What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Golden Tate vs. Marvin Jones (3 Viewers)

FF Ninja

Footballguy
MFL is down so I can't log in to check the PDSL drafts, but I feel like both of these guys are going quite late despite significant upside. I'm curious what everyone's take is on these guys and their situation. And for clarity, I'm purely speaking from a 2016 redraft perspective and, although I play both formats, I prefer 0ppr.

I don't mean to sway anyone, but I'll share my initial thoughts, questions, and some cursory data.

First off, I don't like Caldwell. I can't believe he hasn't been fired yet. But he's been there two years so we've got a little data to work with. Over those two years the Lions have the following ranks: passing yards - 12th (8718), passing TDs - 12th (55), pass attempts - 8th (1233), and more importantly WR targets - 13th (490), WR rec TDs - 13th (34).

Just looking at that, Detroit appears a good, not great situation for a WR. However, when Jim Bob Cooter took over as OC for the last 8 games, Stafford really turned around his season. His splits look like this:

193-299-2083-13-11

205-293-2179-19-2

So in conclusion, we should conservatively view this as a slightly above average situation (~13th) with a realistic upside of pretty good (~8th).

Next, let's look at the WRs during the JBC reign. Calvin actually had 7 less targets and 8 less receptions during that span while Tate had 9 less targets and 10 more receptions. So it sure seems JBC figured out how to better utilize Tate. However, I should point out that Tate's YPR actually dropped from 9.4 to 8.7 after the switch. Still he was on pace for 120-100-872-10. But when did Golden Tate turn into Jarvis Landry?? Prior to last year, he averaged 13.4 YPR for his career. So I don't know how he suddenly dropped significantly under two different offensive coordinators. Aberration or red flag? Either way, even in 0ppr, he appears worth a WR3 price tag with that crappy YPR, offering huge upside if he can regain some YPR and maintain that TD pace. His 2014 season (144-99-1331-4), while lacking TDs, was still good for a WR13 finish in 0ppr and certainly much higher in ppr due to the 99 receptions.

As for Marvin Jones, he got a lot of hype due to his own aberration - 10 TDs on just 51 receptions during Dalton's unexpected QB3 year. He then missed a year due to an ankle injury (injured it before the season and then re-injured it before returning) and came in with a respectable 65/816/4 via 103 targets. You might think, well, he'd have done better if Dalton hadn't missed a quarter of the season. Surprisingly, he actually did a little better with McCarron (26-18-221-0). It is difficult to project a guy in a new situation, but it's obviously safe to expect more targets and I don't know how popular this will be but I don't see the quality of the targets being any better from Stafford than Dalton. That being said, should he catch Stafford's eye and somehow absorb all of Calvin's 9+ targets per game, the volume alone would propel him to at least near WR1 production.

I think realistically, we can expect 130 targets for the already entrenched Tate and 120 for the new starter, with an upside of +20 for both. I was really high on Tate in 2014 due to his yards after the catch numbers and his high catch rate, thinking he'd thrive while Calvin was drawing coverage. As it turned out, while Calvin was injured (either an active decoy or out altogether) Tate actually excelled as the WR1. His 2014 number were actually propped up by the time that Calvin was injured. Hard to predict that to be the case after the change in OC and the drop in YPR, but I figured it was worth noting in case anyone forgot how that played out. Also of note, while this is a redraft discussion, Marvin Jones is only about 1.5 years younger than Tate. Right now they are 27 and 26, but by the time the season starts they'll be 28 and 26.

So what does everyone else think? Are people more excited about the shiny new arrival or do people think Tate can recapture his 2014 magic? Or do people think JBC's offense will get figured out and the Lions will crash and burn this year without Calvin? -which would justify both guys' current ADP.

 
Following the Lions' Week 9 bye last season, Matthew Stafford completed 70 percent of his passes for 2,179 yards (7.4 YPA), 19 touchdowns, and just two interceptions.

OC Jim Bob Cooter took over for the fired Joe Lombardi in Week 8, but didn't get his hands on the offense until Week 10. When he did, Stafford's game took off. He finished with the best eight-game stretch in team history. "If you really like what you’re running, you can be really successful," Stafford said. "If you have a great relationship with the guys around you, and the guy calling the plays, you can be really successful." Stafford is still just 28 and theoretically entering the prime of his career. He could be poised for a big season.
 
