This article certainly won't win any awards for best timing, but I think there is some merit to what he says. These cops put their lives on the line everyday; and if you're going to behave in a belligerent and threatening manner toward them, be prepared to be taken at face value and don't be surprised if things escalate quickly if you don't cooperate because these cops have probably been trained to shut suspected perps down hard as it's probably been proven to save both their life and the lives of the suspect more often than not.
His quotes perfectly spell out the problem: Cops really do believe they have a right to tell anyone to do anything and not complying with that is a crime in and of itself. They consider it appropriate to punish this crime with use of force, even deadly force.
Truth is, unless you are caught breaking a law, and placed under arrest, cops by law don't have the ability to tell you what to do. If I'm walking down the street doing nothing and a cops yells at me to get down on the ground, where is the law on the books saying I have to do exactly what this cop says or face the prospect of physical force? If one exists please someone link it.
It is not that people who antagonize police aren't at fault. They are at fault being ####ty human beings, and not being smart enough to recognize that the laws don't actually protect them from police, because police do not have to abide the same laws as regular citizens.
But the true problem is that our society has been permissive enough with cops overstepping their legal bounds in a number of ways that it has absolutely reinforced this notion in cops that whatever they tell anyone to do is the law, and therefore they are the actual law. This is counter to every founding principle of our country, and that is why protection against illegal search and seizure was written into the bill of rights. Unfortunately these protections were not explicit enough, and our chicken-#### court system has not had the balls to call out police practices that clearly violate individual rights.
Furthermore, this is not a zero-sum game: cops either get the green light to trample anyone's rights and personal safety, or we get no protection from cops. All that is required is that we start enforcing laws, take discpline out of the hands of the individual police precincts and into the hands of judges who should be held accountable for the impartiality of their rulings towards law enforcement. Every single police precinct in the nation should be heavily emphasizing how to de-escalate situations and use non-lethal force to resolve incidents where force is required.
From the video of the obviously mentally ill guy in St. Louis, it was obvious that if that training occurs, it is either completely ineffective or officers are told they don't have to abide by it.
So to me, this is letter from this cop is a lot less damning to the people he describes, than it is to his mindset that following his orders, regardless of to what degree they infringe on an individuals rights, is the only way to avoid having very bad things happen to you. It's essentially showing that he beleives himself to be the dictator of any citizen he comes in contact with. It's a controlling, non-empathetic authoritarian attitude towards the people he is pad to serve and protect. If he does not believe in the last two things he should be kicked off the force. His personality is the last kind we need protecting us.