This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Argue what? You have an opinion that can't be supported or falsified by facts because nobody knows what the outcome of the game would have been with Culpepper at the helm. I don't even know what the point of this thread is actually.......
Minnesota being way better with Brad Johnson instead of Culpepper, is the point of the thread. Which is something that can be discussed and or argued.
Ok thats fine and a good point to discuss but I would shy away from words like "guarantee" when you start a thread like this.......
Culpepper will hook you up with a boat full of BJs.
We will see week 11. I say a crucial turnover by Pep in the fourth quarter costs Miami the game. Brad Johnson is better, make note of it son.
Wouldn't it be more correct to say Johnson sucks less?
Mmm.. Nah, I stick by my guarantee that we would of lost with Culpepper. That's my opinion however, and opinions can be argued.
At I'm honestly unsure if AE intended to embed innuendo in his thread title.
Agreed. No more standing at the line of scrimmage with the "deer in the headlights" look on the face of the Minesota QB.
On the record, for the mods, no. Off the record, for my fellow forum friends, yes.
Thanks, but I just don't find Culpepper all that attractive.
Your disagreement displayed through sarcasm is duly noted...
They said this on Mike and Mike this morning, though I don't think it was guaranteed.
I might agree with this. However, it is worth noting that if Culepper was playing instead of Johnson last night, Sean Taylor comes no where near the line of scrimmage to support the run. Chester Taylor might have proceeded to rush for 145 yards.
Your avatar disturbs me. :(
Ouch.
