What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Frank Thomas (1 Viewer)

When I heard about Frank Thomas' two homers today, first thing I thought of was this thread and how it escaped my conciousness. After waffling on the issue when the thread came out, I concluded that Thomas definately deserves a trip to the Hall, and today's effort just magnified that all the more (though today shouldnt have much bearing, but was a nice reminder).

 
I have no idea how a bunch of whiny, overly sensitive sportswriters will vote his first, second, etc. year because he could be a little abrasive and he's probably rubbed some the wrong way, but I would vote for him if I had a vote. This one is easy, people.
The media wants players that make their job easier. If you are not accessible in interviews, or rub them the wrong way, or don't give good quotes, the media will tear you apart hoping to get rid of you. The media will claim you are ignoring the fans because you aren't giving easy interviews. They will try to turn the fans against you. All in the hopes that you are replaced with someone that is easy to get a quick quote and write up their articles fast so they can go home all the sooner.
 
If Frank can lead the A's to a World Series Championship (and continue to hit 500 HRs for his career), he'll be a 1st ballot HOFer.

If he can't achieve either, it's gonna be a struggle. Unfortunately (guilty or innocent) Frank is playing in the roids/HGH era.

And I'm a fan of the Big Hurt!

 
I say no. definately not first ballot and imo shouldnt make it at all.a few years that rank wth thebet ever, but I dont think he had enough of those easons to earn HoF.that said i need to check the stats again before forming a hard opinion.
Jesus, what more do you want, a .450 career OBP and a thousand home runs?Guy is a f'n lock. Look at the numbers, it's the biggest no-brainer ever.
totally agreed with Capella here. Usually I'm on the side of "no, if its close", but Frank Thomas was one of the top 3 players in baseball for a number of years. He should be a first ballot HOFer easily imo.
 
Without a doubt. First ballot all the way. Anyone that says otherwise doesn't have a clue. A clean power hitter in the age of steroids hitting over .300 for his career, not to mention his individual accolades (including back-to-back MVPs), and on the brink of a "natural" 500 HRs. Will also finish high on the all-time list for runs and RBIs and has one of the best "eyes" in baseball (look at his walk totals).All hail Future HOFer Big Hurt! :banned:
seriously...is there any 2 time MVP in any sport to not be in the HOF?
 
Mr. Thomas joined my team late in the season when Hafner got hurt and I needed another power bat to guide me through the playoffs.

I won the title. Didn't need the two homers today. Love the guy. Hope he gets in.

 
Without a doubt. First ballot all the way. Anyone that says otherwise doesn't have a clue. A clean power hitter in the age of steroids hitting over .300 for his career, not to mention his individual accolades (including back-to-back MVPs), and on the brink of a "natural" 500 HRs. Will also finish high on the all-time list for runs and RBIs and has one of the best "eyes" in baseball (look at his walk totals).All hail Future HOFer Big Hurt! :banned:
seriously...is there any 2 time MVP in any sport to not be in the HOF?
Juan Gonzalez
 
Without a doubt. First ballot all the way. Anyone that says otherwise doesn't have a clue. A clean power hitter in the age of steroids hitting over .300 for his career, not to mention his individual accolades (including back-to-back MVPs), and on the brink of a "natural" 500 HRs. Will also finish high on the all-time list for runs and RBIs and has one of the best "eyes" in baseball (look at his walk totals).All hail Future HOFer Big Hurt! :banned:
seriously...is there any 2 time MVP in any sport to not be in the HOF?
Juan Gonzalez
is he eligible yet?
 
Without a doubt. First ballot all the way. Anyone that says otherwise doesn't have a clue. A clean power hitter in the age of steroids hitting over .300 for his career, not to mention his individual accolades (including back-to-back MVPs), and on the brink of a "natural" 500 HRs. Will also finish high on the all-time list for runs and RBIs and has one of the best "eyes" in baseball (look at his walk totals).All hail Future HOFer Big Hurt! :banned:
seriously...is there any 2 time MVP in any sport to not be in the HOF?
Juan Gonzalez
is he eligible yet?
:shrug: I wouldn't vote for him, though.
 
Without a doubt. First ballot all the way. Anyone that says otherwise doesn't have a clue. A clean power hitter in the age of steroids hitting over .300 for his career, not to mention his individual accolades (including back-to-back MVPs), and on the brink of a "natural" 500 HRs. Will also finish high on the all-time list for runs and RBIs and has one of the best "eyes" in baseball (look at his walk totals).All hail Future HOFer Big Hurt! :banned:
seriously...is there any 2 time MVP in any sport to not be in the HOF?
Juan Gonzalez
is he eligible yet?
No, he played in a game last season.He's likely not an HOF'er anyways. Thomas on the other hand is a 1st ballot lock.
 
