Did they edit it? I didn't see the Steelers guy with the #4 uni in there at the end.those nike sjax/merrimen ads are awesome
Awesomely fake....most of those plays would never happen.those nike sjax/merrimen ads are awesome
Wait - the commercial is fake? My God.Awesomely fake....most of those plays would never happen.those nike sjax/merrimen ads are awesome
DuhAwesomely fake....most of those plays would never happen.those nike sjax/merrimen ads are awesome
Could use real life plays....plenty of those happen every week.Wait - the commercial is fake? My God.Awesomely fake....most of those plays would never happen.those nike sjax/merrimen ads are awesome
I guess we'll have to sign an Arlington native. Any chance they can bring Leon Johnson out of retirement?Are we going to have to hear how Tyson Thompson is a native of Irving, Texas every week?!?!We get it, the stadium is there, not really in Dallas, and going to Arlington real soon. Let it go Al, let it go.
I guess we'll have to sign an Arlington native. Any chance they can bring Leon Johnson out of retirement?Are we going to have to hear how Tyson Thompson is a native of Irving, Texas every week?!?!We get it, the stadium is there, not really in Dallas, and going to Arlington real soon. Let it go Al, let it go.

lol @ "let"Bears have let so many sacks slip out of their hands tonight.
and Vick can't throw the ball out of the stadium from the 50 yard line?? riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiightWait - the commercial is fake? My God.Awesomely fake....most of those plays would never happen.those nike sjax/merrimen ads are awesome

I think this works for the entire NFC North, actually.Blue-print on how to beat the Bears: Abandon the run and pass every down.....
pork-fried rice hoes?half and half hoes??MMMMM margaritas and hoes.
Would you prefer "had". I wasn't discrediting what Romo is doing, it's basically entirely his pocket presence and shiftiness in the pocket that has escaped all those sacks. Obviously I was not implying that they made a conscious choice to not get a sack because they didn't want one at the time. It was just meant to say that they have been close many times, and should have more sacks with how close they have been getting.Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go back to football. If you're looking for more semantics to pick apart and squirt sacastic one-liners at I hear there is a great grammar forum nearby.lol @ "let"Bears have let so many sacks slip out of their hands tonight.

Let's talk about them boobs, darlin'.MMMMM margaritas and hoes.
Is there any Bears player you won't abandon ship on at an instant?List includes: Grossman, Benson, Arch.....to be continued.Good thing we picked up Arch. There's a reason no one else wanted him
Don't be such a pissy girl. "Let" seems to indicate that Romo had nothing to do with it. That's all.Would you prefer "had". I wasn't discrediting what Romo is doing, it's basically entirely his pocket presence and shiftiness in the pocket that has escaped all those sacks. Obviously I was not implying that they made a conscious choice to not get a sack because they didn't want one at the time. It was just meant to say that they have been close many times, and should have more sacks with how close they have been getting.Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go back to football. If you're looking for more semantics to pick apart and squirt sacastic one-liners at I hear there is a great grammar forum nearby.lol @ "let"Bears have let so many sacks slip out of their hands tonight.![]()