What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hot! (3 Viewers)

She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).

 
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
yeah i agree that giving her a second cover might have been too early or too soon but maybe they were worried she would be looking like this next yearand wanted to give her a second cover before it was impossible.
 
I agree that she's extremely pretty and has a "nice" body. What I don't understand is how she can be surrounded by all that other swimsuit talent and not notice that she's no where near as lean as the other girls. All she'd have to do is watch her diet a little, workout a little, and she tighten that mid-section right up. I bet she's the Otis of swimsuit models when it comes to dieting and working out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
 
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
 
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
Its all about selling magazines, and Upton is their most well known model with unrivaled name recognition. 90% of people have never heard of any of their other models that could have got the cover. Easy, no-brainer choice for SI, who im sure recognize that her time may be short. They are striking while the iron is still hot.Plus, she probably lets them pay her with cheeseburgers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
Its all about selling magazines, and Upton is their most well known model with unrivaled name recognition. 90% of people have never heard of any of their other models that could have got the cover. Easy, no-brainer choice for SI, who im sure recognize that her time may be short. They are striking while the iron is still hot.Plus, she probably lets them pay her with cheeseburgers.
She was kind of a no name before she got her first cover. She had like 50K twitter followers before that i believe and then she blew up after the cover. They could create a name by making any of their super hotties cover girls and have Upton featured in it as well. Bar Rafaeli was not that big a name before she got the cover then she blew up.
 
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
Its all about selling magazines, and Upton is their most well known model with unrivaled name recognition. 90% of people have never heard of any of their other models that could have got the cover. Easy, no-brainer choice for SI, who im sure recognize that her time may be short. They are striking while the iron is still hot.Plus, she probably lets them pay her with cheeseburgers.
She was kind of a no name before she got her first cover. She had like 50K twitter followers before that i believe and then she blew up after the cover. They could create a name by making any of their super hotties cover girls and have Upton featured in it as well. Bar Rafaeli was not that big a name before she got the cover then she blew up.
I don't know about this. She was already a huge name before last year's cover. She was in the issue the year before which was when we all really kinda noticed her, and then over the next year she became really famous even before last year's issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
Its all about selling magazines, and Upton is their most well known model with unrivaled name recognition. 90% of people have never heard of any of their other models that could have got the cover. Easy, no-brainer choice for SI, who im sure recognize that her time may be short. They are striking while the iron is still hot.Plus, she probably lets them pay her with cheeseburgers.
She was kind of a no name before she got her first cover. She had like 50K twitter followers before that i believe and then she blew up after the cover. They could create a name by making any of their super hotties cover girls and have Upton featured in it as well. Bar Rafaeli was not that big a name before she got the cover then she blew up.
I don't know about this. She was already a huge name before last year's cover. She was in the issue the year before which was when we all really kinda noticed her, and then over the next year she became really famous even before last year's issue.
I knew of her but not sure most people actually knew her that well before the cover. Its a moot point, SI is so big they create supermodels, I think it would sell the same amount no matter who they placed on their cover from their crop of talent.
 
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
Its all about selling magazines, and Upton is their most well known model with unrivaled name recognition. 90% of people have never heard of any of their other models that could have got the cover. Easy, no-brainer choice for SI, who im sure recognize that her time may be short. They are striking while the iron is still hot.Plus, she probably lets them pay her with cheeseburgers.
She was kind of a no name before she got her first cover. She had like 50K twitter followers before that i believe and then she blew up after the cover. They could create a name by making any of their super hotties cover girls and have Upton featured in it as well. Bar Rafaeli was not that big a name before she got the cover then she blew up.
I don't know about this. She was already a huge name before last year's cover. She was in the issue the year before which was when we all really kinda noticed her, and then over the next year she became really famous even before last year's issue.
I knew of her but not sure most people actually knew her that well before the cover. Its a moot point, SI is so big they create supermodels, I think it would sell the same amount no matter who they placed on their cover from their crop of talent.
You're probably right, probably just feels like she was more famous before then because 99% of the stuff I hear about comes from the FFA first
 
