What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W3 - Dallas V Chicago (1 Viewer)

Are we going to have to hear how Tyson Thompson is a native of Irving, Texas every week?!?!

We get it, the stadium is there, not really in Dallas, and going to Arlington real soon. Let it go Al, let it go.

 
I lied.........

Anyone have an up to date listing of penalties for each team and the yardage?

I know when I coached basketball when things start getting lopsided in terms of fouls going one way the coach made sure the refs knew it was 7 to 2 one way or whatever.

 
Are we going to have to hear how Tyson Thompson is a native of Irving, Texas every week?!?!We get it, the stadium is there, not really in Dallas, and going to Arlington real soon. Let it go Al, let it go.
I guess we'll have to sign an Arlington native. Any chance they can bring Leon Johnson out of retirement?
 
Bears have let so many sacks slip out of their hands tonight.
lol @ "let"
Would you prefer "had". I wasn't discrediting what Romo is doing, it's basically entirely his pocket presence and shiftiness in the pocket that has escaped all those sacks. Obviously I was not implying that they made a conscious choice to not get a sack because they didn't want one at the time. It was just meant to say that they have been close many times, and should have more sacks with how close they have been getting.Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go back to football. If you're looking for more semantics to pick apart and squirt sacastic one-liners at I hear there is a great grammar forum nearby. :rolleyes:
 
What Tony Romo is doing right now is not easy. He's making it look easy but him moving around like that and escaping that rush and finding receivers is something special.

No turnovers Dallas!

 
Barber's just a TD magnet.

When you think about how many Td's dallas will score because of their offense and how they like to go to him during the run or pass down near the goaline.....you start to think to yourself, How will this guy NOT score?

I mean, he gets one every week, it's freaken money.

 
Bears have let so many sacks slip out of their hands tonight.
lol @ "let"
Would you prefer "had". I wasn't discrediting what Romo is doing, it's basically entirely his pocket presence and shiftiness in the pocket that has escaped all those sacks. Obviously I was not implying that they made a conscious choice to not get a sack because they didn't want one at the time. It was just meant to say that they have been close many times, and should have more sacks with how close they have been getting.Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go back to football. If you're looking for more semantics to pick apart and squirt sacastic one-liners at I hear there is a great grammar forum nearby. :rolleyes:
Don't be such a pissy girl. "Let" seems to indicate that Romo had nothing to do with it. That's all.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top