigan +4

Texas +14

Texas Tech +14.5

Nebraska +9

Iowa +8

Clemson +3 -115
Bowling Green -4.5 tomorrow for big
Before the lines were released I had Bowling Green as a strong play at -6 or better, so I'm tempted by that line also. I played the under because I don't see Pitt being able to handle that great Falcon front seven. Pitt's D is pretty decent as well, but I'm not all that sure about Bowling Greens offense vs a team with better athletes. They scored 20 on Miss State and 10 on Indiana, I think Pittsburgh is somewhere in-between those two teams but probably closer to Indiana.

I'm surprised the Michigan line hasn't moved much with news that Devin Gardner is somewhere between questionable and doubtful. I don't see them staying in that game if Gardner doesn't play.

I am also tempted to take OU. I had that line at 10.5 and it's 15 so that falls into autoplay territory as far as my system goes. Problem is as a homer, it's hard to push that button because then I lose in more ways than one. Public has 80% on Bama and on paper Bama is not two TDs better than OU. I just worry about Bama getting a two touchdown lead then running down hill the rest of the game. OU's front seven is young and iffy vs the run.
Let's hit it tomorrow. Before family and kids we would go to motor city/little ceaser's bowl every year. Except we called it the black out bowl, and would just drink all day stay for about the first half and end up on at some "club" on 8 mile. Remember seeing Eminem's wife there once

also yes worried about Umich line now. Morris was supposed to be a stud. Kid went to my high school :hifive:
Benders of Boys, Molders of men
no no its builders of boys makers of men!
As long as you didnt go the the university of michigan of the Catholic League (cc), we are ok Swirve..... :hifive:
de la salle and michigan st. Growing up in Detroit, public school would have been Finney or Denby. I think I would be a different man today if I went to either of those
Fordson and michigan st. Had we not moved to dearborn i would have gone to Detroit Southwestern. I think I would have been a great point guard....dribble to halfcourt and chuck it over to Antoine Joubert.

 
I am going with Man City/Liverpool O3 -130 today. In their 8 home matches this season Man City has scored 35 and given up 5 for an avg scored of 5 per. In Liverpool's 8 away matches they have scored 17 and given up 13 for a avg scored of 3.75 per. Plus it adds some extra rooting interest for those that bet the Luis Suarez Top Goal Scorer future.

ETA a Prop of 7 or more goals +1200 $5/$60
:moneybag: :tebow:

 
Michigan announced today that Devin Gardner won't start but didn't rule him out completely. I don't think he plays at all. I won't fade my guys but I am hitting the under 55.5 now because I can't see Michigan getting more than 17.

Lamb>thoughts?
I don't know much about Kstate (other than Baylor didn't cover for me against them) but I'd agree Michigan probably gets rolled here. Won't bet against my team and I generally hate betting Unders so I'll probably just lay off and go to bed early that night

 
Not sure what's worse that my buddy texted me a years old photo of Allison Stokke in her polevault costume or that I immediately knew what her name was

 
The MAC started playing a championship game in 1997. Since then, the winner of that championship in their subsequent BG is:
SU: 10-6-0 (4.38, 62.5%) ATS: 10-5-1 (4.53, 66.7%) avg line: 0.2 link

As the favorite:
SU: 6-1-0 (8.57, 85.7%) ATS: 5-1-1 (3.00, 83.3%) avg line: -5.6 link

 
That The Dare website is :moneybag: .

Fired up The Dark Knight Rises just to test it out - exceeding expectations.

Bye bye, movie channel subscriptions. I pay $34 to get HBO and Showtime a month, offset by my $33 credit first 12 months with DTV. Outside of the shows, it's a waste. This will make that decision much easier.
That reminds me - I need to call and cancel HBO. Only reason to have HBO anymore is for the Sunday night shows and right now if GoT or BE isn't showing its not worth the $15 or whatever.
Seriously, outside of the shows I never watch these channels. $34/month for HBO & SHO. Like ~40% of my bill for crap I don't even flip through unless there's 0 sports on.

I've seen the light, Ref.
I think Showtime is useless.
Without Dexter and Nurse Jackie what else do they offer that's good now?
so they need a credit card to open your free account? uhhh

 
Aaron Rodgers (collarbone) has been named the Packers' Week 17 starter.
What is Aaron Rodgers worth? A touchdown.

The Bears went from 4.5-point favorites to 3-point dogs.
Chad Millman on ESPN has a stat called "PSVAR" (Point Spread Value Above Replacement). Rodgers is #1 at 10 points. Romo is 4, btw. I think the highest non-QB is 3?

10 might be a pretty good estimate, factoring in rust.

 
Aaron Rodgers (collarbone) has been named the Packers' Week 17 starter.
What is Aaron Rodgers worth? A touchdown.