This blurb illustrates what you said above. There will be passing stats in this offense - especially when they may not be able to run the ball consistently.
 
I'm with you on what I perceive is your preference for Tate. I think he's the better talent, already knows the offense and he has the trust of Stafford. I can see a relatively big season out of him. Personally I think the low ypc was an aberration as he has always made hay with his ability to gain yards after the catch.
 
Cooter will make/has made a big difference to the Lions offense.

From Roto...

Matthew Stafford - QB - Lions

Following the Lions' Week 9 bye last season, Matthew Stafford completed 70 percent of his passes for 2,179 yards (7.4 YPA), 19 touchdowns, and just two interceptions.

OC Jim Bob Cooter took over for the fired Joe Lombardi in Week 8, but didn't get his hands on the offense until Week 10. When he did, Stafford's game took off. He finished with the best eight-game stretch in team history. 

 
I would take Tate if both were on the board, if only because of the extra time he has already logged with Stafford and their demonstrated success together.  Talentwise, it is close.

Im hoping to avoid this situation entirely for redraft purposes.  I expect it will be a case where both post respectable yearly totals, but deciding week to week which one gets 70% of the fantasy points would be an exercise in frustration.  Likely higher variance for both.

 
I will take Tate, if they have about the same ADP. Better player, chemistry with the QB, knows the system and has proven he can be the lead receiver in that offense. 

However, the draft hasn't even happened yet so we a still a good distance from when the preseason hype starts. Once a couple of fantasy media people start putting together these same pieces, Tate's stock will take off. Then people will over correct and Jones will a favorite "sleeper" pick. My guess is that Tate ends up around WR 15-20 and Jones around the WR 25-30. 

 
Cooter will make/has made a big difference to the Lions offense.

From Roto...

Matthew Stafford - QB - Lions

Following the Lions' Week 9 bye last season, Matthew Stafford completed 70 percent of his passes for 2,179 yards (7.4 YPA), 19 touchdowns, and just two interceptions.

OC Jim Bob Cooter took over for the fired Joe Lombardi in Week 8, but didn't get his hands on the offense until Week 10. When he did, Stafford's game took off. He finished with the best eight-game stretch in team history. 
Now that opposing defenses have seen him for half a season and have an offseason to prepare, do you think there could be some regression?  I'm thinking that Stafford doesn't keep this pace up, but could still produce very well.  I'd expect something like 4,500 yards, 30 TDs, 14 INTs. 

 
Now that opposing defenses have seen him for half a season and have an offseason to prepare, do you think there could be some regression?  I'm thinking that Stafford doesn't keep this pace up, but could still produce very well.  I'd expect something like 4,500 yards, 30 TDs, 14 INTs. 
You are actually predicting an increase in yards, but yeah, that TD:INT ratio is definitely going to change. Your numbers seem fair.

 
FWIW, Tate went 59th on average in the PDSLs (WR30) and Jones 79th (WR38). I think you're right and the ADP of both, especially Tate, will probably catch some helium the closer we get to the regular season.

There are WRs who are #2s just because of situation but have the talent and mindset to be #1s, and then there are those whose skillset / mindset just lends itself better to being a #2. I'm not convinced that Tate can be the former, which is why I feel he's pretty fairly valued at his present ADP. If I'm right, Tate's going to spend weeks getting bottled up in coverage and Jones becomes the better bargain. If I'm wrong, a #1's target volume plus a reversion to the mean in YPR could give him a monster season.

It wouldn't surprise me at all to see the two finish with near-identical fantasy stats in non-PPR, maybe 90 / 1,000 / 6-8 for Tate and 75 / 1,000 / 6-8 for Jones. TD's are the wild card here - if the Lions begin to trust their RB options in the red zone (I like Zenner as a way-down-the-board fantasy play this season) and Ebron finally breaks out, one or the other of these guys could put up the standard-scoring-nightmare "1,000 yards but 4 TDs" fantasy line. If not, they could score 20 between them.

At their respective prices I like Jones slightly better than Tate, but I think Tate has top-18 upside where Jones' is a little more capped. Pick your poison.

 
I don't get the Marvin Jones love.  I appear to be on an island, but for me there's a massive value gap from him to Tate.

