Foxy Knoxy (1 Viewer)

[jon_mx]

I did not remember her being that hot, but I saw a couple recent photos and she is looking real good. She needs to be released and released now. Too hot to be wasting away in prison.

 

[wadegarrett]

I did not remember her being that hot, but I saw a couple recent photos and she is looking real good. She needs to be released and released now. Too hot to be wasting away in prison.

needs to give those eyebrows a trimming though...can see trees growing in there

 

[Phil Elliott]

I did not remember her being that hot, but I saw a couple recent photos and she is looking real good. She needs to be released and released now. Too hot to be wasting away in prison.

 

[culdeus]

Still not sure why CNN has been running this story like she's Casey Anthony for years. If it wasn't for CNN would anyone in the US ever have heard of her?

 

[meanjoegreen]

Still not sure why CNN has been running this story like she's Casey Anthony for years. If it wasn't for CNN would anyone in the US ever have heard of her?

Her case has been discussed on all the news stations, so yes the US would still have heard of her.

 

[Drifter]

The Amanda Knox trial will be going to the jury in a day or so, what do you think?

Does anyone honestly give two ##### about this?

She's from my neighborhood so it's constant coverage here. Passed under a banner this morning that said "Free Amanda". Also met her dad at the local golf course over the summer. Hard to ignore it under those circustances.

 

[Oh Yes!]

The Amanda Knox trial will be going to the jury in a day or so, what do you think?

Does anyone honestly give two ##### about this?

Also met her dad at the local golf course over the summer. Hard to ignore it under those circustances.

did he say if she did it?

 

[Tom Servo]

Despite liberals' desperate need for Europeans to like them, the American media have enraged the entire nation of Italy with their bald-faced lies about a heinous murder in Perugia committed by a fresh-faced American girl, Amanda Knox.

The facts aren't elusive: In December 2009, the Italian court released a 400-plus page report detailing the mountains of evidence that led the judges and jury to conclude that Knox, along with her Italian beau, Raffaele Sollecito, and a petty thief of her acquaintance, Rudy Guede, had murdered Knox's English roommate, Meredith Kercher, on the evening of Nov. 1, 2007.

Now liberals are howling that the DNA evidence was "contaminated," but they always say that. It wasn't. And the DNA was already thoroughly vetted at trial.

Nonetheless, let's consider only a tiny slice of the evidence available to the police in the first week after the murder -- long before any DNA tests came back.

Murders and murder convictions obviously occurred before 1986 -- the first time DNA was used in any criminal investigation -- so it is possible to establish guilt with no DNA at all.

Knox's first-of-several alibis for the night of the murder was that she was at her boyfriend (and co-defendant) Sollecito's house all night, sound asleep until 10 a.m. the next morning.

A few days later, when that was proved false by telephone records, eyewitnesses and Sollecito's admission that it was a lie, Knox claimed she was in the house during Meredith's murder ... and she knew who the murderer was!

She said it was her boss, Patrick Lumumba, the owner of a popular bar in town:

"He wanted her. ... Raffaele and I went into another room and then I heard screams. ... Patrick and Meredith were in Meredith's bedroom while I think I stayed in the kitchen. ... I can't remember how long they were together in the bedroom, but the only thing I can say is that at a certain point I remember hearing Meredith's screams and I covered my ears. ... I can't remember if Meredith was screaming and if I heard thuds but I could imagine what was going on."

Solely because of Knox's claim that Lumumba murdered Meredith, he was arrested and sat in jail for two weeks before being released when the police discovered about a hundred eyewitnesses who could place him at his bar all night, the night of the murder.

If the police were intent on framing Knox for the murder, they were easily distracted by this wild goose chase.

Knox later said she falsely accused Lumumba only because the police wanted her to do so.

But absent Knox's false accusation, there would have been no reason for the police to consider Lumumba a suspect in the first place. He was a successful entrepreneur in Perugia, married with a child, and had no connection whatsoever to the murdered girl.

Knox's effort to frame an innocent man was nothing but a desperate attempt to throw suspicion off herself. In the process, she inadvertently revealed that she knew something only the police knew about the murder: that Meredith had also been sexually assaulted.

