Donnybrook
Footballguy
What does Bob Kraft like most about Gabriel?
Answer: His contract. Gabriel is working for peanuts.
Answer: His contract. Gabriel is working for peanuts.
me tooI'm tempted to jump all over Curry in a couple of my my dynasty leagues, but this is holding me back. Well, partly this, the other thing is I don't want to pull a flranger.Does anyone feel that the reason the compensation for Gabriel has not been revelaed is because Branch is heading to Oakland? I could see Davis pulling this off.![]()

I'm tempted to jump all over Curry in a couple of my my dynasty leagues, but this is holding me back. Well, partly this, the other thing is I don't want to pull a flranger.Does anyone feel that the reason the compensation for Gabriel has not been revelaed is because Branch is heading to Oakland? I could see Davis pulling this off.![]()
Now that's funny!!Since my crappy team has partially hijacked this thread, which WR would you drop in a non-dynasty PPR league (it's the least I can ask for all the laughs I have given you guys, I had to drop one by Thursday):MuhammedColesB. EdwardsMcCardellBranchLee EvansGotta have a little fun with you while it's fresh, my friend.I'm tempted to jump all over Curry in a couple of my my dynasty leagues, but this is holding me back. Well, partly this, the other thing is I don't want to pull a flranger.Does anyone feel that the reason the compensation for Gabriel has not been revelaed is because Branch is heading to Oakland? I could see Davis pulling this off.![]()
Now that's funny!!

i was drooling when someone in my dynasty league dropped Curry last week. i picked him up on Thursday and now this information. i am stoked. i picked up Gabriel in 2004 and remember kicking myself for not grabbing Curry first. Curry was clearly coming into his own and outshining all of the WRs. Curry is going to be a top notch WR2 if he can stay healthy.-orphanI've been thinking about this a little bit... I'm thinking the real winner in all this is Curry. Moss is Moss, he'll be the featured threat, that's a given. But I've never been sold on Porter over Curry. When they were starting together, pre-Moss and pre-achilles, Curry was clearly outplaying Porter and was quickly becoming the go-to target. He really was reminding me of another converted QB, Hines Ward.Now, two years later, much has changed. Different QBs, Moss is #1, and two achilles injuries. If Curry is all the way back, though, he's much better suited to be the possession guy to Moss' deep threat. Most are assuming Porter is now out of the doghouse with this trade, but that's not a given. I suppose Porter wiil start - that's what's being assumed - but I think the Raiders are better with Curry out there.Also, from a dynasty perspective, I read not long ago that Moss is likely to be gone after this year, given his contractual situation (and I don't remember the particulars, but it was a huge number). If Curry has a strong 2006, I still think he could end up being a future WR1. The Raiders, I think, will have a long memory concerning Porter's mouth. That sort of insubordination doesn't go over real well in Raiderland.CP
Must be a small league.At this point, given the Gabriel trade and how ugly things have become, it looks like Branch either sits until week 10 or gets shipped off. In a redraft, given the above names as alternatives and all the uncertaintly involving him, I'd just be done with Branch. Even with a trade, he's unlikely to assimilate quickly and be as productive as the other guys on your list.I'm tempted to jump all over Curry in a couple of my my dynasty leagues, but this is holding me back. Well, partly this, the other thing is I don't want to pull a flranger.Does anyone feel that the reason the compensation for Gabriel has not been revelaed is because Branch is heading to Oakland? I could see Davis pulling this off.![]()
Now that's funny!!Since my crappy team has partially hijacked this thread, which WR would you drop in a non-dynasty PPR league (it's the least I can ask for all the laughs I have given you guys, I had to drop one by Thursday):MuhammedColesB. EdwardsMcCardellBranchLee Evans
Clayton is a much better WR than Gabriel IMO.Right now I have Michael Clayton, but I am not very sure of his productivity this season behind Galloway and matched up against a tough "pass defense" schedule. Is Gabriel or Curry a better bet?
I think this a huge bump for Curry. He's clearly the number 2 WR in an offense that will throw the ball a lot and will play a lot from behind. I don't see Porter coming back and it's also possible Moss could miss a few games this season (he's had a hard time staying healthy for 16). Curry's definately a sleeper and I've got him at about 900/7.Doug Gabriel just becomes another face in the crowd in New England. I don't see any WR getting the ball enough to be a much more than a WR5 on most rosters.