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
Its all about selling magazines, and Upton is their most well known model with unrivaled name recognition. 90% of people have never heard of any of their other models that could have got the cover. Easy, no-brainer choice for SI, who im sure recognize that her time may be short. They are striking while the iron is still hot.Plus, she probably lets them pay her with cheeseburgers.
She was kind of a no name before she got her first cover. She had like 50K twitter followers before that i believe and then she blew up after the cover. They could create a name by making any of their super hotties cover girls and have Upton featured in it as well. Bar Rafaeli was not that big a name before she got the cover then she blew up.
I don't know about this. She was already a huge name before last year's cover. She was in the issue the year before which was when we all really kinda noticed her, and then over the next year she became really famous even before last year's issue.
I knew of her but not sure most people actually knew her that well before the cover. Its a moot point, SI is so big they create supermodels, I think it would sell the same amount no matter who they placed on their cover from their crop of talent.
You're probably right, probably just feels like she was more famous before then because 99% of the stuff I hear about comes from the FFA first
yeah we uncover all the major talent real early here.Not sure when Upton actually blew up (bad term considering the fat jokes on her) but the first cover really extended her into super stardom. I recall the Dougie video really got her a lot of awareness and her dating Mark Sanchez drew people to her.
 
I agree that she's extremely pretty and has a "nice" body. What I don't understand is how she can be surrounded by all that other swimsuit talent and not notice that she's no where near as lean as the other girls. All she'd have to do is watch her diet a little, workout a little, and she tighten that mid-section right up. I bet she's the Otis of swimsuit models when it comes to dieting and working out.
I'm glad she doesn't. She's in a healthy range now, nowhere close to "obese". Meanwhile, a disturbing number of models, the "swimsuit talent", have serious eating disorders and unhealthy on THE LOW SIDE body fat %s. I've looked through the magazine: Upton is the hottest one in it, by a good margin.Not sure why so many men are so attracted to women whose ribs are showing.
 
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
Its all about selling magazines, and Upton is their most well known model with unrivaled name recognition. 90% of people have never heard of any of their other models that could have got the cover. Easy, no-brainer choice for SI, who im sure recognize that her time may be short. They are striking while the iron is still hot.Plus, she probably lets them pay her with cheeseburgers.
She was kind of a no name before she got her first cover. She had like 50K twitter followers before that i believe and then she blew up after the cover. They could create a name by making any of their super hotties cover girls and have Upton featured in it as well. Bar Rafaeli was not that big a name before she got the cover then she blew up.
I don't know about this. She was already a huge name before last year's cover. She was in the issue the year before which was when we all really kinda noticed her, and then over the next year she became really famous even before last year's issue.
I knew of her but not sure most people actually knew her that well before the cover. Its a moot point, SI is so big they create supermodels, I think it would sell the same amount no matter who they placed on their cover from their crop of talent.
You're probably right, probably just feels like she was more famous before then because 99% of the stuff I hear about comes from the FFA first
yeah we uncover all the major talent real early here.Not sure when Upton actually blew up (bad term considering the fat jokes on her) but the first cover really extended her into super stardom. I recall the Dougie video really got her a lot of awareness and her dating Mark Sanchez drew people to her.
Shes still not a superstar imo. My wife doesnt even know who she is and she knows all the gossip
 
She's sexy, and yes, a little more curvy than most of today's models, but my main problem with her as the back-to-back SI cover girl is that she seems a little young for the selection. I don't know it for a fact, but she's likely one of the youngest- if not the youngest- selected for the cover girl. Cover girl at 19 seems a little young (especially for SI's audience).
:lmao: Schtick, right?
Models obviously have a short window to be relevant and considered sexy, but I think Upton getting this cover starting at 19 and in back-to-back years makes it less of a "career achievement". At this rate, she could have more covers than Tiegs/Ireland/Brinkley before the age they had their 1st cover. Upton still seems to belong to the Maxim-generation, and feels like a young choice for SI. She obviously fits the bill, but there are also plenty of women 3-5 years older that could have been good selections too. VS models and SI models used to be interchangeable.Or I'm in my mid-30s and maybe she just makes me feel old.
Its all about selling magazines, and Upton is their most well known model with unrivaled name recognition. 90% of people have never heard of any of their other models that could have got the cover. Easy, no-brainer choice for SI, who im sure recognize that her time may be short. They are striking while the iron is still hot.Plus, she probably lets them pay her with cheeseburgers.
She was kind of a no name before she got her first cover. She had like 50K twitter followers before that i believe and then she blew up after the cover. They could create a name by making any of their super hotties cover girls and have Upton featured in it as well. Bar Rafaeli was not that big a name before she got the cover then she blew up.
I don't know about this. She was already a huge name before last year's cover. She was in the issue the year before which was when we all really kinda noticed her, and then over the next year she became really famous even before last year's issue.
I knew of her but not sure most people actually knew her that well before the cover. Its a moot point, SI is so big they create supermodels, I think it would sell the same amount no matter who they placed on their cover from their crop of talent.
You're probably right, probably just feels like she was more famous before then because 99% of the stuff I hear about comes from the FFA first
yeah we uncover all the major talent real early here.Not sure when Upton actually blew up (bad term considering the fat jokes on her) but the first cover really extended her into super stardom. I recall the Dougie video really got her a lot of awareness and her dating Mark Sanchez drew people to her.
Shes still not a superstar imo. My wife doesnt even know who she is and she knows all the gossip
any adult male who has internet access knows who Kate Upton is. Not many models have close to 1M Twitter followers
 