 
FWIW, Tate went 59th on average in the PDSLs (WR30) and Jones 79th (WR38). I think you're right and the ADP of both, especially Tate, will probably catch some helium the closer we get to the regular season.

There are WRs who are #2s just because of situation but have the talent and mindset to be #1s, and then there are those whose skillset / mindset just lends itself better to being a #2. I'm not convinced that Tate can be the former, which is why I feel he's pretty fairly valued at his present ADP. If I'm right, Tate's going to spend weeks getting bottled up in coverage and Jones becomes the better bargain. If I'm wrong, a #1's target volume plus a reversion to the mean in YPR could give him a monster season.

It wouldn't surprise me at all to see the two finish with near-identical fantasy stats in non-PPR, maybe 90 / 1,000 / 6-8 for Tate and 75 / 1,000 / 6-8 for Jones. TD's are the wild card here - if the Lions begin to trust their RB options in the red zone (I like Zenner as a way-down-the-board fantasy play this season) and Ebron finally breaks out, one or the other of these guys could put up the standard-scoring-nightmare "1,000 yards but 4 TDs" fantasy line. If not, they could score 20 between them.

At their respective prices I like Jones slightly better than Tate, but I think Tate has top-18 upside where Jones' is a little more capped. Pick your poison.
Thanks for looking that up. And I had the same assessment about Tate going into 2014. I thought Detroit was the perfect landing spot for him - lots of targets and a true WR1 to draw coverage. But I really had to rethink my stance on him when Calvin was hurt. He limped through weeks 4 and 5 (3 total targets) and didn't play again until week 10. During that 5 game span, Tate amassed 59-39-599-3. He was the unquestioned #1 WR on the team while Calvin was out and he put up superstar numbers. The other 11 games he totaled 84-60-732-1. That's still a pace of 87 rec for 1065 yards, but obviously a sharp departure from being a #1.

I'm not trying to draw a conclusion here. I don't think a 5 game sample is enough to label him a dominant #1, but I do think it is enough to cast some doubt that he's nothing more than a #2. As for the mindset of being a #1 that you mentioned, he's definitely got that. I recall a quote from him last year saying he didn't see himself as a #2 to Calvin.

The interesting thing will be how these guys roles will be defined next year. Calvin was obviously the deep ball guy while Tate got a lot of short passes last year. He ran a 4.42 at the combine and Jones ran a 4.46 so there's not a lot of difference there.

I agree that both of these guys are standard scoring risks. Tate is well known for being one of the most elusive WRs out there, so he can slip out for a long TD at any moment and also gets a few passes behind the line of scrimmage while at the goal line. Last year he got 7 passes inside the 5 yard line, caught 6 of them and scored on 5 of them. In 2014, he only got 1 pass inside the five, but scored 3 TDs from more than 50 yards out. FWIW, total red zone targets were similar (15 in 2014, and 18 in 2015).

In Marvin's 10 TD season, he actually didn't catch any TDs inside the 5. Nine of them came from 6-20 yards out, though.

Sorry, I'm devoting a lot of thought to two guys coming off the board as a WR3 and WR4. I just find this to be a very interesting situation with surprisingly little discussion about it.

 
I don't get the Marvin Jones love.  I appear to be on an island, but for me there's a massive value gap from him to Tate.
I own no shares thus far, but I know he was a popular sleeper in the SP for a while, which some see as verified by the TD aberration, so he got even more hype, missed a season due to injury, so he got some post-hype hype, and now he's in a very favorable situation to get a lot of targets.

Personally, I see value in anyone on a decent scoring offense who will get over 100 targets. Like you I favor Tate, but if Marvin gets the deep targets and red zone love then he could outscore Tate in all formats. I don't expect that to be the case, but much stranger things have happened in the world of FF.

 
Unless they draft an early WR that plays right away (a distinct possibility), then Jones will be a mid WR2, IMO, this year, making him a tremendous value right now.  As someone mentioned earlier, though, I think it will be a bit of a seesaw from week-to-week between him and Tate, making it very difficult to manage.  I'd like to sell high on him right now, but can't find buyers.  After Megatron retired, I think it only makes sense for them to draft Treadwell or Doctson, despite what the mockers have them doing.  What do they have Kerley as their WR3?  I guess you could do worse, but I am hoping they pass on those WRs so I can get a solid year out of Jones.  Without that rookie WR to dilute targets, I can't see Jones or Tate getting less than 130 targets each, maybe a few more.  Jones could easily finish with 80-90 catches for 1100-1300 yards, 6-10 TDs.  In PPR, what is that, a range of 226-282 FPs?  Those are low WR1, high WR2 numbers.  On a pass happy team, give me Jones all day. Unless they draft a solid rookie, then I want no piece of any of them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is my expectation for 2016.
Care to explain why? Tate has gotten a pretty decent share of red zone targets in his two years with Stafford. He also appears to have gotten some deep targets when Calvin was hurt. I don't see how anyone could comfortably conclude that Marvin will take over both duties. Seems like a leap of faith to me.

