What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Harvin to Bills/ Formerly the Harvin to Hawks & Jets (1 Viewer)

1 TD/32 carries is a pretty good conversion rate for any RB, much less a guy who will probably get no carries in the red zone. I think 1 TD is optimistic.
Why would he get no carries in the red zone? He's got 24 since he entered the league, including several straight-up short-yardage carries at the goal line. The last season he played with Bevell as his OC, he had 6 red-zone carries on 15 attempts.

League-wide (and excluding QBs), the NFL average was about 140 rushing yards for every TD last season. If you think Harvin is only going to get 60 rushing yards, I can see not projecting a TD, but for everyone who is projecting 150-200 rushing yards, I think the TD is much more likely than not.
How many of those came while Peterson was hurt?

Harvin had peculiar usage in Minnesota. Wasn't he only on the field for like 48% of the snaps or something? I feel like his role is going to be totally different in Seattle. They've got 3 good RBs and are paying him a ton of money. So with Seattle not being a heavy passing volume team, you pretty much have to bet on his rushing numbers to justify his ADP. I just don't feel comfortable with that.

But I would be curious to see what others are projecting, both receiving and rushing.

 
1 TD/32 carries is a pretty good conversion rate for any RB, much less a guy who will probably get no carries in the red zone. I think 1 TD is optimistic.
Why would he get no carries in the red zone? He's got 24 since he entered the league, including several straight-up short-yardage carries at the goal line. The last season he played with Bevell as his OC, he had 6 red-zone carries on 15 attempts.

League-wide (and excluding QBs), the NFL average was about 140 rushing yards for every TD last season. If you think Harvin is only going to get 60 rushing yards, I can see not projecting a TD, but for everyone who is projecting 150-200 rushing yards, I think the TD is much more likely than not.
How many of those came while Peterson was hurt?

Harvin had peculiar usage in Minnesota. Wasn't he only on the field for like 48% of the snaps or something? I feel like his role is going to be totally different in Seattle. They've got 3 good RBs and are paying him a ton of money. So with Seattle not being a heavy passing volume team, you pretty much have to bet on his rushing numbers to justify his ADP. I just don't feel comfortable with that.

But I would be curious to see what others are projecting, both receiving and rushing.
So they aren't passing in volume to their #1 receiver and he isn't getting any rushes. Interesting take. So they paid 12 million for him to be a kickoff returner?

 
How many kicks did he return last year? One went for 50 ish yards. One for a touchdown in the super bowl. He looked electric. He's a league winner type wr, similar to Gordon last year. People are group thinking his ADP down due to injury concerns. Drafting him as a wr3/4 when he's really a low end 1 with top 3 upside in return/ppr leagues.

 
I think most are aware of his upside, but the concerns about him playing a full slate of games are legitimate. If he can play a full 16, he'll definitely be a steal at his current ADP, without a doubt.

 
Should be concerned about anyone's ability to play full slate on a long enough timeline every NFL player misses chunks of seasons. With the exception of Chris Johnson which is odd.

 
rdrouyn said:
1 TD/32 carries is a pretty good conversion rate for any RB, much less a guy who will probably get no carries in the red zone. I think 1 TD is optimistic.
Why would he get no carries in the red zone? He's got 24 since he entered the league, including several straight-up short-yardage carries at the goal line. The last season he played with Bevell as his OC, he had 6 red-zone carries on 15 attempts.

League-wide (and excluding QBs), the NFL average was about 140 rushing yards for every TD last season. If you think Harvin is only going to get 60 rushing yards, I can see not projecting a TD, but for everyone who is projecting 150-200 rushing yards, I think the TD is much more likely than not.
How many of those came while Peterson was hurt?

Harvin had peculiar usage in Minnesota. Wasn't he only on the field for like 48% of the snaps or something? I feel like his role is going to be totally different in Seattle. They've got 3 good RBs and are paying him a ton of money. So with Seattle not being a heavy passing volume team, you pretty much have to bet on his rushing numbers to justify his ADP. I just don't feel comfortable with that.

