Starting to hate getting up to run. Probably because I haven't seen quicker results.
I'm the poster child right now for diet vs exercise.
Slow 1.5 miles today. About 14 minute pace
That's not bad at all - much less important to lose weight fast and more important to lose it in a way that you'll be able to sustain the weight loss once you're done losingDown 3 pounds in 3 weeks. Not good but got a mile "run" in this morning.
I can tell I'm getting in better shape overall and a little tighter but still lackadaisical with the diet.
I was stuck in a cycle for a while...I 'm 55 and was too heavy (5'6", 205ish pounds) and as a result, I could only do a limited amount of running before I started to have problems with my knees, leg muscles, etc. And because that prevented me from running a lot, I wasn't burning enough calories to offset the amount I was eating, so there wasn't much progress.Starting to hate getting up to run. Probably because I haven't seen quicker results.
I'm the poster child right now for diet vs exercise.
Slow 1.5 miles today. About 14 minute pace
Good stuff here.I was stuck in a cycle for a while...I 'm 55 and was too heavy (5'6", 205ish pounds) and as a result, I could only do a limited amount of running before I started to have problems with my knees, leg muscles, etc. And because that prevented me from running a lot, I wasn't burning enough calories to offset the amount I was eating, so there wasn't much progress.Starting to hate getting up to run. Probably because I haven't seen quicker results.
I'm the poster child right now for diet vs exercise.
Slow 1.5 miles today. About 14 minute pace
Two things that helped break me out of the cycle recently:
- You don't need to run continuously. You'll get (more or less) the same benefits from running say 2-3 minutes at a time, then walking for a minute at a time and repeating as you will from running non-stop. The difference is it won't take nearly as much of a toll on your body, and you'll be able to do WAY more without wearing yourself out.
- For some reason, I'm suddenly not having any trouble keeping the amount I eat to reasonable levels. I was previously focused on avoiding carbs, which has worked for me for weight loss in the past, but didn't seem to work any more. Now I'm eating more or less whatever I want, but in small quantities and stopping when I'm full.
I always have a belvita biscuit with me just in case I don't have enough ammo to get through an afternoon cardio session. I try to avoid it (zero benefit carb) but it's better than running into something you described, pun intended this time.One other fitness problem I solved recently. For the past year or more, I had noticed that if I ran more than about 30 minutes in the morning, I'd feel great during and shortly after my run. But sometime later in the day, usually around mid-afternoon, I would almost always get a headache. My good friend ChatGPT did some diagnosing for me, and we eventually came to the conclusion that I need to eat a little bit before I run. Since then, I've either run later in the day, or I eat something small (probably ~100-150 calories on average) right before I run, and I think I've only had one headache out of about twenty runs.
Changed it up a little bit today. I went a little bit harder doing the runs but if I needed to take a break and walk a little I did.
Worked out. Did the 1.5 mi in my best time yet. Slowly but surely
Well I was trying to run the entire thing base on the setup training but it was at a way slower pace. So I was able to run the entire time but it really was more of a jog shuffleChanged it up a little bit today. I went a little bit harder doing the runs but if I needed to take a break and walk a little I did.
Worked out. Did the 1.5 mi in my best time yet. Slowly but surely
I think that method is better for burning fat and keeping muscle as well. Just look at marathon runners compared to sprinters.
Well I was trying to run the entire thing base on the setup training but it was at a way slower pace. So I was able to run the entire time but it really was more of a jog shuffleChanged it up a little bit today. I went a little bit harder doing the runs but if I needed to take a break and walk a little I did.
Worked out. Did the 1.5 mi in my best time yet. Slowly but surely
I think that method is better for burning fat and keeping muscle as well. Just look at marathon runners compared to sprinters.
I mean I'm still avg a 12 minute mile with today's method but it felt better
I keep planning to add this in but haven't. Stretching some but not enough. Also want to add some body weight and kettlebell work in but haven't done so in a consistent basis yet.I've been doing light weights and stretching on my non run days ftr
Lots of ways to do it but my preferred method has always been to try to set a pace I can keep for however far I plan to go. I.e. show and steady wins the race. But that's more a preference thing. Whatever works for you.Changed it up a little bit today. I went a little bit harder doing the runs but if I needed to take a break and walk a little I did.
Worked out. Did the 1.5 mi in my best time yet. Slowly but surely
Trail and bike path availability do matter. If roads were my only option, in the dark wouldn't be an option.I have a bike also
But I don't like biking in the dark
Path availability is why I haven't prioritized getting a bike. Have to go a ways to get more than a few miles of dedicated bike trail void of motor vehicles (and it's mostly flat) whereas there's a variety of single track (run / hike) trails all over the place. Due to the steep grade and limited size of them they're not suitable for biking, but great for on foot. Although I did watch someone try to bike one several years ago. Dude ran into a series of roots, didn't handle them well, then went flying into the ravine beside us. No serious injuries though. Just a very bruised ego.Trail and bike path availability do matter. If roads were my only option, in the dark wouldn't be an option.I have a bike also
But I don't like biking in the dark
Sounds like the stuff we ride here. Roots, rocks, stuff you can barely walk on. Definitely not the way to get started though or in the dark. Mountain biking isn't the way to avoid injury.Path availability is why I haven't prioritized getting a bike. Have to go a ways to get more than a few miles of dedicated bike trail void of motor vehicles (and it's mostly flat) whereas there's a variety of single track (run / hike) trails all over the place. Due to the steep grade and limited size of them they're not suitable for biking, but great for on foot. Although I did watch someone try to bike one several years ago. Dude ran into a series of roots, didn't handle them well, then went flying into the ravine beside us. No serious injuries though. Just a very bruised ego.Trail and bike path availability do matter. If roads were my only option, in the dark wouldn't be an option.I have a bike also
But I don't like biking in the dark
As does Florida. I do miss mountains and try to get a hike or easy trail run any time I travel to elevation.Welcome to the vertical world, my friend. Mountains are suuuuch a good resource for physical fitness, as well as mental health.I don't know where I'll land a few months from now, but it'll be somewhere out on the trails, and hopefully about 20 pounds or so lighter.
