What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Fred Taylor vs Pittsburg this week (1 Viewer)

Thumper

Footballguy
The Pittsburg D looked great vs Miami last week. I think Taylor is looking at a pretty mediocre week.

Anybody feel Taylor will have a good day?

 
The Pittsburg D looked great vs Miami last week. I think Taylor is looking at a pretty mediocre week.Anybody feel Taylor will have a good day?
He has missed 4 of his last 65 games, I don't think the nickname fits anymore. People who don't realize this let him slip in the draft. If he is your RB#3 (as thats as high as he should have been drafted) he will have a rough week, but will be one of the better RB#3s out there this year.In short he will have a rough week but will outperform his draft position by a long shot this year.
 
I'm sitting him (unless Westbrook cant go :hot: ).

R. Browns 30 yards on 15 carries last week is a pretty good indicator of how good the Pitt D is. They shut down the running game, and forced CPep to put it up 37 times.

They'll try the same strategy on Jac - shut down Taylor and pressure the heck out of Leftwich.

 
I don't think the nickname fits anymore.
He's spent a lot of time on the bench earning that nickname. Why do you want to take it away from him? :confused:
Because I drafted him?Or maybe because I am hoping that I am making my observations based on all the data availible, not tired witty nicknames that may not accurately describe the situation today. I know you are joking but I have a feeling about Fred this year. He wont be a top 10 back, but he will outperform his ADP.
 
The reasonable bet is that Pitt locks down on Jax. But, Jax gets no respect. They beat Pitt and Cincy last year. Greg Jones ran pretty good against Pitt last year. I think better OL play and QB play will help Taylor not be in the same situation Brown was in last week. Sure he's not a #1 option, but if Taylor is your regular flex, #2 or whatever, I would not try to be too cute with the WDIS.

 
I don't think the nickname fits anymore.
He's spent a lot of time on the bench earning that nickname. Why do you want to take it away from him? :confused:
Because I drafted him?Or maybe because I am hoping that I am making my observations based on all the data availible, not tired witty nicknames that may not accurately describe the situation today. I know you are joking but I have a feeling about Fred this year. He wont be a top 10 back, but he will outperform his ADP.
He will have a decent year. But, I don't think he will match his production from last season.
 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot

 
Fred won't have much rushing against the Steelers, but could still have some nice points if they use him in the passing game, screens and dumpoffs to slow down the pass rush. I hope he does nothing... :football:

 
The reasonable bet is that Pitt locks down on Jax. But, Jax gets no respect. Tommy Maddox handed the Jags the game and they beat Cincy last year. Greg Jones ran pretty good against Pitt last year. I think better OL play and QB play will help Taylor not be in the same situation Brown was in last week. Sure he's not a #1 option, but if Taylor is your regular flex, #2 or whatever, I would not try to be too cute with the WDIS.
Correction
 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
:jawdrop:
To be fair...anyone see FTaylor not at least averaging more than the paltry 2.0ypc that Brown had? I'm not starting Taylor. But...RBrown sucked last week, big time. Yes, he scored two TD's...but if the rest of the team had played like RBrown, they'd have been shut out.

 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
:jawdrop:
To be fair...anyone see FTaylor not at least averaging more than the paltry 2.0ypc that Brown had? I'm not starting Taylor. But...RBrown sucked last week, big time. Yes, he scored two TD's...but if the rest of the team had played like RBrown, they'd have been shut out.
What RB does well against the Steelers DT???? :banned:
 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
:jawdrop:
To be fair...anyone see FTaylor not at least averaging more than the paltry 2.0ypc that Brown had? I'm not starting Taylor. But...RBrown sucked last week, big time. Yes, he scored two TD's...but if the rest of the team had played like RBrown, they'd have been shut out.
What RB does well against the Steelers DT???? :banned:
None, really. But most do better than 15/30 even against the best D's.
 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
:jawdrop:
To be fair...anyone see FTaylor not at least averaging more than the paltry 2.0ypc that Brown had? I'm not starting Taylor. But...RBrown sucked last week, big time. Yes, he scored two TD's...but if the rest of the team had played like RBrown, they'd have been shut out.
What RB does well against the Steelers DT???? :banned:
None, really. But most do better than 15/30 even against the best D's.
Hate to tell ya..but R.Brown was rated 8th best RB in scoring week1 (basic and bonus leagues)..and thats against the Steelers..You see in FF land its points for the week who cares how the guy got them! :D
 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
That sounds like my boat, but I've got M.Bell to think about. I'm benching Bell 'cause of the broken finger and Skeletor's intolerance for fumbles.
 
