Golden Tate block on Sean Lee (1 Viewer)

[K172]

Someone want to catch me up here

WHAT IS A NEW RULE?

If you are a cowboys fan and your player gets jacked up ... then cry.

Right, there's clearly no crying by the Hawks fans at all

Why would Hawk fans have ANY reason to cry? 27-7 dominating victory, and just physically beat down the other team. I don't get it?

That's exactly my question as I stated several times in this thread. It makes no sense why the Hawks fans are crying so much. It's quite a sad representation of their fan base.Their team totally destroyed the Cowboys on the field and they can't own that an illegal play got missed. It is not even a play that would have changed the outcome - no one suggests that. But they are still butthurt about it. It's actually pretty telling...

 

[K172]

Can't stand the Cowboys and normally wouldn't defend them but ...It's Illegal (unnecessary roughness) and Cheap as hell the intent was to take Lee's head off

Then why didn't Tate launch himself straight into Lee's face?

Huh? Ask him! That is a quote from Tate!“Linebackers and safeties are always trying to take your head off,” he said. “Who says offensive guys can’t do the same thing?”http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/09/17/2693518/block-shows-tates-true-grit.html#storylink=cpyYour comments on this topic are so confusing. Tate says he was trying to take Lee's head off and you ask why he didn't launch himself into Lee's face. I don't know, because he missed?

Sweeney, I'm very interested to hear if you disagree with Tate himself that he was trying to take Lee's head off. He said he was, but apparently you know better, right?

He certainly said it, but it doesn't indicate that he was going to do it illegally (like as in a cheap shot).

Right, trying to take someone's head off is not cheap I've posted on many message boards but never found anyone who spun and flip flopped as much as you do. Does your back hurt from the contortions you have to make to switch positions like that?qimqam's point was that it was cheap as hell because he was trying to take his head off. You disagreed. Own it.

I was responding to the poster above calling it a cheap as hell shot intended to take his head off. If he wanted to chap shot him, he cold've actually launched himself at Lee's head or a number of cheap as hell shots. He didn't, he gave a legal hard as hell shot.

That's your opinion. Many disagree with you. Presenting it as fact is silly.Regardless, Tate himself said he was trying to take his head off. Are you really this stubborn?

Please try to keep the post being replied to in mind when going off on your tirades.

No tirade here. But last chance on the personal attacks

I believe I acknowledged that he said it but disagreed with how it was being presented by the poster. I haven't flopped on a single thing dude. I have no idea what makes you think that other than you truly do not understand what you're reading. At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

You implied that he didn't try to take Lee's head off because he didn't go for the head (in your opinion), but then you were presented with a quote from Tate that said he was trying to take Lee's head off.Keep spinning it though if it boosts your ego.

 

[K172]

At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

Tell you what, since you are so confident that it isn't illegal, despite multiple national writers and video evidence, if the NFL fines or disciplines Tate for the hit are you willing to put the following in your sig?"I have no concept of basic football rules - I'm obsessed with my team and can't see past my own ignorant bias"?I'm willing to do that if there's no fine or discipline.You in?

 

[ImTheScientist]

 

[ImTheScientist]

Someone want to catch me up here

WHAT IS A NEW RULE?

If you are a cowboys fan and your player gets jacked up ... then cry.

Right, there's clearly no crying by the Hawks fans at all

Why would Hawk fans have ANY reason to cry? 27-7 dominating victory, and just physically beat down the other team. I don't get it?

That's exactly my question as I stated several times in this thread. It makes no sense why the Hawks fans are crying so much. It's quite a sad representation of their fan base.Their team totally destroyed the Cowboys on the field and they can't own that an illegal play got missed. It is not even a play that would have changed the outcome - no one suggests that. But they are still butthurt about it. It's actually pretty telling...

Im a hawks fan and I don't care if it was legal or not. Dude got jacked up just like the team. I prefer a reputation for dirty play, hard hits, and trash talking..... playing soft gets you no where. Witten and Dez played scared all game. Hit them hard and they drop passes.