Police first came to the house the day after the murder to investigate a burglary in the bedroom of another roommate, Filomena Romanelli, that had been reported by Knox and Sollecito.

But the break-in turned out to be staged. Among many other reasons, glass from the broken window was on top of the piles of clothes thrown on the floor. (Always remember to break the window before trying to stage a burglary!)

Also, nothing had been stolen from Filomena's room. Of course, that wasn't known by anyone except the fake "burglar" until Filomena returned and determined her jewelry and other valuables were still there.

So it is especially telling that when Sollecito had called the police to report the "burglary" in two separate, recorded phone calls, he said nothing had been stolen -- despite the fact that Filomena had not yet come home. The only way Sollecito would know nothing was stolen was if he had helped stage the burglary himself.

Also highly suspicious, when the police first arrived and Knox was the only roommate there, she lied to them, driving them away from Meredith's locked bedroom door by assuring them that Meredith always locked her door, even to go to the bathroom.

So the police continued to investigate the alleged burglary and ignored Meredith's room, until Filomena arrived, found out Meredith's door was locked and demanded the police break it down, telling them -- contra Knox -- that Meredith never locked her door.

Everyone in the apartment -- the police, Filomena and her friends -- gathered around Meredith's door before it was kicked in. Everyone, that is, except Knox and Sollecito, who moved as far away as possible, to the other end of the apartment, strangely uninterested in seeing what was behind Meredith's door.

Now Knox is back to claiming she was in Sollecito's apartment all night on Nov. 1 -- with no evidence to support that story, but witnesses, phone and computer records contradicting it. Her only alibi witness is her co-defendant, Sollecito, and he's already told the police that he has lied for her.

Based on the wounds on Meredith's body, investigators conclusively determined that she had multiple attackers.

By now, the only people who believe Knox and Sollecito are the usual criminal apologists and their friends in the American media.

From Tawana Brawley, Mumia and the Central Park rapists, to the Duke lacrosse players and Karl Rove, liberals are always on the wrong side of a criminal case. A few times could be a coincidence; every time is evidence of a psychological disorder.

As described in "Demonic," liberals defend the guilty and impugn the innocent not only because they side with barbarians, but because a fair and just system of law challenges their hegemony as judges of the universe.

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it. You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

 

[Godsbrother]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

I haven't read the 400 pages of evidence and have no idea if she is guilty or not but when I heard there was zero DNA of Knox at an incredibly bloody and violent murder scene it sure adds doubt in my mind.

 

[Mister Martie]

Despite liberals' desperate need for Europeans to like them, the American media have enraged the entire nation of Italy with their bald-faced lies about a heinous murder in Perugia committed by a fresh-faced American girl, Amanda Knox.

The facts aren't elusive: In December 2009, the Italian court released a 400-plus page report detailing the mountains of evidence that led the judges and jury to conclude that Knox, along with her Italian beau, Raffaele Sollecito, and a petty thief of her acquaintance, Rudy Guede, had murdered Knox's English roommate, Meredith Kercher, on the evening of Nov. 1, 2007.

Now liberals are howling that the DNA evidence was "contaminated," but they always say that. It wasn't. And the DNA was already thoroughly vetted at trial.

Nonetheless, let's consider only a tiny slice of the evidence available to the police in the first week after the murder -- long before any DNA tests came back.

Murders and murder convictions obviously occurred before 1986 -- the first time DNA was used in any criminal investigation -- so it is possible to establish guilt with no DNA at all.

Knox's first-of-several alibis for the night of the murder was that she was at her boyfriend (and co-defendant) Sollecito's house all night, sound asleep until 10 a.m. the next morning.

A few days later, when that was proved false by telephone records, eyewitnesses and Sollecito's admission that it was a lie, Knox claimed she was in the house during Meredith's murder ... and she knew who the murderer was!

She said it was her boss, Patrick Lumumba, the owner of a popular bar in town:

"He wanted her. ... Raffaele and I went into another room and then I heard screams. ... Patrick and Meredith were in Meredith's bedroom while I think I stayed in the kitchen. ... I can't remember how long they were together in the bedroom, but the only thing I can say is that at a certain point I remember hearing Meredith's screams and I covered my ears. ... I can't remember if Meredith was screaming and if I heard thuds but I could imagine what was going on."