But I would be curious to see what others are projecting, both receiving and rushing.
So they aren't passing in volume to their #1 receiver and he isn't getting any rushes. Interesting take. So they paid 12 million for him to be a kickoff returner?
I thought they overpaid to get Harvin but there's no way in my mind they make such a deal without plans to make him the centerpiece of the offense. He has the highest salary and cap number on the entire team.

 
rdrouyn said:
1 TD/32 carries is a pretty good conversion rate for any RB, much less a guy who will probably get no carries in the red zone. I think 1 TD is optimistic.
Why would he get no carries in the red zone? He's got 24 since he entered the league, including several straight-up short-yardage carries at the goal line. The last season he played with Bevell as his OC, he had 6 red-zone carries on 15 attempts.

League-wide (and excluding QBs), the NFL average was about 140 rushing yards for every TD last season. If you think Harvin is only going to get 60 rushing yards, I can see not projecting a TD, but for everyone who is projecting 150-200 rushing yards, I think the TD is much more likely than not.
How many of those came while Peterson was hurt?

Harvin had peculiar usage in Minnesota. Wasn't he only on the field for like 48% of the snaps or something? I feel like his role is going to be totally different in Seattle. They've got 3 good RBs and are paying him a ton of money. So with Seattle not being a heavy passing volume team, you pretty much have to bet on his rushing numbers to justify his ADP. I just don't feel comfortable with that.

But I would be curious to see what others are projecting, both receiving and rushing.
So they aren't passing in volume to their #1 receiver and he isn't getting any rushes. Interesting take. So they paid 12 million for him to be a kickoff returner?
Um what? Did you read what I wrote? He'll lead the team in targets - my prediction is close to 120. What I said was that they are just not a team with a lot of passing volume.

 
1 TD/32 carries is a pretty good conversion rate for any RB, much less a guy who will probably get no carries in the red zone. I think 1 TD is optimistic.
Why would he get no carries in the red zone? He's got 24 since he entered the league, including several straight-up short-yardage carries at the goal line. The last season he played with Bevell as his OC, he had 6 red-zone carries on 15 attempts.

League-wide (and excluding QBs), the NFL average was about 140 rushing yards for every TD last season. If you think Harvin is only going to get 60 rushing yards, I can see not projecting a TD, but for everyone who is projecting 150-200 rushing yards, I think the TD is much more likely than not.
How many of those came while Peterson was hurt?

Harvin had peculiar usage in Minnesota. Wasn't he only on the field for like 48% of the snaps or something? I feel like his role is going to be totally different in Seattle. They've got 3 good RBs and are paying him a ton of money. So with Seattle not being a heavy passing volume team, you pretty much have to bet on his rushing numbers to justify his ADP. I just don't feel comfortable with that.

But I would be curious to see what others are projecting, both receiving and rushing.
His rookie year? None of them.

He got some carries when Peterson was hurt, but he's gotten plenty when Peterson was healthy, too. Peterson was healthy for this sequence:

1 4:26 1 10 OTI 16 Adrian Peterson right guard for 1 yard (tackle by Markelle Martin) 0 0 4.51 4.05 76.9 1 3:50

2 9 OTI 15 Adrian Peterson left end for -1 yards (tackle by Will Witherspoon and Alterraun Verner) 0 0 4.05 3.08 74.4 1 3:14

3 10 OTI 16 Christian Ponder pass complete short right to Michael Jenkins for 12 yards (tackle by Alterraun Verner and Jordan Babineaux) 0 0 3.08 6.28 82.1 1 2:35

1 4 OTI 4 Percy Harvin right guard for 4 yards, touchdown 0 6 6.28 7 81.5

And for this one:

1 13:13 1 10 CAR 16 Percy Harvin up the middle for 6 yards (tackle by Terrell McClain) 0 0 4.51 4.97 43.8 1 12:34

2 4 CAR 10 Percy Harvin right guard for 10 yards, touchdown 6 0 4.97 7 40.6

And for this one:

1 2:58 1 10 GNB 32 Adrian Peterson right end for 2 yards (tackle by B.J. Raji) 0 7 3.45 3.17 68.6 1 2:24

2 8 GNB 30 Brett Favre pass complete short right to Visanthe Shiancoe for 4 yards (tackle by Frank Zombo) 0 7 3.17 3.01 69.1 1 1:40

3 4 GNB 26 Brett Favre pass complete short left to Visanthe Shiancoe for 14 yards (tackle by Brandon Chillar). Penalty on Visanthe Shiancoe: Delay of Game, 5 yards 0 7 3.01 4.44 64.8 1 1:16

1 10 GNB 17 Percy Harvin left guard for 17 yards, touchdown 6 7 4.44 7 59.8

Note the direction given on those runs. Those are all inside, between-the-tackle handoffs given to Percy Harvin in the red zone in games where Adrian Peterson was healthy.