For what its worth, Taylor has averaged about 75 yds/gm vs. the Steelers and got quite a few looks in the passing game last week.

 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
:jawdrop:
To be fair...anyone see FTaylor not at least averaging more than the paltry 2.0ypc that Brown had? I'm not starting Taylor. But...RBrown sucked last week, big time. Yes, he scored two TD's...but if the rest of the team had played like RBrown, they'd have been shut out.
What RB does well against the Steelers DT???? :banned:
None, really. But most do better than 15/30 even against the best D's.
Hate to tell ya..but R.Brown was rated 8th best RB in scoring week1 (basic and bonus leagues)..and thats against the Steelers..You see in FF land its points for the week who cares how the guy got them! :D
I realize he scored a couple TD's. Doesn't mean he didn't play like crap. Watching that game reminded me of owning Stephen Davis last year.
 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
:jawdrop:
To be fair...anyone see FTaylor not at least averaging more than the paltry 2.0ypc that Brown had? I'm not starting Taylor. But...RBrown sucked last week, big time. Yes, he scored two TD's...but if the rest of the team had played like RBrown, they'd have been shut out.
What RB does well against the Steelers DT???? :banned:
None, really. But most do better than 15/30 even against the best D's.
Hate to tell ya..but R.Brown was rated 8th best RB in scoring week1 (basic and bonus leagues)..and thats against the Steelers..You see in FF land its points for the week who cares how the guy got them! :D
I realize he scored a couple TD's. Doesn't mean he didn't play like crap. Watching that game reminded me of owning Stephen Davis last year.
If you ignore the fact that he played against one of the best run Defenses in the league, on the road. And you ignore his recieving yardage you have a point. If you actually watched the game you would know that if he had any room to run at all he did so with authority and very rarely went down to only one defender, it took 2 almost all the time. The holes were not there in the middle, not much ANY RB can do about that. When he had any room at all he looked pretty damn good.

Sometimes the stat line does not tell the whole story. You can't ignore his 2TD's but harp on 2.0 YPC. Either accept them both or throw them both out.

You are correct, he wont get 2 TD's every game. But he will get 2 TD's more often than he will get only 2YPC.

I can't believe you honestly rank Taylor above Brown, but I guess that why they play the game. We will see how you rank them after they have a common opponent, and that opponent is Pit.

 
fred is catching the ball too, good for leagues with 1 pt per catch. I think he's a solid #2 rb until he gets dinged up.

 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
:jawdrop:
To be fair...anyone see FTaylor not at least averaging more than the paltry 2.0ypc that Brown had? I'm not starting Taylor. But...RBrown sucked last week, big time. Yes, he scored two TD's...but if the rest of the team had played like RBrown, they'd have been shut out.
What RB does well against the Steelers DT???? :banned:
None, really. But most do better than 15/30 even against the best D's.
Hate to tell ya..but R.Brown was rated 8th best RB in scoring week1 (basic and bonus leagues)..and thats against the Steelers..You see in FF land its points for the week who cares how the guy got them! :D
I realize he scored a couple TD's. Doesn't mean he didn't play like crap. Watching that game reminded me of owning Stephen Davis last year.
If you ignore the fact that he played against one of the best run Defenses in the league, on the road. And you ignore his recieving yardage you have a point. If you actually watched the game you would know that if he had any room to run at all he did so with authority and very rarely went down to only one defender, it took 2 almost all the time. The holes were not there in the middle, not much ANY RB can do about that. When he had any room at all he looked pretty damn good.

Sometimes the stat line does not tell the whole story. You can't ignore his 2TD's but harp on 2.0 YPC. Either accept them both or throw them both out.

You are correct, he wont get 2 TD's every game. But he will get 2 TD's more often than he will get only 2YPC.