Solely because of Knox's claim that Lumumba murdered Meredith, he was arrested and sat in jail for two weeks before being released when the police discovered about a hundred eyewitnesses who could place him at his bar all night, the night of the murder.

If the police were intent on framing Knox for the murder, they were easily distracted by this wild goose chase.

Knox later said she falsely accused Lumumba only because the police wanted her to do so.

But absent Knox's false accusation, there would have been no reason for the police to consider Lumumba a suspect in the first place. He was a successful entrepreneur in Perugia, married with a child, and had no connection whatsoever to the murdered girl.

Knox's effort to frame an innocent man was nothing but a desperate attempt to throw suspicion off herself. In the process, she inadvertently revealed that she knew something only the police knew about the murder: that Meredith had also been sexually assaulted.

Police first came to the house the day after the murder to investigate a burglary in the bedroom of another roommate, Filomena Romanelli, that had been reported by Knox and Sollecito.

But the break-in turned out to be staged. Among many other reasons, glass from the broken window was on top of the piles of clothes thrown on the floor. (Always remember to break the window before trying to stage a burglary!)

Also, nothing had been stolen from Filomena's room. Of course, that wasn't known by anyone except the fake "burglar" until Filomena returned and determined her jewelry and other valuables were still there.

So it is especially telling that when Sollecito had called the police to report the "burglary" in two separate, recorded phone calls, he said nothing had been stolen -- despite the fact that Filomena had not yet come home. The only way Sollecito would know nothing was stolen was if he had helped stage the burglary himself.

Also highly suspicious, when the police first arrived and Knox was the only roommate there, she lied to them, driving them away from Meredith's locked bedroom door by assuring them that Meredith always locked her door, even to go to the bathroom.

So the police continued to investigate the alleged burglary and ignored Meredith's room, until Filomena arrived, found out Meredith's door was locked and demanded the police break it down, telling them -- contra Knox -- that Meredith never locked her door.

Everyone in the apartment -- the police, Filomena and her friends -- gathered around Meredith's door before it was kicked in. Everyone, that is, except Knox and Sollecito, who moved as far away as possible, to the other end of the apartment, strangely uninterested in seeing what was behind Meredith's door.

Now Knox is back to claiming she was in Sollecito's apartment all night on Nov. 1 -- with no evidence to support that story, but witnesses, phone and computer records contradicting it. Her only alibi witness is her co-defendant, Sollecito, and he's already told the police that he has lied for her.

Based on the wounds on Meredith's body, investigators conclusively determined that she had multiple attackers.

By now, the only people who believe Knox and Sollecito are the usual criminal apologists and their friends in the American media.

From Tawana Brawley, Mumia and the Central Park rapists, to the Duke lacrosse players and Karl Rove, liberals are always on the wrong side of a criminal case. A few times could be a coincidence; every time is evidence of a psychological disorder.

As described in "Demonic," liberals defend the guilty and impugn the innocent not only because they side with barbarians, but because a fair and just system of law challenges their hegemony as judges of the universe.

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it. You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

Good god.

 

[General Malaise]

I did not remember her being that hot, but I saw a couple recent photos and she is looking real good. She needs to be released and released now. Too hot to be wasting away in prison.

needs to give those eyebrows a trimming though...can see trees growing in there

:X Imagine what her kitty looks like.

 

[Drifter]

I did not remember her being that hot, but I saw a couple recent photos and she is looking real good. She needs to be released and released now. Too hot to be wasting away in prison.

needs to give those eyebrows a trimming though...can see trees growing in there

:X Imagine what her kitty looks like.

My link

 

[scoobygang]

Weird that Coulter would cite to the Central Park jogger case. That's an example of the type of reflexive "liberals support criminals" mindset you see often among people like Ann.

If that conviction can't be overturned it's hard to think of any conviction that could be.

