Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch (1 Viewer)

[Sinn Fein]

Anyone have a flowchart of Tim's positions in this thread?

 

[timschochet]

As for "spreading my repulsive views", it's obvious I can't sway you because you won't allow your feelings to be to be swayed by arguments coming from me. That's why I share news articles of other people who are obviously non-bigoted and who share the exact same "repulsive" views. It's not to spread the wealth of my "repulsive" views as you suggest, it's to show you that such views aren't as repulsive as you think if those views are also held by credible professionals in the legal field and by respected black Americans.

Yeah, you keep repeating this crap over and over. You have repeatedly, in several threads, made two assertions:1. African-Americans are genetically not as intelligent as white people and Asians. 2. African-Americans are a "threat" to riot at any time, and racially motivated black on white violence is a real cause of concern in modern day America. Now I want to know which "highly credible professionals" share these two assertions. I'd like to know which "respected black Americans" believe either of these two points to be true.

 

[meatwad1]

As for "spreading my repulsive views", it's obvious I can't sway you because you won't allow your feelings to be to be swayed by arguments coming from me. That's why I share news articles of other people who are obviously non-bigoted and who share the exact same "repulsive" views. It's not to spread the wealth of my "repulsive" views as you suggest, it's to show you that such views aren't as repulsive as you think if those views are also held by credible professionals in the legal field and by respected black Americans.

Yeah, you keep repeating this crap over and over. You have repeatedly, in several threads, made two assertions:1. African-Americans are genetically not as intelligent as white people and Asians. 2. African-Americans are a "threat" to riot at any time, and racially motivated black on white violence is a real cause of concern in modern day America. Now I want to know which "highly credible professionals" share these two assertions. I'd like to know which "respected black Americans" believe either of these two points to be true.

Tim, what do you think will happen if Zimmerman does not get convicted of 2nd degree murder? Will it be more like the million man march or more like the L.A Rodney King riots. Or will people just be chilled out and not care?

 

[Clinton]

40% Now Say Trayvon Martin Shot in Self-Defense; 24% Say It Was Murder

As evidence continues to emerge from the shooting death of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin, Americans are becoming more convinced that his killer acted in self-defense and that the legal system will come to that conclusion.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 24% of American Adults still believe the man who shot Martin should be found guilty of murder. But that’s down from 33% in late March when the case first began to draw national headlines and 30% in early April.

Forty percent (40%) now think George Zimmerman, who has been charged with second degree murder in the Martin shooting, acted in self-defense. That’s up 25 points from 15% in March and up 16 points from 24% last month. Thirty-six percent (36%) remain undecided, compared to 55% two months ago. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

The survey of 1,000 Adults nationwide was conducted on May 19-20, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC.

http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/may_2012/40_now_say_trayvon_martin_shot_in_self_defense_24_say_it_was_murder

 

[RBM]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

 

[TexanFan02]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Might as well send them all back to Africa now, right Clinton?

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Why did Reginald Denny get beaten nearly to death?

"Because he was white" ~ Bobby Green (Black truck driver that took him to the hospital)

 

[RBM]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Might as well send them all back to Africa now, right Clinton?

Woooo...take it easy nutbag. I was just stating those are clear possibilities to worry about. How could you disagree?

 

[RBM]

Why did Reginald Green get beaten nearly to death?

"Because he was white" ~ Bobby Green (Black truck driver that took him to the hospital)

Reginald Denny

 

[glock]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Might as well send them all back to Africa now, right Clinton?

Woooo...take it easy nutbag. I was just stating those are clear possibilities to worry about. How could you disagree?

Who would be rioting if Obama loses? And why?

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Why did Reginald Denny get beaten nearly to death?

"Because he was white" ~ Bobby Green (Black truck driver that took him to the hospital)

Reginald Denny

yes. sorry

 

[identikit]

Anyone have a flowchart of Tim's positions in this thread?

It doesn't really 'flow'; lots of backpedals and gut feelings and contradictions and ignorance of the facts that are out there..

 

[RBM]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Might as well send them all back to Africa now, right Clinton?

Woooo...take it easy nutbag. I was just stating those are clear possibilities to worry about. How could you disagree?

Who would be rioting if Obama loses? And why?

Dont be an idiot

 

[Carolina Hustler]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Might as well send them all back to Africa now, right Clinton?

Woooo...take it easy nutbag.

 

[glock]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Might as well send them all back to Africa now, right Clinton?

Woooo...take it easy nutbag. I was just stating those are clear possibilities to worry about. How could you disagree?

Who would be rioting if Obama loses? And why?

