This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
And pays him a boatload of cash to do it.
edited it just to include some bonus info
This might be the greatest line said this year on ESPN. We need some t-shirt printed up with this on it.
But first you have to buy the insider subscription.
Doesn't matter - I just saw the Parcells interview and it was absolutely clear that he thought TO's misses were TO's fault.And he didn't blame Drew for the INTs - b;amed the WRs not knowing the plays s (ie - not coming to training camp you big sissy baby)I think TO's career is over. No , I'm not kidding.
but i think his point is Irvin had TOs back last year too, when it was clear that TO was wrong and mcnabb handled everything perfectly(at least from what we saw through the media)i dont think its an irvin opinion based on cowboys/eagles, just his boy(TO) vs mcnabbirvin will always have excuses for TO
Marc I have always valued your opinion but I think we need more than this to say TO is done.
Redskins and Oakland - just off the top of my head.Imagine Moss and TO - Al Davis would explode all over himself.
And which QB would they be elevating the play of this time?I can't imagine a worse combination of teammates than Moss and TO. It makes my head hurt.
But EVERYONE would look forward to every game they were in, regardless of record.But Al Davis would do it.I think it would be aof epic proportions.
BP said he didn't notice TO or what he said, obviously avoiding any controversy. would've liked to get the ball to him, but they were covering him. but TO needs to gain some more knowledge on his routes. part of it being new to the offense.i'm not sure where you're getting your info to make any of those statementscontrast to pat watkins, what do you say to help his confidence? - he needs to get it going
he was expecting a little more than what he got last night. asked about where the defense is. look last night it was just one player. 
i assume he's talking about watkins and not mcnabb.for bledsoe, we're scoring pts pretty good, doing everything good, but we need to protect the ball, until we do that we're not going to be any good.
Watching the interview again right now. Maybe I misinterpreted what Parcells said, but the impression I got from the first go-round was that many of the misses - and one of the INTs - was due to the receiver not properly running the route. That sounds like a clear indictment of TO not being in camp and not LEARNING WHERE PARCELLS WANTS HIM rather than where he "thinks" he should be to get open.BP said he didn't notice TO or what he said, obviously avoiding any controversy. would've liked to get the ball to him, but they were covering him. but TO needs to gain some more knowledge on his routes. part of it being new to the offense.i'm not sure where you're getting your info to make that statement.contrast to pat watkins, what do you say to help his confidence? - he needs to get it going
I agree. Owens is done if and when he blows this stint with the Cowboys. Even Davis and Snyder would know better.
sure there's the mcnabb vs TO statement aspect. but irvin's comments and ditka's laughing was because irvin said the cowboys were the best team in the nfc
good point.it is really troubling, however, that he learned diddly plus squat from his stays in sf and philly - and is, once again, throwing teamates under the bus by blowing up on the sidelines and in the locker room.i'm sure zhe sees nothing wronig witrh his behavior, which is why he's a horse's ####.
Nobody ever accused Cowboy Fans of be objective or knowing anything about football.
No way. Seriously, can you imagine Joe Gibbs signing TO?
Joe Gibbs: "In TO we have a guy who we think is super smart, a guy who really plays his guts out. And best of all he's just a good, humble guy, who never complains . . ." 
TO is handling it wrong, as usual, but the criticism of Bledsoe if unfortunately right on. He can't put the ball where it needs to be. His long passes almost always come up short and he doesn't seem to know what he wants to do with the ball when he drops back. The Eagles were doubling TO's side most of the game, but they did not cover him as well as the stats showed. BTW, TO was not the only frustrated WR (numerous shots of Glenn during the game). BP is fiercely loyal and I respect that, but when he watches film this week he will see the OL and WRs didn't play such a bad game.Apparently you have to misspell words to "know anything about football"?
On Sunday, before the games started, Irvin and Ditka were asked what the best team in the NFL was. Ditka said the Bears. Irvin said the Cowboys. What? I guess that showed on Sunday didn't it?
Just thought I would bump this thread. I loved Irvin as a player, kind of meh on him as a commentator, but seems like a QB change to Romo has helped TO and the team as a whole. I guess Irvin might not have been completely off base.
Last week on Dan Patrick's show Irvin insinuated that one of Romo's ancestor's may have had relations with a black slave and that is why Romo is athletic. Any one else would have been fired for this type of statement, see Jimmy the Greek, Al Campanis, but Irvin gets a pass. He is disgraceful and an idiot.
It is really a joke. But I bet it gets ratings from the "average" NFL fan.
