BobbyLayne
Footballguy
Am I the only one who thinks there are way too many fumble calls when players are down or forward progress is stopped? Its like just keep ripping at the ball, if its ever comes out they'll allow it.
good play callJeez. A tremendous play by Woodson.
I wasn't sure something like that could be reviewed. I've definitely never seen an overturn for something like that.
You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
Why not? Seriously.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
Well goody for you that we get bent over.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
I thought Dallas was challenging the Felix Jones fumbleWhy not? Seriously.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
Why not? Seriously.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
In other words it all goes back to the official(s) who somehow missed Jones landing on the ball, being turned over while cradling it, and then after a pause having it stripped out of his hands while laying on the ground with the ball in his possession.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.
He doesn't play on plays where they throw the ball.Is Jennings hurt, or is he just not a part of that goal line offense? He was on the sidelines the entire series.
fixoredIs Jennings hurt, or is he just not a part of that goal line offense? He was on the sidelines the entire series.
Felix Jones didn't fumble. The ruling on the field was that he never recovered it, which is not challengeable.I thought Dallas was challenging the Felix Jones fumbleWhy not? Seriously.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
It's semantics. Just ask them to review if Felix fumbled? I'd get an attorney. Seriously. GB has spanked Dallas today and deserves the win. Unless, of course, Dallas goes off here to close the game.Why not? Seriously.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
Yes, of course Witten should have known to let Hawk score on the play-that way we get it back.Why not? Seriously.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes againThose are the rules.
Semantics. We know he didn't fumble. That's the point.Felix Jones didn't fumble. The ruling on the field was that he never recovered it, which is not challengeable.I thought Dallas was challenging the Felix Jones fumbleWhy not? Seriously.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
I can't say I'm too broken up over it.Well goody for you that we get bent over.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again
Anything for a buck. NFL loves commercials.Sooooooo,we have a timeout on the field to review a play that in the end they say is non-reviewable?Give me a break.
Didn't think so.I can't say I'm too broken up over it.Well goody for you that we get bent over.You can't review recovery of a fumble. You can only review whether or not a fumble occurred.F'ing garbage. Triplett strikes again