Yeah, Forsett blows. I think he's been on every team in the league.
yeah, that ranking is just simply silly. I do not like the Browns at all, but having them tied for 26th is simply silly. they beat the Saints, and gave the Steelers a good run for their money.Aaron Rudnicki said:clear sign these people have no idea what they are doing.Good Posting Judge said:NFL Power Rankings from ESPN Insider:
s Rankings
16 (tie). Miami Dolphins (19.5)
The Dolphins were unable to build on their upset over the Patriots in Week 1 as they lost 24-10 at Buffalo as 1-point road dogs.
Previous rating: 20
19 (tie). Buffalo Bills (19)
The Bills continue climb with a 24-10 win over the Dolphins as 1-point favorites; they are one of only four teams at 2-0 SU and ATS.
Previous rating: 18
Dolphins moved up 4 spots (from 20 to 16) and passed the Bills after a game in which they were completely dominated in just about all phases?
Also, how do you move from 18 to 19 and "continue to climb"? Are they climbing backwards?
GTFO
swirv, I must have missed it. In a nutshell, what constitutes a play in this system?Looks like Iowa will be a system play this week currently at 47 and 131 rypg
Chargers @ Bills - SD covered last week (falls into 29.6% ATS)
Total of 47 or lessswirv, I must have missed it. In a nutshell, what constitutes a play in this system?Looks like Iowa will be a system play this week currently at 47 and 131 rypg
In on Iowa.Looks like Iowa will be a system play this week currently at 47 and 131 rypg
Currently at 6.5 or 7 at -115
Florida Atl is close but at 47.5 and avg 113
thats it for the week.
Can you see the win rate on this system from say week 2-6 vs 7-13? Essentially you're looking for "good rushing teams", and I absolutely hate the fact that a team can be labeled as a good rushing team with a 1, 2, 3+ game sample size. A passing team that has little interest in rushing can get up 40 points against Elon in week 1, carry the ball 50 times in the 2h, avg less than 3 ypc, and fall in the good rushing team category in this system. Makes me cringe.Total of 47 or lessswirv, I must have missed it. In a nutshell, what constitutes a play in this system?Looks like Iowa will be a system play this week currently at 47 and 131 rypg
Road team dog b/w 3-19
Road team avgs. more than 125 rushing/game
http://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/good-rushing-teams-undervalued-low-scoring-college-football-games/
I would assume you could if you were a betlabs customer, but it wasn't specified in the article. Totally get your point though.Can you see the win rate on this system from say week 2-6 vs 7-13? Essentially you're looking for "good rushing teams", and I absolutely hate the fact that a team can be labeled as a good rushing team with a 1, 2, 3+ game sample size. A passing team that has little interest in rushing can get up 40 points against Elon in week 1, carry the ball 50 times in the 2h, avg less than 3 ypc, and fall in the good rushing team category in this system. Makes me cringe.Total of 47 or lessswirv, I must have missed it. In a nutshell, what constitutes a play in this system?Looks like Iowa will be a system play this week currently at 47 and 131 rypg
Road team dog b/w 3-19
Road team avgs. more than 125 rushing/game
http://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/good-rushing-teams-undervalued-low-scoring-college-football-games/
wow really reconfirms that buffalo bet.Chargers @ Bills - SD covered last week (falls into 29.6% ATS)
Raiders @ Pats - OAK did not cover last week (falls into 43.6% ATS)
non ranked teamTotal of 47 or lessswirv, I must have missed it. In a nutshell, what constitutes a play in this system?Looks like Iowa will be a system play this week currently at 47 and 131 rypg
Road team dog b/w 3-19
Road team avgs. more than 125 rushing/game
http://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/good-rushing-teams-undervalued-low-scoring-college-football-games/
Supposed to be closing line so I'm going to wait. Last week Minny was 47.5 on Tuesday closed around 50 and they got smoked, plus that big of a jump made it a no play.. double plus that line went from +10 to +16Should we be playing these as soon as they are in all the criteria windows or what until Sunday morning to do so?
agreed would have liked to look at that too after week 1 cupcake match-up vs someone. Havent all of our dogs won straight up anyways?I would assume you could if you were a betlabs customer, but it wasn't specified in the article. Totally get your point though.Can you see the win rate on this system from say week 2-6 vs 7-13? Essentially you're looking for "good rushing teams", and I absolutely hate the fact that a team can be labeled as a good rushing team with a 1, 2, 3+ game sample size. A passing team that has little interest in rushing can get up 40 points against Elon in week 1, carry the ball 50 times in the 2h, avg less than 3 ypc, and fall in the good rushing team category in this system. Makes me cringe.Total of 47 or lessswirv, I must have missed it. In a nutshell, what constitutes a play in this system?Looks like Iowa will be a system play this week currently at 47 and 131 rypg
Road team dog b/w 3-19
Road team avgs. more than 125 rushing/game
http://www.sportsinsights.com/blog/good-rushing-teams-undervalued-low-scoring-college-football-games/
67% is not good enough to cover the vig of teasers, btw.Feel like Saw, but this site just has tons of info
Bet Labs Software @Bet_Labs
FollowNFL double-digit dogs cover the spread 54% of the time, and they cover the 6-point tease 67% of the time.
the nccaf has produced a whopping 1 real play in 3 weeks.The problem that I have with system plays is that I always get the feeling that somebody smarter than me has figured this out and the lines are adjusted accordingly. That, and there are always about a third to a half of all games on a given weekend go contrary to any logic whatsoever.
For God's sake don't act on anything I post. I'm posting for education on sportsdb technique, maybe I'll learn something over time.Interesting stat.I'll throw a dart imo...
NFL teams that played their first two games on the road and then play at home in week 3 are 21-41-4 ATS (33.9%)
Since 2004: 6-16-2 (27.3%)
Since 2009: 3-11-1 (21.4%)
Jags, Pats, Saints fall into the above.
Lmao:The climb refers to the power rating (18 to 19), not their rankings.Aaron Rudnicki said:clear sign these people have no idea what they are doing.Good Posting Judge said:NFL Power Rankings from ESPN Insider:
s Rankings
16 (tie). Miami Dolphins (19.5)
The Dolphins were unable to build on their upset over the Patriots in Week 1 as they lost 24-10 at Buffalo as 1-point road dogs.
Previous rating: 20
19 (tie). Buffalo Bills (19)
The Bills continue climb with a 24-10 win over the Dolphins as 1-point favorites; they are one of only four teams at 2-0 SU and ATS.
Previous rating: 18
Dolphins moved up 4 spots (from 20 to 16) and passed the Bills after a game in which they were completely dominated in just about all phases?
Also, how do you move from 18 to 19 and "continue to climb"? Are they climbing backwards?
GTFO
They need to cover the 6pt tease ~71% of the time to be profitable so teasing them is a loserFeel like Saw, but this site just has tons of info
Bet Labs Software @Bet_Labs
FollowNFL double-digit dogs cover the spread 54% of the time, and they cover the 6-point tease 67% of the time.
You could follow me while I follow someone else. It'll be lemmingtastic.who else are we following gambling wise on twitter?
Yeah it's OTB...few places I see it up are at 17Jameis may miss some of Clemson game. 20 PTS is a lot -Winston imo
That escalated quickly. Left for the gym and the line was on the board and the discussion was just the warchant writer. Leave the gym and Winston's name is mixed w Peterson on espns coverage of "everything except sports" and the line is otb. The downside of rooting for college sports is your depending on the decisions of kids.Yeah it's OTB...few places I see it up are at 17Jameis may miss some of Clemson game. 20 PTS is a lot -Winston imo
"I just flew in for this wedding and boy are my arms tired" always goes over wellBest Man speech on Saturday any suggested one liners to use?
Say what jameis said.Best Man speech on Saturday any suggested one liners to use?
9 hits in the 1st..SO FAR.So far it's 5-0 in the Rox/Dodgers game...2 outs in the 1st and both outs were on the basepaths.
Wow...Morneau had 5 RBI's alone!9 hits in the 1st..SO FAR.So far it's 5-0 in the Rox/Dodgers game...2 outs in the 1st and both outs were on the basepaths.
10
11
I thought that was really impressive....then I read about fernando tatisWow...Morneau had 5 RBI's alone!9 hits in the 1st..SO FAR.So far it's 5-0 in the Rox/Dodgers game...2 outs in the 1st and both outs were on the basepaths.
10
11
"I just flew in for this wedding and boy are my arms tired" always goes over wellBest Man speech on Saturday any suggested one liners to use?
Also make sure to reference past sexual escapades of the groom and maybe mix in a crack about the brides promiscuity
I've yet to see that used in the wild, but it's stored in the back of my mind for future usage.I actually remember that now. Yes it is crazy!I thought that was really impressive....then I read about fernando tatisWow...Morneau had 5 RBI's alone!9 hits in the 1st..SO FAR.So far it's 5-0 in the Rox/Dodgers game...2 outs in the 1st and both outs were on the basepaths.
10
11
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Major_League_Baseball_leaders_in_RBI_in_one_inning
2 grand slams in one inning, crazy
where?JACKPOT
Just stumbled across some baseball props I haven't seen in years
Will player x get an RBI
Will player x get an extra base hit
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()