What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (9 Viewers)

Screw you Bovada on this too

Football - NFL Player Props (Prop) Moneyline

From kickoff until final whistle. Live pictures only, any taped pictures or past video does not count towards wager. Halftime does not count towards wager. Must clearly refer to it. Book Manager's decision is final. NO OVERLIMITS

SPECIAL (NE @ SEA) - Will it be mentioned during the game that Pete Carroll was the last head coach of the Patriots?

(6022) Yes +110 Feb 01/15@06:30p

Final Scores

Yes 0

No 1

Outcome: Loss

 
Last edited by a moderator:
swirvenirvin said:


Screw you Bovada on this too



Football - NFL Player Props (Prop) Moneyline

From kickoff until final whistle. Live pictures only, any taped pictures or past video does not count towards wager. Halftime does not count towards wager. Must clearly refer to it. Book Manager's decision is final. NO OVERLIMITS

SPECIAL (NE @ SEA) - Will it be mentioned during the game that Pete Carroll was the last head coach of the Patriots?

(6022) Yes +110 Feb 01/15@06:30p

Final Scores

Yes 0

No 1



Outcome: Loss
Click to expand...
Is this Bovada? I'm too drunk to deal with this #### now. ####### ####s
 
Peyton Marino said:
swirvenirvin said:
Screw you Bovada on this too



Football - NFL Player Props (Prop) Moneyline

From kickoff until final whistle. Live pictures only, any taped pictures or past video does not count towards wager. Halftime does not count towards wager. Must clearly refer to it. Book Manager's decision is final. NO OVERLIMITS

SPECIAL (NE @ SEA) - Will it be mentioned during the game that Pete Carroll was the last head coach of the Patriots?

(6022) Yes +110 Feb 01/15@06:30p

Final Scores

Yes 0

No 1



Outcome: Loss
Click to expand...
Is this Bovada? I'm too drunk to deal with this #### now. ####### ####s
Click to expand...
yep.. book managers final decision too doubt we win here

 
Action-junkie after-school special (0-0-0 YTD +0.0)
Sharks and division-rival Oilers have played four times in San Diego since the Oilers joined the Pacific Division last season. The Sharks went 4-0 SU and the games went 4-0 to the over. Since 2012 when the Sharks have been lined ≤ -200 within the division they are 7-1 SU and 7-1 to the over.

Oilers/Sharks o5½ +115

 
Dan Lambskin said:
Dr D what game we going to
Click to expand...
Whatever game that is unbearably hot and sunny so you can sweat off the pain you have delivered tonight.

I hope Frosty adds you to his hate list, you suck. See you soon!

 
Carroll provided some context around that last play, although I don't know if it really washes. They had extra receivers against NE's goal-line group, they had 3 downs, 1 TO. So they were going to do some combo of 2 runs and 1 pass with the remaining 3 downs.

It makes sense that you have some combo of 2 runs and a pass for the 3 remaining downs, but THAT throw does seem problematic. It's going to get HotTaked to death because the worst possible outcome occurred, but the chances of a pick there ARE pretty nil.

It may have made sense to run inside, TO if it doesn't get in, and then run a Wilson bootleg on 3rd down with a releasing TE. If the TE gets open, you have a pretty easy, low-risk throw. If it's not there, you have one of the fastest QBs in the league who can probably jog to the pylon. If someone does get a bead on him, maybe he gets knocked out and the clock stops. Even if he doesn't, you still have time to reset and try to plunge it in on 4th and short.

It's a bad call throwing into a tight spot, but I think the OMGZ YOU JUST HAND IT TO LYNCH!!11!!! analysis is a bit too simplistic.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The context of the announcers referencing the Ahmad Bradshaw "gimme" touchdown is what made it so painful to me. It went from, "They're going to give them the touchdown and let them walk in to score and take the lead with 20 seconds left," to GAME OVER within the span of less than two seconds.

