What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hawk = BOD (1 Viewer)

I'm still plenty happy with the pick.
Do you think he's already justified the #5 pick...what will he need to do to justify that pick? A couple of Pro Bowls? Injury free starter? Create more TO's?? Personally, if you draft a LB at #5 I think he needs to at least see a Pro Bowl or two.
Well it's pretty hard to say he justifies a Number 5 overall pick already. So far so good, I'd say and if he continues on his path he'll justify it easily.
 
I'm still plenty happy with the pick.
Do you think he's already justified the #5 pick...what will he need to do to justify that pick? A couple of Pro Bowls? Injury free starter? Create more TO's?? Personally, if you draft a LB at #5 I think he needs to at least see a Pro Bowl or two.(and not like a Phillip Rivers Pro Bowl bid, but a bid that is actually deserved)
Why limit this to LB's? I think everyone drafted in the top 5, regardless of position, needs to see a Pro Bowl or two in his career to not be considered a bust.
 
Hawk's season was at least as good as Mario Williams and D'Brick, way, way better than Vernon Davis, and basically appropriate for where he was drafted. He didn't tear up the league, but he was a solid contributor with potential to be a good player for a long time. If 2006 is his best season, he wasn't worth the #5 pick, but how many people drafted after him would have been worth it based on their 2006 season? I think he's likely to be a valuable contributor.

 
I'm still plenty happy with the pick.
Do you think he's already justified the #5 pick...what will he need to do to justify that pick? A couple of Pro Bowls? Injury free starter? Create more TO's?? Personally, if you draft a LB at #5 I think he needs to at least see a Pro Bowl or two.(and not like a Phillip Rivers Pro Bowl bid, but a bid that is actually deserved)
Why limit this to LB's? I think everyone drafted in the top 5, regardless of position, needs to see a Pro Bowl or two in his career to not be considered a bust.
Disagree...there are certain positions you draft at the top...LT, QB, RB, DE etc. You don't see a lot of LBs go top 5 because the skillset isn't as unique.
 
I'm still plenty happy with the pick.
Do you think he's already justified the #5 pick...what will he need to do to justify that pick? A couple of Pro Bowls? Injury free starter? Create more TO's?? Personally, if you draft a LB at #5 I think he needs to at least see a Pro Bowl or two.(and not like a Phillip Rivers Pro Bowl bid, but a bid that is actually deserved)
Lhucks - since you aren't high on the Hawk pick, based on your comment above, does that mean you think Hawk will NOT make a couple of Pro Bowls? I happen to think Hawk will be a 4-5 time pro bowler. But only time will tell.
 
I'm still plenty happy with the pick.
Do you think he's already justified the #5 pick...what will he need to do to justify that pick? A couple of Pro Bowls? Injury free starter? Create more TO's?? Personally, if you draft a LB at #5 I think he needs to at least see a Pro Bowl or two.(and not like a Phillip Rivers Pro Bowl bid, but a bid that is actually deserved)
Why limit this to LB's? I think everyone drafted in the top 5, regardless of position, needs to see a Pro Bowl or two in his career to not be considered a bust.
Disagree...there are certain positions you draft at the top...LT, QB, RB, DE etc. You don't see a lot of LBs go top 5 because the skillset isn't as unique.
So Mario Williams won't be a bust if he never makes a probowl?While I agree a LB isn't an ideal top 5 pick AJ appears like he's going to be a very good pro. That really doesn't make him a bust. Why not crack on the Raiders for taking Michael Huff at 7...aren't safeties a dime a dozen?
 
I'm still plenty happy with the pick.
Do you think he's already justified the #5 pick...what will he need to do to justify that pick? A couple of Pro Bowls? Injury free starter? Create more TO's?? Personally, if you draft a LB at #5 I think he needs to at least see a Pro Bowl or two.(and not like a Phillip Rivers Pro Bowl bid, but a bid that is actually deserved)
Lhucks - since you aren't high on the Hawk pick, based on your comment above, does that mean you think Hawk will NOT make a couple of Pro Bowls? I happen to think Hawk will be a 4-5 time pro bowler. But only time will tell.
If he makes 4-5 he's well worth the pick...I don't think that he will.
 