Those in here saying Upton isn't attractive because she's curvier are insane. Seriously. Granted, she's not the hottest woman I've ever seen, but her curves, to me, make her a bit more attractive, because she's not a stick like so many other models. I'd be willing to bet that any guy in here would jump at the chance to go for a roll in the hay with Upton.

 
Yeah most horny males know who she is. But in order to be considered a superstar, i think you need to crossover into other genres. All shes done is some goofy internet videos, some hamburger commercials, and had a bit part in the three stooges. She hasnt made the leap yet. In a baseball analogy, albert pujols is a baseball superstar but hes not a "superstar" like a derek jeter is. Many previous supermodels (many mentioned here plus condy crawford) made the crossover into superstar status. Shes still not there yet imo.

 
All i know is, she was on my wife's gay top 5 list before last year's cover. I remember cause she was mad that they used such a bad picture.In terms of celeb knowledge, Mrs Brown >>> Mrs Shady

 
All i know is, she was on my wife's gay top 5 list before last year's cover. I remember cause she was mad that they used such a bad picture.In terms of celeb knowledge, Mrs Brown >>> Mrs Shady
:lmao: this may be the only thing she gets wrong. Shes like a TMZ rainman
Oh, no. We're getting into the "is Joe Flacco elite?" range of discussion now.
:lmao: good point. Ill back away slowly
 
All i know is, she was on my wife's gay top 5 list before last year's cover. I remember cause she was mad that they used such a bad picture.In terms of celeb knowledge, Mrs Brown >>> Mrs Shady
:lmao: this may be the only thing she gets wrong. Shes like a TMZ rainman
Oh, no. We're getting into the "is Joe Flacco elite?" range of discussion now.
:lmao: good point. Ill back away slowly
haha I will debate you on Kate though. She is only 20 years old or something. Give her 5 more years and she will be the biggest model on the planet (the puns are too easy at this point) :lmao:
 
no, they were both preggo at the timefrom Wiki:

She returned to the cover in 1992 and in 1994. In her third appearance, she was accompanied by Rachel Hunter and Elle Macpherson; notably, both Hunter and Ireland were pregnant at the time.
Wow. Haven't seem shuke owned like this since the whole werewolf debacle.
 
no, they were both preggo at the timefrom Wiki:

She returned to the cover in 1992 and in 1994. In her third appearance, she was accompanied by Rachel Hunter and Elle Macpherson; notably, both Hunter and Ireland were pregnant at the time.
Wow. Haven't seem shuke owned like this since the whole werewolf debacle.
Hint: I knew they were pregnant. I was trying to make a point, which you obviously missed.

 
no, they were both preggo at the timefrom Wiki:

She returned to the cover in 1992 and in 1994. In her third appearance, she was accompanied by Rachel Hunter and Elle Macpherson; notably, both Hunter and Ireland were pregnant at the time.
Probably about four months or so.
 
She's just a savvy business woman that's already signed the largest endorsement contract ever by a weight loss company.Just not sure who yet.....Weight watchers? Jenny? P90X?Maybe she's playing the really long game and ABC (or whatever network it's on) has already given her a billion dollars do star in Biggest Loser 2018.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
no, they were both preggo at the timefrom Wiki:

She returned to the cover in 1992 and in 1994. In her third appearance, she was accompanied by Rachel Hunter and Elle Macpherson; notably, both Hunter and Ireland were pregnant at the time.
Wow. Haven't seem shuke owned like this since the whole werewolf debacle.
Hint: I knew they were pregnant. I was trying to make a point, which you obviously missed.
Sure you did.
 
no, they were both preggo at the timefrom Wiki:

She returned to the cover in 1992 and in 1994. In her third appearance, she was accompanied by Rachel Hunter and Elle Macpherson; notably, both Hunter and Ireland were pregnant at the time.
Wow. Haven't seem shuke owned like this since the whole werewolf debacle.
Hint: I knew they were pregnant. I was trying to make a point, which you obviously missed.
Sure you did.
Dallas Latos tweeted about it yesterday. :unsure:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top