 

[Ripley]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

These kinds of statements make me fear for the legal system in this country. I have no idea if she's guilty or not. Neither do you. 400 pages of evidence doesn't mean anything if it's bad evidence or people draw the wrong conclusion from it. I hear lots of news about the case around here because she went to the same school I do. The general consensus around here is that the case has been a pig circus. I don't know if that's the case or not, I haven't followed it closely, but I do see quotes like the following in the articles I have read about it:

At a Seattle University symposium in April, Steve Moore, a retired FBI agent who once oversaw Al Queda investigations, compared Knox's prosecution to a "lynching."

"This will be an academy class in most forensic academies, I hope," said Moore. "This is the worst case I have ever seen in a western country."

I have no idea whether she did it or not or what the 400 pages of evidence says, but there is also plenty of evidence suggesting that the original trial she got was a sham.I do know that the original DNA evidence was extremely inconclusive (and has been thrown out in the appeal). I also heard that the day after the murder, before she was arrested, she had the opportunity to leave the country, but didn't because she wanted to support her friend. Those aren't the actions of a guilty person.

 

[SacramentoBob]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

These kinds of statements make me fear for the legal system in this country. I have no idea if she's guilty or not. Neither do you. 400 pages of evidence doesn't mean anything if it's bad evidence or people draw the wrong conclusion from it. I hear lots of news about the case around here because she went to the same school I do. The general consensus around here is that the case has been a pig circus. I don't know if that's the case or not, I haven't followed it closely, but I do see quotes like the following in the articles I have read about it:

At a Seattle University symposium in April, Steve Moore, a retired FBI agent who once oversaw Al Queda investigations, compared Knox's prosecution to a "lynching."

"This will be an academy class in most forensic academies, I hope," said Moore. "This is the worst case I have ever seen in a western country."

I have no idea whether she did it or not or what the 400 pages of evidence says, but there is also plenty of evidence suggesting that the original trial she got was a sham.I do know that the original DNA evidence was extremely inconclusive (and has been thrown out in the appeal). I also heard that the day after the murder, before she was arrested, she had the opportunity to leave the country, but didn't because she wanted to support her friend. Those aren't the actions of a guilty person.

If I were innocent, I would've gotten the hell out of dodge if I thought there was a chance they'd come after me.

 

[Nick Vermeil]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

These kinds of statements make me fear for the legal system in this country. I have no idea if she's guilty or not. Neither do you. 400 pages of evidence doesn't mean anything if it's bad evidence or people draw the wrong conclusion from it. I hear lots of news about the case around here because she went to the same school I do. The general consensus around here is that the case has been a pig circus. I don't know if that's the case or not, I haven't followed it closely, but I do see quotes like the following in the articles I have read about it:

At a Seattle University symposium in April, Steve Moore, a retired FBI agent who once oversaw Al Queda investigations, compared Knox's prosecution to a "lynching."

"This will be an academy class in most forensic academies, I hope," said Moore. "This is the worst case I have ever seen in a western country."

I have no idea whether she did it or not or what the 400 pages of evidence says, but there is also plenty of evidence suggesting that the original trial she got was a sham.I do know that the original DNA evidence was extremely inconclusive (and has been thrown out in the appeal). I also heard that the day after the murder, before she was arrested, she had the opportunity to leave the country, but didn't because she wanted to support her friend. Those aren't the actions of a guilty person.

I love me a pig circus.

 

[Johnnymac]

Despite liberals' desperate need for Europeans to like them, the American media have enraged the entire nation of Italy with their bald-faced lies about a heinous murder in Perugia committed by a fresh-faced American girl, Amanda Knox.

The facts aren't elusive: In December 2009, the Italian court released a 400-plus page report detailing the mountains of evidence that led the judges and jury to conclude that Knox, along with her Italian beau, Raffaele Sollecito, and a petty thief of her acquaintance, Rudy Guede, had murdered Knox's English roommate, Meredith Kercher, on the evening of Nov. 1, 2007.

Now liberals are howling that the DNA evidence was "contaminated," but they always say that. It wasn't. And the DNA was already thoroughly vetted at trial.

Nonetheless, let's consider only a tiny slice of the evidence available to the police in the first week after the murder -- long before any DNA tests came back.

Murders and murder convictions obviously occurred before 1986 -- the first time DNA was used in any criminal investigation -- so it is possible to establish guilt with no DNA at all.