Without a doubt. First ballot all the way. Anyone that says otherwise doesn't have a clue. A clean power hitter in the age of steroids hitting over .300 for his career, not to mention his individual accolades (including back-to-back MVPs), and on the brink of a "natural" 500 HRs. Will also finish high on the all-time list for runs and RBIs and has one of the best "eyes" in baseball (look at his walk totals).All hail Future HOFer Big Hurt! :banned:
seriously...is there any 2 time MVP in any sport to not be in the HOF?
Juan Gonzalez
Dale Murphy -- who has been eligible for many years.
 
I used to hear people say that he would have been a great NFL tight end, since he played college football at Auburn. He was just voted THE slowest runner in MLB. Yeah, he's 38, but it's not like he just got slow this year.

A guy with his lack of speed could never have been a good TE, right?

 
If Frank can lead the A's to a World Series Championship (and continue to hit 500 HRs for his career), he'll be a 1st ballot HOFer.If he can't achieve either, it's gonna be a struggle. Unfortunately (guilty or innocent) Frank is playing in the roids/HGH era.And I'm a fan of the Big Hurt!
Utter nonsense. He was completely deserving of the HOF before ALDS Game 1. Artificial benchmarks like "world championship" or even "500 HR" are inane.
 
He'd get my vote the first year and every other year. There's no telling what the sportswriters will do.

 
Without a doubt. First ballot all the way. Anyone that says otherwise doesn't have a clue. A clean power hitter in the age of steroids hitting over .300 for his career, not to mention his individual accolades (including back-to-back MVPs), and on the brink of a "natural" 500 HRs. Will also finish high on the all-time list for runs and RBIs and has one of the best "eyes" in baseball (look at his walk totals).All hail Future HOFer Big Hurt! :goodposting:
seriously...is there any 2 time MVP in any sport to not be in the HOF?
Juan Gonzalez
Dale Murphy -- who has been eligible for many years.
Roger Maris is another.---Yes, Thomas is a lock.
 
Tim McCarver(who I thought had a clue) said he wouldn't vote Thomas in the HOF because he was a DH for half of his career. I'm baffled, and I hope knuckle-draggers like McCarver don't have a vote. Does he remember how intimidating Thomas was in the 90's? Think Pujols...not quite on Pujols' uber-elite level, but close...

EDIT: Thomas effectively called it quits today, and is taking a job with the White Sox as a part-time commentator.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a Cubs fan that never took anything more than a passing interest into what was happening on the South Side, I would keep an eye on Sox games in the 90's to make sure I got to watch Frank Thomas bat. Only Barry Bonds has reached Thomas' level of control over the game at the plate since. Pujols is scary to Cubs fans, but Thomas was better.

 
Given the fact he has not been mentioned in steroids discussions, I think he's got a very good chance to get in on the first ballot.

 
Tough call.

To me, Alan Trammell is the best every day player not in the hall. The question I ask myself is "would I rather have a young player x on my team or a young Trammell?"

Frank Thomas doesn't make it to that cut off line.

 
Tough call. To me, Alan Trammell is the best every day player not in the hall. The question I ask myself is "would I rather have a young player x on my team or a young Trammell?"Frank Thomas doesn't make it to that cut off line.
Seriously? Do you remember what Frank Thomas did in the 1990's? He was the most intimidating hitter in the game, and he did play in the field during that decade. Thomas was outspoken against PED's when nobody else was, get out of here with that crap...guy was a monster at age 15.99% of current/past GM's take a prime Thomas over Trammell without having to think for more than a second. It 'aint close...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tough call.

To me, Alan Trammell is the best every day player not in the hall. The question I ask myself is "would I rather have a young player x on my team or a young Trammell?"

Frank Thomas doesn't make it to that cut off line.
Seriously? Do you remember what Frank Thomas did in the 1990's? He was the most intimidating hitter in the game, and he did play in the field during that decade. Thomas was outspoken against PED's when nobody else was, get out of here with that crap...guy was a monster at age 15.

99% of current/past GM's take a prime Thomas over Trammell without having to think for more than a second. It 'aint close...
I saw Thomas, did you see Trammell?Papi is outspoken against PED's.

 
Stop bringing up Pujols' name in this thread. Do you think the best hitter in the steroid era did not juice? He has a monster head and mashed from day one.

 
Don't get me wrong, Trammell was a stud, and deserves consideration for the HOF due to his all-around game, but his offensive numbers(185 HR, .285 AVG, .352 OBP) simply do not compare to Thomas'(521 HR, .301, .419). In the end, both probably will have a space in Cooperstown, but time will tell.

