What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread Week 10 - San Francisco at Arizona (1 Viewer)

An Edge sighting :lol:

One my fav. players but looks like he could be going toward that 8-10 carries a game role for rest of his career if he stays in Arizona? I heard 2 years ago they were looking to replace him so anyone else have any insight?

 
What happened for those not able to watch the game?
3rd and 8. Pass complete to Jason Hill at the sideline, gets both feet in. Falls to ground out of bounds.Side judge calls him out of bounds but he had both feet in on replay. Then they rule incomplete for he didn't maintain possession as he fell to the ground about 4 yards out of bounds (but that wasn't why he was initially ruled as not completing the catch).
 
An Edge sighting :confused:

One my fav. players but looks like he could be going toward that 8-10 carries a game role for rest of his career if he stays in Arizona? I heard 2 years ago they were looking to replace him so anyone else have any insight?
Edge is slated to make $5M in 08 and 09 with a cap charge of $6.75/yr. If they don't keep him they'll take a one-time hit for the balance of his 06 signing bonus of $3.5M.50/50 they keep him.

 
What happened for those not able to watch the game?
3rd and 8. Pass complete to Jason Hill at the sideline, gets both feet in. Falls to ground out of bounds.Side judge calls him out of bounds but he had both feet in on replay. Then they rule incomplete for he didn't maintain possession as he fell to the ground about 4 yards out of bounds (but that wasn't why he was initially ruled as not completing the catch).
ya i dont get the ruling. They didnt challenge they ball coming out at the end nor was it the original ruling by the ref. SF challenged the catch in bounds which is what the call was and they should have won the challenge.
 
I haven't caught any SF games this year and I'm currently at work...

Does Reggie Smith even sniff the field? I believe he was drafted as a CB by the niners.

 
He had the ball in his possession when his knee was down..maybe I'm just not understanding basic rules here.
I don't really get this rule either. I guess the ground can cause a fumble is you're out of bounds. Just don't get it.
it's not a fumble. it's incomplete. you have to maintain possession after hitting the ground.
I know that it's the rule. I just don't understand it. Why would you have to maintain possession out of bounds but if you're in bounds you don't? My understanding of "the ground can't cause a fumble" is because as soon as you make contact with the ground then you're down. This should also be the case if you're out of bounds. Anyway, back to the game.
 
He had the ball in his possession when his knee was down..maybe I'm just not understanding basic rules here.
I don't really get this rule either. I guess the ground can cause a fumble is you're out of bounds. Just don't get it.
it's not a fumble. it's incomplete. you have to maintain possession after hitting the ground.
I know that it's the rule. I just don't understand it. Why would you have to maintain possession out of bounds but if you're in bounds you don't? My understanding of "the ground can't cause a fumble" is because as soon as you make contact with the ground then you're down. This should also be the case if you're out of bounds. Anyway, back to the game.
the rule isn't different in bounds. you still have to maintain control if you're going to the ground as you catch it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top