My projections for him are somewhere around 950 receiving and 200 rushing, iirc.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How many kicks did he return last year? One went for 50 ish yards. One for a touchdown in the super bowl. He looked electric. He's a league winner type wr, similar to Gordon last year. People are group thinking his ADP down due to injury concerns. Drafting him as a wr3/4 when he's really a low end 1 with top 3 upside in return/ppr leagues.
Those were his only two returns last year.

 
How many kicks did he return last year? One went for 50 ish yards. One for a touchdown in the super bowl. He looked electric. He's a league winner type wr, similar to Gordon last year. People are group thinking his ADP down due to injury concerns. Drafting him as a wr3/4 when he's really a low end 1 with top 3 upside in return/ppr leagues.
Those were his only two returns last year.
$12 million per year for a returner who averages 60 yards per return is pretty decent value. Any offense is gravy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The most remarkable thing about those two returns is that they were the two longest kickoff returns of the year for Seattle, on his only two attempts.

Seattle 50+ yard kickoff returns

Harvin: 2 on 2 attempts

Everyone else: 0 on 31 attempts

:o

 
Interesting tidbit. Sea has not had a player with 900 or more yds receiving since Carroll arrived as HC.
Good point, though they haven't had a WR as talented as Harvin, either.
Well, Tate did have 898 last year.

You figure if Harvin can improve on that even a little then he has a pretty decent baseline for yards when you add his rushing numbers into the mix, even if Seattle continues to pass the ball very little.

 
Russell Wilson finished 4th in YPA in 2012 and 2013 throwing to a group of WRs that most would say were collectively below average (when comparing them to other receiving corps in the NFL), and has averaged 25 pass attempts per game. I think Harvin will more than get his chances.

 
I watch every little news interview and article out of Seattle, and perticularily when it involves Percy. One intangible that he has this year: extreme motivation. He wants to payback the team for missing all those games and PC wants to unleash him in a bad way also….all over the field. Expect 100 yards per game on the ground and air, not counting returns, and a legit shot to score from anywhere. Full disclosure, I own him this year in a keeper league and have been licking my chops watching the OTA coverage.

75 catches @ 15 YPC and 40 runs 7 YPC =

1220 total with 9 passing TD's and 3 rushing. Top 5-7 WR….pending 16 games total.

 
Maybe I missed it, but what are Harvin fans predicting for usage? His stats have always been padded by close to 100/1 rushing, which I have a hard time counting on with a new team. I do agree that there's a good chance he's used as an outside receiver more, which should improve his YPR (while decreasing his catch rate), but I have a hard time predicting more than 120 targets in this offense. I also think Rice is a very good outside option when healthy.

My current guess for Harvin is:

120 targets x 68% = 81.6 rec x 13 ypr = 1060 yds 7 TD

12 rush x 5 ypc = 60 yds 0 TD

Mid level WR2. Roughly around his current ADP. I don't think he's injury prone so no need to discount him there, so I feel like he's one of those guys that is valued just right by his ADP. Should have a pretty high floor (I'd be shocked if he got less than 100 targets) and with some upside if they give him more carries or decide to pass more than last year.
You are way too low on rushing attempts IMO. After hardly playing all season, he played 48 snaps in the playoffs. During those snaps, he was officially targeted 7 times, catching 4 passes and drawing one defensive penalty, and he had 3 carries for 54 yards. Those carries went for 9, 15, and 30 yards.

If healthy, I think he will average at least 2 carries per game. That could mean 200+ rushing yards. And I doubt he would carry the ball that often with zero rushing TDs.
1 TD/32 carries is a pretty good conversion rate for any RB, much less a guy who will probably get no carries in the red zone. I think 1 TD is optimistic.

I don't think last year's sample size or game situation is good enough to project his carries next season. I'm not surprised they used their very expensive toy in the running game during the playoffs. You put all your chips on the table there. But I doubt he sees a lot of action as a runner during the regular season.
Since week 9 of his rookie year, Harvin has only had less than 2 carries in a game 6 times. He's also averaged over 2 carries per game started in his career.