 
ChainsawU said:
The context of the announcers referencing the Ahmad Bradshaw "gimme" touchdown is what made it so painful to me. It went from, "They're going to give them the touchdown and let them walk in to score and take the lead with 20 seconds left," to GAME OVER within the span of less than two seconds.
Click to expand...
I would have understood Collinsworth's "let them score" theory if the Pats were up by only 1 or 2, but up by 4? No chance.

 
Raider Nation said:
ChainsawU said:
The context of the announcers referencing the Ahmad Bradshaw "gimme" touchdown is what made it so painful to me. It went from, "They're going to give them the touchdown and let them walk in to score and take the lead with 20 seconds left," to GAME OVER within the span of less than two seconds.
Click to expand...
I would have understood Collinsworth's "let them score" theory if the Pats were up by only 1 or 2, but up by 4? No chance.
Click to expand...
lookin foward to francesca tomorrow, havent listened in a while.

 
Cleavage grade at sports book is horse #### :lol: cost me a break even ish night. All in all down a couple units. I'll take it.

 
Good Posting Judge said:
Carroll provided some context around that last play, although I don't know if it really washes. They had extra receivers against NE's goal-line group, they had 3 downs, 1 TO. So they were going to do some combo of 2 runs and 1 pass with the remaining 3 downs.

It makes sense that you have some combo of 2 runs and a pass for the 3 remaining downs, but THAT throw does seem problematic. It's going to get HotTaked to death because the worst possible outcome occurred, but the chances of a pick there ARE pretty nil.

It may have made sense to run inside, TO if it doesn't get in, and then run a Wilson bootleg on 3rd down with a releasing TE. If the TE gets open, you have a pretty easy, low-risk throw. If it's not there, you have one of the fastest QBs in the league who can probably jog to the pylon. If someone does get a bead on him, maybe he gets knocked out and the clock stops. Even if he doesn't, you still have time to reset and try to plunge it in on 4th and short.

It's a bad call throwing into a tight spot, but I think the OMGZ YOU JUST HAND IT TO LYNCH!!11!!! analysis is a bit too simplistic.
Click to expand...
That whole last drive was weird to me. When Seattle had the ball with 2:02 I was thinking milk the clock, spread the D out, mix in a couple inside runs, maybe a Wilson run. 2:02 downfield to Lynch, 1:55 incomplete deep to Kearse, 1:50 incomplete deep to Matthews, 1:41 short pass, 1:14 deep to Kearse. It was obvious Wilson wanted to push it down and score FAST, with 1:00+ left. Even if they scored on that final play with :26, I'm pretty sure Brady could/would have gotten into fg range. Give him over 1:00 and Brady probably pushes it in for the 35-31 win. Good game nonetheless, congrats Pats guys!

 
TheGooRoo said:
Good Posting Judge said:
Carroll provided some context around that last play, although I don't know if it really washes. They had extra receivers against NE's goal-line group, they had 3 downs, 1 TO. So they were going to do some combo of 2 runs and 1 pass with the remaining 3 downs.

It makes sense that you have some combo of 2 runs and a pass for the 3 remaining downs, but THAT throw does seem problematic. It's going to get HotTaked to death because the worst possible outcome occurred, but the chances of a pick there ARE pretty nil.

It may have made sense to run inside, TO if it doesn't get in, and then run a Wilson bootleg on 3rd down with a releasing TE. If the TE gets open, you have a pretty easy, low-risk throw. If it's not there, you have one of the fastest QBs in the league who can probably jog to the pylon. If someone does get a bead on him, maybe he gets knocked out and the clock stops. Even if he doesn't, you still have time to reset and try to plunge it in on 4th and short.