 

[K172]

Someone want to catch me up here

WHAT IS A NEW RULE?

If you are a cowboys fan and your player gets jacked up ... then cry.

Right, there's clearly no crying by the Hawks fans at all

Why would Hawk fans have ANY reason to cry? 27-7 dominating victory, and just physically beat down the other team. I don't get it?

That's exactly my question as I stated several times in this thread. It makes no sense why the Hawks fans are crying so much. It's quite a sad representation of their fan base.Their team totally destroyed the Cowboys on the field and they can't own that an illegal play got missed. It is not even a play that would have changed the outcome - no one suggests that. But they are still butthurt about it. It's actually pretty telling...

Im a hawks fan and I don't care if it was legal or not. Dude got jacked up just like the team. I prefer a reputation for dirty play, hard hits, and trash talking..... playing soft gets you no where.

That's fair, you aren't the main crier. And I understand that you prefer that type play. That is certainly your perogative. Does not make the hit any more or less legal though. It does say a bit about where you are coming from though....FWIW I'm not a fan of either team.

 

[ImTheScientist]

FWIW I'm not a fan of either team.

fair enough...but damn....you got mad sweeney

 

[mad sweeney]

Can't stand the Cowboys and normally wouldn't defend them but ...It's Illegal (unnecessary roughness) and Cheap as hell the intent was to take Lee's head off

Then why didn't Tate launch himself straight into Lee's face?

Huh? Ask him! That is a quote from Tate!“Linebackers and safeties are always trying to take your head off,” he said. “Who says offensive guys can’t do the same thing?”http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/09/17/2693518/block-shows-tates-true-grit.html#storylink=cpyYour comments on this topic are so confusing. Tate says he was trying to take Lee's head off and you ask why he didn't launch himself into Lee's face. I don't know, because he missed?

Sweeney, I'm very interested to hear if you disagree with Tate himself that he was trying to take Lee's head off. He said he was, but apparently you know better, right?

He certainly said it, but it doesn't indicate that he was going to do it illegally (like as in a cheap shot).

Right, trying to take someone's head off is not cheap I've posted on many message boards but never found anyone who spun and flip flopped as much as you do. Does your back hurt from the contortions you have to make to switch positions like that?qimqam's point was that it was cheap as hell because he was trying to take his head off. You disagreed. Own it.

I was responding to the poster above calling it a cheap as hell shot intended to take his head off. If he wanted to chap shot him, he cold've actually launched himself at Lee's head or a number of cheap as hell shots. He didn't, he gave a legal hard as hell shot.

That's your opinion. Many disagree with you. Presenting it as fact is silly.Regardless, Tate himself said he was trying to take his head off. Are you really this stubborn?

Please try to keep the post being replied to in mind when going off on your tirades.

No tirade here. But last chance on the personal attacks

I believe I acknowledged that he said it but disagreed with how it was being presented by the poster. I haven't flopped on a single thing dude. I have no idea what makes you think that other than you truly do not understand what you're reading. At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

You implied that he didn't try to take Lee's head off because he didn't go for the head (in your opinion), but then you were presented with a quote from Tate that said he was trying to take Lee's head off.Keep spinning it though if it boosts your ego.

What spinning? I was replying to a poster in regards to his post! You have no clue whatsoever what context even means, do you? Do you not see the difference between "taking someone's head off" legally and illegally (cheap)?! In response to the poster who said he was trying to take his head off cheaply, I replied that if he'd wanted to he could've done a lot worse and actually aimed for the head. You have a quote from Tate that doesn't say anything about being cheap.

 

[K172]

FWIW I'm not a fan of either team.

fair enough...but damn....you got mad sweeney

Heh, if you say so! Was not my intent.Given you don't care if the hit was illegal, do you expect to see a fine come down? I sure as heck do, and I think that's what this topic was about.

 

[K172]

Then why didn't Tate launch himself straight into Lee's face?

