Yeah but 3rd and 5, or even 6, 7, 8...it appeared to me Dixon was the fastest guy on the field. He could easily have run for a lot more yards vs the Raven blitzes. We had a slim chance coming into the game, had Dixon gone down, no big deal. At least, IMO, the Steelers now have a QB2 going forward, Ben gets beat on every week, so its good to know. We had been rolling the dice most of the 4thQ and OT with Dixon's decision making, I would have loved to seen him run a bootleg instead of the drop back pass that was the INT.Tough game, tough opponent, tough loss. But now we need to win out(11-5), get healthy(Ben, Troy, Kemo). We had 3 cannons on the sideline and took the Ravens to OT in their house. We are down, but not out.Ravens still have to come to Heinz Field.Probably because they don't have anyone behind Dixon other than Palko, who hasn't even had a full week on the practice squad yet.Why wouldn't Arians call a bootleg pass/run option? Because he is a moron that is why.
Also "We had heart and desire" as if the Steelers don't.Yeah that interview was a littleI think Rey Lewis wants to make sweet love to Ray Rice after the game.
If Cundiff can't make this one, he should be looking for a gig before the Ravens get back to the bench.That sucks.
But I still can't say that I'm disappointed in tonight's game. Dixon's played well tonight for a guy who was a 5th round pick and had 1 pass attempt before tonight.
They took the Ravens to OT on the road without Ben, Kemo, Polamalu, and and Smith.
It'll be a big win for the Ravens if they can finish it off.
Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.
The one that got favorable non-existant penalties that overturned TDs.Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.
If I remember correctly it was the Zebras.Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.
The one that got favorable non-existant penalties that overturned TDs.Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.

It was this team:Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.
What teams beat the Steelers this year? Are there enough smilies for them all?Hey those 3-8 Chiefs are better than their record says.It was this team:Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.What teams beat the Steelers this year? Are there enough smilies for them all?

I'm sure the 4-7 Bears are, too! :XHey those 3-8 Chiefs are better than their record says.It was this team:Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.What teams beat the Steelers this year? Are there enough smilies for them all?
![]()
Call us when Minnesota wins 6 Lombardis...on second thought, call us when they win one.Hey those 3-8 Chiefs are better than their record says.It was this team:Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.What teams beat the Steelers this year? Are there enough smilies for them all?
![]()
When the viks win 6 Lombardi's then you can talk smack.It was this team:Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.What teams beat the Steelers this year? Are there enough smilies for them all?
Call us when Minnesota wins 6 Lombardis...on second thought, call us when they win one.
Hey I think you guys read the same comeback book.When the viks win 6 Lombardi's then you can talk smack.
Unfortunately for you, you have no comeback.Call us when Minnesota wins 6 Lombardis...on second thought, call us when they win one.Hey I think you guys read the same comeback book.When the viks win 6 Lombardi's then you can talk smack.

None is necessary when there isUnfortunately for you, you have no comeback.Call us when Minnesota wins 6 Lombardis...on second thought, call us when they win one.Hey I think you guys read the same comeback book.When the viks win 6 Lombardi's then you can talk smack.![]()
![]()

You better get to bed. Kindergarten comes pretty early in the morning.None is necessary when there isUnfortunately for you, you have no comeback.Call us when Minnesota wins 6 Lombardis...on second thought, call us when they win one.Hey I think you guys read the same comeback book.When the viks win 6 Lombardi's then you can talk smack.![]()
![]()
![]()
Thanks for the heads up. Now... where did I leave my security blanket? Ohhhh! Here it is:You better get to bed. Kindergarten comes pretty early in the morning.

Or they could just talk smack now.When the viks win 6 Lombardi's then you can talk smack.It was this team:Vikings have one loss. Remind me again what team beat them.What teams beat the Steelers this year? Are there enough smilies for them all?
Agreed. The secondary is very average without Troy back there. Gay has been disappointing.This loss was on the Steelers D. 3rd and 22 should have been the end of the game.
I think you are being very generous. Gay is awful, Clark is a huge hitter but frequently blows coverage and Carter is a backup. Ike is decent in coverage but couldn't make an interception if it was underhanded to him. I swear my mother has better hands. During training camp I thought signing Clark was a priority -- now not so much.Overall I thought the team played well considering the players that were out. Still it is very disappointing to see the Steelers defense blow a 4th quarter lead again. I also think they should have called more bootlegs and rollouts for Dixon.The Steelers have now dropped three in a row but if they beat Oakland at home and the Browns on the road they'll be sitting 8-5 and have a long week to get ready for Green Bay at home. Things look bleak but they are still very much in the thick of it.Agreed. The secondary is very average without Troy back there. Gay has been disappointing.This loss was on the Steelers D. 3rd and 22 should have been the end of the game.
I gotta disagree.Pitt's D sacked Flacco over and over, had turnovers, and sacked Flacco again late to prevent <theoretically> a long field goal.I know you Pitt guys are spoiled by your D being dominant, but 5 sacks, 3 forced fumbles, and keeping Ray Rice to 88 yards rushing does not a bad D performance make. Polamalu is dominant but this was a respectable performance.Pitt lost due to having their third string QB out there, plain and simple. If Roethlisberger or Batch were out there, I'd bet the game would have been much different. Dixon was terrible in the second half.This loss was on the Steelers D. 3rd and 22 should have been the end of the game.
Exactly why it was on the defense (and they knew it) to close out the game and they failed. We know our team well and we also know who to blame. Dixon played about as well as can be expected given the circumstances. If the team were to win, the D had to win it for them.I gotta disagree.Pitt's D sacked Flacco over and over, had turnovers, and sacked Flacco again late to prevent <theoretically> a long field goal.I know you Pitt guys are spoiled by your D being dominant, but 5 sacks, 3 forced fumbles, and keeping Ray Rice to 88 yards rushing does not a bad D performance make. Polamalu is dominant but this was a respectable performance.Pitt lost due to having their third string QB out there, plain and simple. If Roethlisberger or Batch were out there, I'd bet the game would have been much different. Dixon was terrible in the second half.This loss was on the Steelers D. 3rd and 22 should have been the end of the game.