I feel like Gabriel will just step in and put up Branch's numbers. Brown and Caldwell are awful and Brady has to know that.Clayton is a much better WR than Gabriel IMO.Right now I have Michael Clayton, but I am not very sure of his productivity this season behind Galloway and matched up against a tough "pass defense" schedule. Is Gabriel or Curry a better bet?
Not so much, unless 12 team is small. I intentionally failed to draft a TE because I knew Wiggins would remain available and in PPR I think he will be solid, but not spectacular. Check my RB's on my sig (which I updated). In PPR format I'm in heaven.Must be a small league.At this point, given the Gabriel trade and how ugly things have become, it looks like Branch either sits until week 10 or gets shipped off. In a redraft, given the above names as alternatives and all the uncertaintly involving him, I'd just be done with Branch. Even with a trade, he's unlikely to assimilate quickly and be as productive as the other guys on your list.I'm tempted to jump all over Curry in a couple of my my dynasty leagues, but this is holding me back. Well, partly this, the other thing is I don't want to pull a flranger.Does anyone feel that the reason the compensation for Gabriel has not been revelaed is because Branch is heading to Oakland? I could see Davis pulling this off.![]()
Now that's funny!!Since my crappy team has partially hijacked this thread, which WR would you drop in a non-dynasty PPR league (it's the least I can ask for all the laughs I have given you guys, I had to drop one by Thursday):MuhammedColesB. EdwardsMcCardellBranchLee Evans
I just cut Kerry Collins in 2 leagues to pick Curry up. I picked him up in another league, but I have to drop 2 players before Thurs.Wow. Lotta people are more optimistic about Curry than I am.One thing regarding Porter, there hasn't been one bit of negative feedback since his initial blowup. He hasn't said a word to the press, and has been practicing every day. Unfortunately the Raiders keep their practices closed, so it's tough to say how he's been behaving, but no news is good news as far as that's concerned. Anyone venturing a guess as to his status with the team is taking a shot in the dark.As to Curry: Best case scenario, he continues his work in the slot, where he was the best guy on the team in that role. Bump? Absolutely. Big bump? I dunno about that. The man's had two blown Achilles. I wouldn't be cutting anyone decent to pick him up.
This is within the guidelines of the above rule.I just cut Kerry Collins in 2 leagues to pick Curry up.I wouldn't be cutting anyone decent to pick him up.

How is getting trading to the Patriots a good thing for a WR? Edwards is the clear-cut #1 for his team and looks great in a dynasty - why would you drop him?Gete Edwards back ASAP. Don't do knee jerk stuff like that!I just dropped Braylon Edwards for Gabriel.........I have Branch. Did I goof?![]()
Agree, dumb move. Hope he clears waivers. We only have 5 bench spots in our league and Edwards was going to get dropped anyways so I can get a TE by Thursday (I didn't draft one, would rather sit on extra WR/RB until right before the first game).
But as Massraider outlined what have we heard about Porter lately...
from yesterday:
September 1, 2006, 19:48 Raiders :: WRWR Porter Slides Down Depth ChartSteve Corkran, Contra Costa Times - [Full Article]Disgruntled WR Jerry Porter has been passed on the depth chart by WR Doug Gabriel and WR Ronald Curry. Going into the season opener Gabriel will start opposite WR Randy Moss.
I responded to that post already. Porter was working with the 3rd team from the time camp started. That article could have been published August 1st.But as Massraider outlined what have we heard about Porter lately...from yesterday:
September 1, 2006, 19:48
Raiders :: WR
WR Porter Slides Down Depth Chart
Steve Corkran, Contra Costa Times - [Full Article]
Disgruntled WR Jerry Porter has been passed on the depth chart by WR Doug Gabriel and WR Ronald Curry. Going into the season opener Gabriel will start opposite WR Randy Moss.
You dropped Jennings for Gabriel prior to this newsI took a chance in my redraft and dropped Jennings for Gabriel. I think they both have about the same opportunities, but Brady is better than Favre.He's my 6th WR behind CJ, Boldin, Mason, Williamson and EngramWorth a gamble, but not worth a WR3 or 4, IMO.Curry's value is directly related to Porter's situation and I just don't know what's going to happen there, so I'm not moving on Curry.
Maybe you did this a long while ago but Jennings was one of a few players after watching a couple preseason games and looking at the competion around him has the skills to put up WR #2 numbers. Gabriel has the same type of potential but was behind Porter so you were banking on Porter leaving or getting hurt.That's a possibility, but I doubt it. They announced it as an undisclosed draft pick. I can't imagine the Raiders getting Branch and a pick for Gabriel......that did not happen. As a Raiders fan they are sold on Curry being back or Porter and Shell made up.I'm tempted to jump all over Curry in a couple of my my dynasty leagues, but this is holding me back. Well, partly this, the other thing is I don't want to pull a flranger.Does anyone feel that the reason the compensation for Gabriel has not been revelaed is because Branch is heading to Oakland? I could see Davis pulling this off.![]()
NE homer here. You are right on the money. No NE WR is gonna post top 10, or even top 15 numbers. TE Watson is the only decent receiving investment you should make in NE.I think this a huge bump for Curry. He's clearly the number 2 WR in an offense that will throw the ball a lot and will play a lot from behind. I don't see Porter coming back and it's also possible Moss could miss a few games this season (he's had a hard time staying healthy for 16). Curry's definately a sleeper and I've got him at about 900/7.Doug Gabriel just becomes another face in the crowd in New England. I don't see any WR getting the ball enough to be a much more than a WR5 on most rosters.![]()
And LM Dillion is slow and old!NE homer here. You are right on the money. No NE WR is gonna post top 10, or even top 15 numbers. TE Watson is the only decent receiving investment you should make in NE.I think this a huge bump for Curry. He's clearly the number 2 WR in an offense that will throw the ball a lot and will play a lot from behind. I don't see Porter coming back and it's also possible Moss could miss a few games this season (he's had a hard time staying healthy for 16). Curry's definately a sleeper and I've got him at about 900/7.Doug Gabriel just becomes another face in the crowd in New England. I don't see any WR getting the ball enough to be a much more than a WR5 on most rosters.![]()