Huh? Ask him! That is a quote from Tate!Linebackers and safeties are always trying to take your head off, he said. Who says offensive guys cant do the same thing?http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/09/17/2693518/block-shows-tates-true-grit.html#storylink=cpyYour comments on this topic are so confusing. Tate says he was trying to take Lee's head off and you ask why he didn't launch himself into Lee's face. I don't know, because he missed?

Sweeney, I'm very interested to hear if you disagree with Tate himself that he was trying to take Lee's head off. He said he was, but apparently you know better, right?

He certainly said it, but it doesn't indicate that he was going to do it illegally (like as in a cheap shot).

Right, trying to take someone's head off is not cheap I've posted on many message boards but never found anyone who spun and flip flopped as much as you do. Does your back hurt from the contortions you have to make to switch positions like that?qimqam's point was that it was cheap as hell because he was trying to take his head off. You disagreed. Own it.

I was responding to the poster above calling it a cheap as hell shot intended to take his head off. If he wanted to chap shot him, he cold've actually launched himself at Lee's head or a number of cheap as hell shots. He didn't, he gave a legal hard as hell shot.

That's your opinion. Many disagree with you. Presenting it as fact is silly.Regardless, Tate himself said he was trying to take his head off. Are you really this stubborn?

Please try to keep the post being replied to in mind when going off on your tirades.

No tirade here. But last chance on the personal attacks

I believe I acknowledged that he said it but disagreed with how it was being presented by the poster. I haven't flopped on a single thing dude. I have no idea what makes you think that other than you truly do not understand what you're reading. At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

You implied that he didn't try to take Lee's head off because he didn't go for the head (in your opinion), but then you were presented with a quote from Tate that said he was trying to take Lee's head off.Keep spinning it though if it boosts your ego.

What spinning? I was replying to a poster in regards to his post! You have no clue whatsoever what context even means, do you? Do you not see the difference between "taking someone's head off" legally and illegally (cheap)?! In response to the poster who said he was trying to take his head off cheaply, I replied that if he'd wanted to he could've done a lot worse and actually aimed for the head. You have a quote from Tate that doesn't say anything about being cheap.

OK so you think Tate lied about wanting to take his head off since he didn't go for the head, right? Got it.If you don't think what Tate said, and the reaction he had while Lee was on the ground, was cheap, I feel sorry for you bro.

 

[mad sweeney]

Someone want to catch me up here

WHAT IS A NEW RULE?

If you are a cowboys fan and your player gets jacked up ... then cry.

Right, there's clearly no crying by the Hawks fans at all

Why would Hawk fans have ANY reason to cry? 27-7 dominating victory, and just physically beat down the other team. I don't get it?

That's exactly my question as I stated several times in this thread. It makes no sense why the Hawks fans are crying so much. It's quite a sad representation of their fan base.Their team totally destroyed the Cowboys on the field and they can't own that an illegal play got missed. It is not even a play that would have changed the outcome - no one suggests that. But they are still butthurt about it. It's actually pretty telling...

I thought this wasn't a fact? Which is it?

 

[mad sweeney]

Huh? Ask him! That is a quote from Tate!“Linebackers and safeties are always trying to take your head off,” he said. “Who says offensive guys can’t do the same thing?”http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/09/17/2693518/block-shows-tates-true-grit.html#storylink=cpyYour comments on this topic are so confusing. Tate says he was trying to take Lee's head off and you ask why he didn't launch himself into Lee's face. I don't know, because he missed?

Sweeney, I'm very interested to hear if you disagree with Tate himself that he was trying to take Lee's head off. He said he was, but apparently you know better, right?

He certainly said it, but it doesn't indicate that he was going to do it illegally (like as in a cheap shot).

Right, trying to take someone's head off is not cheap I've posted on many message boards but never found anyone who spun and flip flopped as much as you do. Does your back hurt from the contortions you have to make to switch positions like that?qimqam's point was that it was cheap as hell because he was trying to take his head off. You disagreed. Own it.

I was responding to the poster above calling it a cheap as hell shot intended to take his head off. If he wanted to chap shot him, he cold've actually launched himself at Lee's head or a number of cheap as hell shots. He didn't, he gave a legal hard as hell shot.