Knox's first-of-several alibis for the night of the murder was that she was at her boyfriend (and co-defendant) Sollecito's house all night, sound asleep until 10 a.m. the next morning.

A few days later, when that was proved false by telephone records, eyewitnesses and Sollecito's admission that it was a lie, Knox claimed she was in the house during Meredith's murder ... and she knew who the murderer was!

She said it was her boss, Patrick Lumumba, the owner of a popular bar in town:

"He wanted her. ... Raffaele and I went into another room and then I heard screams. ... Patrick and Meredith were in Meredith's bedroom while I think I stayed in the kitchen. ... I can't remember how long they were together in the bedroom, but the only thing I can say is that at a certain point I remember hearing Meredith's screams and I covered my ears. ... I can't remember if Meredith was screaming and if I heard thuds but I could imagine what was going on."

Solely because of Knox's claim that Lumumba murdered Meredith, he was arrested and sat in jail for two weeks before being released when the police discovered about a hundred eyewitnesses who could place him at his bar all night, the night of the murder.

If the police were intent on framing Knox for the murder, they were easily distracted by this wild goose chase.

Knox later said she falsely accused Lumumba only because the police wanted her to do so.

But absent Knox's false accusation, there would have been no reason for the police to consider Lumumba a suspect in the first place. He was a successful entrepreneur in Perugia, married with a child, and had no connection whatsoever to the murdered girl.

Knox's effort to frame an innocent man was nothing but a desperate attempt to throw suspicion off herself. In the process, she inadvertently revealed that she knew something only the police knew about the murder: that Meredith had also been sexually assaulted.

Police first came to the house the day after the murder to investigate a burglary in the bedroom of another roommate, Filomena Romanelli, that had been reported by Knox and Sollecito.

But the break-in turned out to be staged. Among many other reasons, glass from the broken window was on top of the piles of clothes thrown on the floor. (Always remember to break the window before trying to stage a burglary!)

Also, nothing had been stolen from Filomena's room. Of course, that wasn't known by anyone except the fake "burglar" until Filomena returned and determined her jewelry and other valuables were still there.

So it is especially telling that when Sollecito had called the police to report the "burglary" in two separate, recorded phone calls, he said nothing had been stolen -- despite the fact that Filomena had not yet come home. The only way Sollecito would know nothing was stolen was if he had helped stage the burglary himself.

Also highly suspicious, when the police first arrived and Knox was the only roommate there, she lied to them, driving them away from Meredith's locked bedroom door by assuring them that Meredith always locked her door, even to go to the bathroom.

So the police continued to investigate the alleged burglary and ignored Meredith's room, until Filomena arrived, found out Meredith's door was locked and demanded the police break it down, telling them -- contra Knox -- that Meredith never locked her door.

Everyone in the apartment -- the police, Filomena and her friends -- gathered around Meredith's door before it was kicked in. Everyone, that is, except Knox and Sollecito, who moved as far away as possible, to the other end of the apartment, strangely uninterested in seeing what was behind Meredith's door.

Now Knox is back to claiming she was in Sollecito's apartment all night on Nov. 1 -- with no evidence to support that story, but witnesses, phone and computer records contradicting it. Her only alibi witness is her co-defendant, Sollecito, and he's already told the police that he has lied for her.

Based on the wounds on Meredith's body, investigators conclusively determined that she had multiple attackers.

By now, the only people who believe Knox and Sollecito are the usual criminal apologists and their friends in the American media.

From Tawana Brawley, Mumia and the Central Park rapists, to the Duke lacrosse players and Karl Rove, liberals are always on the wrong side of a criminal case. A few times could be a coincidence; every time is evidence of a psychological disorder.

As described in "Demonic," liberals defend the guilty and impugn the innocent not only because they side with barbarians, but because a fair and just system of law challenges their hegemony as judges of the universe.

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it. You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

You are delusional if you think she's guilty. That's 400 pages of bad and/or doctored evidence. Hell, the prosecutor in the case is more of a criminal than she is.

 

[culdeus]

But it's 400!!!!! pages!!!!!!!