Unless they draft an early WR that plays right away (a distinct possibility), then Jones will be a mid WR2, IMO, this year, making him a tremendous value right now.  As someone mentioned earlier, though, I think it will be a bit of a seesaw from week-to-week between him and Tate, making it very difficult to manage.  I'd like to sell high on him right now, but can't find buyers.  After Megatron retired, I think it only makes sense for them to draft Treadwell or Doctson, despite what the mockers have them doing.  What do they have Kerley as their WR3?  I guess you could do worse, but I am hoping they pass on those WRs so I can get a solid year out of Jones.  Without that rookie WR to dilute targets, I can't see Jones or Tate getting less than 130 targets each, maybe a few more.  Jones could easily finish with 80-90 catches for 1100-1300 yards, 6-10 TDs.  In PPR, what is that, a range of 226-282 FPs?  Those are low WR1, high WR2 numbers.  On a pass happy team, give me Jones all day. Unless they draft a solid rookie, then I want no piece of any of them.
If they draft an early WR, these guys both probably see a significant drop in ADP and become major bargains due to rookie hype. People expect rookies to come in right away and produce but that's only because teams that draft WRs highly are typically really WR needy and have to force them into a starting role. I still believe most teams would like the luxury of not starting a rookie WR. In this case they've got an established, productive starter and they just paid Jones some serious cash ($40M/5y). I expect even if they draft a WR they will not feature him that year.

However, he may get enough targets to make 130 targets for Jones unattainable, but that's a pretty lofty prediction even if they don't draft a WR. Calvin only had 149 (and had even less per game after JBC took over). It's reasonable to expect Tate to steal a few of those due to familiarity while some get spread around.

FWIW, only one team had two players with 130+ targets last year: Oakland. AJ Green managed your top end (86/1297/10) off of 132, while Cooper was at your bottom end with 72/1070/6 from 130. Both of those guys had much higher YPR than Jones has ever achieved and are likely just much more talented. I think 130 would net Marvin about 79/1030/6.

 
Care to explain why? Tate has gotten a pretty decent share of red zone targets in his two years with Stafford. He also appears to have gotten some deep targets when Calvin was hurt. I don't see how anyone could comfortably conclude that Marvin will take over both duties. Seems like a leap of faith to me.
I truly believe that Tate's success when Calvin was out was entirely smoke and mirrors.  It's unsustainable, and we have likely already seen his peak career production.  I think Jones is a better receiver and fit for the offense.

 
I truly believe that Tate's success when Calvin was out was entirely smoke and mirrors.  It's unsustainable, and we have likely already seen his peak career production.  I think Jones is a better receiver and fit for the offense.
How so? This just seems like a "gut call" with no real analysis. 99-1331-4 doesn't seem flukey.

He did that coming off a 64-898-5 season in a very conservative Seattle offense (only 3,357 passing yards for Wilson that year).

 
I truly believe that Tate's success when Calvin was out was entirely smoke and mirrors.  It's unsustainable, and we have likely already seen his peak career production.  I think Jones is a better receiver and fit for the offense.
How was it smoke and mirrors? They weren't using trick plays to pad his stats or playing against defenses that had quit. They were trying to win football games during the middle of the season.

Obviously it was unsustainable - he was on a 16g pace of about 125/1900/10. He could regress a lot from that and still significantly outproduce his ADP. Hell, a 50% cut from that would probably about hit his ADP on the nose.

I think Jones is a good WR. I don't think he's any better of a fit as a WR1 than Tate and has certainly showed less than Tate thus far. I think most love for him is based on the "unknown" factor that leads to rookie hype combined with a weird 10 TD season. Like I said, I can see a feasible scenario where he leads the team in fantasy points, I just don't think it is realistic. Tate has already produced on this team and has the added benefit of familiarity and trust with his QB.

