Green Bay LB's (1 Viewer)

[WCWarlords2008]

Just a quick message to see how people see the 3rd LB spot in Green Bay panning out. It seems they have decent money tied up in both Poppinga and Chillar. Poppinga is the incumbent but why would they go out and sign Chillar if they didn't want to use him?

 

[bcr8f]

Just a quick message to see how people see the 3rd LB spot in Green Bay panning out. It seems they have decent money tied up in both Poppinga and Chillar. Poppinga is the incumbent but why would they go out and sign Chillar if they didn't want to use him?

Poppinga isn't good in coverage so they may plug in Chillar to cover tight ends in passing situations. Neither are worthy fantasy contributors in my opinion.

 

[Jayrod]

Just a quick message to see how people see the 3rd LB spot in Green Bay panning out. It seems they have decent money tied up in both Poppinga and Chillar. Poppinga is the incumbent but why would they go out and sign Chillar if they didn't want to use him?

Poppinga isn't good in coverage so they may plug in Chillar to cover tight ends in passing situations. Neither are worthy fantasy contributors in my opinion.

Since they will never see the field in nickle situations due to the greatness of Barnett and Hawk, I agree with this.A strong side 2-down backer in possible committee situation is about as bad as it gets.

 

[trader jake]

Since they will never see the field in nickle situations due to the greatness of Barnett and Hawk, I agree with this.A strong side 2-down backer in possible committee situation is about as bad as it gets.

As long as Barnett and Hawk are healthy there are better IDP options out there on other teams...including back-ups to players in prime point producing positions.