My first year of playing fantasy football, I had no clue about RB handcuffs. Drafted Priest Holmes at number 4. He has a spinal/neck injury and LJ takes the guy who drafted him to the championship. We all know how important a backup is in a run-first offense when that lead guy goes down. But when you're drafting the perfect draft, you're not really wanting to waste those first 6 rounds forced to get a RB1/handcuff when those first 6 rounds most likely determine your season.
Forced to get DeShaun and DeAngelo, well you're gonna be spending two of your first 6 picks on them. LT and Burner Turner? Not so bad as the deviation between LT and his backup are pretty big compared. Just as you don't draft tradebait, you don't waste those high picks (6 rds) on the backup in hopes of finding someone. VBD (IMO) should suggest you look for the backup in those rounds 10+ when you're simply filling out a roster and NOT lose value on those picks prior. You'll find the Pittmans, the Buckhalters, the Bennetts, the Shipps, etc.
Same philosophy could be applied to pass happy WR team situations...
Discuss. You consider this in a draft?
2007 most likely worst situation RB standard deviation (targetting both) - New Orleans
WR situation - Indy
Forced to get DeShaun and DeAngelo, well you're gonna be spending two of your first 6 picks on them. LT and Burner Turner? Not so bad as the deviation between LT and his backup are pretty big compared. Just as you don't draft tradebait, you don't waste those high picks (6 rds) on the backup in hopes of finding someone. VBD (IMO) should suggest you look for the backup in those rounds 10+ when you're simply filling out a roster and NOT lose value on those picks prior. You'll find the Pittmans, the Buckhalters, the Bennetts, the Shipps, etc.
Same philosophy could be applied to pass happy WR team situations...
Discuss. You consider this in a draft?
2007 most likely worst situation RB standard deviation (targetting both) - New Orleans
WR situation - Indy