GregR_2
Footballguy
As underperforming as Clayton has been for the Ravens, I think he might be the best healthy WR they have right now. I went ahead and picked him up in a league where most teams start 5 WR including a flex, though I'm not sure I'd bother in a league that starts fewer or doesn't have large rosters like ours (34 players).If I were a Rams fan I wouldn't consider this a bad move by them in any event. Not unless they gave up something earlier than a 6th round pick for him.Don't worry, I laughed. Like I said above, hope he outperforms my meager expectations.Trade finalized an hour later!Abrantes said:Clayton? Seriously? Regardless of how WR-starved the team is, trading for him would be ridiculous.Donnybrook said:I think this would be an excellent move by the Rams if they made some sort of offer for him. I guess that makes it highly unlikely.GregR said:I'm debating if it might be a good move for leagues with bigger rosters and that start more WRs, to pick up Clayton (or keep him if he was already rostered) in the hopes that the Ravens release or trade him now to a team like the Rams where he might end up starting.![]()