JU, you say that Caldwell isn't getting it done? I had only seen some positive comments made by Bill about him and those are usually rare from Bill. I thought he was doing real well? Am I wrong?Caldwell just isn't getting it done, so NE felt they needed to get a decent WR. They accomplished that IMO. I see Gabriel becoming a very dependable WR, and certainly better than Brown or Caldwell. It's not news to anyone on this board that NE likes to spread the ball around, but going to NE is a good thing for Gabriel. Watson will lead the team in receptions in 2006, but Gabriel should do just fine.Name a veteran receiver who came into New England and produced immediately? The New England offense is all about situational players. I'd expect Gabriel to be a situational player for first downs where they want him to run deep and intermediate pass routes. I wouldn't expect him to play much on third downs, especially if his hands are as bad as advertised - the only formation I'd expect to see him in would be the 5 WR formation where Brady might sneak or throw to one of several receivers running quick hooks and quick slants. And I disagree that anyone has to get much more than those numbers by default. Brown will get 600-700 yards, Caldwell another 500-600, Kevin Faulk another 250-300, Watson around 500-650, Dillon and Maroney combine for about 200-300, Gabriel about 375-450, other TEs around 300-500, and other receivers around 300-500, which would give us a range of 3000-4000 yards for Brady. Who do you see falling off to give Gabriel bigger numbers?What other receivers do you see getting numbers? I would think that you have Brown and Caldwell starting. Gabriel's talent level is greater than both of those guys. Caldwell has not impressed me, and Brady has had to show him where to line up several times. Just by default the Pats offense will have him get much more than the numbers you suggest.Thanks. I'd probably put him at 25-30 catches, 375-450 yards, 2 TDs right now, with very little upside. They'll probably work him in slowly, mostly on first downs for deep or intermediate pass routes.Has deep speed for sure, but I've seen him make some tough intermediate catches. Hands have been spotty. Makes tough catches, drops some he should grab.
Major goof. Don't anyone forget how the Pats and Brady move the ball around. I would have never made this move in a million years.I just dropped Braylon Edwards for Gabriel.........I have Branch. Did I goof?
no no whoa! This is a new year the pats will pound there Rbs this year much more. Forget about 4300 for Brady this year, will not happen unless both Dillon and Marony go down. Gabriel will not catch 6 Tds. Closer to three it says here and 500.Assuming Branch gone:Brady: 3800/26 (had 4300 last year I think)Watson 700/6Gabriel 700/6Brown 600/4Caldwell 400/3Other WRs 200/2Other TEs 400/2All RBs 500/3What other receivers do you see getting numbers? I would think that you have Brown and Caldwell starting. Gabriel's talent level is greater than both of those guys. Caldwell has not impressed me, and Brady has had to show him where to line up several times. Just by default the Pats offense will have him get much more than the numbers you suggest.Thanks. I'd probably put him at 25-30 catches, 375-450 yards, 2 TDs right now, with very little upside. They'll probably work him in slowly, mostly on first downs for deep or intermediate pass routes.Has deep speed for sure, but I've seen him make some tough intermediate catches. Hands have been spotty. Makes tough catches, drops some he should grab.
Drop the Phins for now and get Edwards then work a trade or drop Gabriel for a Defense/TE. Edwards is almost 100% and could be a star sooner than later.I'm tempted to jump all over Curry in a couple of my my dynasty leagues, but this is holding me back. Well, partly this, the other thing is I don't want to pull a flranger.Does anyone feel that the reason the compensation for Gabriel has not been revelaed is because Branch is heading to Oakland? I could see Davis pulling this off.![]()
Now that's funny!!Since my crappy team has partially hijacked this thread, which WR would you drop in a non-dynasty PPR league (it's the least I can ask for all the laughs I have given you guys, I had to drop one by Thursday):MuhammedColesB. EdwardsMcCardellBranchLee Evans
Not too much. With the spread offense NE runs it's hard for any receiver to be a fantasy stud. Branch was awesome there and he barely broke 1000 yards last year.how high would you raise gabriels stock? would you drop the likes of ladell betts or ryan moats for him? assuming those are your 4-6th rbs?
Before preseason, yes, after preseason, no.JU, you say that Caldwell isn't getting it done? I had only seen some positive comments made by Bill about him and those are usually rare from Bill. I thought he was doing real well? Am I wrong?
Suprised Gabriel was on anyones ww list still..knowing that he was a 2nd wideout at oakland and porter in doghouse.But I believe Chad Jackson (HURT NOW YES WE KNOW) is going to be the #3 and get as many touches as the others since NE does spread the ball around .OK, everyone is talking about projections so I am gonna add mine.Let me start off by saying I immediately dropped Reche Caldwell as my WR6 and picked up Gabriel off the WW. So you know I am liking this trade already.Gabriel should step in and play quickly. Caldwell has not looked good...Chad Jackson isn't playing, Troy Brown is mor than a little long in the tooth. I think Gabriel will play even if branch comes back to NE. I like Gabriel to post numbers similar to David Givens...you could make a case for 700-850 yds and 4-6 TDs depending on the gameplans and matchups. I like this move a lot for Gabriel owners...he was buried in oakland and now has one of the game's best QBs tossing him perfect spirals...he should do well.

