Tau837
Footballguy
Speaking as someone who worked at Cal for many years, graduated from Cal, and also sat through every game in the 1-10 Tom Holmoe season, I can tell you that the only public institutions Berkeley considers peers are UCLA, UNC and Michigan, probably in that order.academics are central to the institution at Berkeley and in Chapel Hill
LMFAO. You may not be aware of the 20+ year fake classes scheme UNC ran so their athletes, especially football, MBB, and baseball players, could maintain eligibility without going to class. Plenty of college sports programs have avoided, bent, or broken various rules over the past 50 years, but to hold UNC up as being comparable to Cal from an academic perspective seems like a joke to me.
I've also sat through Cal being on NCAA probation, and my wife was a student advisor who worked with (Pro Bowler and Super Bowl champion) Tarik Glenn, now the executive director of the Athletic Study Center. Harry Edwards and Derek Van Rheenan's work on sports and human rights are foundational to the field. Cal is better about focusing on academics for athletes than many institutions, but we're not good. Justin Wilcox last year gave an interview about how we all should just enjoy the sport, enjoy the games, and don't look behind the curtain, because you might not like what's going on.
Anyway, my point is, public institutions without a deep history of funding football at a high level are unlikely to be able to compete in this environment.
Fair enough. I am a NC State fan, and our public institution is in the same boat.