Thomas wasn't great with the glove, but his lack of an arm was the main problem, and I wouldn't call him a liability, as he fielded pretty much everything that was hit at him. It was funny watching him attempt to turn the DP, but a football injury will do that. I always laughed at how strong his arm was in video games, when in fact 95% of footballguys probably have a better arm.

I know the roiders make his 1992-2000 numbers seem mortal, but at the time they were considered about as good as a hitter can get.

Sorry for the rant, it just amazes me that a supposed baseball mind(McCarver) can simply brush off the Big Hurt. Guy was a beast, and he and Griffey Jr. should be the one's that go down as the great hitters from the 1990's.

 
Don't get me wrong, Trammell was a stud, and deserves consideration for the HOF due to his all-around game, but his offensive numbers(185 HR, .285 AVG, .352 OBP) simply do not compare to Thomas'(521 HR, .301, .419). In the end, both probably will have a space in Cooperstown, but time will tell.Thomas wasn't great with the glove, but his lack of an arm was the main problem, and I wouldn't call him a liability, as he fielded pretty much everything that was hit at him. It was funny watching him attempt to turn the DP, but a football injury will do that. I always laughed at how strong his arm was in video games, when in fact 95% of footballguys probably have a better arm.I know the roiders make his 1992-2000 numbers seem mortal, but at the time they were considered about as good as a hitter can get. Sorry for the rant, it just amazes me that a supposed baseball mind(McCarver) can simply brush off the Big Hurt. Guy was a beast, and he and Griffey Jr. should be the one's that go down as the great hitters from the 1990's.
well put
 
Frank Thomas officially retired today. For many of us in the in the 25-30 age group, Frank Thomas was one of our first baseball heroes/villains/dominant forces/etc that comes to mind when we think back to our youth. His seven year stretch from '91 to '98 was on par with the greatest individual seasons the game has ever seen, and it's no shock that the only players with comparable stretches of elite play were, at that time(Pujols and Bonds entered that area soon after)Teddy Ballgame and Babe Ruth. He won two MVP awards, was robbed of a third, and finished 4th in the voting two years ago at the ripe old age of 39.

Many idiots(sorry, if you try and hold this against him, this is what you are, imo, of course) will point out that he played half of his games as a DH, and thus isn't as deserving as some lesser players...I say BS. Some may say his attitude was a turn-off and he pissed off a few media members. He certainly did, but most remember how nice/generous he was during his first four or five years and while that doesn't make up for being an ###, it shouldn't be held against him when it comes to his legacy an an all-time great, and a FIRST BALLOT HALL OF FAMER!

Congrats to the Big Hurt, what a career, I now feel old....

 
I think Thomas is a lock unless steroids allegations start
No players from the steroid era are able to completely escape suspicion. In spite of guys like Clemens and Jason Grimsley, there's more questioning around hitters than pitchers. Because of this, I think guys like Maddux, Johnson and Pedro will probably get higher first ballot percentages than any recent hitters.Don't take this as me questioning his credentials but some voters might not be impressed by Thomas' lack of eye-catching career milestones (3000 hits, 600 HRs, 2000 RBI), his DH status and infrequency of All-Star game appearances.
 
All Star game appearances are about as good of a measurement as Pro Bowl appearances. THere were years that Thomas was a beast and lost out to the usual "necessary" roster spots:

2000 - 43 HR, 143 RBI, not an All Star (instead FRed McGriff and Mike Sweeney were on) - should have been MVP for 3rd time if not for roider Giambi

2003 - 42 HR 105 RBI, not an All Star (again lost out to Giambi and Sweeney)

2006 - had the stats but so did the couple of Sox taken ahead of him.

So even if just adding the other 2, 7 time all star, should have been 3 time MVP, and look at the OPS, OBP, and runs created numbers and this isn't even a discussion. UNfortunately for the dopes that have votes, he may not go first ballot, but he'll get there. BTW, unless Thomas was on roids before he ever hit college (check out his minor league and even college baseball cards.....he wasn't scrawny like Sosa, McGwire, and Bonds....he was huge from the very beginning), he looks to be as clean as they come. Congrats hall of famer to be

 
Frank Thomas actually spoke up FOR testing for roids., I feel the roid era hurt him the most since the focus was on Soso and MacCheese and not the best hitter of his era. Bonds was a bit of both so who knows what type of production he would have had without roids.

When I was in high school in the 70's Sports Illustrated did an article on how roids were prelavent in High School sports so anyone who is acting like they were not around big time sports is lying. Anyone who is sayint they didn't know they were around is lying as well IMO.

Should be first time ballot but I would guess he won't be. Hope I am wrong.

 
Are players eligible 5 years after their official retirement or 5 years after they stop playing?

Assuming that it is the former, we will have Thomas, Johnson, Glavine and possibly Smoltz all up at the same time. Should be interesting.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top