This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
OL is not remotely safe and sound as far as us old-timers are concerned. D. Sherrod, J. Michels, T. Mandarich ...
Come ON! They trade away a first round (albeit never actually played like one) in Randall for Kizer in one of Gute's first move as GM....not gonna happen.
Agreed hacks comparing it to the Packers drafting Rodgers when they still had Favre. Completely different as Favre was talking retirement for at least a season or two when they drafted Rodgers.These draft experts predicting Lock @ 1.30
Take Hock or the best OL at 12, if somehow Hock falls to 12, trade 30 for more OL, DL & Andy Isabella.
Go Pack!
The two situations are obviously different, but the fact remains that Rodgers' successor is not currently on the roster, and I think there are signs he is declining and becoming more and more susceptible to injury. Its always better to act early, before it becomes an emergency situation where we are acting from a position of urgent need, rather than preparing for the future. I don't really follow the draft, but if the Packers believe another Aaron Rodgers is on the board at #12 or #30, they absolutely have to take him. I think it is imperative the team is comfortable that they have identified and signed Rodgers' successor by this time next year. Putting it off any longer risks sending the team into a Bears/Vikings spiral into NFL hell.
We saw the QB stylings of DKizer and it aint pretty. Agree, the heir apparent needs to be on board asap and I will be shocked if it happens in the first round of this years draft.
They have too many needs to take a QB with one of their 1st 3 picks. Draft a QB in round 3 or later. You have a couple of years to gamble on a later round QB. More important needs for future OL on the right side, need a replacement for the senior citizens at TE, and still need some pass rushers. Could also use another weapon at WR.CletiusMaximus said:
If agree but have heard some say it...and there goes Williams. I don’t see WR here . Think it’s D still .
Not a terrible choice...odd Schefter posted earlier they looked to trade up from 30 so who knows if they like a few guys in the teens to twenties and move down now and back up later tonight with picks they get for moving down.
Yeah but don’t waste a top pick. Build a team to win now odds are there is going to be a period of crappy football once Rodgers is done.Dark Matter said:
Seems that test in Indy was wrong by many reports today on Sweat. Still a concern I’m sure.
I love these kind of comments lol. Not one person on this board knows if a pick is horrible or excellent before a guy steps on the field.
Can’t be worse than ted Thompson.
Opinion is one thing but he declared it a terrible pick. An opinion is I hate that pick declaring a pick as terrible seems more like a statement of fact.
Agree...opinion is I prefer this guy or this guy.
