What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I'm starting Matt Asiata this week over ___________. (2 Viewers)

Over P Thomas at RB2, or perhaps over B Marsh/FJax/Hurns in flex pending todays news regarding his ankle.

 
Volume and poor run D should help. Should be interesting to see how much work McKinnon gets and if they mix in more Patterson runs.

PFF regarded Asiata as a RB2 with McKinnon a "speculative add" in their Tamme index (ranks backups and where they would rank them in case of starter injury, named after Jacob Tamme).

 
Englishteacher said:
Volume and poor run D should help. Should be interesting to see how much work McKinnon gets and if they mix in more Patterson runs.

PFF regarded Asiata as a RB2 with McKinnon a "speculative add" in their Tamme index (ranks backups and where they would rank them in case of starter injury, named after Jacob Tamme).
Click to expand...
The Patriots had one bad game against the Dolphins and now they have a poor run D? The Seahawks gave up back to back 200 rushing yard games last year so I guess they have a poor run D too?

 
ponchsox said:
Englishteacher said:
Volume and poor run D should help. Should be interesting to see how much work McKinnon gets and if they mix in more Patterson runs.

PFF regarded Asiata as a RB2 with McKinnon a "speculative add" in their Tamme index (ranks backups and where they would rank them in case of starter injury, named after Jacob Tamme).
Click to expand...
The Patriots had one bad game against the Dolphins and now they have a poor run D? The Seahawks gave up back to back 200 rushing yard games last year so I guess they have a poor run D too?
Click to expand...
They also had a horrific 2013. Until proven otherwise on the field, no reason to upgrade them.

That they were gashed by a unit with 5 new guys upfront isn't going to alleviate concerns either.

Minnesota is a very good run blocking team.

 
Craig_MiamiFL said:
ponchsox said:
Englishteacher said:
Volume and poor run D should help. Should be interesting to see how much work McKinnon gets and if they mix in more Patterson runs.

PFF regarded Asiata as a RB2 with McKinnon a "speculative add" in their Tamme index (ranks backups and where they would rank them in case of starter injury, named after Jacob Tamme).
Click to expand...
The Patriots had one bad game against the Dolphins and now they have a poor run D? The Seahawks gave up back to back 200 rushing yard games last year so I guess they have a poor run D too?
Click to expand...
They also had a horrific 2013. Until proven otherwise on the field, no reason to upgrade them.That they were gashed by a unit with 5 new guys upfront isn't going to alleviate concerns either.

Minnesota is a very good run blocking team.
Click to expand...
2013 Pats defense lost Wilfork and Mayo. Add them along with Easley and an improved secondary and they will improve this year. Not saying they will be great, but not horrific like everyone is saying.

 
ponchsox said:
Craig_MiamiFL said:
ponchsox said:
Englishteacher said:
Volume and poor run D should help. Should be interesting to see how much work McKinnon gets and if they mix in more Patterson runs.

PFF regarded Asiata as a RB2 with McKinnon a "speculative add" in their Tamme index (ranks backups and where they would rank them in case of starter injury, named after Jacob Tamme).
Click to expand...
The Patriots had one bad game against the Dolphins and now they have a poor run D? The Seahawks gave up back to back 200 rushing yard games last year so I guess they have a poor run D too?
Click to expand...
They also had a horrific 2013. Until proven otherwise on the field, no reason to upgrade them.That they were gashed by a unit with 5 new guys upfront isn't going to alleviate concerns either.

Minnesota is a very good run blocking team.
Click to expand...
2013 Pats defense lost Wilfork and Mayo. Add them along with Easley and an improved secondary and they will improve this year. Not saying they will be great, but not horrific like everyone is saying.
Click to expand...
They certainly got run on in Week One. :shrug: Granted, Dolphins imported Lazor from Philly with a very effective run scheme and an uptempo style. However, it's not like anyone regards the new Miami O line THAT highly and Moreno/Miller are average starters.

I like the matchup.

 
ponchsox said:
Craig_MiamiFL said:
ponchsox said:
Englishteacher said:
Volume and poor run D should help. Should be interesting to see how much work McKinnon gets and if they mix in more Patterson runs.