 
How so? This just seems like a "gut call" with no real analysis. 99-1331-4 doesn't seem flukey.

He did that coming off a 64-898-5 season in a very conservative Seattle offense (only 3,357 passing yards for Wilson that year).
He wasn't 99-1331-4 while Calvin was out.  This is a different team, with a different scheme.

 
He wasn't 99-1331-4 while Calvin was out.  This is a different team, with a different scheme.
Yeah, that was over the full season (a season in which Calvin has missed a lot of time. No one is saying that he's going to put up a season of the numbers he was on pace for during the stretch of games Calvin missed - but it did show he's capable of being a go to guy. The scheme is somewhat different but it was actually more effective so I'm not sure that it hurts Tate much.

 
Yeah, that was over the full season (a season in which Calvin has missed a lot of time. No one is saying that he's going to put up a season of the numbers he was on pace for during the stretch of games Calvin missed - but it did show he's capable of being a go to guy. The scheme is somewhat different but it was actually more effective so I'm not sure that it hurts Tate much.
My take is that there will be more running, more passing targets to the RB, and the organic growth of Ebron means that he's going to get more targets.  Plus you take one of the top WRs ever to play the game out of the gameplan and all of a sudden opposing defenses can do many more things to negate Tate.  I've been saying all spring that Jones will score more fantasy points than Tate this year.

 
If they draft an early WR, these guys both probably see a significant drop in ADP and become major bargains due to rookie hype. People expect rookies to come in right away and produce but that's only because teams that draft WRs highly are typically really WR needy and have to force them into a starting role. I still believe most teams would like the luxury of not starting a rookie WR. In this case they've got an established, productive starter and they just paid Jones some serious cash ($40M/5y). I expect even if they draft a WR they will not feature him that year.

However, he may get enough targets to make 130 targets for Jones unattainable, but that's a pretty lofty prediction even if they don't draft a WR. Calvin only had 149 (and had even less per game after JBC took over). It's reasonable to expect Tate to steal a few of those due to familiarity while some get spread around.

FWIW, only one team had two players with 130+ targets last year: Oakland. AJ Green managed your top end (86/1297/10) off of 132, while Cooper was at your bottom end with 72/1070/6 from 130. Both of those guys had much higher YPR than Jones has ever achieved and are likely just much more talented. I think 130 would net Marvin about 79/1030/6.
I agree, unless that rookie's name is Treadwell or Doctson.  Then I think they split time and/or eventually win versus Jones at the X.  I am a strong believer in Tate.  I don't think any of his work was a fluke.  But Jones is definitely more fitting for the X than Tate.  So are those two rookies.  If it's a different rookie, then I agree he probably sits and I'm taking Jones all day long because the sky is the limit.  So many targets to be had in Detroit and he's not behind AJ Green anymore.  Seriously, though, what's not to love about Jones's upside?  His floor scares me if they draft one of these two, but otherwise he has a ton of talent and ability.  I'm still a little scared of the volatility of Jones vs Tate in any given week.  They do probably end the year with pretty even numbers.  I like Jones in the redzone more, and he is cheaper.  Not a huge risk to snag him and I think mid WR3 is his floor but low WR1 is his ceiling.  We'll see. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My take is that there will be more running, more passing targets to the RB, and the organic growth of Ebron means that he's going to get more targets.  Plus you take one of the top WRs ever to play the game out of the gameplan and all of a sudden opposing defenses can do many more things to negate Tate.  I've been saying all spring that Jones will score more fantasy points than Tate this year.
First of all, you seem to have missed that Tate blew up when Calvin wasn't present. I thought you acknowledged it earlier with the strange "smoke and mirrors" comment that you have yet to explain, but then you said the bolded. So let me repeat, in 5 games while Calvin was injured, Tate put up 59-39-599-3. This was from week 5-9, so all teams were in it to win it.

Second, Detroit was 2nd in the league in passing attempt to the RB position. I find it hard to believe there will be a significant increase in targets. It is far more likely they decrease RB targets than increase.

 
Statistical aberration or athletic aberration?  Or both?  Seems perfectly fair to point out that Marvin's numbers that year have led to a lot of hype, but he didn't earn those numbers that year because of a LACK of athletic ability, right?  I'm not saying he is going to replace Calvin Johnson, but he is likely going to literally replace him in the lineup at least.  And he can actually run pretty good routes and is phenomenal at catching the football, so..........