That's your opinion. Many disagree with you. Presenting it as fact is silly.Regardless, Tate himself said he was trying to take his head off. Are you really this stubborn?

Please try to keep the post being replied to in mind when going off on your tirades.

No tirade here. But last chance on the personal attacks

I believe I acknowledged that he said it but disagreed with how it was being presented by the poster. I haven't flopped on a single thing dude. I have no idea what makes you think that other than you truly do not understand what you're reading. At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

You implied that he didn't try to take Lee's head off because he didn't go for the head (in your opinion), but then you were presented with a quote from Tate that said he was trying to take Lee's head off.Keep spinning it though if it boosts your ego.

What spinning? I was replying to a poster in regards to his post! You have no clue whatsoever what context even means, do you? Do you not see the difference between "taking someone's head off" legally and illegally (cheap)?! In response to the poster who said he was trying to take his head off cheaply, I replied that if he'd wanted to he could've done a lot worse and actually aimed for the head. You have a quote from Tate that doesn't say anything about being cheap.

OK so you think Tate lied about wanting to take his head off since he didn't go for the head, right? Got it.

So, you don't comprehend the difference? I din't think so. I'm done with you. See you when the NFL rules on it.Yet... you still insist that it was blow to the head even though Sean Lee said it wasn't. Someone talking figuratively is to be taken at more than his word, that he was trying to do an illegal hit, but someone talking factually about the hit isn't relieable. Unbelievable.

 

[mad sweeney]

Huh? Ask him! That is a quote from Tate!“Linebackers and safeties are always trying to take your head off,” he said. “Who says offensive guys can’t do the same thing?”http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/09/17/2693518/block-shows-tates-true-grit.html#storylink=cpyYour comments on this topic are so confusing. Tate says he was trying to take Lee's head off and you ask why he didn't launch himself into Lee's face. I don't know, because he missed?

Sweeney, I'm very interested to hear if you disagree with Tate himself that he was trying to take Lee's head off. He said he was, but apparently you know better, right?

He certainly said it, but it doesn't indicate that he was going to do it illegally (like as in a cheap shot).

Right, trying to take someone's head off is not cheap I've posted on many message boards but never found anyone who spun and flip flopped as much as you do. Does your back hurt from the contortions you have to make to switch positions like that?qimqam's point was that it was cheap as hell because he was trying to take his head off. You disagreed. Own it.

I was responding to the poster above calling it a cheap as hell shot intended to take his head off. If he wanted to chap shot him, he cold've actually launched himself at Lee's head or a number of cheap as hell shots. He didn't, he gave a legal hard as hell shot.

That's your opinion. Many disagree with you. Presenting it as fact is silly.Regardless, Tate himself said he was trying to take his head off. Are you really this stubborn?

Please try to keep the post being replied to in mind when going off on your tirades.

No tirade here. But last chance on the personal attacks

I believe I acknowledged that he said it but disagreed with how it was being presented by the poster. I haven't flopped on a single thing dude. I have no idea what makes you think that other than you truly do not understand what you're reading. At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

You implied that he didn't try to take Lee's head off because he didn't go for the head (in your opinion), but then you were presented with a quote from Tate that said he was trying to take Lee's head off.Keep spinning it though if it boosts your ego.

What spinning? I was replying to a poster in regards to his post! You have no clue whatsoever what context even means, do you? Do you not see the difference between "taking someone's head off" legally and illegally (cheap)?! In response to the poster who said he was trying to take his head off cheaply, I replied that if he'd wanted to he could've done a lot worse and actually aimed for the head. You have a quote from Tate that doesn't say anything about being cheap.

OK so you think Tate lied about wanting to take his head off since he didn't go for the head, right? Got it.If you don't think what Tate said, and the reaction he had while Lee was on the ground, was cheap, I feel sorry for you bro.

Here's an actual fact for you: What your feelings are about me mean less than what I just flushed down the toilet. I already said earlier I wanted to see Tate's reaction because I don't remember it being too classless, but I know that anything that doesn't fit your narrative gets 'lost' in your responses.