PFF regarded Asiata as a RB2 with McKinnon a "speculative add" in their Tamme index (ranks backups and where they would rank them in case of starter injury, named after Jacob Tamme).
Click to expand...
The Patriots had one bad game against the Dolphins and now they have a poor run D? The Seahawks gave up back to back 200 rushing yard games last year so I guess they have a poor run D too?
Click to expand...
They also had a horrific 2013. Until proven otherwise on the field, no reason to upgrade them.That they were gashed by a unit with 5 new guys upfront isn't going to alleviate concerns either.

Minnesota is a very good run blocking team.
Click to expand...
2013 Pats defense lost Wilfork and Mayo. Add them along with Easley and an improved secondary and they will improve this year. Not saying they will be great, but not horrific like everyone is saying.
Click to expand...
Agree they couldnt be worse than 2013.

Funny you mention Wilfork and Mayo, because that's exactly who the Phins ran at. Behind castoffs Darryn College and Samson Satele. They simply smashed the Pats front 7 in the mouth up the gut. It wasn't anything fancy.

And mind you, the #1 weakness heading into this season for the Phins was the OL. An OL that was missing its best lineman in Pouncey Week 1. The Phins run blocking isn't even in the same conversation as the Vikings.

The game plan vs. the Pats this year is going to be simple. Smash them in the mouth. They're going to have to prove 2013 was an aberation before that game plan changes. In the meantime, I'd start any RB against them.

 
Passing on him this week, I see the Pats getting up big on the Vikings and McKinnon playing the second half as he is the better pass receiver.

 
Gopher State said:
Passing on him this week, I see the Pats getting up big on the Vikings and McKinnon playing the second half as he is the better pass receiver.
Click to expand...
Reports I see are Asiata is better at pass protection and has upped his receiving game. If they fall, not sure they vey away from vet if Cassel has to sling it.Oh, and thinking of starting him over T West, but jury still out on that one.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
By kickoff, people in this thread will be saying they Asiata is better than Peterson. He's a backup, people, and they drafted another RB because they know he is barely even viable in a backup role.

 
Cyclones said:
Lots of stupid in this thread. I seem to recall this guy toting the rock like 30 times for 50 yards in a game last year. He is a backup for a reason - he's no good, and shouldn't be started over any RB2 or WR2 on your roster. You're talking about a very mediocre offense in which the most talented pure runner since Barry Sanders is going to be subbed out for a guy with a career YPC of under 4. You know those long runs that make AP AP? Asiata is not capable of busting those runs. Expect a Trent Richardson type line here - 13 carries, 34 yards.
Click to expand...
:lmao: The guy has one career start and 49 life time totes, who gives a #### about his YPC. He followed up that 30 for 51 game with a 14 for 115 game (8.2YPC) with an ankle injury. You know those long runs AP makes, you'd have to go back to Novemeber of last year against DAL to find a longer AP run than the 39 yarder Asiata broke off vs. DET in relief work. That 39 yarder is also longer than any run TRich has ever made in his career. I'm not saying he's some kind of stud but the opportunity is there to be productive in what looks to be a plus match-up.

 
SameSongNDance said:
Cyclones said:
Lots of stupid in this thread. I seem to recall this guy toting the rock like 30 times for 50 yards in a game last year. He is a backup for a reason - he's no good, and shouldn't be started over any RB2 or WR2 on your roster. You're talking about a very mediocre offense in which the most talented pure runner since Barry Sanders is going to be subbed out for a guy with a career YPC of under 4. You know those long runs that make AP AP? Asiata is not capable of busting those runs. Expect a Trent Richardson type line here - 13 carries, 34 yards.
Click to expand...
:lmao: The guy has one career start and 49 life time totes, who gives a #### about his YPC. He followed up that 30 for 51 game with a 14 for 115 game (8.2YPC) with an ankle injury. You know those long runs AP makes, you'd have to go back to Novemeber of last year against DAL to find a longer AP run than the 39 yarder Asiata broke off vs. DET in relief work. That 39 yarder is also longer than any run TRich has ever made in his career. I'm not saying he's some kind of stud but the opportunity is there to be productive in what looks to be a plus match-up.
Click to expand...
He was also chased down by a white defender with a number starting with "9" on that play. Not impressed. Even if AP was suspended for the entire season, I wouldn't give 6 games of Josh Gordon for Asiata. Guy is a stiff, I will be here to watch all of his suddenly optimistic supporters eat crow after he craps the bed today. How many AP owners even had him as a handcuff? 1%? Less than 1%? Hilarious.

 
ponchsox said:
Englishteacher said:
Volume and poor run D should help. Should be interesting to see how much work McKinnon gets and if they mix in more Patterson runs.