The way Harvin is used in the running game I don't think he's any more likely to be injured than catching a pass.
Did not know that.

Good research and Harvin fun fact.

So that is something like 42 of 48 times (87.5%) from midway through his rookie season (2009) to midway through his fourth season (2012).

* I'm seeing different numbers after double checking.

2009 - from week 9 (1, 0, 2, 2, 0, 1, 1) 5/7 games less than 2 carries (first 8 weeks, 6/8)

2010 - (1, 0, 2, 0, 2, 3, 0, 0, 0, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2) 7/14 games less than 2 carries

2011 - (4, 2, 2, 4, 1, 1, 2, 4, 3, 5, 5, 5, 4, 1, 4, 5) 3/16 games less than 2 carries

2012 - (5, 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 4) 2/9 games less than 2 carries

I don't see a reason to leave out the first half of his rookie season, he had 2 or more carries twice in the first 8 games and twice in the last 7 games.

In his first two seasons, he had less than 2 carries in 18/29 games.

He was much better in the next two seasons (really season and a half), he had less than 2 carries 5/25 games, 2 or more 80% of the time.

An amazing 52 carries in 2011, 22 in 9 games of 2012 prorates to about 40.

I wonder if there are some TEAMS in NFL history that didn't have that many combined WR rushes in a DECADE. :)

Not sure if 2011 was a record for WR carries, Dexter McCluster had 114 rushes that same year, PFR had him listed at WR?

BTW, SEA OC Darrell Bevell held the same position for part of Harvin's tenure in MIN, but Bill Musgrave was the OC when he was used so extensively as a rusher in 2011-2012.

It may not be a coincidence that 2011 was the year Christian Ponder was drafted (started playing week 6). It is possible that the monster rush numbers that season were due to a decision that the QB had such hinky accuracy as a rookie (54.3%) that it was just safer and more effective to get the ball in Harvin's hands by handing the ball off to him. That obviously won't be an issue with Wilson. Though on that first jet sweep carry in the Super Bowl, if he could have tip-toed along the sideline (his momentum carried him out of bounds), that would have been a long TD.

Most people know this, but Harvin was primarily a RB at Florida. Sometimes people like WRs that are great returners (like Harvin and Patterson, Tim Brown, Eric Metcalf, etc., though guys like Devin Hester and Josh Cribbs were great returners but it didn't translate to WR very well) because you know they have outstanding elusiveness and open field moves. Another saying is, that WR is like a RB in the open field. Harvin, literally is a RB in the open field. Metcalf was a collegiate RB that had 31 receiving TDs, 12 rushing TDs and 12 return TDs. He is second in NFL history with 10 punt return TDs, was a 3 X All-Pro, and like Harvin, very compact at 5'10", 190 lbs. and a track star. He still is in the top 10 all time for an indoor long jump by a prep, still holds the University of Texas record, was a 2 X NCAA champ and finished 8th in the Olympic Trials. He was a multi-purpose weapon in CLE, than had the great receiving season with over 100 receptions his first year in the run and shoot with ATL in 1995.

Are there any other college (primarily ) RBs that have had as high a level of success at WR in the NFL (not sure if conversion is the right word, as I think Harvin played WR at Florida, too).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
rdrouyn said:
1 TD/32 carries is a pretty good conversion rate for any RB, much less a guy who will probably get no carries in the red zone. I think 1 TD is optimistic.
Why would he get no carries in the red zone? He's got 24 since he entered the league, including several straight-up short-yardage carries at the goal line. The last season he played with Bevell as his OC, he had 6 red-zone carries on 15 attempts.

League-wide (and excluding QBs), the NFL average was about 140 rushing yards for every TD last season. If you think Harvin is only going to get 60 rushing yards, I can see not projecting a TD, but for everyone who is projecting 150-200 rushing yards, I think the TD is much more likely than not.
How many of those came while Peterson was hurt?

Harvin had peculiar usage in Minnesota. Wasn't he only on the field for like 48% of the snaps or something? I feel like his role is going to be totally different in Seattle. They've got 3 good RBs and are paying him a ton of money. So with Seattle not being a heavy passing volume team, you pretty much have to bet on his rushing numbers to justify his ADP. I just don't feel comfortable with that.

