For the love of God, do not elect Hilary Clinton next election. (1 Viewer)

[tommyGunZ]

Ill bet you $10,000

Damn. I know you mean it too.What fascinates me about you, tommyboy, are not your political convictions (many people share those) but your absolute continual certainty that "your side" is going to win, despite the fact that quite often they don't.

i have no idea who's going to win, i just know that Hillary has zero chance, as I've said repeatedly since before this thread even started. The fact she's under serious federal investigation might be a small clue, but the other fact that she couldn't beat a freshman senator in 2008 is a larger one. She's just not likable, or trustworthy, and her time has passed.

there is currently no one running for president that excites me, congratulations America. We're all losers here[/quote

You're overstating your case with the "no chance" nonsense.

If she truly has "no chance", I'll gladly put up $500 at 10-1 odds, against your $5k. Should be an easy $500 for you, if your really believe she has "no chance".

 

[tommyboy]

wow, you've got huge balls

 

[tommyGunZ]

Backpedal much?

 

[John Bender]

lol at 10-1

 

[tommyGunZ]

lol at 10-1

If she really has no chance, it's a sucker bet, right?

 

[John Bender]

lol at 10-1

If she really has no chance, it's a sucker bet, right?

wrong. It's something someone who has no balls to actually take a real bet with someone says. (and I don't mean that offensively to you to be honest, I've just seen it 100 times). Why don't you bet him 1-1 if you're so confident?

 

[tommyGunZ]

lol at 10-1

If she really has no chance, it's a sucker bet, right?

wrong. It's something someone who has no balls to actually take a real bet with someone says. (and I don't mean that offensively to you to be honest, I've just seen it 100 times). Why don't you bet him 1-1 if you're so confident?

Im extremely confident that Hillary Clinton "has a chance" at this point. That's a far cry from putting up 10k that she will actually win.

 

[John Bender]

lol at 10-1

If she really has no chance, it's a sucker bet, right?

wrong. It's something someone who has no balls to actually take a real bet with someone says. (and I don't mean that offensively to you to be honest, I've just seen it 100 times). Why don't you bet him 1-1 if you're so confident?

Im extremely confident that Hillary Clinton "has a chance" at this point. That's a far cry from putting up 10k that she will actually win.

She's gonna win easily. Asking people for 10-1 and then calling someone out when they don't accept it is just kinda weak.

 

[timschochet]

Tommyboy I'm willing to bet you $500 straight up that Hillary will be the Democratic nominee for President.

 

[John Bender]

Tommyboy I'm willing to bet you $500 straight up that Hillary will be the Democratic nominee for President.

See? now that's a real man.

 

[John Bender]

I'll take 500 that she does win as well.

 

[Rohn Jambo]

Tommyboy I'm willing to bet you $500 straight up that Hillary will be the Democratic nominee for President.

Why do you want to make me leave the country?

 

[timschochet]

Tommyboy I'm willing to bet you $500 straight up that Hillary will be the Democratic nominee for President.

Why do you want to make me leave the country?

Well that's not part of the wager, but...

 

[tommyboy]

i'm not betting anyone, i was ####### with CSTU. geebus people. After losing $2500 on romney and probably another $Q500 on the ####### obamacare fiasco, i tink i'm done betting politics. i mean, i was at a casino the other night and made $800 off a $200 start on 1-2NL holdem, i think my odds are better there.

but i really did like Tgunz yuge offer to bet me 10-1, lolz.

 

[timschochet]

I wish I could win at Hold em. But I suck at it even with friends.

 

[tommyboy]

I wish I could win at Hold em. But I suck at it even with friends.

my general strategy is avoid the pros and take the guppy money. every table i've ever sat at has 2 or 3 regulars on it, i avoid them unless i have a monster.

 

[Rohn Jambo]

i'm not betting anyone, i was ####### with CSTU. geebus people. After losing $2500 on romney and probably another $Q500 on the ####### obamacare fiasco, i tink i'm done betting politics. i mean, i was at a casino the other night and made $800 off a $200 start on 1-2NL holdem, i think my odds are better there.

but i really did like Tgunz yuge offer to bet me 10-1, lolz.

Romney only worthed a $1 bet.

 

[Zegras11]

I'll take 500 that she does win as well.

I will put up $50 to win $500 that Hillary does not win the Dem Nom.

 

[avoiding injuries]

Tommyboy I'm willing to bet you $500 straight up that Hillary will be the Democratic nominee for President.

See? now that's a real man.