Dont be an idiot

 

[timschochet]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

RBM, I've read a lot of your posts. You are a very conservative Republican (I don't think that you're socially conservative, but you are conservative in most other areas- you can correct me if I'm wrong about this.) You are no racist. I don't believe for one second that you share Clinton's views about genetic differences in intelligence, or anything like that. (Again, you can correct me if I'm wrong, and if I am, I will be sorely disappointed, since I regard you as a very decent person.)However, your comments here border on a simplistic, borderline racist attitude IMO, and I do disagree with them. Three points:1. Blacks (and other people as well) don't riot because things don't go their way. When they riot, it's because of perceived injustice. I can guarantee you 100% that if Obama loses, there is not going to be any significant rioting. There might be some idiot or two somewhere, but if you're expecting to see people out on the streets, it will not happen. The only way it COULD happen is if somehow it were perceived that Obama was cheated in a crooked election, but that's really far-fetched. 2. The Zimmerman case is a little more complicated because many people began with a perceived injustice. However, for there to be a violent reaction, what would have to happen IMO is a court trial in which Zimmerman is CLEARLY GUILTY TO ANY REASONABLE OBSERVER, and yet still acquitted by the jury. That's what happened in the original Rodney King hearing; that was one factor behind that violence. The other factor was the destitution and anger felt over living conditions for African-Americans in south central Los Angeles. That had been building for some time. Now looking over the evidence for this Zimmerman case, I strongly doubt there's going to be ANYTHING clear cut coming from this trial, so that strong feeling of perceived injustice will not be there. Whatever there outcome, I strongly doubt there will be a riot. (Again, a few people might act stupid, but that's not the same thing.)3. Finally, with regard to the Rodney King riots- those began with a few angry youths acting like idiots on the corner of Florence and Normandy. Because we had an incompetent police chief at the time (Daryl Gates), these fools were allowed to run rampant with no police presence. The entire riot could have been easily prevented, and in fact ALL riots can be easily prevented with good law enforcement tactics. Most people in every group are law abiding and have no interest in anything other than peaceful protests.

 

[RBM]

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

 

[Corky]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

 

[timschochet]

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

I gave my opinion. I was the middle of the Rodney King riots; I saw storefront windows broken into 5 feet in front of me. That doesn't make an expert by any means, but I think I can speak intelligently about this subject. If you have any specific disagreements with what I wrote, please state them.

 

[RBM]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

 

[Corky]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Sounds pretty confident.

 

[TexanFan02]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Over on Stormfront? Those guys tend towards hyperbole. HTH.

 

[RBM]

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

I gave my opinion. I was the middle of the Rodney King riots; I saw storefront windows broken into 5 feet in front of me. That doesn't make an expert by any means, but I think I can speak intelligently about this subject. If you have any specific disagreements with what I wrote, please state them.

Were you rioting (lol)? Were you in the heads of the dirtbags rioting? No to both. So maybe you dont know what motivates or triggers that kind of reaction.

 

[RBM]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Sounds pretty confident.

About there being a possibility....not of it def happening. Jeez.

 

[timschochet]

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

I gave my opinion. I was the middle of the Rodney King riots; I saw storefront windows broken into 5 feet in front of me. That doesn't make an expert by any means, but I think I can speak intelligently about this subject. If you have any specific disagreements with what I wrote, please state them.

Were you rioting (lol)? Were you in the heads of the dirtbags rioting? No to both. So maybe you dont know what motivates or triggers that kind of reaction.

RBM, can you give an example in American history when a significant riot has begun without a perceived injustice as it's triggering point?

 

[timschochet]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Over on Stormfront? Those guys tend towards hyperbole. HTH.

Don't do this. He's not Clinton.

 

[RBM]

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

I gave my opinion. I was the middle of the Rodney King riots; I saw storefront windows broken into 5 feet in front of me. That doesn't make an expert by any means, but I think I can speak intelligently about this subject. If you have any specific disagreements with what I wrote, please state them.

Were you rioting (lol)? Were you in the heads of the dirtbags rioting? No to both. So maybe you dont know what motivates or triggers that kind of reaction.

RBM, can you give an example in American history when a significant riot has begun without a perceived injustice as it's triggering point?

Tim, maybe they will perceive those two situations as injustices. Its not that far fetched.

 

[Corky]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Sounds pretty confident.

About there being a possibility....not of it def happening. Jeez.

Your abuse of the English language and your spin are noted.

 

[RBM]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Sounds pretty confident.

About there being a possibility....not of it def happening. Jeez.

Your abuse of the English language and your spin are noted.

Get the hell outta here you dope.

 

[timschochet]

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

I gave my opinion. I was the middle of the Rodney King riots; I saw storefront windows broken into 5 feet in front of me. That doesn't make an expert by any means, but I think I can speak intelligently about this subject. If you have any specific disagreements with what I wrote, please state them.