But I would be curious to see what others are projecting, both receiving and rushing.
So they aren't passing in volume to their #1 receiver and he isn't getting any rushes. Interesting take. So they paid 12 million for him to be a kickoff returner?
Um what? Did you read what I wrote? He'll lead the team in targets - my prediction is close to 120. What I said was that they are just not a team with a lot of passing volume.
120 targets sound about right. that would put him around 80 catches. So that plus 20 rushes should put him at solid WR2 with upside for more depending on touchdowns. His rushes are usually big plays as well. I'd think that is high Wr2 territory if the ypr and TDs break close to his averages. Not sure that he needs more than that to be value at his ADP. Who do you think is a better value around his ADP?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bob Magaw said:
An amazing 52 carries in 2011, 22 in 9 games of 2012 prorates to about 40.

I wonder if there are some TEAMS in NFL history that didn't have that many combined WR rushes in a DECADE. :)
Nice thing about wondering out loud...

Since 2002 (12 years), the following teams have fewer than 52 WR rushes:

Tennessee (38)

Indianapolis (40)

New York Giants (41)

19 teams have fewer than 100 WR rushes over that span. I won't list them all. ;)

Also worth noting that the Data Dominator overestimates WR rushes, because it counts players who were a WR at any point in their career as if they were a WR for their entire career. Josh Cribbs started his career at RB and spent a lot of time as a wildcat QB, but because he was listed as a WR later in his career, all of his rushes are considered "WR rushes". Brad Smith is another notable example- for most of his career he was a backup QB who only played in the wildcat (which meant a lot of rushes), but he got moved to WR later on. Joe Webb is another example.

 
Bob Magaw said:
Most people know this, but Harvin was primarily a RB at Florida. Sometimes people like WRs that are great returners (like Harvin and Patterson, Tim Brown, Eric Metcalf, etc., though guys like Devin Hester and Josh Cribbs were great returners but it didn't translate to WR very well) because you know they have outstanding elusiveness and open field moves. Another saying is, that WR is like a RB in the open field. Harvin, literally is a RB in the open field. Metcalf was a collegiate RB that had 31 receiving TDs, 12 rushing TDs and 12 return TDs. He is second in NFL history with 10 punt return TDs, was a 3 X All-Pro, and like Harvin, very compact at 5'10", 190 lbs. and a track star. He still is in the top 10 all time for an indoor long jump by a prep, still holds the University of Texas record, was a 2 X NCAA champ and finished 8th in the Olympic Trials. He was a multi-purpose weapon in CLE, than had the great receiving season with over 100 receptions his first year in the run and shoot with ATL in 1995.

Are there any other college (primarily ) RBs that have had as high a level of success at WR in the NFL (not sure if conversion is the right word, as I think Harvin played WR at Florida, too).
Position switches were much more common earlier in NFL history. A guy like Joe Morrison used to regularly bounce back and forth between halfback and flanker in the '60s. Hall of Famer Lenny Moore was an interesting Harvin-like hybrid for the '50s/'60s Colts who made 5 All Pro and 7 Pro Bowl teams at both the RB and flanker positions; he made the All-'50s team, earned some MVP consideration in 1964, and finished his career with 5100 rushing yards and 6000 receiving yards. Heisman Trophy winner Billy Cannon made the All Pro team as both an RB and a TE in the AFL. There are a handful of other guys like that who transition from one position to the other in the late '50s on through the mid-70s. And of course guys like Josh Cribbs have done it recently, though he was always more of a slash-type who was never really relevant at any position.

One of my favorite stats about Percy Harvin's college career:

Percy Harvin rushed for 1852 yards and 19 TDs in college.

Frank Gore rushed for 1975 yards and 17 TDs in college.

 
Mike Clay recently tweeted that he has Harvin projected for 27% of Seattle's targets, which seems like a reasonable expectation. Then, I suppose, the question is just how many targets you think there'll be in Seattle. If Wilson throws 400 passes like he has the last two years, that's only 108 targets. At 8 yards per target (conservatively), that's 864 yards.