 

[Nick Vermeil]

Verdict at 3:30 ET

 

[Ripley]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

These kinds of statements make me fear for the legal system in this country. I have no idea if she's guilty or not. Neither do you. 400 pages of evidence doesn't mean anything if it's bad evidence or people draw the wrong conclusion from it. I hear lots of news about the case around here because she went to the same school I do. The general consensus around here is that the case has been a pig circus. I don't know if that's the case or not, I haven't followed it closely, but I do see quotes like the following in the articles I have read about it:

At a Seattle University symposium in April, Steve Moore, a retired FBI agent who once oversaw Al Queda investigations, compared Knox's prosecution to a "lynching."

"This will be an academy class in most forensic academies, I hope," said Moore. "This is the worst case I have ever seen in a western country."

I have no idea whether she did it or not or what the 400 pages of evidence says, but there is also plenty of evidence suggesting that the original trial she got was a sham.I do know that the original DNA evidence was extremely inconclusive (and has been thrown out in the appeal). I also heard that the day after the murder, before she was arrested, she had the opportunity to leave the country, but didn't because she wanted to support her friend. Those aren't the actions of a guilty person.

If I were innocent, I would've gotten the hell out of dodge if I thought there was a chance they'd come after me.

If I were guilty, I would've definitely gotten the hell out of dodge. The only reason I can think of for why she didn't was that she didn't think there was any reason they'd come after her. As I said before, I have no idea if she did it or not, but her not leaving when she had the chance to makes me think she's innocent and had no idea she'd be a suspect.

 

[jon_mx]

I did not remember her being that hot, but I saw a couple recent photos and she is looking real good. She needs to be released and released now. Too hot to be wasting away in prison.

needs to give those eyebrows a trimming though...can see trees growing in there

If un-mannicured eyebrows are the worst thing about a chick, sign me up now.

 

[SacramentoBob]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

These kinds of statements make me fear for the legal system in this country. I have no idea if she's guilty or not. Neither do you. 400 pages of evidence doesn't mean anything if it's bad evidence or people draw the wrong conclusion from it. I hear lots of news about the case around here because she went to the same school I do. The general consensus around here is that the case has been a pig circus. I don't know if that's the case or not, I haven't followed it closely, but I do see quotes like the following in the articles I have read about it:

At a Seattle University symposium in April, Steve Moore, a retired FBI agent who once oversaw Al Queda investigations, compared Knox's prosecution to a "lynching."

"This will be an academy class in most forensic academies, I hope," said Moore. "This is the worst case I have ever seen in a western country."

I have no idea whether she did it or not or what the 400 pages of evidence says, but there is also plenty of evidence suggesting that the original trial she got was a sham.I do know that the original DNA evidence was extremely inconclusive (and has been thrown out in the appeal). I also heard that the day after the murder, before she was arrested, she had the opportunity to leave the country, but didn't because she wanted to support her friend. Those aren't the actions of a guilty person.

If I were innocent, I would've gotten the hell out of dodge if I thought there was a chance they'd come after me.

If I were guilty, I would've definitely gotten the hell out of dodge. The only reason I can think of for why she didn't was that she didn't think there was any reason they'd come after her. As I said before, I have no idea if she did it or not, but her not leaving when she had the chance to makes me think she's innocent and had no idea she'd be a suspect.

This makes sense to you because you're a rational person not thinking like a murderer. People capable of those kinds of acts do all sorts of things that don't seem logical because they are sociopaths or megalomaniacs.

 

[toadstool]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

These kinds of statements make me fear for the legal system in this country. I have no idea if she's guilty or not. Neither do you. 400 pages of evidence doesn't mean anything if it's bad evidence or people draw the wrong conclusion from it. I hear lots of news about the case around here because she went to the same school I do. The general consensus around here is that the case has been a pig circus. I don't know if that's the case or not, I haven't followed it closely, but I do see quotes like the following in the articles I have read about it:

At a Seattle University symposium in April, Steve Moore, a retired FBI agent who once oversaw Al Queda investigations, compared Knox's prosecution to a "lynching."

"This will be an academy class in most forensic academies, I hope," said Moore. "This is the worst case I have ever seen in a western country."

I have no idea whether she did it or not or what the 400 pages of evidence says, but there is also plenty of evidence suggesting that the original trial she got was a sham.I do know that the original DNA evidence was extremely inconclusive (and has been thrown out in the appeal). I also heard that the day after the murder, before she was arrested, she had the opportunity to leave the country, but didn't because she wanted to support her friend. Those aren't the actions of a guilty person.

If I were innocent, I would've gotten the hell out of dodge if I thought there was a chance they'd come after me.

If I were guilty, I would've definitely gotten the hell out of dodge. The only reason I can think of for why she didn't was that she didn't think there was any reason they'd come after her. As I said before, I have no idea if she did it or not, but her not leaving when she had the chance to makes me think she's innocent and had no idea she'd be a suspect.

This makes sense to you because you're a rational person not thinking like a murderer. People capable of those kinds of acts do all sorts of things that don't seem logical because they are sociopaths or megalomaniacs.

So really, her staying could mean she did it, or didn't do it.Sounds about right...

 

[JbizzleMan]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

These kinds of statements make me fear for the legal system in this country. I have no idea if she's guilty or not. Neither do you. 400 pages of evidence doesn't mean anything if it's bad evidence or people draw the wrong conclusion from it. I hear lots of news about the case around here because she went to the same school I do. The general consensus around here is that the case has been a pig circus. I don't know if that's the case or not, I haven't followed it closely, but I do see quotes like the following in the articles I have read about it:

At a Seattle University symposium in April, Steve Moore, a retired FBI agent who once oversaw Al Queda investigations, compared Knox's prosecution to a "lynching."

"This will be an academy class in most forensic academies, I hope," said Moore. "This is the worst case I have ever seen in a western country."

I have no idea whether she did it or not or what the 400 pages of evidence says, but there is also plenty of evidence suggesting that the original trial she got was a sham.I do know that the original DNA evidence was extremely inconclusive (and has been thrown out in the appeal). I also heard that the day after the murder, before she was arrested, she had the opportunity to leave the country, but didn't because she wanted to support her friend. Those aren't the actions of a guilty person.

If I were innocent, I would've gotten the hell out of dodge if I thought there was a chance they'd come after me.

If I were guilty, I would've definitely gotten the hell out of dodge. The only reason I can think of for why she didn't was that she didn't think there was any reason they'd come after her. As I said before, I have no idea if she did it or not, but her not leaving when she had the chance to makes me think she's innocent and had no idea she'd be a suspect.

This makes sense to you because you're a rational person not thinking like a murderer. People capable of those kinds of acts do all sorts of things that don't seem logical because they are sociopaths or megalomaniacs.

So really, her staying could mean she did it, or didn't do it.Sounds about right...

I saw some CNN special recently and apparently it's common knowledge in Europe that Italian authorities have no problem trying people based on very little to no physical evidence. Everyone else got out of town as quickly as possible because of this. Amanda obviously wasn't aware of this and stayed around.

 

[St. Louis Bob]

I wish I would have started her over Johnny.

 

[culdeus]

Is it possible that of the three people she had nothing to do with it at all and the other two did? I haven't read the 400 pages of evidence.

 

[B-Deep]

none of us know #### about what happened

 

[B-Deep]

my money is on still guilty reduced sentence

 

[CYP]

my money is on still guilty reduced sentence

wanna tongue kiss?

 

[B-Deep]

my money is on still guilty reduced sentence

wanna tongue kiss?

you or her?either way INprison dames is CRRRRazyand the prosecution says this one is kinda slutty too

 

[CYP]

my money is on still guilty reduced sentence

wanna tongue kiss?

you or her?either way INprison dames is CRRRRazyand the prosecution says this one is kinda slutty too

Threesome?

 

[B-Deep]

my money is on still guilty reduced sentence

wanna tongue kiss?

you or her?either way INprison dames is CRRRRazyand the prosecution says this one is kinda slutty too

Threesome?

her last 3some may or may not have ended that well

 

[CYP]

my money is on still guilty reduced sentence

wanna tongue kiss?

you or her?either way INprison dames is CRRRRazyand the prosecution says this one is kinda slutty too

Threesome?

her last 3some may or may not have ended that well

I doubt she makes the same mistake twice and all

 

[wadegarrett]

Anyone know Italian?