Were you rioting (lol)? Were you in the heads of the dirtbags rioting? No to both. So maybe you dont know what motivates or triggers that kind of reaction.

RBM, can you give an example in American history when a significant riot has begun without a perceived injustice as it's triggering point?

Tim, maybe they will perceive those two situations as injustices. Its not that far fetched.

Yes it is. That's the point. I think a lot would have to happen for any significant number of blacks to perceive Obama losing the election as an injustice. As I wrote, the Zimmerman case is more complicated, but still unlikely.

 

[Corky]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Sounds pretty confident.

About there being a possibility....not of it def happening. Jeez.

Your abuse of the English language and your spin are noted.

Get the hell outta here you dope.

Listen, friend. I am just pointing out that you spoke in far more 'absolute' terms than tim did, and yet you chose to admonish him. If you don't see that, you are 'way deep in the sand. Its (sic) as clear as day."

 

[RBM]

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

I gave my opinion. I was the middle of the Rodney King riots; I saw storefront windows broken into 5 feet in front of me. That doesn't make an expert by any means, but I think I can speak intelligently about this subject. If you have any specific disagreements with what I wrote, please state them.

Were you rioting (lol)? Were you in the heads of the dirtbags rioting? No to both. So maybe you dont know what motivates or triggers that kind of reaction.

RBM, can you give an example in American history when a significant riot has begun without a perceived injustice as it's triggering point?

Tim, maybe they will perceive those two situations as injustices. Its not that far fetched.

Yes it is. That's the point. I think a lot would have to happen for any significant number of blacks to perceive Obama losing the election as an injustice. As I wrote, the Zimmerman case is more complicated, but still unlikely.

Again, I dont think either of us can accurately speak for the kinds of people that would riot.I do respect your positivity on the subject though and hope you're right.

 

[TexanFan02]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Sounds pretty confident.

About there being a possibility....not of it def happening. Jeez.

Your abuse of the English language and your spin are noted.

Get the hell outta here you dope.

Listen, friend. I am just pointing out that you spoke in far more 'absolute' terms than tim did, and yet you chose to admonish him. If you don't see that, you are 'way deep in the sand. Its (sic) as clear as day."

But, but... It's ok when RBM does it.

 

[RBM]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Sounds pretty confident.

About there being a possibility....not of it def happening. Jeez.

Your abuse of the English language and your spin are noted.

Get the hell outta here you dope.

Listen, friend. I am just pointing out that you spoke in far more 'absolute' terms than tim did, and yet you chose to admonish him. If you don't see that, you are 'way deep in the sand. Its (sic) as clear as day."

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

 

[TexanFan02]

I think we are looking at two potential riot problems.....the Zimmerman thing and if Obama loses.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Tim, just a word to the wise...dont speak in such absolute truths.

Im really not sure that you or most of the posters on this board for that matter are in a position to speak confidently on the riot subject.

Um. Ok.

By no means was I speaking confidently. I have no idea what will happen. But for me and other people I speak to about it, those are two potential scenarios that might turn explosive.

Anyone who disagrees is way deep in the sand. Its as clear as day.

Sounds pretty confident.

About there being a possibility....not of it def happening. Jeez.

Your abuse of the English language and your spin are noted.

Get the hell outta here you dope.

Listen, friend. I am just pointing out that you spoke in far more 'absolute' terms than tim did, and yet you chose to admonish him. If you don't see that, you are 'way deep in the sand. Its (sic) as clear as day."

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

That's not what you said, though.

 

[Corky]

Listen, friend. I am just pointing out that you spoke in far more 'absolute' terms than tim did, and yet you chose to admonish him. If you don't see that, you are 'way deep in the sand. Its (sic) as clear as day."

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

tim speaks in hyperbolic terms always. It is genetic. Any reasonable person knows he is not stating that with 100% certainty, but he is generalizing. You, on the other hand, make your bold statement that you predict two riots if the outcome of certain events don't fall a particular way. Then you choose to challenge and/or insult any who might disagree with you. ("If you don't see that, you are way deep in the sand", i.e. ignorant, willfully stupid, moronic). Then you make an absolute statement ("Its (sic) clear as day" It is written. It has been fortold. Done deal). The main difference between these two is that tim is at least generalizing/sterotyping a particular group to be more reasonable/rational whereas you are stereotyping them into sore losers.

 

[Corky]

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

That's not what you said, though.

In his defense, they are only 'clear as day' if either a) zimmerman is acquitted or b) Obama isn't re-elected.

If neither of those happen, there will be no riots. So therefore only 'possible'

 

[RBM]

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

That's not what you said, though.

