What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread PL1 - Dallas V Seattle (3 Viewers)

I predict that in about 2 weeks I will want to kill anyone who hums, whistles or signs even a note from a Grease song.

 
RB: Seattle
I think Doc Detroit meant the 'boys run game is equivelant to the 'hawks' - not head to head SA v. JJ or v. MBIII.It's hard to argue with that.
Cowboy fan here..... I'll trade you all our RB's for all of Seattle RB's.Hard to agrue with that......I am sure Seattle would hang up on Jerry if he offered that trade.
Again - RUN GAME versus RUN GAME is what I think Doc Detroit meant - NOT RB v. RB!!!!!Dallas:472 carries (13) 1936 yards (13) 4.10 YPC (15) 21 rush TDs (3)Seattle:484 carries (14) 1923 yards (14) 3.97 YPC (17) 8 rush TDs (27)Even factoring in SA as better at the GL and improving the team's YPA, the run games are comparable (IOW, EVEN)
 
WTF is with not getting a pass rush on Romo? I mean the fumble is nice but you can't let Dallas do that because they are gonna get rolling.

Also Seattle can't run early. I'm not liking that scenario at all.

 
Holy crap! Did you see the replay? He never had the ball. What's wrong with him? Why didn't he protest so they could challenge?

 
RB: Seattle
I think Doc Detroit meant the 'boys run game is equivelant to the 'hawks' - not head to head SA v. JJ or v. MBIII.It's hard to argue with that.
Cowboy fan here..... I'll trade you all our RB's for all of Seattle RB's.Hard to agrue with that......I am sure Seattle would hang up on Jerry if he offered that trade.
Again - RUN GAME versus RUN GAME is what I think Doc Detroit meant - NOT RB v. RB!!!!!Dallas:472 carries (13) 1936 yards (13) 4.10 YPC (15) 21 rush TDs (3)Seattle:484 carries (14) 1923 yards (14) 3.97 YPC (17) 8 rush TDs (27)Even factoring in SA as better at the GL and improving the team's YPA, the run games are comparable (IOW, EVEN)
:ph34r:This place is as fun as I remember.
 
RB: Seattle
I think Doc Detroit meant the 'boys run game is equivelant to the 'hawks' - not head to head SA v. JJ or v. MBIII.It's hard to argue with that.
Cowboy fan here..... I'll trade you all our RB's for all of Seattle RB's.Hard to agrue with that......I am sure Seattle would hang up on Jerry if he offered that trade.
Again - RUN GAME versus RUN GAME is what I think Doc Detroit meant - NOT RB v. RB!!!!!Dallas:472 carries (13) 1936 yards (13) 4.10 YPC (15) 21 rush TDs (3)Seattle:484 carries (14) 1923 yards (14) 3.97 YPC (17) 8 rush TDs (27)Even factoring in SA as better at the GL and improving the team's YPA, the run games are comparable (IOW, EVEN)
Good beagling. :ph34r:
 
Holy crap! Did you see the replay? He never had the ball. What's wrong with him? Why didn't he protest so they could challenge?
That goes on the coaches in the booth. We saw it enough times to know it was a bad call, somebody shoulda buzzed the tuna on that. Witten may have thought he caught it and fumbled it.
 
RB: Seattle
I think Doc Detroit meant the 'boys run game is equivelant to the 'hawks' - not head to head SA v. JJ or v. MBIII.It's hard to argue with that.
Cowboy fan here..... I'll trade you all our RB's for all of Seattle RB's.Hard to agrue with that......I am sure Seattle would hang up on Jerry if he offered that trade.
Again - RUN GAME versus RUN GAME is what I think Doc Detroit meant - NOT RB v. RB!!!!!Dallas:472 carries (13) 1936 yards (13) 4.10 YPC (15) 21 rush TDs (3)Seattle:484 carries (14) 1923 yards (14) 3.97 YPC (17) 8 rush TDs (27)Even factoring in SA as better at the GL and improving the team's YPA, the run games are comparable (IOW, EVEN)
:ph34r:This place is as fun as I remember.
Rush numbers:Dallas = 6-18Seattle = 7-20Maybe evenly inept would have been a better statement.
 
Romo's arm looks like a noodle.

Parcells should throw in Bledsoe in for a few plays. Max protect and just launch it to T.O.

 
Yup - ball has to be more than 3 inches above the carpet when it reaches the receiver for there to be a good chance at a pick.

 
I like the first down play action there but didn't like the result. Running well opens up that play and it was there.

Nice catch Bobby. I think even Hawk fans underestimated his return. He is reliable if anything.

 
Seattle getting FD's this drive.

If anyone cares to know, MBIII was in the game for the 3rd & 7, but it was an unsuccessful pass play.

 
I like the first down play action there but didn't like the result. Running well opens up that play and it was there. Nice catch Bobby. I think even Hawk fans underestimated his return. He is reliable if anything.
Of all the injuries for the season I think his was the most impactful. Especially with Branch joining the ranks of the dropsies. He is Hass' security blanket and a complete first down machine. Third down is so much more manageable with 84 in the game. There's really no way to understate how important he is.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top