I'm still plenty happy with the pick.
Do you think he's already justified the #5 pick...what will he need to do to justify that pick? A couple of Pro Bowls? Injury free starter? Create more TO's?? Personally, if you draft a LB at #5 I think he needs to at least see a Pro Bowl or two.(and not like a Phillip Rivers Pro Bowl bid, but a bid that is actually deserved)
Lhucks - since you aren't high on the Hawk pick, based on your comment above, does that mean you think Hawk will NOT make a couple of Pro Bowls? I happen to think Hawk will be a 4-5 time pro bowler. But only time will tell.
If he makes 4-5 he's well worth the pick...I don't think that he will.
We shall see.
 
So Mario Williams won't be a bust if he never makes a probowl?
I didn't say that.
While I agree a LB isn't an ideal top 5 pick AJ appears like he's going to be a very good pro. That really doesn't make him a bust.
If he ends up being a "good pro" I agree he will not be considereda bust.
Why not crack on the Raiders for taking Michael Huff at 7...aren't safeties a dime a dozen?
Because Huff wasn't getting the media hype that Hawk was.
 
I used a little hyperbole to get the juices flowing in this thread with the Katzenmoyer comparison, but I stand by what I've said in this thread.Hawk was so overhyped it was ridiculous...and I was the only person on the planet calling it out...the responses in this thread tell the entire story.Great White Hype.
:thumbdown:
Things we learned todayA) avoid the water in CaliforniaB) NorrisB is a LHucks alias.
 
Honestly, I'd say he might be least likely to bust out of the supposed top10 picks outside of D'Brick.
I'd give that honor to Leinart and Bush...about as can't miss as they come.
yeah, they'll both be MVPs someday Two of the biggest busts of the draft in terms of expectations, so far at least

 
Ok, I am finally going to say this...... Let me compose myself here..................

I AGREE with LHUCKS :shrug: :unsure:

I won't go as far as a bust, but he's definitely not playing like a top 5 pick. He's a very solid LB, but he's no Brian Urlacher.

:gulp: That was difficult

 
1. Houston - Mario Williams, DE North Carolina State

2. New Orleans - Reggie Bush, RB USC

3. Tennessee - Vince Young, QB Texas

4. N.Y. Jets - D'Brickashaw Ferguson, OT Virginia

5. Green Bay - A.J. Hawk, LB Ohio State

6. San Francisco - Vernon Davis, TE Maryland

7. Oakland - Michael Huff, DB Texas

8. Buffalo - Donte Whitner, S Ohio State

9. Detroit - Ernie Sims, LB Florida State

10. Arizona - Matt Leinart, QB USC

11. Denver (from St. Louis) - Jay Cutler, QB Vanderbilt

12. Baltimore (from Cleveland) - Haloti Ngata, DT Oregon

13. Cleveland (from Baltimore) - Kamerion Wimbley, DE/OLB Florida State

14. Philadelphia - Broderick Bunkley, DT Florida State

15. St. Louis (from Atlanta through Denver) - Tye Hill, Cb Clemson

16. Miami - Jason Allen, DB Tennessee

17. Minnesota - Chad Greenway, LB Iowa

18. Dallas - Bobby Carpenter, LB Ohio State

19. San Diego - Antonio Cromartie, CB Florida State

20. Kansas City - Tamba Hali, DE Penn State

21. New England - Laurence Maroney, RB Minnesota

22. San Francisco (from Washington through Denver) - Manny Lawson, DE/OLB North Carolina State

23. Tampa Bay - Davin Joseph, G Oklahoma

24. Cincinnati - Johnathan Joseph, CB South Carolina

25. Pittsburgh (from N.Y. Giants) - Santonio Holmes, WR Ohio State

26. Buffalo (from Chicago) - John McCargo, DT North Carolina State

27. Carolina - DeAngelo Williams, RB Memphis

28. Jacksonville - Marcedes Lewis, TE UCLA

29. NY Jets (from Denver through Atlanta) - Nick Mangold, C Ohio State

30. Indianapolis - Joseph Addai, RB LSU

31. Seattle - Kelly Jennings, CB Miami (FL)

32. N.Y. Giants (from Pittsburgh) - Mathias Kiwanuka, DE Boston College

I was not thrilled with the pick when it was made but Hawk is an OK LBer. A disappointment yes but I see some other candidates that seem like bigger busts to me.

 
If you are going to sit around and complain that Hawk should not have been taken, then man up and say what player should have been taken in that spot.