Not exactly, with the democratic nominee stipulation. And I would also like to lolz at the 10-1 offer.

 

[McGarnicle]

I'll bet you $1million that she's a crazy old bat who couldn't tell the truth for 48 straight hours to save her life.

 

[John Bender]

I'll bet you $1million that she's a crazy old bat who couldn't tell the truth for 48 straight hours to save her life.

give me 10-1 on it and you're on!

 

[Bottomfeeder Sports]

And I would also like to lolz at the 10-1 offer.

I agree! 10 - 1 is way too much to give up when the house set the true odds at...

...i just know that Hillary has zero chance, ...

... ∞ to 1

 

[avoiding injuries]

I'll bet you $1million that she's a crazy old bat who couldn't tell the truth for 48 straight hours to save her life.

give me 10-1 on it and you're on!

And make it 48 minutes!

 

[avoiding injuries]

And I would also like to lolz at the 10-1 offer.

I agree! 10 - 1 is way too much to give up when the house set the true odds at...

...i just know that Hillary has zero chance, ...

... ∞ to 1

Clinton is -700 to be the democratic nominee, but Tim is willing to bet straight up. She's +100 to be the president but tgun wants 10-1.

So yes, lolz.

 

[Bottomfeeder Sports]

And I would also like to lolz at the 10-1 offer.

I agree! 10 - 1 is way too much to give up when the house set the true odds at...

...i just know that Hillary has zero chance, ...

... ∞ to 1

Clinton is -700 to be the democratic nominee, but Tim is willing to bet straight up.She's +100 to be the president but tgun wants 10-1.

So yes, lolz.

Those odds don't reflect the zero chance quoted.

 

[John Bender]

And I would also like to lolz at the 10-1 offer.

I agree! 10 - 1 is way too much to give up when the house set the true odds at...

...i just know that Hillary has zero chance, ...

... ∞ to 1

Clinton is -700 to be the democratic nominee, but Tim is willing to bet straight up.She's +100 to be the president but tgun wants 10-1.

So yes, lolz.

Those odds don't reflect the zero chance quoted.

wow

 

[Rohn Jambo]

I'll take 500 that she does win as well.

No one smart will put up serous money for her to win the Presidency.

 

[Maurile Tremblay]

If tommyboy had said that Hillary had no better than a 20% chance to become President, the 10-1 offer by tGunZ would have been LOL.

 

[John Bender]

awesome thread.

 

[FreeBaGeL]

I find it hard to believe that a bunch of dudes on a fantasy football forum have never seen someone use hyperbole to make a point.

 

[John Bender]

I find it hard to believe that a bunch of dudes on a fantasy football forum have never seen someone use hyperbole to make a point.

It's amazing

 

[Mister CIA]

Backpedal much?

Good gawd, you're awful.

 

[Maurile Tremblay]

I find it hard to believe that a bunch of dudes on a fantasy football forum have never seen someone use hyperbole to make a point.

Nobody said we've never seen someone use hyberb -- oh.

 

[tommyboy]

Zero chance. Mark it down and study it.

 

[tommyboy]

https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/sign-3.jpg?w=300&h=200

 

[squistion]

Zero chance. Mark it down and study it.

I'll mark it down and study it along with this:

Ty Smith ‏@tysmith0214 · Aug 27

Calling it now: the kid leash market will explode in fall 2015 #predictions

 

[tommyGunZ]

Zero chance. Mark it down and study it.

Why do you continue to say this, and not accept my free $?

 

[jon_mx]

Shes toast

Put your money where your mouth is.

I have $100 which says Hillary is in fact not a piece of bread which has been heated such that her outer surface is now a crispy brown.

 

[MaxThreshold]

Zero chance. Mark it down and study it.

Why do you continue to say this, and not accept my free $?

Maybe because tommyboy is a stand-up guy and doesn't think it is morally right to take advantage of the mentally handicapped.

 

[timschochet]

Shes toast

Put your money where your mouth is.

I have $100 which says Hillary is in fact not a piece of bread which has been heated such that her outer surface is now a crispy brown.

Hmm. I am considering this wager, but how to verify? One of us would have to get close to her to find out.

 

[tommyboy]

All she has to do is say bill is gonna be VP and she'll win a landslide, but shes too much of a #####

 

[Xavier L. Steele]

Google Vince Foster before you even think of voting for Hilary..

 

[squistion]

Google Vince Foster before you even think of voting for Hilary..

 

[Rohn Jambo]

Google Vince Foster before you even think of voting for Hilary..