tim curry = speedDonald Curry = speed
Idian Curry = tasty foodtim curry = speedDonald Curry = speed
Idia...isn't that the home country of Idiots?Idian Curry = tasty foodtim curry = speedDonald Curry = speed
j/kNo, thats Cleveland.Idian...isn't that the home country of Idiots?Idian Curry = tasty foodtim curry = speedDonald Curry = speedj/k

LOL. Plus, your quote caught my "idiot" error that I tried to edit.No, thats Cleveland.Idian...isn't that the home country of Idiots?Idian Curry = tasty foodtim curry = speedDonald Curry = speedj/k
![]()

As opposed to my "idian" curry?LOL. Plus, your quote caught my "idiot" error that I tried to edit.No, thats Cleveland.Idian...isn't that the home country of Idiots?Idian Curry = tasty foodtim curry = speedDonald Curry = speedj/k
![]()
![]()
![]()
I have 2 words for late season waiver wire pickup in a deep league... "Bam Childress"Yessir, and no, he's not my cousin. Call it a gut feeling... He's been catching balls, and getting comfy w/ the system. I think he'll be one of those Belichek "where the hell'd that guy come from?" players.Assuming Branch gone:
Brady: 3800/26 (had 4300 last year I think)
Watson 700/6
Gabriel 700/6
Brown 600/4
Caldwell 400/3
Other WRs 200/2
Other TEs 400/2
All RBs 500/3
Wait..you were serious?Gete Edwards back ASAP. Don't do knee jerk stuff like that!I just dropped Braylon Edwards for Gabriel.........I have Branch. Did I goof?![]()
Agree, dumb move. Hope he clears waivers. We only have 5 bench spots in our league and Edwards was going to get dropped anyways so I can get a TE by Thursday (I didn't draft one, would rather sit on extra WR/RB until right before the first game).

Why don't I have people in my leagues that do things like this??Wait..you were serious?Gete Edwards back ASAP. Don't do knee jerk stuff like that!I just dropped Braylon Edwards for Gabriel.........I have Branch. Did I goof?![]()
Agree, dumb move. Hope he clears waivers. We only have 5 bench spots in our league and Edwards was going to get dropped anyways so I can get a TE by Thursday (I didn't draft one, would rather sit on extra WR/RB until right before the first game).
![]()

I have people like this in my main leagueWhy don't I have people in my leagues that do things like this??Wait..you were serious?Gete Edwards back ASAP. Don't do knee jerk stuff like that!I just dropped Braylon Edwards for Gabriel.........I have Branch. Did I goof?![]()
Agree, dumb move. Hope he clears waivers. We only have 5 bench spots in our league and Edwards was going to get dropped anyways so I can get a TE by Thursday (I didn't draft one, would rather sit on extra WR/RB until right before the first game).
![]()
![]()
One guy drafted DDavis, 2nd round, and CRogers in about the 10th and he's still got 'em. He posts on the league message, just doesn't drop 'em