 

[JbizzleMan]

Overturned!!!

 

[wadegarrett]

Not guilty of all charges.

 

[whoknew]

Wow. She's free.

 

[wadegarrett]

Boyfriend free too.

 

[Nick Vermeil]

Possibly the worst live translation in CNN history.

 

[jamny]

Possibly the worst live translation in CNN history.

wtf was that. I thought she was found guilty.

 

[jon_mx]

The hot slut is free...the world is a better place!

 

[SacramentoBob]

The wussification of Italy continues.

 

[Anonymous Internet User]

So the two white defendants go free and the black guy stays in jail ?

 

[Ripley]

Yeah, there's "no evidence" -- only 400 freaking pages of it.

You people are delusional if you think she's innocent.

These kinds of statements make me fear for the legal system in this country. I have no idea if she's guilty or not. Neither do you. 400 pages of evidence doesn't mean anything if it's bad evidence or people draw the wrong conclusion from it. I hear lots of news about the case around here because she went to the same school I do. The general consensus around here is that the case has been a pig circus. I don't know if that's the case or not, I haven't followed it closely, but I do see quotes like the following in the articles I have read about it:

At a Seattle University symposium in April, Steve Moore, a retired FBI agent who once oversaw Al Queda investigations, compared Knox's prosecution to a "lynching."

"This will be an academy class in most forensic academies, I hope," said Moore. "This is the worst case I have ever seen in a western country."

I have no idea whether she did it or not or what the 400 pages of evidence says, but there is also plenty of evidence suggesting that the original trial she got was a sham.I do know that the original DNA evidence was extremely inconclusive (and has been thrown out in the appeal). I also heard that the day after the murder, before she was arrested, she had the opportunity to leave the country, but didn't because she wanted to support her friend. Those aren't the actions of a guilty person.

If I were innocent, I would've gotten the hell out of dodge if I thought there was a chance they'd come after me.

If I were guilty, I would've definitely gotten the hell out of dodge. The only reason I can think of for why she didn't was that she didn't think there was any reason they'd come after her. As I said before, I have no idea if she did it or not, but her not leaving when she had the chance to makes me think she's innocent and had no idea she'd be a suspect.

This makes sense to you because you're a rational person not thinking like a murderer. People capable of those kinds of acts do all sorts of things that don't seem logical because they are sociopaths or megalomaniacs.

So really, her staying could mean she did it, or didn't do it.Sounds about right...

Yes, this is true. My original point was in condemnation of the people who assume the guilt (or innocence) of people with no knowledge of what happened.

 

[FavreCo]

So the two white defendants go free and the black guy stays in jail ?

Well, someone has to stay in jail. Guess he should have appealed first.

 

[GroveDiesel]

I forget which one, but some famous American author refuses to go back to Italy specifically because of the prosecutor in this case. The guy tried to pin a murder on the author simply because the author was in Italy to wrote about some true crime stuff and he had questions about some of the prosecutor's previous work.

I think justice was carried out today.

 

[scoobygang]

So the two white defendants go free and the black guy stays in jail ?

Well, someone has to stay in jail. Guess he should have appealed first.

He did. He choose a fast track trial and two appeals. His sentence was reduced from 30 years to 16 years. The case against Gueda is also much, much stronger than against the others.

 

[FavreCo]

So the two white defendants go free and the black guy stays in jail ?

Well, someone has to stay in jail. Guess he should have appealed first.

He did. He choose a fast track trial and two appeals. His sentence was reduced from 30 years to 16 years. The case against Gueda is also much, much stronger than against the others.

Sadly comical judicial system over there. All 3 convicted. 2 for a 3-way gone awry, then this dude. Either they were all there or they weren't. Maybe they shoudl ahve rounded up a few other people and convicted them too. Oh, wait they all hauled ### outta the country.

 

[BlackMagic10]

So, is she able to leave Italy asap?

 

[FavreCo]

So, is she able to leave Italy asap?

I think so. I'd haul ### outta there right after I got some pizza. She's going to make million$ on this if she wants to. I know I would if I got railroaded outta 4 years of my life.Should be the top story tonight for big fat pear shaped Nancy Grace.