I don't think wanting to vote for Hillary was Vince Foster's problem.

 

[Rohn Jambo]

All she has to do is say bill is gonna be VP and she'll win a landslide, but shes too much of a #####

There is no way in hell Bill would want to be her VP.

 

[Rohn Jambo]

Shes toast

Put your money where your mouth is.

I have $100 which says Hillary is in fact not a piece of bread which has been heated such that her outer surface is now a crispy brown.

Hmm. I am considering this wager, but how to verify? One of us would have to get close to her to find out.

This is for you Tim: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7BNMrybHO4

 

[tommyboy]

this is problematic

"It is hard to move classified documents into the non-classified system. You couldn't move a document by mistake," said Willes Lee, a former operations officer for the U.S. Army in Europe and former operations officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

State Department spokesman Alec Gerlach confirmed the two systems don't connect. "The classified and unclassified system are separate and you cannot email between the two," Gerlach told Fox News.

 

[The Commish]

this is problematic

"It is hard to move classified documents into the non-classified system. You couldn't move a document by mistake," said Willes Lee, a former operations officer for the U.S. Army in Europe and former operations officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

State Department spokesman Alec Gerlach confirmed the two systems don't connect. "The classified and unclassified system are separate and you cannot email between the two," Gerlach told Fox News.

It's only problematic to guys like TGunz and their argument against the faux argument few here were making or coming close to suggesting. This, of course, doesn't prevent the scenario where information is passed along, then deemed classified at a later date. I don't know what their process is when this happens or how they enforce it now. However, if it's shown that she received emails that were classified all along, it goes to my concern that she had a server set up that was, indeed, receiving classified emails as well as personal emails which means her server was a potential bridge between the systems the gov't is claiming are completely separate. THAT'S a bigger concern to me than the actual emails.

 

[Bottomfeeder Sports]

this is problematic

"It is hard to move classified documents into the non-classified system. You couldn't move a document by mistake," said Willes Lee, a former operations officer for the U.S. Army in Europe and former operations officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

State Department spokesman Alec Gerlach confirmed the two systems don't connect. "The classified and unclassified system are separate and you cannot email between the two," Gerlach told Fox News.

It's only problematic to guys like TGunz and their argument against the faux argument few here were making or coming close to suggesting. This, of course, doesn't prevent the scenario where information is passed along, then deemed classified at a later date. I don't know what their process is when this happens or how they enforce it now. However, if it's shown that she received emails that were classified all along, it goes to my concern that she had a server set up that was, indeed, receiving classified emails as well as personal emails which means her server was a potential bridge between the systems the gov't is claiming are completely separate. THAT'S a bigger concern to me than the actual emails.

You cannot e-mail between the classified and non classified government systems, but you think that you could e-mail from the classified system to private e-mail address? And you criticize others for the nature of their arguments?

 

[The Commish]

this is problematic

"It is hard to move classified documents into the non-classified system. You couldn't move a document by mistake," said Willes Lee, a former operations officer for the U.S. Army in Europe and former operations officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

State Department spokesman Alec Gerlach confirmed the two systems don't connect. "The classified and unclassified system are separate and you cannot email between the two," Gerlach told Fox News.

It's only problematic to guys like TGunz and their argument against the faux argument few here were making or coming close to suggesting. This, of course, doesn't prevent the scenario where information is passed along, then deemed classified at a later date. I don't know what their process is when this happens or how they enforce it now. However, if it's shown that she received emails that were classified all along, it goes to my concern that she had a server set up that was, indeed, receiving classified emails as well as personal emails which means her server was a potential bridge between the systems the gov't is claiming are completely separate. THAT'S a bigger concern to me than the actual emails.

You cannot e-mail between the classified and non classified government systems, but you think that you could e-mail from the classified system to private e-mail address? And you criticize others for the nature of their arguments?

um, wut?

She's said she had that server so she could get ALL her emails in one place and that it mixed both her personal and work. If that's true, then there is no other option If this is two separate networks then she'd have to be connected to both networks wouldn't she? It would be monumentally stupid of her not clarify that her server was not part of the "classified network" if that were the case. I guess that's possible. I'm going by the she's spewing and the small pieces of data that have been slowly released. Until it's all out we won't "know" the full story....even then I am confident there will be large gaps. As of right now, her versions of her ever changing story aren't jiving with each other. All I know for certain is there were no isolated networks for classified emails in the 2004-2007 range.....that'd be a new security feature if true.