PFF regarded Asiata as a RB2 with McKinnon a "speculative add" in their Tamme index (ranks backups and where they would rank them in case of starter injury, named after Jacob Tamme).
Click to expand...
The Patriots had one bad game against the Dolphins and now they have a poor run D? The Seahawks gave up back to back 200 rushing yard games last year so I guess they have a poor run D too?
Click to expand...
A starting Asiata > a Moreno that comes off the bench.

 
chad in Indy said:
Gonna start him over Stacy. Everyone assumes they'll double Patterson, but maybe Patterson will see an uptick in carries himself to around 10 and put a ceiling on Asiatas carries?
Click to expand...
I would be shocked to see Patterson get that many carries. I know McKinnon is raw but I wouldn't be surprised if this were a 70/30 split (Asiata).

 
SameSongNDance said:
Cyclones said:
Lots of stupid in this thread. I seem to recall this guy toting the rock like 30 times for 50 yards in a game last year. He is a backup for a reason - he's no good, and shouldn't be started over any RB2 or WR2 on your roster. You're talking about a very mediocre offense in which the most talented pure runner since Barry Sanders is going to be subbed out for a guy with a career YPC of under 4. You know those long runs that make AP AP? Asiata is not capable of busting those runs. Expect a Trent Richardson type line here - 13 carries, 34 yards.
Click to expand...
:lmao: The guy has one career start and 49 life time totes, who gives a #### about his YPC. He followed up that 30 for 51 game with a 14 for 115 game (8.2YPC) with an ankle injury. You know those long runs AP makes, you'd have to go back to Novemeber of last year against DAL to find a longer AP run than the 39 yarder Asiata broke off vs. DET in relief work. That 39 yarder is also longer than any run TRich has ever made in his career. I'm not saying he's some kind of stud but the opportunity is there to be productive in what looks to be a plus match-up.
Click to expand...
Detroit was already thinking about the off-season in Asiata's big game. Still, starting RBs with GL opportunities on a team with a very good o-line are worth a flyer. Gerhart had a 41-yard TD and averaged almost 8 yards a carry in 2013. Prediction: Belechick adjusts and makes it tough for any Viking RB.

 
I am probably nuts, but I am rolling the dice and starting McKinnon over Asiata. I have a hunch NE will do a better job containing the big guy and we night see more of McKinnon than most expect.

 
Jimbo Slice said:
In the end I went with Ingram over asiata
Click to expand...
One of my tough choices as well. Thinking I will go Ingram due to the overall questions in the Min backfield.

Going with Ivory instead. Argh... I have a bunch of RB2's so I need to pick right.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I ended up plugging Rainey in as I had DMart originally. Thought I would go with Asiata, but Rainey's time last year sealed it for me. Went with the devil I know over the one I don't...

 
I needed help in a big way at RB......Luckily I snagged Asiata in blind bidding. He's starting over the likes of Ivory, Bradshaw,Quizz, Sankey.

He is heavily involved, and Cassel is Capt. checkdown.....lovin it!

 
Manster said:
I needed help in a big way at RB......Luckily I snagged Asiata in blind bidding. He's starting over the likes of Ivory, Bradshaw,Quizz, Sankey.

He is heavily involved, and Cassel is Capt. checkdown.....lovin it!
Click to expand...
Unfortunately he checking all the way down to Pats.

 
Despite Cassel trying his very hardest to give NE the ball on essentially every drive, Asiata was able to have a very productive week.

 
In Cassel's defense, the vikes receivers have dropped a ton of passes, and we under constant duress.....just a bad game for the vikes

 
Thinking hard about starting him over J. Charles this week due to the Charles dreaded "high ankle sprain", playing on Monday night. If Charles is the announced starter before Sunday morning, Asiata will be riding pine this week behind Charles and L. Bell., as well as my flex, Donald Brown.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ingram and Foster here. Even if Foster starts, I may give him a week to make it through a game. Kinda hope Foster sits...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Start at rb 2
Replies
5
Views
138
Chaka
Chaka
Joe Bryant
  • Poll Poll
Who will be the Browns 2025 Week 1 Starting QB?
2 3
Replies
146
Views
7K
travdogg
T
RaidersAreOne
Waiver Wire & FAAB Discussion - Week #2
2
Replies
68
Views
4K
dipandglide
dipandglide

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top