What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (4 Viewers)

fantasycurse42 said:
Still holding on at an implied probability of .1782 versus .1354
Click to expand...
When you bet you can convert the odds into a percentage, taking into account the house edge, and eliminating the need to express the actual true odds of an event occurring. So when you take a bet at 110 you are saying you expect the bet to hit greater than 47.62% in the long-run in order to turn a profit. If you take a bet at 130 you expect it to hit over 43.48% in the long run. You asked if the 110 was still a bet. So in order to try and help you obtain an answer for yourself I gave you the two different sets of implied probabilities you re trying to decide between. I have no idea what you are talking about with .1782 versus .1354 unless it is just nonsense and you are ####### with me.

 
ChainsawU said:
fantasycurse42 said:
Still holding on at an implied probability of .1782 versus .1354
Click to expand...
When you bet you can convert the odds into a percentage, taking into account the house edge, and eliminating the need to express the actual true odds of an event occurring. So when you take a bet at 110 you are saying you expect the bet to hit greater than 47.62% in the long-run in order to turn a profit. If you take a bet at 130 you expect it to hit over 43.48% in the long run. You asked if the 110 was still a bet. So in order to try and help you obtain an answer for yourself I gave you the two different sets of implied probabilities you re trying to decide between. I have no idea what you are talking about with .1782 versus .1354 unless it is just nonsense and you are ####### with me.
Click to expand...
I was just ####### around... That makes sense, thanks.

 
Dan Lambskin said:
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you....

The Iowa Pig####ers!
Click to expand...
worst part is i always find these kind of games on live betting. Have restricted myself much better then last night, but was all excited to see Iowa +5.5 <_< . I think my new motto for anything i am not familiar with is no live betting. O/U on how long i can make this last?

 
Betting the next ESPN game.... Taking Stanford +108 to win (lines already moved, now -105).

UCLA has lost 5 in a row by about 19 per. They've been beaten down by almost every respectable team they've played. Stanford has won 4 in a row including at Texas and vs Wash.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, Iowa stays on the enemies list, maybe forever as they #### me once again. Looked good at half, went to play some Zelda with my daughter, get a text from my brother that Iowa is down 12. Neat.

 
I brought a fat girl (a different girl from the unit) back to my buddy's apartment once from one of the clubs down on the square in San Marcos. She and I made out a little bit in the bed and she was so impressed by my fresh breath that she went down on me right then and there. Left no stain, cause she swallowed it up and I've carried a pack of Dentyne Ice on me ever since.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I nailed a softball catcher... She was about 6'1 160ish. Not fat, just big, I'm confident she could beat up at least 1/3 of this form, prob more.

Possibly the best beej of all time.

 
I finger banged a fatty and had her honk on bobo for a parking pass to a college basketball game I never used, and had her park three houses down from mine in a driveway, and refused to let her inside and was out of there before I knew if she was a spitter or not.

That's about it.

 
Tiger Fan said:
Just played this 4 teamer for action .33u to win 4u

Bal +7

Car +11

GB -6

Den -7
Click to expand...
I think I agree with all these but GB, that one worries me as I think the Cowboys have a shot straight up. Carolina may cover, that is a big number and I really think Denver rolls over a one-man-team in the Colts.

 
I bang a fatty bout once a week, of course we've been married 24 years. She brings home about 15k a month, so I would rather #### sheep than screw that up

 
cfbmatrix.com said today on the radio to take the Buckeyes (w/ the points) and the over. Guy seems to be pretty good when i've heard him on. Just thought i'd pass it along.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Playing BYU/Pepperdine o 151 because:

1. It's the last game of the night

2. It's on TV

3. BYU loves to run

4. BYU hates defense

5. Pepperdine is traditionally dumb enough to try to run with BYU

6. Overs rule

7. I have no feel for a side, but really want to bet on this game and am too tired to do any research

 
Frostillicus said:
Playing BYU/Pepperdine o 151 because:

1. It's the last game of the night

2. It's on TV

3. BYU loves to run

4. BYU hates defense

5. Pepperdine is traditionally dumb enough to try to run with BYU

6. Overs rule

7. I have no feel for a side, but really want to bet on this game and am too tired to do any research
Click to expand...
ok, in. Let's hope those FTs at the end of the game all go in :)

 
Frostillicus said:
Playing BYU/Pepperdine o 151 because:

1. It's the last game of the night

2. It's on TV

3. BYU loves to run

4. BYU hates defense

5. Pepperdine is traditionally dumb enough to try to run with BYU

6. Overs rule

7. I have no feel for a side, but really want to bet on this game and am too tired to do any research
Click to expand...
hmm, fun game to watch so far

 
Need some Magic Help.

I'm in one of those "one and done" playoff leagues. You can only use a guy once.

I'm 9th (14 back) after Week 1. 80 entries.

I used:
QB - Big Ben
RB - Bernard and J.Hill
WR - A.Brown, Mar Bryant, Calvin Johnson

All of these players lost

TE Olsen

K Vinatieri
D Carolina

So I'm sitting pretty good here

Lineup is QB, RB, WR, WR, TE, FLEX (rb,wr,te), Flex, K, D.

What would you do this week?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ministry of Pain
Texas floods
2
Replies
59
Views
3K
fatness
fatness
scorchy
Any banking guys that can offer solutions to a vexing issue?
Replies
31
Views
526
Mrs. Rannous
Mrs. Rannous
BLOCKED_PUNT
list index
Replies
16
Views
614
El Floppo
El Floppo

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Back
Top