Banger
Footballguy
The problem is his competition for targets, catches, tds is with Gordon. Gordon came in with little TC, a year out of football and I thought he looked much better, much more explosive and a real threat although being extremely raw. I think Gordon has much more upside than Little and sure it's possible for him to improve but I haven't been getting the indication that he's wowing and jumping up to the next step. I continue to read that everywhere about Gordon and that he has real star potential so if it's a choice between Gordon at WR39 and Little at WR54, I will load up on Gordon in every single league without quesiton.The bolded seems way over the top to me. He's been in the league for two years, and has played for kind of a mess of an organization with multiple QBs. Now they have a new GM, new HC and OC, a QB with another year of experience, and some other young players who show promise. It wouldn't be unheard of for them to make decent progress on offense, and there's no reason to think he isn't going to get an opportunity to be a part of that, especially considering he's going to have at least 2 weeks as the WR 1.players have ebbs and flows over the course of a season. I just don't really see any upside in his situation...what's going to change to make him fantasy relevant? Gordon is light years better than him right now and his ascent will continue unless he shoots himself in the foot with off the field problems. Norv runs a one wr offense and Gordon is that receiver...they aren't going to be a passing team and the QB isn't very good so it's not little there's gonna be a lot of yards to go around...the pie is small and the biggest piece is going to revolve around Gordon. When I'm allocating roster spots especially with the bench spots, I'm not looking for a Little who may if things work out can be the #30 wr...I'd much rather take a shot at a Hartline, Jeffrey, Broyles who are all being drafted around the same spot. I think they all offer more potential upside.Little was the #33 WR from weeks 11-17 last year (IE 2nd half). Not super, but a WR3. Definitely not a waste of a roster spot.I wouldn't waste a roster space unless you have a very deep league. He finished 54th and 51st and has 6 total tds and 1350 yards in 2 seasons. I can't see myself ever starting him.I like him much better than Gordon (value-wise) at his current ADP.
I just can't make a case for him unless Gordon is out all year.
I liked the opportunity for Little at one point and I have posts in this thread from last june in support of taking a shot at him so it's not like I hate the guy or something....
Posted 21 June 2012 - 08:58 AM
he's definitely someone I'm keeping my eye on. He's in an offense void of WR talent so the opportunity is there for him to take the reigns, he's physically talented but there are some negatives as well. Take a shot as a 4/5 WR keep him on the roster for a few weeks, see if he gets the targets and makes plays...if he does you keep him a bit longer, if not you cut him and pick up the WW darling of the week.
I just think he had his opportunity and clearly lost his shot.
I think people have been spoiled by the immediate results from some of the stud WRs recently- Little's numbers aren't bad so far, all things considered. He's far from a sure thing, but I think it's foolish to write him off.
Last edited by a moderator: