So to that end, I'm curious to what you think deadspin WAS all about?
Burneko just posted an interesting blog post about this, but I think the upshot is that Deadspin, in many ways, was a lot like what I expect the very best stuff I remember from the FFA to be about.
A place where a vibrant comments section identified writers of real talent who may have initially formed the community around the discussion of sports, but who eventually became about what a set of interesting people were interested in. Magary is obviously the best example. People liked his voice and eventually didn't just want to hear him do a Jamboroo with Jim Tomsula life hacks, but wanted to see him trash the Williams Sonoma catalog, or go through his daughter's Dear Santa letter, or become a Bonafide SmokeBoy (and, of course, eventually about his harrowing brush with death).
Of course, the site also brought in more established writers, like Scocca, but because there was a culture, they picked writers that fit in. Like many communities, that certainly led to a certain homogenization of viewpoints (I'm sure Vivian Darkbloom could have graduated from commenter to blogger there, Maurile might not have). A tendency to favor the millionaire athlete over the billionaire owners. But generally the site's ethos was to punch up and not down, which is what distinguished it, for me, from Barstool.
And maybe Deadspin wasn't that much different as a daily follow to check up on whatever goofy happened in sports the night before. There were probably plenty of other sites I could have followed for that. But those sites wouldn't occasionally surprise me with a dead on Hamilton Nolan blog about the importance of unions or a great piece of investigative reporting by Diana Moskovitz.