Ren. I'm a fan since bops. Your rage vids are legend. But dood. This needs to be schtick or dial it back. Maybe half of what JDP says is challenging and truth and maybe half is misguided.
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick and Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existencial catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's genius unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools... how I pity them. ? And yes by the way, I DO have a Rick and Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.
lmaoooooooooooohttps://youtu.be/-BDgQMGs7Mc
"'Burger King,' that name is so bloody complicated. It took me like three months of non-stop thought to figure this out. Well you look at it and you see 'King', well what's that? That's actually an instantiation of a patriarchal mode of being, isn't it? It's like...that's the typification of a fatherly figure that exists at the top of all possible dominance hierarchies, I guess that'd be a good way to describe it.
"But it's not A king per se when you go to Burger King, it's the instantiation of an INDIVIDUAL as necessarily being the embodiment of the transcendent ideal of a King. It's a king AS SUCH! The typified aspect of Kingship-as-such is inexorably tied-up with the word! And what does the typified father-figure DO? Well he provides, doesn't he? He provides food! And shelter! And BURGERS! Well yah, that's bloody well right, a king who provides burgers? Exactly."
My man look like a coked out version of the brother from everybody loves raymondIlov80s said:
this seems right. He's a well educated jagaloonHe caters to a very specific crowd who believe unpopular things and want to feel good and justified about it. He's their idea of an intellectual in the same way that Trump is an ignorant person's idea of a rich guy.
Let's just be straight. The dudes a massive douchecanoe.this seems right. He's a well educated jagaloon
OMFUG. That video just made my night. I love all the girls checking their phones...
Holy ####### ####https://youtu.be/-BDgQMGs7Mc
"'Burger King,' that name is so bloody complicated. It took me like three months of non-stop thought to figure this out. Well you look at it and you see 'King', well what's that? That's actually an instantiation of a patriarchal mode of being, isn't it? It's like...that's the typification of a fatherly figure that exists at the top of all possible dominance hierarchies, I guess that'd be a good way to describe it.
"But it's not A king per se when you go to Burger King, it's the instantiation of an INDIVIDUAL as necessarily being the embodiment of the transcendent ideal of a King. It's a king AS SUCH! The typified aspect of Kingship-as-such is inexorably tied-up with the word! And what does the typified father-figure DO? Well he provides, doesn't he? He provides food! And shelter! And BURGERS! Well yah, that's bloody well right, a king who provides burgers? Exactly."
wtf peyton.https://youtu.be/-BDgQMGs7Mc
"'Burger King,' that name is so bloody complicated. It took me like three months of non-stop thought to figure this out. Well you look at it and you see 'King', well what's that? That's actually an instantiation of a patriarchal mode of being, isn't it? It's like...that's the typification of a fatherly figure that exists at the top of all possible dominance hierarchies, I guess that'd be a good way to describe it.
"But it's not A king per se when you go to Burger King, it's the instantiation of an INDIVIDUAL as necessarily being the embodiment of the transcendent ideal of a King. It's a king AS SUCH! The typified aspect of Kingship-as-such is inexorably tied-up with the word! And what does the typified father-figure DO? Well he provides, doesn't he? He provides food! And shelter! And BURGERS! Well yah, that's bloody well right, a king who provides burgers? Exactly."
Which begs the question, should I never, ever, ever admit that I know the name, Jordan Peterson?Can't believe there are people who still don't see through this guy. My earlier posts in here look better and better the more time passes.
If I was a woman, guaging how a dude feels about Jordan Peterson, if he's aware of him, would be an excellent relationship filter.
Being aware of him just gives you the opportunity to show you're on the smart side, I guess. To be honest most people probably aren't aware who he is, but if he's on someone's radar then your thoughts on him one way or the other would probably be relevant to that person.Which begs the question, should I never, ever, ever admit that I know the name, Jordan Peterson?
Did I use "beg the question" correctly? ... I need to know.
Oh my God. I thought that was satire.https://youtu.be/-BDgQMGs7Mc
"'Burger King,' that name is so bloody complicated. It took me like three months of non-stop thought to figure this out. Well you look at it and you see 'King', well what's that? That's actually an instantiation of a patriarchal mode of being, isn't it? It's like...that's the typification of a fatherly figure that exists at the top of all possible dominance hierarchies, I guess that'd be a good way to describe it.
"But it's not A king per se when you go to Burger King, it's the instantiation of an INDIVIDUAL as necessarily being the embodiment of the transcendent ideal of a King. It's a king AS SUCH! The typified aspect of Kingship-as-such is inexorably tied-up with the word! And what does the typified father-figure DO? Well he provides, doesn't he? He provides food! And shelter! And BURGERS! Well yah, that's bloody well right, a king who provides burgers? Exactly."
Your usage (equivalent to, “raises the question”) has more or less become common and perhaps some would even say acceptable, but is wrong.Which begs the question, should I never, ever, ever admit that I know the name, Jordan Peterson?
Did I use "beg the question" correctly? ... I need to know.
What specifically are you referring to? "See through" implies he's not genuine but he seems absolutely genuine to me. And his popularity is increasing as far as I can tell.Can't believe there are people who still don't see through this guy. My earlier posts in here look better and better the more time passes.
If I was a woman, gauging how a dude feels about Jordan Peterson, if he's aware of him, would be an excellent relationship filter.
I have no idea if he's genuine in terms of if he believes what he's saying, himself. He probably does. But I think it's clear he knows who he's pandering to.What specifically are you referring to? "See through" implies he's not genuine but he seems absolutely genuine to me. And his popularity is increasing as far as I can tell.
Since it's so clear to you, please enlighten us.I have no idea if he's genuine in terms of if he believes what he's saying, himself. He probably does. But I think it's clear he knows who he's pandering to.
I think he definitely believes in what he’s saying. I think there may have been a point earlier on where it was a little bit of a schtick , but I’m pretty sure he is now all in and believes it.I have no idea if he's genuine in terms of if he believes what he's saying, himself. He probably does. But I think it's clear he knows who he's pandering to.
agree.Long Ball Larry said:I think he definitely believes in what he’s saying. I think there may have been a point earlier on where it was a little bit of a schtick , but I’m pretty sure he is now all in and believes it.
You could argue that sanctioning or punishing people for insisting on using the pronouns "he" and "her" would be whack jobs, but forget it Chet, it's joffertown.What has he said that makes him a whack job?
The thread is full of valid complaints about Peterson.What has he said that makes him a whack job?
He claimed that drinking a glass of cider caused him to not sleep for 25 days.What has he said that makes him a whack job?
Joe told us not to use rolling laugh emojis without a sentence, so here's the sentence.He claimed that drinking a glass of cider caused him to not sleep for 25 days.![]()