Get hurt?You are all fools. Addai is so overrated. He will be this year Arrington. As for Williams, he will be successfull, but this year hew still has to contend with foster. KJ will be able to do the same things as Jackson was able to do in Martz's offense.
Why do you feel this way about Addai?Actually I was th smart one tha avoided Arrington. But I figured ti put the warning out tis year about the hype. Just like last year's was about Arington.
Agree on Addai.Williams was a top 10 prospect, I didn't realize Jones was rated higher, I thought he was a top 20 prospect? Could be wrong, it was a couple years ago.I think he was a much better prospect coming out than either Williams or Addai.
thank god you're hereActually I was th smart one tha avoided Arrington. But I figured ti put the warning out tis year about the hype. Just like last year's was about Arington.
You are all fools. Addai is so overrated. He will be this year Arrington. As for Williams, he will be successfull, but this year hew still has to contend with foster. KJ will be able to do the same things as Jackson was able to do in Martz's offense.
Williams was the 27th player chosen. Jones was the 30th player chosen. There's not much difference there, but my personal opinion is that Jones was the better prospect. Williams may have better instincts, but Jones has a lot more power, a better build, and similar athletic ability. One of the things that bothers me about DeAngelo is what a squirt he looks like on the field. I know he weighed 217 at the combine, but he only weighed 207 pounds at his Pro Day. More importantly, he just doesn't look like he runs with much authority. Defenders seem to bring him down with relative ease once they get their hands on him. I know he was able to handle a lot of carries at Memphis, but I really wonder whether he'll ever be a full-time starter in the NFL. It doesn't help that the team re-signed Foster, who may actually be the more talented back (I know it's always fashionable to favor the new guy, but these two had pretty similar pedigrees).Williams was a top 10 prospect, I didn't realize Jones was rated higher, I thought he was a top 20 prospect? Could be wrong, it was a couple years ago.
Here's a blurb on Foster's college career: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deshaun_Foster)Foster played at UCLA, where he set a team rushing record for true freshman with 673 yards and 10 touchdowns on 126 carries in 11 games. The next year he spent mostly on the bench with an ankle sprain, but still managed to record 375 yards and 6 scores on 111 carries. As a junior, he led the Bruins with 1,037 yards, wile scoring 13 touchdowns. His final year, he posted 1,109 yards with 12 touchdowns; he had six games of over 100 rushing yards. He set a school record with a 301 yard game against Washington, and tied a record with four touchdowns. He ended his college career in the team top 10 in touchdowns (44), rushing yards (3,194) and points (266).One of the things that bothers me about DeAngelo is what a squirt he looks like on the field. I know he weighed 217 at the combine, but he only weighed 207 pounds at his Pro Day. More importantly, he just doesn't look like he runs with much authority. Defenders seem to bring him down with relative ease once they get their hands on him. I know he was able to handle a lot of carries at Memphis, but I really wonder whether he'll ever be a full-time starter in the NFL. It doesn't help that the team re-signed Foster, who may actually be the more talented back (I know it's always fashionable to favor the new guy, but these two had pretty similar pedigrees).
Pedigree has little to do with college statistics. Jerome Harrison outrushed Laurence Maroney last year by a wide margin. Does that mean Harrison has a better pedigree? Nope.When I say pedigree, I refer to the player's standing as a draft prospect. DeAngelo Williams was the 27th overall pick in 2006. DeShaun Foster was the 34th overall pick in 2002. That's pretty close.Now to me, the two do not have a similar pedigree, especially given the fact that Foster's 4 years in the league have been only marginally successful.
He was effective in college. I never said he wasn't. My argument is that his game won't translate as well to the NFL as people might expect. Running against Tennessee-Chattanooga is not quite the same as running against the Pittsburgh Steelers.As to the idea that defenders easily bring down DeAngelo... I think his YPC speaks against that. It's hard to average over 6 YPC if you're easily tackled.