The Bears went from 4.5-point favorites to 3-point dogs.
Also news that Cobb may be back and Lacy should play. Nice news day for Packers fans.
Maybe the better play would be the Packers TT O? Only because the Packers defense hasn't been great and we know how horrible the Bears defense is.

 
swirvenirvin said:
Heres what I have so far

Boise St +3 (even) Loss

S. Diego St -1 Win

E. Carolina -13.5Win

Wisky (E) -115

Va Tech +7.5

Oklahoma +16

Ga Tech +3.5 -115

Duke +13

Cuse +5

Michigan +4

Texas +14

Texas Tech +14.5

Nebraska +9

Iowa +8

Clemson +3 -115
Bowling Green -4.5 tomorrow for big
Before the lines were released I had Bowling Green as a strong play at -6 or better, so I'm tempted by that line also. I played the under because I don't see Pitt being able to handle that great Falcon front seven. Pitt's D is pretty decent as well, but I'm not all that sure about Bowling Greens offense vs a team with better athletes. They scored 20 on Miss State and 10 on Indiana, I think Pittsburgh is somewhere in-between those two teams but probably closer to Indiana.

I'm surprised the Michigan line hasn't moved much with news that Devin Gardner is somewhere between questionable and doubtful. I don't see them staying in that game if Gardner doesn't play.

I am also tempted to take OU. I had that line at 10.5 and it's 15 so that falls into autoplay territory as far as my system goes. Problem is as a homer, it's hard to push that button because then I lose in more ways than one. Public has 80% on Bama and on paper Bama is not two TDs better than OU. I just worry about Bama getting a two touchdown lead then running down hill the rest of the game. OU's front seven is young and iffy vs the run.
Let's hit it tomorrow. Before family and kids we would go to motor city/little ceaser's bowl every year. Except we called it the black out bowl, and would just drink all day stay for about the first half and end up on at some "club" on 8 mile. Remember seeing Eminem's wife there once

also yes worried about Umich line now. Morris was supposed to be a stud. Kid went to my high school :hifive:
Benders of Boys, Molders of men
no no its builders of boys makers of men!
As long as you didnt go the the university of michigan of the Catholic League (cc), we are ok Swirve..... :hifive:
de la salle and michigan st. Growing up in Detroit, public school would have been Finney or Denby. I think I would be a different man today if I went to either of those
You were almost a Tar? I was two months away from being a Comet, then my parents decided they didn't want me to go to prison.
grew up in 48224 off Morros. Wouldnt say almost as I went to private the whole way. Our Lady Queen of Peace was grade school
48228 Evergreen and W. Chicago, never went to private school but nailed a lot of chicks who did. :thumbup:

 
I am going with Man City/Liverpool O3 -130 today. In their 8 home matches this season Man City has scored 35 and given up 5 for an avg scored of 5 per. In Liverpool's 8 away matches they have scored 17 and given up 13 for a avg scored of 3.75 per. Plus it adds some extra rooting interest for those that bet the Luis Suarez Top Goal Scorer future.

ETA a Prop of 7 or more goals +1200 $5/$60
:moneybag: :tebow:
Pretty sure that's a push, GB.

Good bet, though. Bad luck.

 
I am going with Man City/Liverpool O3 -130 today. In their 8 home matches this season Man City has scored 35 and given up 5 for an avg scored of 5 per. In Liverpool's 8 away matches they have scored 17 and given up 13 for a avg scored of 3.75 per. Plus it adds some extra rooting interest for those that bet the Luis Suarez Top Goal Scorer future.

ETA a Prop of 7 or more goals +1200 $5/$60
:moneybag: :tebow:
Pretty sure that's a push, GB.

Good bet, though. Bad luck.
Yeah but it's better than a loss. Not sure how they didn't score at least one goal in the 2H but that is gambling.

 
Romo OUT for rest of season. Should have bet Philly earlier ( i wonder if there was even a line available?)
Is there really that much of a downgrade from him to Orton though?
It's a pretty big downgrade imo....the one thing that might help the cowboys is the change might force them to run the ball more.

Line opened at phi -2.5 and moved to 3....romo announcement moved it to 7. I would have bet the boys at +3 and I'll definitely be betting them at 7.5, great spot for a cowboys bet
Looks like money came back in on Dallas and a TD, it's +6.5 now. :hifive:

 
Was just chatting with SB. They have a 25% reload bonus which ends tomorrow. No rollover required. What am I missing here? Why can't someone deposit $5K, then make a free bet for $1,250, and then immediately withdraw $6,250 if you win?
i have a $2500 withdrawl outstanding (12/10/13), any red flags for signing up for this again?

 
I am going with Man City/Liverpool O3 -130 today. In their 8 home matches this season Man City has scored 35 and given up 5 for an avg scored of 5 per. In Liverpool's 8 away matches they have scored 17 and given up 13 for a avg scored of 3.75 per. Plus it adds some extra rooting interest for those that bet the Luis Suarez Top Goal Scorer future.

ETA a Prop of 7 or more goals +1200 $5/$60
:moneybag: :tebow:
Pretty sure that's a push, GB.

Good bet, though. Bad luck.
I apologize. I swear i saw the score 3-1 when i checked yahoo sports at work today.

 
I am going with Man City/Liverpool O3 -130 today. In their 8 home matches this season Man City has scored 35 and given up 5 for an avg scored of 5 per. In Liverpool's 8 away matches they have scored 17 and given up 13 for a avg scored of 3.75 per. Plus it adds some extra rooting interest for those that bet the Luis Suarez Top Goal Scorer future.

ETA a Prop of 7 or more goals +1200 $5/$60
:moneybag: :tebow:
Pretty sure that's a push, GB.

Good bet, though. Bad luck.
I apologize. I swear i saw the score 3-1 when i checked yahoo sports at work today.
No worries...it happens

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top