I can't believe you honestly rank Taylor above Brown, but I guess that why they play the game. We will see how you rank them after they have a common opponent, and that opponent is Pit.
Well I never said I ranked Taylor above Brown. I drafted Taylor at 5.01 of a 12 teamer PPR. I had no shot at drafting Brown, but I wouldn't have felt confident drafting him in the first round at ANY position. Not to say I wouldn't have had him ranked in the top 12, I just wasn't confident in him. I'd rather have a proven guy like Rudi Johnson in the first round, who I know many people ranked below him.My point about Brown's 2.0ypc is that it was horrible, and I'd even go so far as to say that I doubt any other starting RB this year who gets at least 15 carries will be held that low vs PIT, home or away. You're welcome to bookmark this thread and throw that back in my face if and when it happens. :D

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think he will do ok...nothing great but I do think he will get a score. He better...my other options are Lamont vs. Baltimore and Kevin Jones vs. Chicago - NOT GOOD!!

 
Well I never said I ranked Taylor above Brown. I drafted Taylor at 5.01 of a 12 teamer PPR. I had no shot at drafting Brown, but I wouldn't have felt confident drafting him in the first round at ANY position. Not to say I wouldn't have had him ranked in the top 12, I just wasn't confident in him. I'd rather have a proven guy like Rudi Johnson in the first round, who I know many people ranked below him.

My point about Brown's 2.0ypc is that it was horrible, and I'd even go so far as to say that I doubt any other starting RB this year who gets at least 15 carries will be held that low vs PIT, home or away. You're welcome to bookmark this thread and throw that back in my face if and when it happens. :D
oh I will, I will :) I bet if I looked I could find one game where SA, LT and LG put up 2.0 ypc. I think you are putting too much stock in one night.

I also think that thursday showed that the run game was the first priority for the fins, and that bodes well for Brown. Jax will abandon the run sooner than Saben will.

I have 10x more respect for you because you used the right "you're".

 
Fred always seems to play pretty well against the Steelers. I wouldn't sit him just because of the matchup.

 
I'm starting him as RB#3, sadly Ahman is running back RB#2... but Brown did put up 2 td's vs the steelers last week, and considering I'm higher on Taylor it's not a bad spot
:jawdrop:
To be fair...anyone see FTaylor not at least averaging more than the paltry 2.0ypc that Brown had? I'm not starting Taylor. But...RBrown sucked last week, big time. Yes, he scored two TD's...but if the rest of the team had played like RBrown, they'd have been shut out.
What RB does well against the Steelers DT???? :banned:
None, really. But most do better than 15/30 even against the best D's.
Hate to tell ya..but R.Brown was rated 8th best RB in scoring week1 (basic and bonus leagues)..and thats against the Steelers..You see in FF land its points for the week who cares how the guy got them! :D
I realize he scored a couple TD's. Doesn't mean he didn't play like crap. Watching that game reminded me of owning Stephen Davis last year.
If you actually watched the game you would know that if he had any room to run at all he did so with authority and very rarely went down to only one defender, it took 2 almost all the time. The holes were not there in the middle, not much ANY RB can do about that. When he had any room at all he looked pretty damn good.
i agree with this
 
2004 Fred Taylor vs. Steelers in Jax

27 rushes / 76 yds

5 catches / 34 yards

(total team 34 rushing attempts)

very close game, came down to a long missed field goal by Jax

2005 Jax rushing vs. Steelers in Pitt (no Fred Taylor)

18 rushes / 77 yards / 1 td (greg jones)

(total teams 32 rushing attempts)

i think the Steelers D is very similar 2006/2005/2004

i think you can expect very similar numbers. i liked the fact they left Fred in to score the rushing td last week against the cowboys, and IMO if they continue to use Fred in most situations they will see he is their best option.

-orphan

 
I am playing him with great confidence. Definitely a player many took a pass on who will win championships!

 
Well I never said I ranked Taylor above Brown. I drafted Taylor at 5.01 of a 12 teamer PPR. I had no shot at drafting Brown, but I wouldn't have felt confident drafting him in the first round at ANY position. Not to say I wouldn't have had him ranked in the top 12, I just wasn't confident in him. I'd rather have a proven guy like Rudi Johnson in the first round, who I know many people ranked below him.

My point about Brown's 2.0ypc is that it was horrible, and I'd even go so far as to say that I doubt any other starting RB this year who gets at least 15 carries will be held that low vs PIT, home or away. You're welcome to bookmark this thread and throw that back in my face if and when it happens. :D
oh I will, I will :) I bet if I looked I could find one game where SA, LT and LG put up 2.0 ypc. I think you are putting too much stock in one night.