On the other hand, if Wilson increases his attempts to 480- which, it should be noted, still would have ranked in the bottom 4 last year- a 27% target ratio would translate to 130 targets, which would be 1040 receiving yards using the same 8 YPT average.

If we wanted to get completely crazy, if Seattle meets last year's league average in pass attempts (567), and Harvin garners 27% of targets, and Wilson averages 8.5 yards per attempt on throws to Harvin, Harvin has 1300 receiving yards. Not that I think this is at all a realistic projection- I don't- I just mean to illustrate how possible it would be for Harvin to put up great numbers just on the strength of his receiving, even ignoring the rushing. That outcome, while very unlikely, is certainly plausible. The 567 attempts would be the least likely component, but it is not an absurdly high threshold; as I said, it only represents the league average. 27% of targets is a pretty reasonable projection. 8.5 yards per target is totally achievable (Harvin averages 8.2 for his career despite MUCH worse QB play). I would think 1300 receiving yards would be a couple of standard deviations above the mean in terms of my projections for Harvin, but we're talking 1.5-2 standard deviations up, not 4-5 standard deviations up.

 
Bob Magaw said:
Most people know this, but Harvin was primarily a RB at Florida. Sometimes people like WRs that are great returners (like Harvin and Patterson, Tim Brown, Eric Metcalf, etc., though guys like Devin Hester and Josh Cribbs were great returners but it didn't translate to WR very well) because you know they have outstanding elusiveness and open field moves. Another saying is, that WR is like a RB in the open field. Harvin, literally is a RB in the open field. Metcalf was a collegiate RB that had 31 receiving TDs, 12 rushing TDs and 12 return TDs. He is second in NFL history with 10 punt return TDs, was a 3 X All-Pro, and like Harvin, very compact at 5'10", 190 lbs. and a track star. He still is in the top 10 all time for an indoor long jump by a prep, still holds the University of Texas record, was a 2 X NCAA champ and finished 8th in the Olympic Trials. He was a multi-purpose weapon in CLE, than had the great receiving season with over 100 receptions his first year in the run and shoot with ATL in 1995.

Are there any other college (primarily ) RBs that have had as high a level of success at WR in the NFL (not sure if conversion is the right word, as I think Harvin played WR at Florida, too).
Position switches were much more common earlier in NFL history. A guy like Joe Morrison used to regularly bounce back and forth between halfback and flanker in the '60s. Hall of Famer Lenny Moore was an interesting Harvin-like hybrid for the '50s/'60s Colts who made 5 All Pro and 7 Pro Bowl teams at both the RB and flanker positions; he made the All-'50s team, earned some MVP consideration in 1964, and finished his career with 5100 rushing yards and 6000 receiving yards. Heisman Trophy winner Billy Cannon made the All Pro team as both an RB and a TE in the AFL. There are a handful of other guys like that who transition from one position to the other in the late '50s on through the mid-70s. And of course guys like Josh Cribbs have done it recently, though he was always more of a slash-type who was never really relevant at any position.

One of my favorite stats about Percy Harvin's college career:

Percy Harvin rushed for 1852 yards and 19 TDs in college.

Frank Gore rushed for 1975 yards and 17 TDs in college.
Cobb played QB at Kentucky. Randle El played QB at Indiana.

 
* I'm seeing different numbers after double checking.
Mea culpa on that one. Somehow I started from midway through his 2nd year, not his rookie year.
I actually looked to see how that happened and should have caught it, easy enough explanation.

It is an impressive stat, thanks for recommending the attention of the thread to it.

 
Bert Emanuel was a converted QB first round pick by ATL that was in the run 'n shoot with Metcalf.

Anquan Boldin and Hines Ward played some QB in college.

I can think of more instances, but not as many RB to WR instances.

Lenny Moore was a great suggestion as a historical example.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenny_Moore

"Moore was both a great runner and receiver. He lined up both in the backfield as a halfback and split wide as a flanker, and was equally dangerous at both positions in the offense engineered by quarterback Johnny Unitas. Moore averaged at least 7.0 yards a carry in several seasons. He made 40 receptions for 687 yards and seven touchdowns in 1957, the first of five straight years in which he would have 40 or more catches. In 1958, he caught a career-high 50 passes for 938 yards and seven touchdowns in helping the Colts win the NFL championship. Then in 1959, Moore had 47 receptions for 846 yards and six TDs as the Colts repeated as champions."

