Why are you still discussing this??? Its been 3 series since then. Get over it.How about he was grasping the ball to his chest, even after he was hit. It's hard to make a "football move" when you're falling to the earth after being crunched. He had possession, there was no bobble at all, despite the vicious hit, which is hard to fathom in the first place. The refs gave it to Chicago because the initial hit caused the man to hit the ground, which caused the fumble. Maybe they need to re-look at how that rule is explained (the ground cannot cause a fumble rule).He never made a "football move" after he caught the ball, therefore it was a goodcall.See - I thought he had possession. He caught it, was DRILLED, hit the ground and the ball popped out. I see down by contact - and I want Chicago to win this game here.He never had possession. The ball never hit the ground. Therefore, INT for CHI.I stand corrected, but that's a TERRIBLE call! How is #12 not Down By Contact?!?!?!?!![]()
No way you can say that the ball came out BEFORE his butt hit the ground. They blew that call big-time.
No way you can say that the ball came out BEFORE his butt hit the ground. They blew that call big-time.

That little 60+ yards of garbage time that Vick just had put me behind for the week.