I also think that thursday showed that the run game was the first priority for the fins, and that bodes well for Brown. Jax will abandon the run sooner than Saben will.

I have 10x more respect for you because you used the right "you're".
LT, last season week 7 VS Philly: 17 rushes, 7 yards.
 
2004 Fred Taylor vs. Steelers in Jax

27 rushes / 76 yds

5 catches / 34 yards

(total team 34 rushing attempts)

very close game, came down to a long missed field goal by Jax

2005 Jax rushing vs. Steelers in Pitt (no Fred Taylor)

18 rushes / 77 yards / 1 td (greg jones)

(total teams 32 rushing attempts)

i think the Steelers D is very similar 2006/2005/2004

i think you can expect very similar numbers. i liked the fact they left Fred in to score the rushing td last week against the cowboys, and IMO if they continue to use Fred in most situations they will see he is their best option.

-orphan
Dont get me wrong, I am high on Fred this year. Just not willing to accept that Fred is going to produce more than Brown.
 
-Pitt has a very good D, but it's not like dallas is swiss cheese. And Fred put up over 100 combined yards and had a TD versus dallas.

-With Greg Jones out, Leftwich appears to be Fred's only comp currently for goalline work. They tried Toefield on a 3rd and short and he lost yardage. Toefield also missed a blitz pick up on the only sack dallas got, so I expect he missed his chance for now.

-Fred was targetted 6 times and had 6 catches versus dallas. Surprising as that is, you can't ignore a pretty healthy pass catching day by the old man.

I'd predict Fred has a second week over around 100 combined yards and a TD. But if the Jags get a lead early, he could add a good deal to those numbers. Fred looked very sharp in the dallas game and still appears to be a homerun threat. Add in some receptions and goalline work and he could be a solid RB2 by the end of the season. And not a bad start this week.

 
I've been spending alot of time thinking about this match up. And why people can't think outside of the box with Fred. Its the beginning of the season and he is healthy! His team is playing one of their most important games of the season. He ran through Dallas last week and historically he has done decent-well against Steelers.

This isn't a WDIS... but, let me give you my thinking. In case you have similar thoughts.

My RBs:

McGahee - He doesn't do a whole lot to seperate himself right now. I'm guessing atleast 75 yards. With upside to 100 yards and TD. Especially if Miami continues to look like that. Has breakout potential in this game. I'm starting.

Droughns - what can I say? I think he has the talent.. I don't know if this team puts it together this week. This is a good week for Cinci to get the lead and test out Palmer some more. When Cleveland gets behind he becomes less of a factor.

T. Bell & M. Bell - T.Bell could go gangbusters... my bets on him this week. Mike still in picture. You have to like the matchup and the fact that their QB is out. Not sure what to think.. and I need to think more on this one.. the potential to breakout is there.

F. Taylor - Jacksonville just beat a tough Dallas team. They are coming out with their sharpest weapons to take Pitt. down. Taylor avgs about 75 yards a game against Pitt... and this Jacksonville team looks good defensively and offensively. I think Taylor has a good shot at his 75 yards and a TD. I'm thinking of Taylor right now as stud that isn't damaged yet. I'll probably start him... with considerations to T.Bell.

MG

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm seriously considering sitting him in favor of Michael Turner this week. Yes, Michael Turner. I think SD blows out Tenn and Turner gets plenty of mop up yds and a possible score. Now watch this logic backfire on me.

 
I think a good way to lose against the Steelers is to abandon the run early and I don't see the Jaguars doing that. They'll run early and they'll stick with it, which means a lot of touches for Freddy.

I doubt he'll run for 100 yards against the Steelers but I could see 70 rushing and another 25 receiving and a TD.