The Midwest makes access a little problematic though.
After controlling for urbanization, temperature category and behavioral and demographic factors, male and female Americans living <500 m above sea level had 5.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7–9.5) and 3.9 (95% CI 1.6–9.3) times the odds of obesity, respectively, as compared with counterparts living ⩾3000 m above sea level.
Agree the sprinter’s physique looks better, but who is healthier?Changed it up a little bit today. I went a little bit harder doing the runs but if I needed to take a break and walk a little I did.
Worked out. Did the 1.5 mi in my best time yet. Slowly but surely
I think that method is better for burning fat and keeping muscle as well. Just look at marathon runners compared to sprinters.
Yep, living in flat lowlands is bad for your health:
After controlling for urbanization, temperature category and behavioral and demographic factors, male and female Americans living <500 m above sea level had 5.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7–9.5) and 3.9 (95% CI 1.6–9.3) times the odds of obesity, respectively, as compared with counterparts living ⩾3000 m above sea level.
Agree the sprinter’s physique looks better, but who is healthier?Changed it up a little bit today. I went a little bit harder doing the runs but if I needed to take a break and walk a little I did.
Worked out. Did the 1.5 mi in my best time yet. Slowly but surely
I think that method is better for burning fat and keeping muscle as well. Just look at marathon runners compared to sprinters.
Sprint Marathon I'll never had that build. My thighs were large before fatnessAgree the sprinter’s physique looks better, but who is healthier?Changed it up a little bit today. I went a little bit harder doing the runs but if I needed to take a break and walk a little I did.
Worked out. Did the 1.5 mi in my best time yet. Slowly but surely
I think that method is better for burning fat and keeping muscle as well. Just look at marathon runners compared to sprinters.
I think we're splitting hairs. I'd say they're both very healthy but being a pencil necked geek is no way to live life.
You’re probably right, though I’m of the mindset we’re alive in a time when there’s a realistic chance human life/healthspan will be significantly extended.Agree the sprinter’s physique looks better, but who is healthier?Changed it up a little bit today. I went a little bit harder doing the runs but if I needed to take a break and walk a little I did.
Worked out. Did the 1.5 mi in my best time yet. Slowly but surely
I think that method is better for burning fat and keeping muscle as well. Just look at marathon runners compared to sprinters.
I think we're splitting hairs. I'd say they're both very healthy but being a pencil necked geek is no way to live life.
Healthy behaviors reduce one's risk of developing cancerCancer doesn't care how great of shape you're in, ask my work buddy :(
Sure, tell him thatHealthy behaviors reduce one's risk of developing cancerCancer doesn't care how great of shape you're in, ask my work buddy :(
It doesn't appear you've read the words I wrote. Sorry about your buddy.Sure, tell him thatHealthy behaviors reduce one's risk of developing cancerCancer doesn't care how great of shape you're in, ask my work buddy :(
Absolutely this.Healthy behaviors reduce one's risk of developing cancerCancer doesn't care how great of shape you're in, ask my work buddy :(
Huh, my point was he was the pillar of health and blammo.......just sucksIt doesn't appear you've read the words I wrote. Sorry about your buddy.Sure, tell him thatHealthy behaviors reduce one's risk of developing cancerCancer doesn't care how great of shape you're in, ask my work buddy :(
It does suck. It also doesn't change what either term or I are saying. Probabilities, homeyHuh, my point was he was the pillar of health and blammo.......just sucksIt doesn't appear you've read the words I wrote. Sorry about your buddy.Sure, tell him thatHealthy behaviors reduce one's risk of developing cancerCancer doesn't care how great of shape you're in, ask my work buddy :(
Well, fell off the wagon a bit and came up 5 pounds short of the goal (damn you Octoberfest beers). Taking consolation prize of 17.4% in a year is still quite a bit.Well that was quick, dropped almost 6 pounds in two days, who knew beer had calories?!?! (and for those of you doing the math, I know. There were others factors impacting #s).
Finally cracked 125 pounds. Never ever thought I'd be here.
Was reviewing my spreadsheet where I've tracked my weight weekly since the beginning. If I can lose a pound+ a week for the next three weeks I will have lost more % wise over that years starting weight than my first year. Barely, but a beat is a beat. That just seems wrong, probably because I've felt roughly the same all year, but the numbers prove it out. SMH
That's the new short term goal, beat year 1's %. That'll set up a reasonable first half of year 4 goal to get to 40% off original weight which conveniently is 215, with an end of year 4 goal of cracking 200.
Typically right there with you on this but i got caught off guard this year and my bulk got completed in the month of August.I keep my calories down from about March-Sep for weight control, but I embrace the winter months with football, holidays and hoodies. It's a great time to go for strength gains for me.