 
First of all, you seem to have missed that Tate blew up when Calvin wasn't present. I thought you acknowledged it earlier with the strange "smoke and mirrors" comment that you have yet to explain, but then you said the bolded. So let me repeat, in 5 games while Calvin was injured, Tate put up 59-39-599-3. This was from week 5-9, so all teams were in it to win it.

Second, Detroit was 2nd in the league in passing attempt to the RB position. I find it hard to believe there will be a significant increase in targets. It is far more likely they decrease RB targets than increase.
Fine, then call it my "gut".  It really doesn't matter to me one way or the other.  I think the larger takeaway here is that there isn't a whole lot of difference between Jones and Tate, and it's far more likely that Tate will regress than improve.

 
Statistical aberration or athletic aberration?  Or both?  Seems perfectly fair to point out that Marvin's numbers that year have led to a lot of hype, but he didn't earn those numbers that year because of a LACK of athletic ability, right?  I'm not saying he is going to replace Calvin Johnson, but he is likely going to literally replace him in the lineup at least.  And he can actually run pretty good routes and is phenomenal at catching the football, so..........
Sure, it wasn't a lack of athletic ability, but it certainly could've happened without any special athletic ability. I mean, James Jones once had 14 TDs in a season. He was no athletic specimen. These things just happen from time to time. Best to take statistical outliers with a grain of salt. Some other notable TD outputs from guys with less than elite skills: Dwayne Bowe - 14, Doug Baldwin - 14, Randall Cobb - 12, Julius Thomas - 12, Mike Williams - 11, Torrey Smith - 11, Ted Ginn - 10, Jerricho Cotchery - 10.

 
Fine, then call it my "gut".  It really doesn't matter to me one way or the other.  I think the larger takeaway here is that there isn't a whole lot of difference between Jones and Tate, and it's far more likely that Tate will regress than improve.
Ok, I will. You are officially on record stating that your gut feeling is that smoke and mirrors led to Tate blowing up while Calvin was hurt. Everyone please use this valuable data to adjust your draft boards.

My "larger takeaway" from the beginning was that I think both guys have significant upside relative to their ADP. My original post wasn't really hyping Tate or discrediting Jones. I wouldn't mind landing them both in auction leagues this year. I imagine the two of them combined will be about the price of a single WR2 and I expect at least one of them to put up WR2 numbers, possibly both, and I really like the idea of hedging my bets by snagging both of them due to the unpredictability of the situation.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think we're selling NFL caliber WR athleticism short.  All those names are world class athletes.  So is Jones.  His skills are elite in my opinion, whereas the names above are not.  He doesn't have the frame of a Calvin or Green, but I'm certainly not counting on anything like that anyway.  At his price he is a steal.  Today anyway.  The draft will reveal a lot. 

 
I think we're selling NFL caliber WR athleticism short.  All those names are world class athletes.  So is Jones.  His skills are elite in my opinion, whereas the names above are not.  He doesn't have the frame of a Calvin or Green, but I'm certainly not counting on anything like that anyway.  At his price he is a steal.  Today anyway.  The draft will reveal a lot. 
*sigh* Yes, obviously they are world class athletes. I was pretty sure we were speaking on a relative scale given the context of your quote which I was replying to. Not sure why you decided to ignore context and get pedantic on me.

And obviously the guys I mentioned were intended to be non-elite level NFL players as I was giving examples of how scoring 10 TDs in a season does not require elite NFL level athleticism. I'm basically saying we have no data to support the notion that Jones is elite in any way. He might be but it is pure speculation at this point. His combine numbers weren't elite, but I'm not a combine stickler. If combine numbers were all important then Jeff Janis should've stepped in and exceeded Jordy Nelson's numbers. If you've got some advanced statistics that show Marvin Jones is elite in some area, I'm all ears. I'm sure there's information I've missed.

 
I seriously doubt we draft a WR early. 

Tate and Jones

TJ Jones, Kearley and Fuller to compete behind

Two good pass catching backs in Riddick and Abdullah. Riddick is a veritable slot receiver at times.

Ebron was on his way to a fairly sizeable uptick in production last year before injury halted him for a period.