Packers needed to get better at LB and Hawk was the best player at that spot in that draft. You might argue Huff, but he was not an extreme safety that you go pick at 5th overall. Hawk has hepled the Packers have solid players at LB and not worry about filling avoid on the defense for the next ten years. IMO the Pro Bowl is a waste of time, and I hope Hawk never has to go there and play in that mockery of a football game.

 
1. Houston - Mario Williams, DE North Carolina State

2. New Orleans - Reggie Bush, RB USC

3. Tennessee - Vince Young, QB Texas

4. N.Y. Jets - D'Brickashaw Ferguson, OT Virginia

5. Green Bay - A.J. Hawk, LB Ohio State

6. San Francisco - Vernon Davis, TE Maryland

7. Oakland - Michael Huff, DB Texas

8. Buffalo - Donte Whitner, S Ohio State

9. Detroit - Ernie Sims, LB Florida State

10. Arizona - Matt Leinart, QB USC

11. Denver (from St. Louis) - Jay Cutler, QB Vanderbilt

12. Baltimore (from Cleveland) - Haloti Ngata, DT Oregon

13. Cleveland (from Baltimore) - Kamerion Wimbley, DE/OLB Florida State

14. Philadelphia - Broderick Bunkley, DT Florida State

15. St. Louis (from Atlanta through Denver) - Tye Hill, Cb Clemson

16. Miami - Jason Allen, DB Tennessee

17. Minnesota - Chad Greenway, LB Iowa

18. Dallas - Bobby Carpenter, LB Ohio State

19. SI an Diego - Antonio Cromartie, CB Florida State

20. Kansas City - Tamba Hali, DE Penn State

21. New England - Laurence Maroney, RB Minnesota

22. San Francisco (from Washington through Denver) - Manny Lawson, DE/OLB North Carolina State

23. Tampa Bay - Davin Joseph, G Oklahoma

24. Cincinnati - Johnathan Joseph, CB South Carolina

25. Pittsburgh (from N.Y. Giants) - Santonio Holmes, WR Ohio State

26. Buffalo (from Chicago) - John McCargo, DT North Carolina State

27. Carolina - DeAngelo Williams, RB Memphis

28. Jacksonville - Marcedes Lewis, TE UCLA

29. NY Jets (from Denver through Atlanta) - Nick Mangold, C Ohio State

30. Indianapolis - Joseph Addai, RB LSU

31. Seattle - Kelly Jennings, CB Miami (FL)

32. N.Y. Giants (from Pittsburgh) - Mathias Kiwanuka, DE Boston College

I was not thrilled with the pick when it was made but Hawk is an OK LBer. A disappointment yes but I see some other candidates that seem like bigger busts to me.
I count 4 top 10 picks worse than Hawk has been. Young, Leinert, Huff, Davis
 
Ok, I am finally going to say this...... Let me compose myself here..................I AGREE with LHUCKS :shock: :loco: I won't go as far as a bust, but he's definitely not playing like a top 5 pick. He's a very solid LB, but he's no Brian Urlacher.:gulp: That was difficult
True...he is no Brian Urlacher.One is an MLB...one is an OLB.
 
nice article in the paper the other day in light of Hawk's recent lack of production recently.

barring Mario Williams.. who else do you want on the roster from the top 15? Bush? Ngata would be the next best but do you grab a 350 lb d-tackle at the #5? maybe if he's a pass rush threat and a great run stuffer.

they didn't have a need at tackle, Davis is a complete bust and they had Rodgers at QB... Huff is a bust.. Whitner is a starter but nothing special... Sims? Leinart? Wimbley?

not exactly a top heavy draft flush with studs.

 
mr. furley said:
nice article in the paper the other day in light of Hawk's recent lack of production recently.barring Mario Williams.. who else do you want on the roster from the top 15? Bush? Ngata would be the next best but do you grab a 350 lb d-tackle at the #5? maybe if he's a pass rush threat and a great run stuffer.they didn't have a need at tackle, Davis is a complete bust and they had Rodgers at QB... Huff is a bust.. Whitner is a starter but nothing special... Sims? Leinart? Wimbley?not exactly a top heavy draft flush with studs.
Bingo.He started off on fire this year...the injury slowed him up for sure...but he is back and not playing great...of course...he is the least of my concern right now at RB for them.Barnett has been plain bad...missing tackles he did not miss last season even...not sure whats up with him.
 