"After being injured in the 1962 season and losing his starting job, Moore had one of his best statistical seasons in 1964 when he scored 20 touchdowns, and helped lead the Colts to a 12-2 regular-season record and a trip to the NFL championship game for the third time in seven seasons.

Moore scored a touchdown in an NFL-record 18 consecutive appearances starting in 1963 and continuing through the entire 1964 season, ending in 1965. This record stood for 40 years until being equaled by LaDainian Tomlinson in 2005. Because his streak was interrupted by a five-game absence due to injury in 1963,[1] he does not hold the NFL's official record for consecutive games rushing for a touchdown."

"Moore retired after the 1967 season. His uniform number 24 was retired by Baltimore, and in 1969 a sportswriters' poll named him to the NFL's 50th Anniversary Team. In 1975, he was elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame. In 1999, Moore was ranked number 71 on The Sporting News' list of the 100 Greatest Football Players. He is also the only player to have at least 40 receiving touchdowns and 40 rushing touchdowns. Football Outsiders, in their book Pro Football Prospectus 2007, named 6 of his seasons among the top 500 running back seasons of all time, which was tied for the 5th most seasons among the top 500 of any player. Moore's retired number is honored along with all of the other Baltimore Colts retired numbers in M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore, home of the Baltimore Ravens."

 
Mike Clay recently tweeted that he has Harvin projected for 27% of Seattle's targets, which seems like a reasonable expectation. Then, I suppose, the question is just how many targets you think there'll be in Seattle. If Wilson throws 400 passes like he has the last two years, that's only 108 targets. At 8 yards per target (conservatively), that's 864 yards.

On the other hand, if Wilson increases his attempts to 480- which, it should be noted, still would have ranked in the bottom 4 last year- a 27% target ratio would translate to 130 targets, which would be 1040 receiving yards using the same 8 YPT average.

If we wanted to get completely crazy, if Seattle meets last year's league average in pass attempts (567), and Harvin garners 27% of targets, and Wilson averages 8.5 yards per attempt on throws to Harvin, Harvin has 1300 receiving yards. Not that I think this is at all a realistic projection- I don't- I just mean to illustrate how possible it would be for Harvin to put up great numbers just on the strength of his receiving, even ignoring the rushing. That outcome, while very unlikely, is certainly plausible. The 567 attempts would be the least likely component, but it is not an absurdly high threshold; as I said, it only represents the league average. 27% of targets is a pretty reasonable projection. 8.5 yards per target is totally achievable (Harvin averages 8.2 for his career despite MUCH worse QB play). I would think 1300 receiving yards would be a couple of standard deviations above the mean in terms of my projections for Harvin, but we're talking 1.5-2 standard deviations up, not 4-5 standard deviations up.
I projected 420 passes for the Seahawks offense but it wouldn't surprise me for that to go up slightly. Not to league average levels, but a modest increase isn't out of the question. I'd think 3 factors could play into this: The running game taking a step back due to Marshawn Lynch getting older and Michael not being ready for prime time, Wilson's given more leeway in the offense and the challenging schedule including 6 games against the improved NFC west and 4 games against the AFC West. Of course having Harvin in the offense can change their game planning as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cobb played QB at Kentucky. Randle El played QB at Indiana.
The QB-to-something-else transition is a pretty common one, since most high schools just put their best athlete at QB and let him go crazy against inferior talent. I think a substantial percentage of players at every position in college played QB in high school, and many of them dabbled at the position in college, too. In addition to Cobb, Jordan Reed and Hines Ward played some QB in college, and iirc Anquan Boldin was recruited to FSU as a QB, too. Just among guys who come immediately to mind.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last year I gave up Crabtree/Vernon for Percy and Julius Thomas..... this was preseason before orange Julius blew up week one..... was targeting Harvin for years from an owner who once stated he was the best reciever in fantasy football, better than Calvin.... in this league his ppg were always near the top of the league..... long story short dude basically when approached about a trade said he was untouchable. .... took the hip scare for me to pry him loose.... I have very little doubt he'll return to the baseline value he held in Minny. Cant worry about injuries when making moves..... scared money dont make money.

