Keith R
The Don
True enough but the flip side wasTo be fair, Spinks really had no business fighting as a heavyweight. His tenure to that point as a heavyweight consisted of two (impressive!) wins over Holmes, and then two fairly easy wins. He got a massive payday for that fight ($13mm, which more than doubled his career earnings), and heavyweight was obviously where the action and money are (were), but he didn't really "belong" there.Came in to post the Wilt 100. Will stick with that.
Runner-up - Mike Tyson beating the "real" World Heavyweight Champion to unify the title... in 91 seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T02RhdpGWgw
That said, that was probably Tyson's pinnacle as a fighter. Douglas was 3 fights later, I think.
* Spinks was an Olympic gold medalist. (Tyson did not make the Olympic team. There is a huge backstory to that but this is not the place for that discussion.)
* Spinks was undefeated.
* He had unified the light heavyweight division and established himself as an all-time Top 5 light-heavyweight with his power, technique, and quality of opposition.
* He went up in weight and became only the second boxer to win both the heavyweight and light heavyweight titles. This was in an era where the cruiserweight division did not exist.
* In winning the heavyweight title, he defeated the great and criminally underrated Larry Holmes. Had Holmes won, Holmes would have equalled Rocky Marciano's legendary 49-0 mark. As mentioned, he also prevailed in a rematch against the much larger Holmes.
* He kayoed Gerry Cooney despite the size difference at a time when that still meant a lot,
No doubt, the dynamo that was 1988 Tyson was a strong favorite going into the fight but plenty of experts picked Spinks and very few saw a 1st round KO as a realistic possibility.
Last edited by a moderator: