footballsavvy
Footballguy
As a Saints homer, I'm pumped about this. That said, I'm a little bit stumped. We have a very crowded backfield all of a sudden. Ivory is signed cheap and is a coach and fan favorite. Presumably he will be relegated to backup duty now? Pierre Thomas isn't necessarily a power runner but he does it adequately when healthy and is a very good (one of the best in the league) as running the screen play. Saints just signed Pierre Thomas to a 4 year deal worth $12 million. I suppose he could be traded without having to rework that contract, but I can't think of a team who really needs a RB (and we are seeing this reflected in the draft).
Reggie Bush is due $11.8 million in 2011 but has already said he is willing to renegotiate his contract in order to stay with the Saints. Sean Peyton loves him because of the unique niche role he fills. Fans have started to sour on Bush, so perhaps landing Ingram is the nail in the coffin for Bush? Then again, if Bush agrees to a contract as little as 3 mil per year then Peyton would likely want to keep him simply due to his versatility, including punt returns.
Perhaps we are looking at an Ingram backfield with Pierre Thomas spelling to the tune of ~10 rush attempts per game and a few receptions smattered in. But what about Ingram's superb receiving ability? The Saints run a lot of screens on early downs so Ingram should get ~40 receptions regardless. Does Pierre attempt to fill in the full Bush role or is the Bush role abandoned completely?
On top of the RB changes we have a new weapon in Jimmy Graham. Personally I think some changes are coming to the Saints offense. Graham will likely see more targets than any Saints TE has ever seen (some of these used to be Bush's targets). PT, if healthy the whole season, might only see 120 rush attempts, but might see 40-50 receptions. Ingram could get 220 rush attempts with around 40 receptions. Chris Ivory will get play time when others are injured or to spell Ingram on some early down work and maybe late in the season when he has fresh legs.
I'd like to hear some other thoughts on what Ingram means for the Saints and their skill position players.
Reggie Bush is due $11.8 million in 2011 but has already said he is willing to renegotiate his contract in order to stay with the Saints. Sean Peyton loves him because of the unique niche role he fills. Fans have started to sour on Bush, so perhaps landing Ingram is the nail in the coffin for Bush? Then again, if Bush agrees to a contract as little as 3 mil per year then Peyton would likely want to keep him simply due to his versatility, including punt returns.
Perhaps we are looking at an Ingram backfield with Pierre Thomas spelling to the tune of ~10 rush attempts per game and a few receptions smattered in. But what about Ingram's superb receiving ability? The Saints run a lot of screens on early downs so Ingram should get ~40 receptions regardless. Does Pierre attempt to fill in the full Bush role or is the Bush role abandoned completely?
On top of the RB changes we have a new weapon in Jimmy Graham. Personally I think some changes are coming to the Saints offense. Graham will likely see more targets than any Saints TE has ever seen (some of these used to be Bush's targets). PT, if healthy the whole season, might only see 120 rush attempts, but might see 40-50 receptions. Ingram could get 220 rush attempts with around 40 receptions. Chris Ivory will get play time when others are injured or to spell Ingram on some early down work and maybe late in the season when he has fresh legs.
I'd like to hear some other thoughts on what Ingram means for the Saints and their skill position players.