It's a bad call throwing into a tight spot, but I think the OMGZ YOU JUST HAND IT TO LYNCH!!11!!! analysis is a bit too simplistic.
Click to expand...
That whole last drive was weird to me. When Seattle had the ball with 2:02 I was thinking milk the clock, spread the D out, mix in a couple inside runs, maybe a Wilson run. 2:02 downfield to Lynch, 1:55 incomplete deep to Kearse, 1:50 incomplete deep to Matthews, 1:41 short pass, 1:14 deep to Kearse. It was obvious Wilson wanted to push it down and score FAST, with 1:00+ left. Even if they scored on that final play with :26, I'm pretty sure Brady could/would have gotten into fg range. Give him over 1:00 and Brady probably pushes it in for the 35-31 win. Good game nonetheless, congrats Pats guys!
Click to expand...
I still don't understand why Belichek didn't burn a timeout after the Lynch run to the 1. I believe SEA had one timeout left, so even if NE stops SEA, SEA can't get the ball back. Why not give you team another 30 seconds if SEA scores?

 
ArbyMelt said:
TheGooRoo said:
Good Posting Judge said:
Carroll provided some context around that last play, although I don't know if it really washes. They had extra receivers against NE's goal-line group, they had 3 downs, 1 TO. So they were going to do some combo of 2 runs and 1 pass with the remaining 3 downs.

It makes sense that you have some combo of 2 runs and a pass for the 3 remaining downs, but THAT throw does seem problematic. It's going to get HotTaked to death because the worst possible outcome occurred, but the chances of a pick there ARE pretty nil.

It may have made sense to run inside, TO if it doesn't get in, and then run a Wilson bootleg on 3rd down with a releasing TE. If the TE gets open, you have a pretty easy, low-risk throw. If it's not there, you have one of the fastest QBs in the league who can probably jog to the pylon. If someone does get a bead on him, maybe he gets knocked out and the clock stops. Even if he doesn't, you still have time to reset and try to plunge it in on 4th and short.

It's a bad call throwing into a tight spot, but I think the OMGZ YOU JUST HAND IT TO LYNCH!!11!!! analysis is a bit too simplistic.
Click to expand...
That whole last drive was weird to me. When Seattle had the ball with 2:02 I was thinking milk the clock, spread the D out, mix in a couple inside runs, maybe a Wilson run. 2:02 downfield to Lynch, 1:55 incomplete deep to Kearse, 1:50 incomplete deep to Matthews, 1:41 short pass, 1:14 deep to Kearse. It was obvious Wilson wanted to push it down and score FAST, with 1:00+ left. Even if they scored on that final play with :26, I'm pretty sure Brady could/would have gotten into fg range. Give him over 1:00 and Brady probably pushes it in for the 35-31 win. Good game nonetheless, congrats Pats guys!
Click to expand...
I still don't understand why Belichek didn't burn a timeout after the Lynch run to the 1. I believe SEA had one timeout left, so even if NE stops SEA, SEA can't get the ball back. Why not give you team another 30 seconds if SEA scores?
Click to expand...
wanted to get the right position group in. guess it worked

 
ArbyMelt said:
TheGooRoo said:
Good Posting Judge said:
Carroll provided some context around that last play, although I don't know if it really washes. They had extra receivers against NE's goal-line group, they had 3 downs, 1 TO. So they were going to do some combo of 2 runs and 1 pass with the remaining 3 downs.

It makes sense that you have some combo of 2 runs and a pass for the 3 remaining downs, but THAT throw does seem problematic. It's going to get HotTaked to death because the worst possible outcome occurred, but the chances of a pick there ARE pretty nil.

It may have made sense to run inside, TO if it doesn't get in, and then run a Wilson bootleg on 3rd down with a releasing TE. If the TE gets open, you have a pretty easy, low-risk throw. If it's not there, you have one of the fastest QBs in the league who can probably jog to the pylon. If someone does get a bead on him, maybe he gets knocked out and the clock stops. Even if he doesn't, you still have time to reset and try to plunge it in on 4th and short.

