What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W15 - Chicago V Atlanta (1 Viewer)

I stand corrected, but that's a TERRIBLE call! How is #12 not Down By Contact?!?!?!?!
He never had possession. The ball never hit the ground. Therefore, INT for CHI.
See - I thought he had possession. He caught it, was DRILLED, hit the ground and the ball popped out. I see down by contact - and I want Chicago to win this game here. :crazy:
:goodposting: No way you can say that the ball came out BEFORE his butt hit the ground. They blew that call big-time.
He never made a "football move" after he caught the ball, therefore it was a goodcall.
How about he was grasping the ball to his chest, even after he was hit. It's hard to make a "football move" when you're falling to the earth after being crunched. He had possession, there was no bobble at all, despite the vicious hit, which is hard to fathom in the first place. The refs gave it to Chicago because the initial hit caused the man to hit the ground, which caused the fumble. Maybe they need to re-look at how that rule is explained (the ground cannot cause a fumble rule).
Why are you still discussing this??? Its been 3 series since then. Get over it.
 
When will Vick be benched?
First you claim that Turner is a better back than Tomlinson and now you want Vick benched. You are either the dumbest person in the world or you really just want to create arguments. I say it's both.
No, I just want you to shut your mouth. Carry on.
That's the best you got? Weak. Have a good day at school tomorrow.
 
That wasn't the worst call of the night though. The worst call of the night was Paul Maguire - "Urlacher is the fastest player on the Bears defense" :lmao: :unsure: :banned:

 
WTF is Theisman talking about?

He just said Grossman is having more success passing, as Vick isn't quite there in his development yet.

This is Rex Grossman's 7th NFL start for Christ's sake!!!
Yeah Theisman is an idiot, but do you really think Vick is a better pure passer than Grossman? I don't think its a crazy statement.
 
I will give Grossman this. Since he is completing passes Jones has had more room to rum, that is when he doesn't run into Grossman. :yes:

 
When will Vick be benched?
First you claim that Turner is a better back than Tomlinson and now you want Vick benched. You are either the dumbest person in the world or you really just want to create arguments. I say it's both.
No, I just want you to shut your mouth. Carry on.
That's the best you got? Weak. Have a good day at school tomorrow.
You are now the starting TE on my ignore list. Welcome, take a seat and shut up.
 
That wasn't the worst call of the night though. The worst call of the night was Paul Maguire - "Urlacher is the fastest player on the Bears defense" :lmao: :unsure: :banned:
I assumed he meant quickest, which may be accurate.
 
SHANK! I watched his feet, he planted all wrong.Bledsoe to Moulds2005 Graduate, Paul Maguire Institute of Feet Watching

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I stand corrected, but that's a TERRIBLE call! How is #12 not Down By Contact?!?!?!?!
He never had possession. The ball never hit the ground. Therefore, INT for CHI.
See - I thought he had possession. He caught it, was DRILLED, hit the ground and the ball popped out. I see down by contact - and I want Chicago to win this game here. :crazy:
:goodposting: No way you can say that the ball came out BEFORE his butt hit the ground. They blew that call big-time.
He never made a "football move" after he caught the ball, therefore it was a goodcall.
How about he was grasping the ball to his chest, even after he was hit. It's hard to make a "football move" when you're falling to the earth after being crunched. He had possession, there was no bobble at all, despite the vicious hit, which is hard to fathom in the first place. The refs gave it to Chicago because the initial hit caused the man to hit the ground, which caused the fumble. Maybe they need to re-look at how that rule is explained (the ground cannot cause a fumble rule).
I agree, terrible call. He clearly had possession and couldn't make a football move cause he was being tackled. The ground caused that fumble and should have been Atlanta's ball. They got hosed...
 
I detest Desmond Clark.

The guy f'n sucks.

This is the second time in a few games where the ball was thrown RIGHT TO HIS HANDS and he's dropped it. The last time it caused an interception.

I should email Desmond Clark this web link.

 
I detest Desmond Clark.

The guy f'n sucks.

This is the second time in a few games where the ball was thrown RIGHT TO HIS HANDS and he's dropped it. The last time it caused an interception.

I should email Desmond Clark this web link.
Quinn Sypniewski 6-7, 265 Colorado (X)This guy would fit in Chicago nicely, he already likes Kielbasa

 
The Bears defense has made Atlanta look pitiful. Where are all you haters at now? Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sure you won't post again unless the Bears lose. :bye:

 
The Bears defense has made Atlanta look pitiful. Where are all you haters at now? Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sure you won't post again unless the Bears lose. :bye:
:thumbup: Not bad, but you'll have to try harder to be as annoying as a stiller fan.

 
:hot: That little 60+ yards of garbage time that Vick just had put me behind for the week. :hot: Granted, I only need Gado to have 18 yards tomorrow, but I would have liked it to be over. What a terrible game that was.
 
:hot: That little 60+ yards of garbage time that Vick just had put me behind for the week. :hot:

Granted, I only need Gado to have 18 yards tomorrow, but I would have liked it to be over.

What a terrible game that was.
good luck, you would think the game was in the bag. I'm in the same situation (need 30 yard from Gado) but for some reason I see him laying an egg.
 
:hot: That little 60+ yards of garbage time that Vick just had put me behind for the week. :hot:

Granted, I only need Gado to have 18 yards tomorrow, but I would have liked it to be over.

What a terrible game that was.
Ninja please, that was a hard hitting, defensive game. Add Grossman coming in and looking pretty sharp and it was entertaining. :ptts:

 
:hot: That little 60+ yards of garbage time that Vick just had put me behind for the week. :hot:

Granted, I only need Gado to have 18 yards tomorrow, but I would have liked it to be over. 

What a terrible game that was.
good luck, you would think the game was in the bag. I'm in the same situation (need 30 yard from Gado) but for some reason I see him laying an egg.
You're worried about getting 30 yds? :lmao:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top