'sn0mm1s said:
'Marvin said:
"The Wanderers" Richard Price
"Tapping the Source" Kem Nunn
"No Country for Old Men" Cormac McCarthy
"White Noise" Don DeLillo
"The Handmaid's Tale" Margaret Atwood
I have read those three. They were OK but I think the only one I have recommended is White Noise (and that was a long time ago). It seems you are more into the theme(s) that a book addresses and the story is somewhat secondary. I am more drawn to characters and world building. Out of curiosity - have you read Ender's Game? I have been trying to convince a friend of mine that teaches high school English to integrate it into her classes' reading list.
I appreciate what Martin has done in creating this "universe" (or at least two continents). There are obviously certain obstacles that a writer must overcome in order to write a work of fantasy. I've said before that I'm not a big fan of the fantasy genre. My gripes about Martin's books do not lie within my distaste for fantasy.
1. He's repetitive to the point of near predictability. It seems like he's almost creating his own cliches. A character thinks of something slightly fearful? He/she touches the pommel of their sword. You can almost bank on this.
2. Waaaay too many dreams. Obviously there are times when a character's dreams are important to the plot (Bran). But Martin over uses dreams to the point where you can skip most of them and not miss a damn thing. Personally I think the overuse of dreams is a cheap shortcut that some authors use (hello, Stephen King).
3. The same thing goes for all of the stories the characters tell each other. Obviously Martin injects myths and legends and histories into his story to bring even more depth to the world that he has created but quite often they just bog things down. I believe it is in the third book where one character (the frog girl or whatever) tells Arya a story that takes up most of a chapter. After about 3 pages I skipped it and finished the book without missing a thing.
I will say that I am enjoying these books. They are fun to read and entertaining. However, I would hesitate to call them "great".
Martin reminds me a lot of Harry Turtledove the king of alternate history. They both know their audiences. They both are skilled at creating a realistic "world". And they both keep the reader interested. Yet, after reading one of their books, I've never felt the urge to gush about it.