It's a bad call throwing into a tight spot, but I think the OMGZ YOU JUST HAND IT TO LYNCH!!11!!! analysis is a bit too simplistic.
Click to expand...
That whole last drive was weird to me. When Seattle had the ball with 2:02 I was thinking milk the clock, spread the D out, mix in a couple inside runs, maybe a Wilson run. 2:02 downfield to Lynch, 1:55 incomplete deep to Kearse, 1:50 incomplete deep to Matthews, 1:41 short pass, 1:14 deep to Kearse. It was obvious Wilson wanted to push it down and score FAST, with 1:00+ left. Even if they scored on that final play with :26, I'm pretty sure Brady could/would have gotten into fg range. Give him over 1:00 and Brady probably pushes it in for the 35-31 win. Good game nonetheless, congrats Pats guys!
Click to expand...
I still don't understand why Belichek didn't burn a timeout after the Lynch run to the 1. I believe SEA had one timeout left, so even if NE stops SEA, SEA can't get the ball back. Why not give you team another 30 seconds if SEA scores?
Click to expand...
Tough decision. He has to immediately call it IMO, once he lets a few ticks go off, forget it, roll with the def.

End of the night I added 10% to my bankroll which is fantastic but oh so close to adding 20-30% if seattle wins. Hell even if seattle pulls off a safety after the INT I'm covering my 2H bet of Sea +2.5 and full game bet of Seattle +3(-130)

Awesome game.

 
[icon] said:
Cleavage grade at sports book is horse #### :lol: cost me a break even ish night. All in all down a couple units. I'll take it.
Click to expand...
It turns out Sportsbetting/BetOnline payed out both sides of the cleavage bet.

Dave Mason ‏@DaveMasonBOL 12h12 hours ago

I say DEFINITELY CLEAVAGE. Boss in Risk Management says NO CLEAVAGE. We paying out both sides as winners. To avoid Cleavage Gate both win.
Click to expand...
 
Somehow I had a ton of money bet last night, it felt like I lost all of them and somehow I stayed under the envelope at RB.

 
regularguy said:
[icon] said:
Cleavage grade at sports book is horse #### :lol: cost me a break even ish night. All in all down a couple units. I'll take it.
Click to expand...
It turns out Sportsbetting/BetOnline payed out both sides of the cleavage bet.

Dave Mason ‏@DaveMasonBOL 12h12 hours ago

I say DEFINITELY CLEAVAGE. Boss in Risk Management says NO CLEAVAGE. We paying out both sides as winners. To avoid Cleavage Gate both win.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
WTF is icon talking about then?

More than you ever wanted to know about cleavage(NSFW) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_%28breasts%29

 
Last edited by a moderator:
lumpy19 said:
regularguy said:
[icon] said:
Cleavage grade at sports book is horse #### :lol: cost me a break even ish night. All in all down a couple units. I'll take it.
Click to expand...
It turns out Sportsbetting/BetOnline payed out both sides of the cleavage bet.
Dave Mason ‏@DaveMasonBOL 12h12 hours ago

I say DEFINITELY CLEAVAGE. Boss in Risk Management says NO CLEAVAGE. We paying out both sides as winners. To avoid Cleavage Gate both win.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
WTF is icon talking about then?

More than you ever wanted to know about cleavage(NSFW) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleavage_%28breasts%29
Click to expand...
Different grading by different sites. Sportsbook.ag graded it as cleavage. My quote was about BOL/sportsbetting.ag.

 
had I laid off totals/sides and not tailed the 4* plays from the propsheet GR posted yesterday, i'd probably be up a decent bit. overall i'm down slightly. hell of a game though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ministry of Pain
Texas floods
2
Replies
59
Views
3K
fatness
fatness
scorchy
Any banking guys that can offer solutions to a vexing issue?
Replies
31
Views
544
Mrs. Rannous
Mrs. Rannous
BLOCKED_PUNT
list index
Replies
16
Views
630
El Floppo
El Floppo

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)
Back
Top