 
Cobb played QB at Kentucky. Randle El played QB at Indiana.
The QB-to-something-else transition is a pretty common one, since most high schools just put their best athlete at QB and let him go crazy against inferior talent. I think a substantial percentage of players at every position in college played QB in high school, and many of them dabbled at the position in college, too. In addition to Cobb, Jordan Reed and Hines Ward played some QB in college, and iirc Anquan Boldin was recruited to FSU as a QB, too. Just among guys who come immediately to mind.
Michael Bush was a hs qb, as was Ricky Seals-Jones, huge wr for Texas a&m
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think he gets a bump for Rice or Lynch. Lynch is a guy who moves the chains. Maybe Harvin is counted on a bit more because of his loss. I don't think Lynch is still holding out in a month though.

I don't think Rice was ever a threat to Harvin.

 
Slight bump with Rice's retirement and a possible Lynch holdout?
When Rice was on the field for the Seahawks he drew most of the coverage. Of course, that was likely because we didn't have any other formidable option--Tate wasn't much of a separation guy so it always looked like he was covered and Baldwin is simply underrated. I have to think coverage will now naturally roll toward Harvin and I suspect Rice's retirement--and only if he was going to see real time at WR which is not a given--really helps out Jermaine Kearse or Luke Willson more than Harvin who will see increased safety help.

Additionally, I don't think Lynch being out will change the offensive scheme much. I think Bevell will continue to run the ball as much as he did last year which was about 53% of the time.

 
Price check on Harvin -- anyone bought recently in dynasty?
Here are all the deals I could find from the past month in the offseason trade thread:

Harvin for Ben Tate / Gordon / 2015 1st / 2016 1st / 2016 2nd (contract league that rewards return yards, Harvin had an insanely good contract).

Harvin for Odell Beckham and John Brown

Harvin, Ladarius Green, and a late 2015 1st for Michael Floyd, Jordan Cameron, and a late 2015 2nd

Harvin for Marshall

Harvin for Roddy White, Donald Brown, and a late 2015 1st

Harvin, Andrew Luck, Carlos Hyde, and Tyler Eifert for Nick Foles, Josh Gordon, and Rob Gronkowski

Harvin hasn't been sold in any of my dynasty leagues recently, mostly because I own Percy Harvin in all of my dynasty leagues and I'm not looking to sell. ;)

 
12 team QRRWWWTF ppr:

Lords of the Grid Iron gave up:

Harvin, Percy SEA WR

Gypsy Scotty gave up:

Year 2014 Draft Pick 1.05

Year 2014 Draft Pick 2.01

 
I am projecting this for Harvin:

120 targets, 84 receptions (70% CR), 1050 receiving yards (12.5 YPR), 9 receiving TDs

35 rushing attempts, 224 rushing yards (6.4 ypc), 1 rushing TD

I'm targeting him in all formats.

 
Not that helpful since it's pretty league specific, but I gave Fitzgerald and a good chunk of FA/RFA bidding cash for Harvin.

 
I wonder if the news with Rice will bump up his ADP. I'm in the unusual situation of having an August dynasty startup draft. I just took him with my 2.14 pick (30th overall, 16 team league) and I learned that the guy immediately after me was going to take him if I didn't.

 
Slight bump with Rice's retirement and a possible Lynch holdout?
When Rice was on the field for the Seahawks he drew most of the coverage. Of course, that was likely because we didn't have any other formidable option--Tate wasn't much of a separation guy so it always looked like he was covered and Baldwin is simply underrated. I have to think coverage will now naturally roll toward Harvin and I suspect Rice's retirement--and only if he was going to see real time at WR which is not a given--really helps out Jermaine Kearse or Luke Willson more than Harvin who will see increased safety help.

Additionally, I don't think Lynch being out will change the offensive scheme much. I think Bevell will continue to run the ball as much as he did last year which was about 53% of the time.
Percy already proved he doesn't need Rice to take away coverage when Rice left him in Minnesota for Seattle.

 
I wonder if the news with Rice will bump up his ADP. I'm in the unusual situation of having an August dynasty startup draft. I just took him with my 2.14 pick (30th overall, 16 team league) and I learned that the guy immediately after me was going to take him if I didn't.
That took me a minute as I was thinking you were referring to the other Rice. How did I miss the news on S Rice?! Thanks for this! If you weren't on the Harvin train already, board now!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top