 

[K172]

Here's an actual fact for you: What your feelings are about me mean less than what I just flushed down the toilet. I already said earlier I wanted to see Tate's reaction because I don't remember it being too classless, but I know that anything that doesn't fit your narrative gets 'lost' in your responses.

Yet again you display your ignorance on the subject. Did you WATCH the game? The reaction was right there on the screen..... obvious.

 

[K172]

At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

Tell you what, since you are so confident that it isn't illegal, despite multiple national writers and video evidence, if the NFL fines or disciplines Tate for the hit are you willing to put the following in your sig?"I have no concept of basic football rules - I'm obsessed with my team and can't see past my own ignorant bias"?I'm willing to do that if there's no fine or discipline.You in?

..... ? Well Sweeney, you in?

 

[mad sweeney]

At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

Tell you what, since you are so confident that it isn't illegal, despite multiple national writers and video evidence, if the NFL fines or disciplines Tate for the hit are you willing to put the following in your sig?"I have no concept of basic football rules - I'm obsessed with my team and can't see past my own ignorant bias"?I'm willing to do that if there's no fine or discipline.You in?

..... ? Well Sweeney, you in?

I didn't see this before. No, I am not in I don't do sig bets and I don't do bets at all with people I don't like.

 

[K172]

At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

Tell you what, since you are so confident that it isn't illegal, despite multiple national writers and video evidence, if the NFL fines or disciplines Tate for the hit are you willing to put the following in your sig?"I have no concept of basic football rules - I'm obsessed with my team and can't see past my own ignorant bias"?I'm willing to do that if there's no fine or discipline.You in?

..... ? Well Sweeney, you in?

I didn't see this before. No, I am not in I don't do sig bets and I don't do bets at all with people I don't like.

Backtrack, backtrack, backtrack.So you have no confidence in what you said, got it. Get lost.

 

[mad sweeney]

Here's an actual fact for you: What your feelings are about me mean less than what I just flushed down the toilet. I already said earlier I wanted to see Tate's reaction because I don't remember it being too classless, but I know that anything that doesn't fit your narrative gets 'lost' in your responses.

Yet again you display your ignorance on the subject. Did you WATCH the game? The reaction was right there on the screen..... obvious.

I said earlier on this page (I think) that I wanted to see it AGAIN (on my DVR no less, because I said earlier that I watch all Seahawks games) because I didn't remember it being overly classless. That's why I said that I wanted to watch it AGAIN with so many people calling it classless. All I remember was him pointing to his name on his jersey. Then I reminded you about it, but once again you #### it up. You're utterly ridiculous.

 

[K172]

once again you #### it up. You're utterly ridiculous.

avoiding the censor is not advised.reported.

 

[MG345]

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y62/tstamper/tate.jpg

Should end the debate. Initiated contact at chest level, fully infront of Lee. Clean block, hands down.

 

[mad sweeney]

At least you're coming around to "presenting as fact" something that is your opinion. You've spent a LOT of time stating outright that your opinion on it is fact. Yet you accuse me of being a flopper. You are a serious piece of work. Don't understand #### then claim the explanations as flopping while doing a complete 180 on your most vociferous point. Truly a wonder of nature.

Tell you what, since you are so confident that it isn't illegal, despite multiple national writers and video evidence, if the NFL fines or disciplines Tate for the hit are you willing to put the following in your sig?"I have no concept of basic football rules - I'm obsessed with my team and can't see past my own ignorant bias"?I'm willing to do that if there's no fine or discipline.You in?

..... ? Well Sweeney, you in?

I didn't see this before. No, I am not in I don't do sig bets and I don't do bets at all with people I don't like.

Backtrack, backtrack, backtrack.So you have no confidence in what you said, got it. Get lost.

How do i backtrack on something I've never said before? I have complete confidence in what I said. I'm not the one that all of sudden started saying "may be" and "it's not a fact yet" despote crowing loudly about how right you are. I've laid out my case point by point and I've stood behind it completely. Like I'm going to do something I've never done on this board in 8-9 years because of a tool like you? Get lost troll.