mr. furley said:
nice article in the paper the other day in light of Hawk's recent lack of production recently.barring Mario Williams.. who else do you want on the roster from the top 15? Bush? Ngata would be the next best but do you grab a 350 lb d-tackle at the #5? maybe if he's a pass rush threat and a great run stuffer.they didn't have a need at tackle, Davis is a complete bust and they had Rodgers at QB... Huff is a bust.. Whitner is a starter but nothing special... Sims? Leinart? Wimbley?not exactly a top heavy draft flush with studs.
Bingo.He started off on fire this year...the injury slowed him up for sure...but he is back and not playing great...of course...he is the least of my concern right now at RB for them.Barnett has been plain bad...missing tackles he did not miss last season even...not sure whats up with him.
tired/inexperienced/ineffective d-line in front of himPickett, Kampman and Jolly are playing way too many snaps. they had a ton of quality depth last year.. this year.. not so much.gotta have someone to slow the guards from firing off the line. he's not a 250lb run stuffing MLB. he needs to be given room to run.
 
mr. furley said:
nice article in the paper the other day in light of Hawk's recent lack of production recently.barring Mario Williams.. who else do you want on the roster from the top 15? Bush? Ngata would be the next best but do you grab a 350 lb d-tackle at the #5? maybe if he's a pass rush threat and a great run stuffer.they didn't have a need at tackle, Davis is a complete bust and they had Rodgers at QB... Huff is a bust.. Whitner is a starter but nothing special... Sims? Leinart? Wimbley?not exactly a top heavy draft flush with studs.
Bingo.He started off on fire this year...the injury slowed him up for sure...but he is back and not playing great...of course...he is the least of my concern right now at RB for them.Barnett has been plain bad...missing tackles he did not miss last season even...not sure whats up with him.
tired/inexperienced/ineffective d-line in front of himPickett, Kampman and Jolly are playing way too many snaps. they had a ton of quality depth last year.. this year.. not so much.gotta have someone to slow the guards from firing off the line. he's not a 250lb run stuffing MLB. he needs to be given room to run.
some truth for sure.though...his missed tackles are whats killing me...he is taking some poor angles at times too (it started in the preseason and has kept on through the season).I really think they need someone on that D to step up in a leadership role. Something that has been missing since Leroy Butler was around.
 
Honestly, I'd say he might be least likely to bust out of the supposed top10 picks outside of D'Brick.
I'd give that honor to Leinart and Bush...about as can't miss as they come.
And 20 minutes later, wrong....again
:goodposting: :lmao: Just a note to the Shark Pool...you have to be careful about what you say about LHUCKS. He loves the report function but I think the mods have him on ignore!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao: Although Bush is giving him a run for his money.

lsucks only tarnishes his already soiled reputation with chest beating bumps like this.

Honestly, I'd say he might be least likely to bust out of the supposed top10 picks outside of D'Brick.
I'd give that honor to Leinart and Bush...about as can't miss as they come.
orly?
 
nice bump.

the Packers depth at linebacker isn't doing him any favors, but at least Hawk is starting while Young and Leinart are holding the clipboard.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
nice bump.the Packers depth at linebacker isn't doing him any favors, but at least Hawk is starting while Young and Leinart are holding the clipboard.
Please recognize whose thread you are in and take your logic and reason elsewhere.
this may not be much longer from reporting in Wisconsin today. his plays are already being cut back.
That doesn't matter we're in bizarro world. So in order for LHUCKS to be right in his predicition Hawk has to be the bust of the draft which clearly he hasn't been thus far. So, yay bizarro world. I win.
 
From everything I've seen on the board LHUCKS is just a giant troll.
:lmao: Great Bush and Leinhart prediction LHucks.Nothing but a Pac 10 homer...
:goodposting: exactly. Hawk has panned out to be an average NFL linebacker. Has he been worthy of a top 5 pick? Absolutely not. Is he a bust? Absolutely not. I'd still take Hawk over almost half of the top 10 draft choices of that year. Hawk > Young, Davis, Huff, Leinart. Hawk about equal with Bush and Sims. He hasn't panned out as good as Williams, Ferguson or Whitner. 2 of the 3 of which went before him in the draft. Whitner also was considered a real reach at the time. Bottom line is that is wasn't a very good draft for 1st rounders. More busts/mediocre players than usual. Could the Packers have done better with the pick than Hawk? No doubt. But TT clearly sucks anyway. He only pulled 5 starters out of this draft.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top