 
I'm seriously considering sitting him in favor of Michael Turner this week. Yes, Michael Turner. I think SD blows out Tenn and Turner gets plenty of mop up yds and a possible score. Now watch this logic backfire on me.
Play Fred, you'll be sorry if you start Turner IMO...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm seriously considering sitting him in favor of Michael Turner this week. Yes, Michael Turner. I think SD blows out Tenn and Turner gets plenty of mop up yds and a possible score. Now watch this logic backfire on me.
Play Fred, you'll be sorry if you start Turner IMO...
Oh come on, you gotta have some balls sometimes ;)Edited to say that I expect Taylor to get about 40 yds rushing, maybe catch a couple passes for not much, and ZERO TDs. I can see Turner getting plenty of playing time on Sunday, which should eclipse Taylor's stats. Now I know I'm taking a risk, and I'm not afraid of failure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm seriously considering sitting him in favor of Michael Turner this week. Yes, Michael Turner. I think SD blows out Tenn and Turner gets plenty of mop up yds and a possible score. Now watch this logic backfire on me.
Haha... well Turner is also on my team. I've had that thought on him... and you do introduce an interesting strategy. I'm just not familiar enough with SD tendencies to not feel like thats a gamble.MG
 
Local article about how well Taylor has played against the Steelers.(Obligatory "Past performance is no guarantee of future returns" disclaimer)

NOTEBOOK: RB Taylor saves best for Steelers By MICHAEL C. WRIGHT, The Times-Union Against Pittsburgh, Jaguars running back Fred Taylor usually plays the "stealer" role, at least when it comes to touchdowns and rushing yardage."He can make a career playing against the Steelers because he's played very well against us," Pittsburgh coach Bill Cowher said. "Fred always seems to get his game up playing against us."Taylor's statistics seem to reflect Cowher's sentiments. Of the 30 teams Taylor has played against during his eight seasons, he's scored more touchdowns (6 rushing and 2 receiving) against Pittsburgh than anybody else.In fact, his best day as a pro came against the Steelers in 2000, when he rushed for 234 yards (averaging 7.8 yards per carry) and three touchdowns in a 34-24 trouncing at Three Rivers Stadium, which closed less than a month after Taylor's performance.A team official retrieved some turf from Three Rivers Stadium after the game, which now sits in Taylor's trophy case at home."I remember a lot about that game," Taylor said. "I don't think I'll ever forget. But at the same time, it's a new day and age."Taylor didn't play last season in the Jags' win over Pittsburgh because of an ankle injury. He looks forward to meeting the Steelers on the national stage of Monday Night Football. After all, his touchdown total against Pittsburgh is three TDs better than his second-best effort against Baltimore, Cincinnati, Cleveland and Tennessee."It's always fun to play against Pittsburgh for the simple fact that they bring out the best in you," Taylor said."It's hard-nosed. You have to bring two hard hats and your lunch to that game."
 
montanagold said:
I'm seriously considering sitting him in favor of Michael Turner this week. Yes, Michael Turner. I think SD blows out Tenn and Turner gets plenty of mop up yds and a possible score. Now watch this logic backfire on me.
Haha... well Turner is also on my team. I've had that thought on him... and you do introduce an interesting strategy. I'm just not familiar enough with SD tendencies to not feel like thats a gamble.MG
Well, it looks like I don't have the balls to start Turner over Taylor, even though my mind tells me otherwise. I just know that game is going to be a blowout win for SD and Turner will get his. I can't say the same for FT.
 
22 for 92, 3 for 29, 0 TD.

Pretty nice line against a tough D.

166 yds rushing with 1 TD, 9 catches for 70 yards on the season.

Is Fred an every week RB2? 2 good weeks against tough D's, both at home though. Or is he still just a matchup play/RB3?

<edit for clarity>

 
Last edited by a moderator:
22 for 92, 3 for 29, 0 TD.Pretty nice line against a tough D.166 yds rushing with 1 TD, 9 catches for 70 yards on the season.Is Fred an every week RB2? 2 good weeks against tough D's, both at home though. Or is he still just a matchup play/RB3?<edit for clarity>
Looks like he's playing well enough to be a solid #2 at this point. The best thing is he's involved in the passing game, which makes him a duel threat. A nice surprise.
 
Those numbers are not great, but when you consider they are against Pitt and Dallas it's pretty impressive. Add in the fact that he should get the majority of the goalline looks this year RB2 numbers look like a good bet right now.

 
Does it hurt him if Winbush is out? Not sure if Fred runs with a FB leading the way. Obviously it helps because they’re running out of reliable GL options, so who knows FT might get some good looks at the stripe. And if he runs like he has been he can get those tough yards for a score.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top