I think Quinn will look at that and feel like he can spend his picks elsewhere unless something really juicy falls in the first 3 rounds.

 
When Calvin was out they had no other options than force feeding Tate.  The rest of the receivers were garbage and Lombardi was clueless.

 
*sigh* Yes, obviously they are world class athletes. I was pretty sure we were speaking on a relative scale given the context of your quote which I was replying to. Not sure why you decided to ignore context and get pedantic on me.
I was just responding with my thoughts.  Didn't mean to offend you.  I appreciate and agree with most of what you've said, except for the bolded here.  A lot of time the whole point of these forums is to get into the weeds and see what we can find.  Sometimes that leads to stray tangents.  I think there is a big difference between athletic ability/prowess and skill.  Steve Largent retired as the all time leading NFL receiver and was slow as ####. But he ran perfect routes.  Nobody is saying Jones is going to dominate the stat sheet like he did in 2013.  It was clearly an aberration, but that doesn't mean he can't be a WR1.  You want data, watch the film.  You can see Jones winning jump balls in the endzone, winning routes (albeit against second corners, a factor that shouldn't be overlooked), and don't forget 9 out of those 10 TDs he caught were in the redzone.  He is a good but not great WR that could explode a bit in Detroit.  Or maybe not.  I'm simply stating my case.  Not sure why you decided to ignore context and get pedantic on me, either.  It happens.

 
barackdhouse said:
I was just responding with my thoughts.  Didn't mean to offend you.  I appreciate and agree with most of what you've said, except for the bolded here.  A lot of time the whole point of these forums is to get into the weeds and see what we can find.  Sometimes that leads to stray tangents.  I think there is a big difference between athletic ability/prowess and skill.  Steve Largent retired as the all time leading NFL receiver and was slow as ####. But he ran perfect routes.  Nobody is saying Jones is going to dominate the stat sheet like he did in 2013.  It was clearly an aberration, but that doesn't mean he can't be a WR1.  You want data, watch the film.  You can see Jones winning jump balls in the endzone, winning routes (albeit against second corners, a factor that shouldn't be overlooked), and don't forget 9 out of those 10 TDs he caught were in the redzone.  He is a good but not great WR that could explode a bit in Detroit.  Or maybe not.  I'm simply stating my case.  Not sure why you decided to ignore context and get pedantic on me, either.  It happens.
What I meant about pedantic was that we were obviously speaking about ability in terms of NFL players, so when I said James Jones wasn't a physical specimen I thought it was clear I meant relative to the elite NFL WRs who are typically the ones putting up 14 TDs in a season. No need to go into the fact that all these guys are world class athletes. I don't think I ever ignored context and got pedantic on you, though. I try to keep discussions on point.

Watching film isn't the same as data. We aren't trained scouts and even they are frequently wrong. I prefer data in the form of some of PFF's advanced stats or Matt Harmon's reception perception articles. I haven't seen much data on Jones, so if you have access to some, please share.

I never said Jones can't be a WR1. I just said I don't see anything strongly indicating he will be, so I don't really see what tangfoot sees. Turns out it was just some sort of gut call which doesn't really help anyone. From what I've seen, we've got a limited sample of Tate as the WR1 with Stafford but he's coming off a down year. Jones has no experience as a WR1 and is coming to a new team. With that limited info if I'm forced to roll with one, I'm going with the incumbent. But I would really like to have both if their prices stay where they are.

 
I keep thinking about the quote from Jones after he signed  "It definitely wasn't about the money. It was about maximizing my opportunity."

http://det.247sports.com/Bolt/Marvin-Jones-joining-Detroit-Lions-to-maximize-his-opportunity-44165085

He must believe that he has a shot at being a lead WR in DET, and he does play the X, so I think both WRs are worth owning, but Jones is a better value now.

I seriously doubt they draft a WR on day 1. Maybe on day 2, but I think they have other more pressing needs. YMMV

 
He must believe that he has a shot at being a lead WR in DET, and he does play the X, so I think both WRs are worth owning, but Jones is a better value now.

I seriously doubt they draft a WR on day 1. Maybe on day 2, but I think they have other more pressing needs. YMMV
I am willing to bet they don't take a WR or TE on day one. Both guys hold good value but Tate has already shown he can produce when Calvin's large shadow is not on the same field as him.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top