Really? Go read my first post again and then come grovel for forgiveness.

 

[TexanFan02]

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

That's not what you said, though.

Really? Go read my first post again and then come grovel for forgiveness.

I wasn't talking about your first post. Please resign from the Internet in embarrassment immediately. Thanks for playing.

 

[RBM]

Listen, friend. I am just pointing out that you spoke in far more 'absolute' terms than tim did, and yet you chose to admonish him. If you don't see that, you are 'way deep in the sand. Its (sic) as clear as day."

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

tim speaks in hyperbolic terms always. It is genetic. Any reasonable person knows he is not stating that with 100% certainty, but he is generalizing. You, on the other hand, make your bold statement that you predict two riots if the outcome of certain events don't fall a particular way. Then you choose to challenge and/or insult any who might disagree with you. ("If you don't see that, you are way deep in the sand", i.e. ignorant, willfully stupid, moronic). Then you make an absolute statement ("Its (sic) clear as day" It is written. It has been fortold. Done deal). The main difference between these two is that tim is at least generalizing/sterotyping a particular group to be more reasonable/rational whereas you are stereotyping them into sore losers.

I predicted riots? Are you drunk?

 

[jon_mx]

Anyone have a flowchart of Tim's positions in this thread?

Here

 

[timschochet]

Listen, friend. I am just pointing out that you spoke in far more 'absolute' terms than tim did, and yet you chose to admonish him. If you don't see that, you are 'way deep in the sand. Its (sic) as clear as day."

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

tim speaks in hyperbolic terms always. It is genetic. Any reasonable person knows he is not stating that with 100% certainty, but he is generalizing. You, on the other hand, make your bold statement that you predict two riots if the outcome of certain events don't fall a particular way. Then you choose to challenge and/or insult any who might disagree with you. ("If you don't see that, you are way deep in the sand", i.e. ignorant, willfully stupid, moronic). Then you make an absolute statement ("Its (sic) clear as day" It is written. It has been fortold. Done deal).

The main difference between these two is that tim is at least generalizing/sterotyping a particular group to be more reasonable/rational whereas you are stereotyping them into sore losers.

Don't tell Clinton.

 

[RBM]

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

That's not what you said, though.

Really? Go read my first post again and then come grovel for forgiveness.

I wasn't talking about your first post. Please resign from the Internet in embarrassment immediately. Thanks for playing.

Which fn post did I say different wiseass?

 

[Corky]

Simply including the word 'potential' does not make your second statement any less absolute. In fact the second sentence negates any mitigation the word "potential" has in the first sentence. Consider this hypothetical:

I think RBM has two potential mental malfunctions...a failure to understand logic...and a failure to grasp the English language.Anyone who doesn't see that is way deep in the sand. It is clear as day.

Seems pretty 'absolute' doesn't it?

 

[Corky]

And frankly, RBM, I had no real problem with your statement. It is your opinion and you're entitled.

It was your calling out tim that just rang so hypocritical that you deserved being called out on it....that, and when you resorted to calling me names.

 

[[icon]]

This thread is awesome

 

[RBM]

And frankly, RBM, I had no real problem with your statement. It is your opinion and you're entitled.It was your calling out tim that just rang so hypocritical that you deserved being called out on it....that, and when you resorted to calling me names.

But you're definitively two things....wrong and a moron.

 

[TexanFan02]

And frankly, RBM, I had no real problem with your statement. It is your opinion and you're entitled.It was your calling out tim that just rang so hypocritical that you deserved being called out on it....that, and when you resorted to calling me names.

But you're definitively two things....wrong and a moron.

It's always cute when you resort to name calling. What alias will you use when you get banned? I need to know so I can continue to mock you.

 

[Corky]

And frankly, RBM, I had no real problem with your statement. It is your opinion and you're entitled.It was your calling out tim that just rang so hypocritical that you deserved being called out on it....that, and when you resorted to calling me names.

But you're definitively two things....wrong and a moron.

Interesting you used the -banned- icon. On this page alone, you've called me a 'dope' and a 'moron' and others 'idiot' and 'wiseass'Your method of discourse reveals your intellect, for sure. Also, the abbreviation for "it is" is "it's"

 

[RBM]

Tim is 100% positive he knows why blacks riot and exactly how they will perceive those two situations. ALL BLACK PEOPLE. Thats not more absolute than me saying riots are possible? Cmon

That's not what you said, though.

Really? Go read my first post again and then come grovel for forgiveness.

I wasn't talking about your first post. Please resign from the Internet in embarrassment immediately. Thanks for playing.

Which fn post did I say different wiseass?

Still waiting Sally....