Probably until he faces a hard hitting defense.Harvin seems to have found his feet. My only concern is how long he will last at this pace.
Right now I'd settle for a D that could hit anything, let alone hit it hard.Probably until he faces a hard hitting defense.Harvin seems to have found his feet. My only concern is how long he will last at this pace.
Or maybe the GB defense is just that bad?I don't see anyone beating Seattle again this year. They're better.
Which is weird, because the Pack have no history of trying to convert 4-3 DLs to 3-4 LBs and having it end poorlyPeppers looks lost in the 3-4.
Wait, it's 17 - 10, with GB having tons of silly penalties to keep drives alive, and you see them as unbeatable?ponchsox said:I don't see anyone beating Seattle again this year. They're better.
Well that didn't take longponchsox said:I don't see anyone beating Seattle again this year. They're better.
He didn't like it when he was at Bama as wellESPN Mike said:Ha-Ha looks brutal as a tackler so far.
I forgot how much I enjoyed these primetime game threads.
Always entertaining.They couldn't even bump FinleyUntouched? God that some pitiful defense by Green Bay.
All kidding aside though, he's still a beast but SEA's defense can make a lot of good backs look mediocre.That's the fatest I've seen Lacy move all night.
If SEA goes up by 10 or more in the 2nd half, I wouldn't be surprised if Starks gets plenty of work compared to Lacy. Starks is a decent back himself.Starks has more yards than Lacy, lol
I don't think for a second that your believe that.Starks looking like a real threat to Lacy's numbers.
Had no idea Aaron could be having trouble hearing.Awesome sideline reporting there.